Re: Redundant GtkWindow destroy_event signal?

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming) writes: 
> It's continuing existence is just confusing. I just had a conversation
> about GtkObject's "destroy" signal and GtkWindow's "delete_event" signal
> that was lasted much longer than usual because of the distraction of
> GtkWindow's "destroy_event" signal.

You may well want to drop destroy_event out of language bindings
though. Inti did this.

Havoc