GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #322 - 7 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 100499] Changed - Build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 100499] Changed - Build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 100499] Changed - cvs build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 99122] Changed - Add GTK+ 2.2 API additions (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 102060] New - We should not wrap key binding signals (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 102060] Changed - We should not wrap key binding signals (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 98312] Changed - Build problem under MinGW 2.0 / Cygwin (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, r_kinder yahoo com
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:37:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 100499] Changed - Build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100499

Changed by daniel elstner gmx net 

--- shadow/100499	Fri Dec  6 09:27:17 2002
+++ shadow/100499.tmp.15830	Thu Dec 26 19:37:58 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 100499
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.2
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: 
-Status: RESOLVED   
-Resolution: WONTFIX
+Status: REOPENED   
+Resolution: 
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: build
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: r_kinder yahoo com               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -71,6 +71,20 @@
 when building from cvs.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From daniel elstner gmx net  2002-12-06 09:27 -------
 Actually I'd have implemented this check already if it weren't for the
 problem that perl 5.8.0 doesn't seem to bail out if the XML::Parser
 module is missing.  That one is much worse.
+
+------- Additional Comments From daniel elstner gmx net  2002-12-26 19:37 -------
+2002-12-27  Daniel Elstner  <daniel elstner gmx net>
+
+* scripts/docgen.m4 (GTKMM_ARG_ENABLE_FULLDOCS): Make the default
+setting of --enable-fulldocs depend on --enable-maintainer-mode.
+Also try to check for the XML::Parser module if we need to build
+sources.  I remember having had some trouble with this; i.e. I'm
+not sure if the test always suceeds, particularly with Perl 5.8.
+
+* scripts/macros.m4 (GTKMM_CHECK_PERL): Some minor corrections.
+
+It'd be really cool if someone could confirm whether this check works
+or not.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, r_kinder yahoo com
Cc: 
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:47:27 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 100499] Changed - Build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100499

Changed by daniel elstner gmx net 

--- shadow/100499	Thu Dec 26 19:37:58 2002
+++ shadow/100499.tmp.18706	Thu Dec 26 19:47:27 2002
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 Bug#: 100499
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.2
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: 
-Status: REOPENED   
+Status: NEEDINFO   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: build
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: r_kinder yahoo com               



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, r_kinder yahoo com
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:20:29 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 100499] Changed - cvs build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100499

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/100499	Thu Dec 26 19:47:27 2002
+++ shadow/100499.tmp.30608	Fri Dec 27 13:20:29 2002
@@ -9,13 +9,13 @@
 Priority: Normal
 Component: build
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: r_kinder yahoo com               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
-Summary: Build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs.
+Summary: cvs build fails due to lack of XML/Parser.pm when generating docs.
 
 gnome/head/INSTALL/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so
 /gnome/head/INSTALL/lib/libatk-1.0.so
 /gnome/head/INSTALL/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so -lm
 /gnome/head/INSTALL/lib/libpangox-1.0.so
 /gnome/head/INSTALL/lib/libpango-1.0.so



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:21:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 99122] Changed - Add GTK+ 2.2 API additions

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99122

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/99122	Mon Dec 23 17:11:32 2002
+++ shadow/99122.tmp.31034	Fri Dec 27 13:21:16 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 99122
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.2
 OS: Linux
 OS Details: 
-Status: NEW   
-Resolution: 
+Status: RESOLVED   
+Resolution: FIXED
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: murrayc usa net               
 TargetMilestone: ---
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From matty chariot net au  2002-12-23 09:59 -------
 As well as gtk_tree_store_reorder, etc, there are apparently also
 list_store versions, gtk_list_store_reorder, etc.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From daniel elstner gmx net  2002-12-23 17:11 -------
 The Gtk::TreeStore and Gtk::ListStore stuff is done.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-12-27 13:21 -------
+So everything seems to be done.



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:23:06 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 102060] New - We should not wrap key binding signals

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102060

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/102060	Fri Dec 27 13:23:06 2002
+++ shadow/102060.tmp.31895	Fri Dec 27 13:23:06 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+Bug#: 102060
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.2
+OS: Linux
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: murrayc usa net               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: We should not wrap key binding signals
+
+For instance, some of the Gtk::Notebook signals aren't really useful
+because they are "key binding" signals. But how do we know which are key
+binding signals? Maybe the GTK+ docs are the only way to know.



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:23:25 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 102060] Changed - We should not wrap key binding signals

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102060

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/102060	Fri Dec 27 13:23:06 2002
+++ shadow/102060.tmp.32027	Fri Dec 27 13:23:25 2002
@@ -7,13 +7,13 @@
 Resolution: 
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: murrayc usa net               
-TargetMilestone: ---
+TargetMilestone: 3
 URL: 
 Summary: We should not wrap key binding signals
 
 For instance, some of the Gtk::Notebook signals aren't really useful
 because they are "key binding" signals. But how do we know which are key
 binding signals? Maybe the GTK+ docs are the only way to know.



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, naofumi yasufuku net
Cc: cgustin ibelgique com
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:24:32 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 98312] Changed - Build problem under MinGW 2.0 / Cygwin

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98312

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/98312	Sun Nov 24 16:57:26 2002
+++ shadow/98312.tmp.32460	Fri Dec 27 13:24:32 2002
@@ -320,6 +320,9 @@
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-11-24 16:57 -------
 How bizarre - stopping maintenance of a stable branch before a new
 stable is available.
 
 Could you repost the gtkmm patch that will fix this for us?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-12-27 13:24 -------
+Any chance of us getting that patch?




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]