On Die , 2004-04-18 at 11:23 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 00:37, Chris Toshok wrote: > > built-in support for handling calendar attachments (imip? i can't > > remember all the calendar protocols.) > > at some point, it will also depend on it for the Followup-Flag feature. Sure. But there is no reason to require a fully complete calendar application to be loaded in order to get these pieces of integration. You don't need to have evolution running at all to subscribe to web calendars, with evolution-webcal, for example. You don't all of gnome running to use evolution, so why should we require the reverse? Saying the architecture is broken isn't an argument against fixing the architecture. And the current architecture is broken with regards to the way the gnome ideology is headed. And fixing the architecture in Evolution to allow completely separate, integrated applications is not hard. Most of the code will be the same. It just needs some code re-organization and API cleanup in the UI bits, to do this. -- dobey
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part