Re: gnome2 port



--- Dave Camp <dave ximian com> wrote:
> Here are my thoughts (some of which I've discussed with jpr) on the
> gnome2 port of anjuta2.
> 
> Gustavo has offered to port gdl.  Since scintilla has not been
> ported,
> initially the gnome2 port will not include the scintilla-control
> subdirectory.  This leaves the gdl/ and idl/ subdirectories.  This
> development will happen on HEAD, and a gdl-0-1-branch will be
> created
> for the gnome1.4 version, and the gdl version number will be bumped
> to
> 0.3.x.
> 
> At least until scintilla is ported (and perhaps afterward, we'll
> see) we
> will be using a GtkSourceView-based control, probably GlimmerFile.
> [...]
> 
> Personally I would like to start the ports of
> gdl/gnome-build/gnome-debug as soon as possible.  Any thoughts?
> 

I have completed the symbol browser component and I will very soon be
commiting it into gdl. Have a look at the screen shot:

http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/anjuta2_ss.jpg

My dsl is broken now, so I will commit the it tomorrow.

Will it be a problem the current gnome2 port? Also, wouldn't it be a
better idea to do the porting in a separate branch rather than going
for the cvs HEAD?

Regards,
-Naba


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]