Re: gnome-i18n-status Bugzilla category?



sön 2002-04-28 klockan 00.37 skrev Carlos Perelló Marín:
> > Carlos, couldn't we use Bugzilla for bugs and requests about the status
> > pages, and set up a component for it? I can imagine that from the sheer
> > number of mails and comments on irc and all possible discussions that
> > it's very difficult to remember all the comments and suggestions that
> > people have for the status pages/status scripts.
> > 
> > So how about a "gnome-i18n-status" product in Bugzilla, or possibly a
> > "gnome-i18n" product with a "status" component (whichever is considered
> > best) that lets people log bugs against the status pages/scripts?
> 
> We have it already. I have send it here several times (I think...)
> 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?product=website&component=gtp&email1=&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to1=1&email2=&emailtype2=substring&emailreporter2=1&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&short_desc=&short_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&long_desc_type=substring&bug_file_loc=&bug_file_loc_type=substring&status_whiteboard=&status_whiteboard_type=substring&keywords=&keywords_type=anywords&op_sys_details=&op_sys_details_type=substring&version_details=&version_details_type=substring&cmdtype=doit&namedcmd=gnome-db+bugs&newqueryname=&order=%27Importance%27&form_name=query
> 
> It's the website product, gtp component.

Oh, I must have missed that.
But how about instead having a seperate "i18n" product with a "status"
component, as deaddog suggested? I think that will make it easier to
find, and also make it more independant from the gtp pages, which I
think is beneficial since the translation status is pretty much created
and used independantly from the rest of the pages, I think.


Christian





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]