Re: validating po files on commit



On 18 Sep 2001, Chema Celorio wrote:

> On 18 Sep 2001 12:40:29 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone fix ko.po and ja.po in gnome-vfs-1-0 branch?
> >
> > Could we set up a CVS script that validates encodings on commit, and
> > refuses to accept commits with bogus encodings? It's really hard to
> > deal with broken pofiles, because automake won't let you make dist
> > unless you actually fix the encoding (which I don't know how to do),
> > or cvs rm the po file (which seems extreme). Just removing the po file
> > from ALL_LINGUAS doesn't work, automake thinks this isn't allowed.
>
> There have been a couple of problems with po files and encodings
> recently. I think (and please correct me if i am wrong) that they are
> caused because gettext changed some behaivior after 0.10.35. So the
> potfiles will either work on 0.10.35 or will work on post 0.10.35. Seems
> to me that what we need to do is decide which version we are going to
> use for GNOME, this way we can all upgrade (and require that version)
> and forget about this problem. It is really annoying, this has happened
> to several hackers.
>
> Can someone with a better understading of the problem confirm if this
> will solve the recent problems with po files ?

Also note that if you are still using a glibc 2.1 based system, you won't
be able to do a "make distcheck" using the newer versions of gettext if
you have a korean translation.

Apparently there is a problem with the EUC-KR iconv routine in glibc 2.1,
so gettext ignores its existance.  You would need to rebuild the gettext
tools with libiconv instead.

James.

-- 
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/



_______________________________________________
gnome-hackers mailing list
gnome-hackers gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]