Re: Where is "stock_missing_image" defined?

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 18:24, Darin Adler wrote:
> on 11/2/01 9:21 AM, Owen Taylor at otaylor redhat com wrote:
> 
> > I guess we should add the dependency explicitely, though dependencies
> > of files on Makefiles are always a little nerve-wracking. ;-(
> 
> Perhaps there's an alternative where the list of images could be in a
> separate file, included or otherwise read by Makefile.am. Then you wouldn't
> need a dependency on the Makefile itself.

I haven't looked at the actual problem, but maybe automake's new include
feature would be useful here. I think that it's available as of automake
1.4

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com