GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #247 - 5 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 94170] Changed - TreeModelColumns cannot be of type "UNSIGNED SHORT" (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 94169] Changed - Gdk-API/Docs lacks methods screen_*() (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 94829] Changed - Lifetime issues again (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 94110] Changed - proposed API additions to Glib::TimeVal (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 94941] New - Segfault with menus and inheritance (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, webmaster nachtwind net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2002 15:04:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94170] Changed - TreeModelColumns cannot be of type "UNSIGNED SHORT"

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94170

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/94170	Tue Oct  1 02:54:36 2002
+++ shadow/94170.tmp.26089	Fri Oct  4 15:04:11 2002
@@ -176,6 +176,9 @@
 + [...]
 +because you'd have to set up your own cell_data_func callbacks -- 
 +GTK+ doesn't know about the type.
 
 not true for the bool-type, for which a call_data_func_cb is also 
 necessary?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-04 15:04 -------
+Daniel?



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, webmaster nachtwind net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2002 15:10:30 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94169] Changed - Gdk-API/Docs lacks methods screen_*()

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94169

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/94169	Thu Oct  3 02:27:07 2002
+++ shadow/94169.tmp.27410	Fri Oct  4 15:10:30 2002
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-02 15:15 -------
 Functions added, and documentation corrected.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From webmaster nachtwind net  2002-10-03 02:27 -------
 Just as a matter of interest, as all my attempts in providing a 
 patch were futile - which files were involved?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-04 15:10 -------
+I created new files - gdk/gdkmm/general.[h|cc].



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: madmaxer poczta fm
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2002 15:12:55 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94829] Changed - Lifetime issues again

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94829

Changed by madmaxer poczta fm 

--- shadow/94829	Fri Oct  4 14:46:04 2002
+++ shadow/94829.tmp.27784	Fri Oct  4 15:12:55 2002
@@ -93,6 +93,12 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-04 14:46 -------
 Please submit a bug report. I don't want to read an irc thread.
 
 And yes, if you don't give me sensible example code then this bug will
 be closed.
+
+------- Additional Comments From madmaxer poczta fm  2002-10-04 15:12 -------
+Then don't read it, I don't care. But this conversation describes this
+bug. Daniel asked me to submit this so he can investigate this later,
+but of course you think you're the only one that can make decisions
+and you're as friendly and helpful as usually...



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2002 17:59:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94110] Changed - proposed API additions to Glib::TimeVal

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94110

Changed by puchs ap univie ac at 

--- shadow/94110	Fri Oct  4 14:50:11 2002
+++ shadow/94110.tmp.18599	Fri Oct  4 17:59:56 2002
@@ -115,6 +115,19 @@
 limited in this area and I can't come up with anything that is
 suitable and does not contain "double" right now.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-04 14:50 -------
 Then you'll have to explain exactly why you do that calculation to get
 the double. Why would I want a double instead of an int?
+
+------- Additional Comments From puchs ap univie ac at  2002-10-04 17:59 -------
+Sometimes it is more convenient to work with the exact time values ,
+seconds and microseconds, stored in seperate long values (example:
+timeout interval). Sometimes a double representation of this time
+value is more convenient, like in scientific applications. I have used
+a double representation of the current time acquired with the
+gettimeofday() UNIX system call several times to calculated the
+approximate mean of a measured value which was weighted with the
+length of the time interval in which it appeared. 
+I believe, that the two representations (long+long and double) are
+both useful for different purposes, but I can of course remove the
+member function from the patch if you want that.  



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, pdewacht vub ac be
Cc: 
Date: Sat,  5 Oct 2002 10:43:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 94941] New - Segfault with menus and inheritance

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94941

Changed by pdewacht vub ac be 

--- shadow/94941	Sat Oct  5 10:43:25 2002
+++ shadow/94941.tmp.20772	Sat Oct  5 10:43:25 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+Bug#: 94941
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.0
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: pdewacht vub ac be               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Segfault with menus and inheritance
+
+The following program segfaults with gtkmm 1.3.23:
+
+#include <gtkmm.h>
+
+class WindowWithMenuBar: public Gtk::Window {
+public:
+    Gtk::MenuBar menubar_;
+    
+    WindowWithMenuBar () {
+        add(menubar_);
+    }
+};
+
+
+class AnotherWindow: public WindowWithMenuBar {
+public:
+    Gtk::Menu menu_foo_;
+
+    AnotherWindow () {
+        menubar_.items().push_back(
+                Gtk::Menu_Helpers::MenuElem("Foo", menu_foo_));
+    }
+};
+
+
+int main (int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+    Gtk::Main kit(argc, argv);
+    AnotherWindow w;
+    kit.run(w);
+}
+
+This program runs without problems if you combine the two classes.




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]