On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:20 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: >I have written up a draft spec for the format of the binary metadata >to back up the repository api which I posted earlier. I hope to have >some initial code implementing both of these soon. guint caller_owns_return_value : 1; Do we also want to have a pointer to a "release function"? I assume with XPCOM since it's C++ they can just use "delete", but we can't do that, right? Also, I think it would be nice if we had a standard way to map from a FunctionBlob -> possible GError domains it throws. Or maybe even a set of specific domain/code pairs. Or should that just be a standard annotation or something?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part