Sean Egan wrote:
Actually, I downloaded the xchat in question, very neat how small he got the gtk runtime, But it does not appear he did anything other then apply some patches such as http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148535. It also looks like he used a modified .def file, which can be easily reproduced using pexports minigtk.dll > minigtk.def Perhaps, there is something else he did not sure to get minigtk.dll to be so small? But really it just appears as if he applied one patch and was smart about how he linked gtk+. Would have been nice of him to include in his sourceOn Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:00:20 -0400 (GMT-04:00), Taybin Rutkin <taybin earthlink net> wrote:Just out of curiousity, are those conditions AND or OR?AND. If it weren't statically linked, the shared object files would need to be distributed. I read this when the license was first changed: "Silverex explains about the differences between the XChat windows build, and his: 'zed compiles gtk+ libraries into xchat.exe executable itself, mine uses gtk+ runtime environment, which many gtk+ for windows applications can share. thus, one can change gtk themes on my build. there are also several other minor differences. zed can and is able to hack gtk+ so it would look better, I'm stuck with official gtk sources, which lack some features.'
release makefiles, and maybe a list of the patches he applied.
"Zed asked Silverex to move his website from the XChat.org domain, and the domain is now disabled." That would imply that it is statically compiled. I can't say whether or not object files are included. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list gnome org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list