Re: Oaf IDL re-structuring ...

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com> writes:

> On 20 Nov 2000, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> 
> > I agree with Elliot that Bonobo::ObjectFactory is not a good name, but
> > GNOME::OAF::ObjectFactory would be fine with me; OAF may not be
> > gnome-dependent really, but we can't just go on eating endless bits of
> > namespace.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> . We are already using the 'OAF' namespace for the internal OAF IDL
> . It is not like we will suddenly run out of namespace anytime soon.
> 
> If we were going to start grouping everything under a single namespace, it
> should be under 'GNU' or something slightly more generic - GNU::GNOME,
> GNU::Bonobo, GNU::OAF, etc. etc.
> 

I'm willing to buy the GNU theory, but that would presumably have to
be registered by the FSF.

 - Maciej