Re: [evolution-patches] Re: Updated Patch for 72285



On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:16 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> this looks better to me.  although i suspect final approval should go
> to one of the other gw maintainers.
> 
> one point - if recp->type isn't one of the types listed, it will leak
> the address.  maybe a final else should unref it (i dont know if that
> case can ever happen though).
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 12:17 +0530, Sankar P wrote: 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Attached with this mail is the patch for 72285.
> > 
> > Instead of adding headers for every address, a list is generated and a
> > single header is added at last, cumulatively.
> > 
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Sankar P

looks good to me. kindly approach vivek/chen for committing the same.



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]