Help wanted with bugzilla 2.20 (classifying products)
- From: Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>
- To: gnome-bugsquad gnome org
- Subject: Help wanted with bugzilla 2.20 (classifying products)
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:30:17 +0200
In 2.20 the products will be divided into classifications. Currently
the following classifications exist:
* Desktop
* Platform
* Bindings
This is for products shipped with GNOME Desktop/Platform/Bindings. If
a product is deprecated, but still shipped, it should still be in
here. The official list should be:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen_2fDesktop
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen_2fBindings
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen_2fPlatform
* Productivity
Possible new GNOME 'release category' (like Desktop/Platform/Bindings).
* Infrastructure
Non-software stuff on bugzilla.gnome.org or software providing a
vital service for GNOME.
Think of: bugzilla.gnome.org, l10n, Release Engineering, HIG, but
also GARGNOME and jhbuild (they are basic tools needed to build
GNOME).
* Deprecated
Software that is not maintained or deprecated. Software shipped with
GNOME is excluded (otherwise vte and a lot of other products would
belong here)
* Other
Software not belonging to any other classification.
* Unclassified
Not a real classification, this just means the software must be
classified into another one.
I'd appreciate if someone could look at the classifications and check
if the software is correctly classified. Extra points if you make an
easy list I can copy paste. The products in each classification can be
seen here:
http://bugzilla-test.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi
(login with your bugzilla.gnome.org username & password if it is needed)
I think Desktop/Platform/Bindings/Productivity/Infrastructure is
generally ok. Just a matter of classifying the 'Unclassified' and
moving some software out of 'Deprecated' (whoops).
Comments on the classifications themselves is welcome too.
--
Regards,
Olav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]