On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 20:37 -0400, JimD wrote: > On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:57:19 -0400 > Adam Hooper <adamh densi com> wrote: > > It's supposed to "Just Work" in the sense that its default set of > > patterns is very accurate. Some users want more, though.... > > As for Greasemonkey: > > Sweet! Thanks for the tips. Are these settings going to get config > dialogs or will they stay "behind the scenes"? I think I heard of somebody working on a dialog for one of them (I forget which), but that was a few months ago, so maybe that never happened. You can check on #epiphany on irc.gnome.org, but I've got a hunch nobody is working on either config dialog. We definitely would like dialogs for these extensions. (But I think the dialogs must look and behave quite differently from the corresponding Firefox extensions' dialogs if they're to get incorporated -- the latter are UI nightmares.) -- Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part