Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel plans and possibilities

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
Cc: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, Evolution Hackers Mailing List <evolution-hackers ximian com>
Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel plans and possibilities
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:03:29 +0100

On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 03:06, Not Zed wrote:

> Its basically a busted mode of operation.  Especially when some of the
> header files can include so much, and include the same stuff over and
> over again.  libc doesn't do this anywhere near as much.

Note that gcc has, for years, optimised the ...

	#ifdef __SOME_HEADER_FILE_H__
	#define __SOME_HEADER_FILE_H__

	 /* blah blah blah */

	#endif /* __SOME_HEADER_FILE_H__ */

... case and doesn't even _open_ the file on the second and subsequent
#includes.

-- 
dwmw2

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel plans and possibilities
  - From: Ettore Perazzoli

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]