Re: Could we discuss the patch again on gal atk implementation? was:Re: [evolution-patches] Re: GAL status

[Gilbert Fang <gilbert fang sun com>]

Hi, Mike

On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 02:04, Mike Kestner wrote:
> Hi Gilbert,
> 
> On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 23:03, Gilbert Fang wrote:
> 
> > 1) Remove the original libgal-a11y-2.0.so (which is rpm packaged as
> > libgal-modules).  Instead of that,  we create a new library
> > libgal-a11y.so for atk support. libgal-a11y.so is not a gtk modules at
> > all, and it should be installed with libgal before gal is dead totally.
> 
> If that's the way it's supposed to be done, we should change to that
> approach in gal.  I would prefer to keep the -2.0 versioning in the
> libname though.
> 
Okay, the name will be libgal-a11y-2.0
> > 2) atk object implementation for epaned. The source code for this part
> > are all under gal/a11y/e-paned.
> 
> I committed a patch to remove e-paned from the build today, along with
> removing the e-scroll-frame and e-[hv]scrollbar.  EPaned and subclasses
> no longer exist in gal as of version 1.99.9 which was tagged and
> tarballed today.
Anyway, just now I checked out the gal (HEAD), gal/e-paned directory and
source files still existed. Do you mean your internal CVS server?
> 
> > At least, part 2 is not harmful. So could I check the whole patch to gal
> > HEAD,or I have to split the patch and make the part 1 into HEAD?
> 
> Please split out part 1 since part 2 is no longer necessary.  Thanks.
okay. The patch for part 1 is in attachment.

Could you please review it soon ? Because we are waiting for it, and
then update the a11y branch for the future work. 

Best Regards
Gilbert