Re: couple more

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 00:01, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:55:02PM -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > gmc? gnorpm? UNMAINTAINED sounds like a better and better resolution :/
> 
> I'd rather not move gnorpm to UNMAINTAINED. I do have intentions of
> getting back to working on it at some point, despite the long period of
> languishing in "unloved" land.
> 
> I read the bug reports from time to time and even fix some of them.

Ah. When I asked gnome-hackers (or maybe desktop-devel-list)about gnorpm
(in February? March?) it'd been agreed that it was unmaintained, which
is why the default maintainer points at unknown bugzilla gnome org  

(1) should the default maintainer change?
(2) are there Really Old Versions against which bug reports should be
closed?

Luis