Re: [Evolution-hackers] Bug #50046.



On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 11:45, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 11:17 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > In the Contact List Editor, you have set
> >  [x] Hide addresses when sending mail to this list
> >
> > Which is a good default to me. Uncheck this option and all recipients in
> > this list will be visible in the To: field, rather than Bcc:ed.
> 
> You misunderstand. I did not use a Contact List. I entered some
> addresses by hand in the Bcc field, and typed some explanatory text
> followed by : ; in the To field.

Sorry, my bad. Now I see. Although my understanding of your initial
explanation didn't change, not even with more coffee. ;)


> Evolution completely removed the To: field, and everything I'd typed in
> it. I didn't want the addresses to be made visible in the To: field. I
> wanted what I'd explicitly typed into the To: field to be in the To:
> field of the mail I sent. Not an unreasonable request :)
> 
> Testing shows that for received messages Evo does actually manage to
> show the To: field in 'Show Email Source' mode, but not in other modes,
> even 'Show Full Headers'.

Yep, I noticed the missing To: field myself. But it seems, this is due
to the formatting of that header:

To: People who needed an example of empty lists in To field:;People who needed an example of empty lists in To field: ;, ""@infradead.org

The above line (copied from your Pine generated message) is only visible
in Evolution in "source" mode.

However, I actually *have* seen the behavior in Evolution, as you want.
The message was generated by Eudora and the To: field had some
explanatory text, whereas all the addresses where not visible, cause
they where sent Bcc:ed.

So I assume, this is Evolutions fault parsing the To: header?

...guenther


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]