Re: [Evolution-hackers] Linking Evo shell with an additional library.

[Sharvil Nanavati <sharvil nit ca>]

On February 25, 2003 02:17 am, Not Zed wrote:
> Did you add shell/test/Makefile.am to configure.in?

I only have a simple Makefile in shell/test/ so it doesn't need to be 
generated.

> Probably have to do autogen.sh to pick up all the changes to the config
> files (at least, that's the easiest way).
>
> What do you mean the library hasn't been linked?  You're getting linking
> failures?

By that I mean that the library has been built (make was run in test/Makefile) 
but test/test.a doesn't actually get linked into the final evolution binary.

> On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 08:00, Sharvil Nanavati wrote:
> > Good day,
> >
> > I'd like to link the Evolution (1.2.2) shell with another static library
> > located in, say, shell/test/. In order to do this, I modified Makefile.am
> > in shell/ and added "test" to SUBDIRS. I also added "test/test.a" to
> > evolution_LDADD. I ran make clean, automake, configure, and make but the
> > library still hasn't been linked into the evolution binary. Am I using
> > the right approach? Is there anything I've missed? Any hints, clues, etc.
> > as to why I'm unsuccessful? Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sharvil Nanavati
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers