Re: a proposal for 2 OAF features



Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com> writes:

> On 3 Jul 2000, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> 
> > 	1. That I should call it CosNaming.
> > or
> > 	2. That we do have CosNaming and we could hook it up into OAF?
> 
> or
> 	3. We have a CosNaming object implemented in oafd.

I meant

4. We have a CosNaming object implemented in oafd, but I don't think
CosNaming is a "nice name service". :-)
 
> Which happens to be present reality. Just use an activation query of
> "repo_ids.has('IDL:CosNaming/NamingContext:1.0')" and it should all work.

Or just call oaf_name_service_get().

 - Maciej




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]