On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 16:16, frank brierley wrote: > Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps because the traditional /etc/printcap listing provides virtually > > no information about the capabilities of a printer? > > > I imagine there are other reasons for employing cups similar to the one > you've suggested. lpd does little beyond catch a print job and spool it > to a printer. But when using gnome-print's interface and specifying lpd > as the printer, lpd catches the job and prints just fine. This suggests > gnome-print merely forwards a postscript docement which lpd has no > problem with. > Of course, there is no _technical_ reason we couldn't look for /etc/printcap. In fact I believe we do have a PAPI module too I have never used it nor looked at the code, so...) and even cups is only used when it is available. I guess the main issue is the available time (and our own priorization). Andreas -- Andreas J. Guelzow Taliesin Software, Shelties, Pyr Sheps and Shetland Sheep
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part