Re: [Evolution-hackers] Do we need camel/camel-i18n.h?

[JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>]

On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 09:21, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 23:15 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 20:35, Not Zed wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 18:49 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 11:12, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > > > what is gi18n.h? where does it come from? I presume it comes from glib?
> > > > > but which version? we can only use it if it is from glib 2.2
> > > > 
> > > > Just to clarify, this is the current situation while we come up with a
> > > > solution for daily snapshots.  We will allow newer glib/gtk stuff in
> > > > about a month or so.
> > > 
> > > you mean, require? :(
> > 
> > Yep.
> > 
> what specifically for, or just for depending on the new GNOME? Could we
> still make things compilable in 2.2?

To provide API testing of the GNOME core, use things like the new file
dialog and generally tidy up the code with things like the i18n thing
above and the object boiler plate macros (which are now in glib 2.3 i
believe).

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.