[Fwd: Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-groupwise-maintainers]

[JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>]

(Not sure this made it to the list lists.x.c seems a little odd atm)

-JP	
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.

--- Begin Message ---

• From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
• To: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
• Cc: ls skeptopotamus ximian com, evolution-groupwise-maintainers ximian com
• Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-groupwise-maintainers
• Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:04:22 -0500

On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:55 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 02:45 +0000, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 12:02 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > I got this alias setup for bugzilla in case we want to assign groupwise
> > > related bugs there some how.  
> > > 
> > > Personally I'd prefer to keep the groupwise bugs assigned to individual
> > > components with the groupwise keyword rather than create a separate
> > > product (the GroupWise product in their now was a broken attempt at
> > > tracking some server issues) or separate component.  We don't put IMAP
> > > or POP bugs in a separate component.  However it is a little different
> > > in this case because we have a specific group working on these bugs and
> > > there are currently a lot of them.  We could transfer the groupwise
> > > keyword bugs that aren't assigned specifically right now to
> > > evolution-groupwise-maintainers and periodically make sure the
> > > assignment is right.  This would cut down the bug traffic to
> > > evolution-mail-maintainers, evolution-calendar-maintainers, etc.
> > 
> > Ok, sounds like you guys want a groupwise component.  Evolution or EDS
> > or both?
> > 
> > -JP
> 
> Sorry if my earlier mail did not convey my thoughts clearly. I said yes
> for the new alias (evo-gw-maintainers)- not necessarily for the creation
> of new gw component.

Moved the bugs.  Sorry for the bug spam all.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.

--- End Message ---