Re: [gdome]LGPL?

[Ian Main <imain netidea com>]

On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:15:11PM +0200, Anders Carlsson wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2001 15:13:14 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:52:56PM +0200, Paolo Casarini wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 12 Jun 2001, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > 
> > > > GDome seems to be licensed under the GPL. Why not license it under the LGPL,
> > > > which is used by the rest of the GNOME libraries. Surely, a GPL library can
> > > > not be used by a LGPL library, such as those GNOME libraries.
> > > When I start working on Gdome2 it was under GPL and it is still under
> > > it. I want that Gdome2 is a LGPL library but I think I can't modify
> > > the today situation without the consent of all previously authors of this
> > > library.
> > > 
> > > To Raph, Daniel, Mathieu, Anders: Are you agree to change the license of
> > > Gdome2 from GPL to LGPL?
> > 
> >   I have no problem with this.
> > 
> Sure, go ahead.

Yeah, no problem at all.  I've even been releasing things under the X/MIT license
lately as it's even less restrictive than LGPL.. so I'm all for it.

Ian