GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #442 - 16 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 114332] Changed - TRu64Unix + cc/cxx: cannot compile (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 114332] Changed - TRu64Unix + cc/cxx: cannot compile (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 110788] Changed - Atk/Gtk StateType confusion on widget page (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  10. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  11. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  12. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  13. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  14. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  15. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  16. [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area () (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, mmokrejs natur cuni cz
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 03:13:01 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114332] Changed - TRu64Unix + cc/cxx: cannot compile

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114332

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114332	Mon Jun 23 12:49:21 2003
+++ shadow/114332.tmp.14058	Tue Jun 24 03:13:01 2003
@@ -60,6 +60,12 @@
 ported gtkmm to it.  I look forward to a patch so we can add it to the
 list of known-to-work platforms.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From mmokrejs natur cuni cz  2003-06-23 12:49 -------
 Make an account on testing machine available from HP:
 http://www.testdrive.hp.com/ - look for Tru64Unix.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 03:12 -------
+No, people who are _using_ that plaform need to port that platform. 
+Why would anybody else take the time? I would need to have vast 
+amounts of spare time and curiosity or be paid to do the work. Sorry, 
+but that's the reality.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, mmokrejs natur cuni cz
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 03:30:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114332] Changed - TRu64Unix + cc/cxx: cannot compile

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114332

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114332	Tue Jun 24 03:13:01 2003
+++ shadow/114332.tmp.20711	Tue Jun 24 03:30:10 2003
@@ -66,6 +66,10 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 03:12 -------
 No, people who are _using_ that plaform need to port that platform. 
 Why would anybody else take the time? I would need to have vast 
 amounts of spare time and curiosity or be paid to do the work. Sorry, 
 but that's the reality.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 03:30 -------
+Sorry if that seemed rude. I just wanted to make the status of this
+bug clear.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 04:24:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Mon Jun 23 09:59:03 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.11707	Tue Jun 24 04:24:50 2003
@@ -768,6 +768,12 @@
 - gtk+-2.2.1
 - gtkmm-2.2.3
 - libsigc++-1.2.4
 - pango-1.2.1
 - pkgconfig-0.14.0.tar.gz
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 04:24 -------
+OK, I will investigate when I get a chance. I was not using the same
+valgrind command.
+
+But you are capable of investigating yourself.



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: dimitri stack nl
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 05:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 110788] Changed - Atk/Gtk StateType confusion on widget page

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110788

Changed by olau hardworking dk 

--- shadow/110788	Tue Jun 17 03:21:09 2003
+++ shadow/110788.tmp.27741	Tue Jun 24 05:04:42 2003
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From olau hardworking dk  2003-06-16 17:01 -------
 I've tried with 1.3.1 just now. Doesn't work. Even though the text for
 the link says Gtk::StateType, it still points to atkmmEnums.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-17 03:21 -------
 Thanks, but "A new doxygen is now out (1.3.2)".
+
+------- Additional Comments From olau hardworking dk  2003-06-24 05:04 -------
+Sorry for the long processing time (exams) - it doesn't work with
+1.3.2 either. The behaviour is exactly the same.



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 04:24:50 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.26689	Tue Jun 24 06:17:41 2003
@@ -774,6 +774,36 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 04:24 -------
 OK, I will investigate when I get a chance. I was not using the same
 valgrind command.
 
 But you are capable of investigating yourself.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 06:17 -------
+Maybe a solution (look at the end of this entry)
+
+- VBox* Dialog::get_vbox() calls Glib::wrap with
+  (implicitly) take_copy = false
+
+- Glib::wrap (inside gtkmm/box.cc !!) calls Glib::wrap_auto
+  by forwarding take_copy = false
+
+- Glib::wrap_auto calls create_new_wrapper(object)
+  if static_cast<ObjectBase*>(g_object_get_qdata(object,
+                                                 Glib::quark_))
+  returns NULL
+
+- create_new_wrapper does a cast for the result
+  of g_object_get_qdata() to bool which is of type gpointer normally.
+  Assuming that a not NULL means the same as true,
+  it calls Gtk::VBox_Class::wrap_new()
+  by using a function pointer
+
+- The Gtk::VBox_Class::wrap_new() creates a new instance and does
+  (STRANGE) a manage on the result pointer.
+----------------------------------------------------------
+As no function does a g_object_set_qdata (!!!) it will repeatingly 
+create new instances. I think anyway there should be only one (or 
+better NONE) copy of the vbox per dialog????
+All this stuff does one vbox for all dialogs if it would work 
+correctly???
+



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 06:17:41 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.14014	Tue Jun 24 07:04:02 2003
@@ -804,6 +804,15 @@
 As no function does a g_object_set_qdata (!!!) it will repeatingly 
 create new instances. I think anyway there should be only one (or 
 better NONE) copy of the vbox per dialog????
 All this stuff does one vbox for all dialogs if it would work 
 correctly???
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 07:04 -------
+Just found that Gtk::ObjectBase::_set_current_wrapper
+calls g_object_set_qdata_full.
+
+Gtk::ObjectBase::_set_current_wrapper is called by 
+Gtk::ObjectBase::initialize which is called by the ctor of Gtk::Object
+
+so we are back at the beginning.



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:42:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 07:04:02 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.31812	Tue Jun 24 07:42:29 2003
@@ -813,6 +813,19 @@
 calls g_object_set_qdata_full.
 
