Re: Status of medusa?

[Rebecca Schulman <rebecka caltech edu>]

Dave Bordoley wrote:

> On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 12:29, Curtis C. Hovey wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to install medusa from cvs with the aim of getting
> > something like I had running under gnome 1.4, and tinkering with it for
> > my current gnome2 setup.
> >
> > What branch should I be using? gnome-2-branch?

> I assume cvs head. Not sure though. There was no gnome2 release of
> medusa and the gnome-2 branches have been basically used for 2.0.x
> stable releases.

CVS head is the best branch to use.  Medusa head should be mostly  with 
gnome 2.0, according to Seth, although I haven't had a chance to try 
this myself (I don't have Gnome 2.0)

> > Is anyone else tinkering with medusa?
I'm still the maintainer, although I've been busy enough that I've 
worked on it very little in the past few months.
I'd still be happy to review and apply patches, however.
There are also some plans for improving it, including reintegrating it 
with nautilus now that the security issues have been removed (Medusa no 
longer runs as root)

Best,
Rebecca

>