Re: gtkhtml



> To the gtkhtml people,
> please dont get all in a huff about this. This guy has tried to add
> support for a gtk only version, making gtkhtml live up to its name, and
> add features (like the extended font tag), but you rejected the patches.

I have never seen any patches. So please let's end this argument now.

> > P.S.
> >     Judging from the amount of support I have received for CscHTML
> > (off this list and on) I am very glad I did this fork, it has been well
> > recieved by developers outside of the GNOME community, and is already
> > being used in several other projects.  It seems that I was correct in
> > thinking that there was a demand for a non-GNOME dependant Gtk HTML
> > widget...

Which projects?

-- 
Ettore




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]