Re: GTK+ and GLib 2.6 branch

[Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>]

On 11.01.2005 05:35, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 21:39 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 00:37 +0100, Hans Breuer wrote:
> >
> > > On 10.01.2005 17:18, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > > Branches for the stable GLib-2.6.x and GTK+-2.6.x series have now been
> > > > created, named:
> > > >
> > > > GLIB: glib-2-6
> > > > GTK+: gtk-2-6
> > > >
> > > > Notes:
> > > >
> > > > - These are the branches for GNOME-2.10
> > > > - GTK+ HEAD is going to grow a Cairo dependency soon, so if you
> > > >   hit that, that should be a reminder about this mail :-)
> > >
> > > Does this mean GTK+ will 'grow' that dependency regardless of the
> > > availability of a win32 backend for cairo, see (still pending):
> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/2004-November/002118.html
> >
> > I don't plan on waiting to commit anything to CVS until we have a
> > working win32 backend. 
>
>
> Changed my mind on this (moments before committing something to CVS...),
> breaking the win32 build strikes me as a something that we shouldn't do,
> since it will make it hard to follow our procedure of committing all
> bug-fixes into HEAD and stable at once.
>
> So right now, win32/Cairo is sitting right on my critical path... 
> I'm wondering if you have a version of your port around (the link in
> your earlier mail is broken) so I can compare it to the GDI+ stuff
> in CVS currently.. 
This link should work:
http://hans.breuer.org/dia/cairo-2004-07-05-hb.diff

[Also I didn't notice the gdi+ stuff being already in cvs,
maybe I have time this evening to give it a try.]

Thanks,
	Hans

-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it.                -- Dilbert