Re: API freeze break request

[Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no>]

man, 17,.01.2005 kl. 08.09 +0000, skrev Mark McLoughlin:
> On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 15:41 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 18:08 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > > > I'm not happy about adding a whole
> > > > class after an API freeze, because we'll have no chance to fix it if
> > > > it's not perfect.
> > > 
> > > 	The python API is a direct mapping of the GConf one - I think it may
> > > even be autogenerated from the headers. I didn't come up with the API
> > > definition, it was already there ... I just implemented it ..
> > 
> > OK. I expected that they had to hand-craft their APIs a bit more than
> > that.
> > 
> > If this is saving you considerable pain on an important project then
> > I'll give you 1 approval. If it's just nice to have then I still don't
> > feel it's worth the risk.
> 
> 	Thanks Murray. Anyone else ? :-)
> 
You have my blessings as well. Sounds like it comes with close to zero
risk.

Cheers
Kjartan