On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 00:03 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > ohhh! gtk.threads_init is getting on my nerves! > > Even worse I don't really have much time to spend on debugging > this :( My masters' deadline is approaching at a scary rate! > > If we just move the gtk.threads_init statement to a point where > hotkeying works but async handlers are semi-broken (they work but shut > down uncleanly) we can still easily hack on async stuff in cvs. > > -- In this case we should put all async handlers in > deskbar/handlers/broken/ or something (and make them not install with > "make install"). So that only devs and people with a death wish should > endure them. > > I'd really much like it this way so that I don't have to sync my patches > against an ever changing cvs tree... I think this is an old issue, you are always coming up with old stuff, it's boring :) Shall i merge the google handler in the CVS ? I think it deserves its place in the official package.. Are you ok with that ? Also, the help file will be somehow included in the .py for online display. The UI with error message handling will continue in the other thread
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part