Re: subshell.c revisited (Was: Re: New Gnome-libs compile error)

From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai wxs nl>
To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
Cc: kushn mail kar net, gnome-list gnome org
Subject: Re: subshell.c revisited (Was: Re: New Gnome-libs compile error)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 20:45:31 +0100 (CET)

On 10-Feb-99 Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> 
>> So when we compare this to the previous error, we got rid of the dat
>> problem, but are still stuck with recvfd/I_RECVFD
> 
> This only means that the configure test is wrong. 
> 
> The fix is on CVS, can you verify if it is on the tarball?

Sorry? Which tarball are your referring to? 

---
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven        join #FreeBSD on Undernet
asmodai(at)wxs.nl          This is my Truth, tell me your's... 
Network/Security Specialist      <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>
*BSD: Powered by Knowledge & Know-how <http://www.freebsd.org>

References:
- Re: subshell.c revisited (Was: Re: New Gnome-libs compile error)
  - From: Miguel de Icaza

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]