Re: simple rotation support for gdk-pixbuf

[muppet <scott asofyet org>]

On Jun 20, 2004, at 7:53 AM, John Cupitt wrote:

> On 20 Jun 2004 10:27:48 +0200, Sven Neumann <sven gimp org> wrote:
> > or similar to avoid the problem of how to interpret the angles?
>
> Even that confuses me :-( does it mean the top of the image moving to
> the right, or the bottom? Image processing textbooks always have
> increasing angles meaning anticlockwise rotation (hope I've got that
> the right way around), I'd say that was the safest model.

given your own uncertainty, i think you proved the "don't use the 
numbers" argument.

what about

    GDK_PIXBUF_ROTATE_NONE
    GDK_PIXBUF_ROTATE_CLOCKWISE
    GDK_PIXBUF_ROTATE_UPSIDEDOWN
    GDK_PIXBUF_ROTATE_COUNTERCLOCKWISE

?

--
Examples really shouldn't include unexploded ordinance.
  -- Joe Smith, referring to an example program i wrote.