Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] GnomeMeeting on 2.6




Hi all

I have very good news with the patch from Christian so
is gnomemeeting work better than ever.

I could run seti play two movies and do other stuff without
any disturbans in the sound.

So now I can say that GM with 2.6 is a perfect match at least for me :)


Thanks a lot Christian :)



Cheers Johnny





Christian Meder wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 11:41, Damien Sandras wrote:

Who is using the 2.6 kernel and is ready to test the latest changes with
it?

Craig, given the fact that many packagers will compile on 2.4, what is
your suggestion?

I tried on the 2.4 kernel to force the P_HAS_SEMAPHORES to 0 and I have a
bad sound quality when compiling, which I had not with P_HAS_SEMAPHORES
set to 1.

The problem becomes complex. Having a bad sound quality is not
problematic. What was problematic on 2.6 was to have people having bad
sound quality as soon as they were moving a window.

What are your comments?



Hi,

I took the gnomemeeting on 2.6 problem to linux-kernel around Christmas
last year and I'm happily running gnomemeeting daily and stable since
the discussion back then.

Unfortunately I switched my laptop from a PIII 450Mhz to PIV 2GHz where
the problem is less obvious. But still even on the 2 GHz laptop the
sound gets distorted with slight load on the machine in the
gnomemeeting-cvs Debian default packaging.

BTW it's really unlikely that the problem has anything to do with audio
drivers as the problem persisted whether I used OSS or ALSA on a
mastro2e chipset (450 MHz) or ALSA on the intel8x0 (2GHz).

Ingo Molnar (the Linux scheduler maintainer) pointed out in December
that the sched_yield usage in pwlib is broken. He suggested to just
nanosleep for 1 timeslice instead.

I tested two approaches:

* compile a shared library with sched_yield defined to a noop and run
gnomemeeting via library preloading with this shared library, called the
romp hack in a paper by David Mosberger-Tang

* substitute the Yield function in pwlib with nanosleep

The first approach seems to hang the GUI and slow down the GUI update
rate resulting in a very sluggish gnomemeeting feeling. Nevertheless
audio quality is improved but at a GUI usability cost.

The second approach is what I'm using since December and audio quality
is rock stable even under heavy load for me.

--- pwlib-cvs-20040128.CVS.orig/src/ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx
+++ pwlib-cvs-20040128.CVS/src/ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx
@@ -1057,7 +1057,8 @@
void PThread::Yield()
 {
-  sched_yield();
+  struct timespec timer = { 0, 1 };
+  nanosleep (&timer, NULL);
 }


Note that I didn't try to play around with the P_HAS_SEMAPHORES because
I just wanted to fix the sched_yield usage without changing much else.

So in summary after compiling a patched pwlib my gnomemeeting problems
where gone. Without the patched pwlib gnomemeeting was unusable even
with the slightest load on the machine be it a 450 MHz or 2 Ghz
processor.

I'm interested in experiences from others.




			Christian





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]