[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [evolution-patches] "Experimental" Plugin Set

From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
To: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Cc: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>, evolution-patches <evolution-patches ximian com>
Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] "Experimental" Plugin Set
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:34:35 +0800

i just think its better to have --enable-plugins not enable the experiemental ones "by default".

i guess i approve it, if its up to me to

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 18:11 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 12:01 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> isn't "all" the same as "experiemental"?
> 
> I think "all" should just be standard+base, removing the need for
> "standard".  Particularly since --enable-plugins/enable-plugins=y is
> an alias for 'all'.

Originally I was going to do this, but it seemed odd that "all" didn't
actually do "every single plugin".  I don't really care either way
though, new patch attached.

-JP

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [evolution-patches] "Experimental" Plugin Set
  - From: JP Rosevear

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]