Re: [Epiphany] Some more input about bookmarks

[Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpeseng tin it>]

> > 4.  Why `topic'? What percentage of people arrange all their bookmarks
> >     by topic? Is it really desirable to try and increase this
> >     percentage, by using the word `topic' rather than `folder'? Back
> >     when I used bookmarks at all (before I started relying on Google
> >     instead), I had Daily, Weekly, and Monthly folders for bookmarks I
> >     visited that often. They weren't `topics'.
> 
> Ok, don't know in which ground do you base your opinion, but for that
> matter I've always ordered my bookmarks and files regarding their
> "topic", so topic makes a lot of sense to me. Obviously, this is not the
> point. If we want to achieve a point where people abandons hierarchical
> modes of arrangement (and IMHO that's what the Bookmarks Editor current
> implementation is all about) of bookmarks, calling the conceptual group
> where you attach a bookmark "Folder" makes no sense at all. We could
> better drop this whole topic idea and return to the old menu concept for
> that matter :)

I dont think the real life concept of folder implies the hierarchy
concept. So maybe we can use it ;)
It has the advantage to be more generic and to not introduce a new term.

> > 6.  If the search field filters the bookmarks you see in the list, it
> >     should be above the list rather than below it.
> 
> Fine (it's already above btw, maybe you are talking about the drafts
> marco sent to the list?)

Yeah, he was.

Marco