[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #703 - 2 msgs



Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 143018]  - Gtk::IconTheme::lookup_icon() should throw an exception if gtk_icon_theme_lookup_icon() returns NULL (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)
   2. [Bug 143018]  - Gtk::IconTheme::lookup_icon() should throw an exception if gtk_icon_theme_lookup_icon() returns NULL (bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Sat,  5 Jun 2004 06:34:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 143018]  - Gtk::IconTheme::lookup_icon() should throw an exception if gtk_icon_theme_lookup_icon() returns NULL

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143018
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From chris cvine freeserve co uk  2004-06-05 06:34 -------
I can do a patch.  Is an operator!() also required? 

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Sat,  5 Jun 2004 07:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 143018]  - Gtk::IconTheme::lookup_icon() should throw an exception if gtk_icon_theme_lookup_icon() returns NULL

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143018
gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.4





------- Additional Comments From chris cvine freeserve co uk  2004-06-05 07:07 -------
On reflection, if we have an operator bool(), then operator !() is not
necessary.  It would only be useful if we were to test the object with operator
void*().


------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]