On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 21:39 -0400, Jody Goldberg wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 06:56:29PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > > > > However, this does depend on a patched cupsd to work properly. > > As discussed that bit may hard to swallow. While I agree that it is > definitely the right way to go (we'll want hal support for cupsd > too) I don't think we can depend on it. I agree, but... > We're stuck with polling as a fallback for now I think. If we don't have any kind of notification, then we are stuck with polling *all printers* *all of the time*.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part