Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 22:57 +0100, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :There is one bugreport with patches that I think should be looked at before 2.10: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137864 It would be very nice if we could ship with the patches in here included as well. I got the impression Mandrake has already been using these.FYI, these patches has been integrated in Mdk vte package for Mdk 10.1 (out for almost 6 months now) and I did get any bug report caused by them.
Has anyone been testing the vte accessibility with these patches? I would have some concerns there, as we (Sun) are not using these patches at the moment.
However, we *are* using patches for the following bugs, which we consider vital for accessibility:
153405 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153405> cri Urg nalin redhat com NEW Terminal crashes often while working with gnopernicus
113590 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113590> maj Hig nalin redhat com NEW vte and AtkText selection
132316 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132316> nor Hig nalin redhat com NEW terminal widget's context menu posting isn't exposed as a... 138653 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138653> nor Hig nalin redhat com NEW crash opening/closing multiple gnome-terminal tabs
156161 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156161> nor Nor nalin redhat com UNCO AccessibleText_getTextAtOffset returns wrong values in g...
In particular the patches for 153405, 138653, and 156161 fix several crasher scenarios. Bug 113590 prevents the implementation of a key ATK interface.
I consider vte to be unmaintained. - Bill