 Gtk::ObjectBase::_set_current_wrapper is called by 
 Gtk::ObjectBase::initialize which is called by the ctor of Gtk::Object
 
 so we are back at the beginning.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 07:42 -------
+Just a qustion:
+Does the Gtk::Dialog normally have a member object of type Gtk::VBox?
+I assume "No".
+
+Therefor the method Gtk::Dialog::get_vbox() (no matter how often 
+called) creates one instance of a wrapper Gtk::VBox that is never 
+cleaned up???
+
+So that "wrapper instance" should be a managed object of the class
+Gtk::Dialog, so it gets deleted when the Gtk::Dialog is destroyed??
+



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 07:42:29 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.1344	Tue Jun 24 07:46:24 2003
@@ -826,6 +826,11 @@
 called) creates one instance of a wrapper Gtk::VBox that is never 
 cleaned up???
 
 So that "wrapper instance" should be a managed object of the class
 Gtk::Dialog, so it gets deleted when the Gtk::Dialog is destroyed??
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 07:46 -------
+The phrase "managed object of the class Gtk::Dialog" should be 
+"managed object of the object of class Gtk::Dialog"
+(to prevent confusion)



--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:49:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 07:46:24 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.2896	Tue Jun 24 07:49:28 2003
@@ -831,6 +831,15 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 07:46 -------
 The phrase "managed object of the class Gtk::Dialog" should be 
 "managed object of the object of class Gtk::Dialog"
 (to prevent confusion)
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 07:49 -------
+Another question:
+
+Does a destruction of a wrapper object always destroy the wrapped 
+object?
+If yes, that would be a problem to the above solution.
+
+



--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:09:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 07:49:28 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.14038	Tue Jun 24 08:09:44 2003
@@ -840,6 +840,22 @@
 
 Does a destruction of a wrapper object always destroy the wrapped 
 object?
 If yes, that would be a problem to the above solution.
 
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 08:09 -------
+No, there is no Gtk::VBox member variable in Gtk::Dialog.
+
+Yes, I would expect anything from Glib::wrap() to be manage()ed. The 
+manage() just means that the lifetime will be controlled by the GTK+ 
+container, as per normal, not by anything in C++. Sooner or later 
+GTK+ should call destroy on that GtkVBox, and the Gtk::VBox will then 
+be destroyed in response. You need to check whether the GtkVBox is 
+being destroyed. If not, you need to check whether it would be 
+destroyed in a C example. Here is a clue about how to check whether 
+it is being destroyed:
+http://bugzilla.gnome.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=16433
+(That's from bug 111084).
+You can use gobj() in your C++ example - you don't need to write the 
+whole thing in C just to test this one thing.



--__--__--

Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:10:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:09:44 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.14636	Tue Jun 24 08:10:51 2003
@@ -856,6 +856,11 @@
 destroyed in a C example. Here is a clue about how to check whether 
 it is being destroyed:
 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=16433
 (That's from bug 111084).
 You can use gobj() in your C++ example - you don't need to write the 
 whole thing in C just to test this one thing.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 08:10 -------
+Yes, destroying a C++ instance always destroys the underlying C 
+instance. The lifetimes of widgets and their C++ wrappers should be 
+very tightly bound.



--__--__--

Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:32:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:10:51 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.24683	Tue Jun 24 08:32:17 2003
@@ -861,6 +861,11 @@
 whole thing in C just to test this one thing.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-06-24 08:10 -------
 Yes, destroying a C++ instance always destroys the underlying C 
 instance. The lifetimes of widgets and their C++ wrappers should be 
 very tightly bound.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:32 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17727)
+test_combo.cc (shows the problem for ComboBox also)
+



--__--__--

Message: 13
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:34:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:32:17 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.25598	Tue Jun 24 08:34:28 2003
@@ -866,6 +866,10 @@
 very tightly bound.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:32 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17727)
 test_combo.cc (shows the problem for ComboBox also)
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:34 -------
+Forgot to replace the ToggleButton with Button in the test_combo.cc 
+example.



--__--__--

Message: 14
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:36:28 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:34:28 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.26779	Tue Jun 24 08:36:28 2003
@@ -870,6 +870,11 @@
 test_combo.cc (shows the problem for ComboBox also)
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:34 -------
 Forgot to replace the ToggleButton with Button in the test_combo.cc 
 example.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:36 -------
+Created an attachment (id=17728)
+New test_combo.cc
+



--__--__--

Message: 15
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:38:31 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:36:28 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.27867	Tue Jun 24 08:38:31 2003
@@ -875,6 +875,11 @@
 example.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:36 -------
 Created an attachment (id=17728)
 New test_combo.cc
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:38 -------
+With this new test_combo.cc it is possible to verify the memory-leak 
+with the Linux-"top" tool also.
+So you can see that this is not only a short-term effect.



--__--__--

Message: 16
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net,
	harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net
Cc: murrayc usa net
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:45:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 114568] Changed - Memory leak in Dialog::get_vbox() and get_action_area ()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114568

Changed by harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net 

--- shadow/114568	Tue Jun 24 08:38:31 2003
+++ shadow/114568.tmp.30656	Tue Jun 24 08:45:53 2003
@@ -880,6 +880,15 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:38 -------
 With this new test_combo.cc it is possible to verify the memory-leak 
 with the Linux-"top" tool also.
 So you can see that this is not only a short-term effect.
+
+------- Additional Comments From harald hopfes hopfes sysde eads net  2003-06-24 08:45 -------
+Murray, you are writing:
+  Sooner or later GTK+ should call destroy on that GtkVBox,
+  and the Gtk::VBox will then be destroyed in response.
+
+Question:
+  How can the GtkVBox cause that a Gtk::VBox is destroyed?
+




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]