Re: [gtkmm] Erros in sources in CVS

[Nick Huxley <nick anvil co uk>]

Is anyone running a overnight or weekly auto build from CVS? If not I
would be interested in setting one up and automatically posting fails to
the list. Wouldn't be for a few weeks though as I'm busy with fixing my
house up at the moment. I take it the compilers we are interested in are
gcc 2.96 and gcc 3.1?

Regards

Nick

On 10 Jul 2002, Murray Cumming wrote:

> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 22:23, Jarek Dukat wrote: 
> > It's a request to Gtkmm CVS maintainers: PLEASE pay more attention to
> > sources available in anonymous CVS. Recently it very often happens that
> > sources taken from CVS are not compilable. This especially applies to
> > Murray: you make many changes in sources that are correct for your g++
> > 2.96 but do not compile with g++-3.
> So then you give us a patch and it gets fixed for your compiler. cvs is
> cvs, not a release. 
> 
> > Such errors are usually easily
> > fixable, but often happens that sources have some more serious errors
> I rarely check in code that doesn't build, for me at least. 
> 
> > or
> > new files are missing.
> Is there some specific problem at the moment? 
> 
>