Le jeudi 04 novembre 2004 à 21:13 +0100, PUYDT Julien a écrit : > Le jeudi 04 novembre 2004 à 21:01 +0100, Damien Sandras a écrit : > > - perhaps the DBUS component could still evolve, Julien, you could > > probably comment on this > > It will probably evolve if the gaim developpers agree with me, since I > don't think it is complete enough to do what I want. > > > All those changes mean that I will have to synchronize the patches with > > my local OPAL GnomeMeeting. So please don't commit to CVS anymore, let > > me do it. > > I sent the stupid patch to the ml and didn't apply it directly exactly > for that reason ;-) > It is applied ;) > > If we delay it, what is the status in *current* (by opposition with > > upcoming) distributions for : > > - DBUS > > 1) DBUS itself is still quite experimental ; > 2) we don't know how fast the gaim-gnomemeeting connection will become > true. > > Don't delay 1.2 for the DBUS component. Should it be built by default? I won't delay it *only* for the DBUS component. > > > Should we enable DBUS by default? Is that dependancy common in Mandrake > > 10.1, Fedora Core X, Debian Sarge, SuSE ? > > It's still quite uncommon. I'm working on it now because I prefer > targetting the future than the present ;-) > > Snark > > _______________________________________________ > Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list > Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=