[gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Abandoning gcc 2.96?



On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:07:42PM +0100, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > Libsigc++ 2 does not build with gcc 2.96. So if we use it in 
> > gtkmm 2.4,
> > gtkmm will also not be able to use gcc 2.96.
> > 
> > Who needs gcc 2.96 and why?
> 
> So, nobody needs gcc 2.96?
> 

Speaking as a developer who uses both gtkmm, and libsigc++ independantly,
I see no burning need to support gcc 2.96 in libsigc++ 2 or later.

Al
-- 
Alistair Riddoch
alriddoch zepler org
http://www.zepler.org/~alriddoch/

Attachment: pgpPfPfcwtMfn.pgp
Description: PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]