On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 18:38, Chema Celorio wrote:
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 12:27, Bill Haneman wrote:
...
The problem with this scheme is that 2-0-0 is "two branches removed"
from HEAD, which is a significant problem in that important patches
(i.e. for stoppers) have to be committed to three places, and ordinary
bugfixes to two places (i.e. 2-0 and HEAD). That's a bit burdensome...
which is why I propose to hold new features until 2-0-1 branches, or
else put them on their own branch.
Yes, the problem here is that each module is different. It is hard to
say to hold new features for all modules, they are in different
development cycles and stability (I'm thinking libgnomeprint).
OK;
Does anyone have an issue with me using gnome-2-0-0 for
2.0.0-release-only code, and continuing to use HEAD for 2.0.1 until it
enters a "deeper" freeze? That way at least the branch names for the
actual release candidates match up.