Re: [gtkmm] TreeView question

[Daniel Elstner <daniel elstner gmx net>]

On Fre, 2003-01-03 at 22:20, Barnaby Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:21:53AM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 19:30, darco wrote:
> > > Since it has been a few days since this was posted and there has not 
> > > yet been a reply, I wanted to say that I am also interested if this is 
> > > possible... I have assumed that it wasn't, but it would be great if 
> > > this is possible.
> > 
> > What's wrong with connecting to the property_visible properties of all
> > cells? There is no class that represents the View's row.
> 
> You then get an entirely blank row in the TreeView when the value in
> the TreeStore is set to false. I did try this thinking it might
> possibly be the solution!

There is GtkTreeModelFilter in libegg that does what you want.  It'll
most probably be included in GTK+ 2.4.

--Daniel