Re: Updated proposal for making the GtkFileChooser code asynchronous

[Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>]

Federico Mena Quintero wrote:

> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 17:47 +0000, Bill Haneman wrote:
>  
>
> > One thing that isn't clear to me, from my admittedly superficial reading 
> > of the proposals, is how the need to notify clients of changes to the 
> > file chooser list will be implemented. 
> >
> > For accessibility, we will need to fire notifications via ATK of all 
> > changes to the file chooser list.  This means we need GtkFileChooser 
> > signals to connect to here in libgail.
> >    
>
> Kris's changes don't touch the widgetry at all.  They are all in the
> backend.  GAIL will see whatever it is accustomed to see from the file
> chooser's widgets.
>  
GAIL is not used to the widgets having stuff added to the list 
asynchronously.  Are you saying that this change will not cause the list 
to be incrementally grown?

Bill

>  Federico
>
>