Re: [xslt] xsltproc memory consumption w/ large DTD / docbook



On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Michael Weiser wrote:

> test stylesheets versions 2.0.46/1.0.22 without patch:
>
>    33577265 526168           0      0  Total of 133
>
> test stylesheet current cvs with patch:
>
>    17910246 526180           0      0  Total of 120

I have to correct myself: The differences in memory usage seem to be
caused by changes from 2.0.46/1.0.22 to cvs. I just tried it with
patched/unpatched versions of the same cvs snapshot and found no
differences in memory usage for my application. Therefore I can't provide
a testcase either.

I'll give source-code-digging another shot.

Daniel: Can you give me a hint where to best start looking for freeing
unneeded memory other than xsltLoadDocument?
-- 
Michael
I'm against hip bones!



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]