Re: GConf and bonobo-config - some ideas

[Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>]

Havoc Pennington wrote:

> I guess the hard thing to implement is "attaching" the schema name to
> a key; I don't know that this is required, maybe it isn't. As I said a
> /schemas/<key> convention is already encouraged by the GConf manual.
>
> I'm not clear on exactly what you're asking maybe...
>

I simply don't want to expose a special schema API to clients, thats all.

- Dietmar