Re: Proposal to revamp bookmarks++



On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 13:25 +1100, Peter Harvey wrote:
> If it was "Store Link" it might be OK. But it still doesn't change the
> fact that I wanted "Links" as a broader term then "Bookmarks", so that
> we could have Bookmarks, History, Searches, and Feeds all under it.
> 
> I'm going to vote to retain the word "Bookmark" for the act/object which
> creates/stores a specific URL at user request for later retrieval.

Ah, in that case I think the term "Favorites" would be better.

Speaking pragmatically, the mind-share covered by the term "bookmark" is
probably 5-10% of people browsing the web.

-- 
Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]