From hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk Tue May 2 07:57:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC6F3B1484 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04399-06 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vdsexch.vds.org.uk (unknown [80.175.191.212]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E183B025A for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail pickup service by vdsexch.vds.org.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 2 May 2006 12:57:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:57:30 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Returned mail: Data format error thread-index: AcZt35be+QebDUYLQHSYCLVV1s9OCQAAAAVD From: "Hazel McAlpine" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2006 11:57:31.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[97B31B70:01C66DDF] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 11:57:36 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am on Leave and will be back in the office on Tuesday 2nd May 2006 thanks Hazel McAlpine Training and Events Co-Ordinator Volunteer Development Scotland Unit 157/158, Stirling Enterprise Park Stirling, FK7 7RP Tel: (01786) 479593 Fax: (01786) 449285 Email:hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk =20 Disclaimer - 5/2/2006=20 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and = intended solely for release-team@gnome.org. If you are not the named = addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this = email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of = the author and might not represent those of Volunteer Development = Scotland. Warning: Although Volunteer Development Scotland has taken = reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, = the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising = from the use of this email or attachments. It is recommended by = Volunteer Development Scotland that you scan any E-mail attachments = prior to opening.=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error

I am on Leave and will be back in the office on = Tuesday 2nd May 2006
thanks




Hazel = McAlpine

Training and = Events Co-Ordinator
Volunteer Development Scotland
Unit 157/158, = Stirling Enterprise Park
Stirling, FK7 7RP

Tel: (01786) 479593
Fax: (01786) = 449285

Email:hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk
http://www.vds.org.uk =



Disclaimer - 5/2/2006

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely = for release-team@gnome.org. If you are not the named addressee you = should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views = or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and = might not represent those of Volunteer Development Scotland. Warning: = Although Volunteer Development Scotland has taken reasonable precautions = to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot = accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of = this email or attachments.  It is recommended by Volunteer = Development Scotland that you scan any E-mail = attachments prior to opening.  ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC-- From kmaraas@broadpark.no Fri May 5 09:58:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80C93B0351; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08056-07; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453A83B017C; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYS001EGPHHOQC0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no>; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:58:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Unknown-00-11-0a-80-83-b7.lan ([80.203.243.165]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYS002C9PHHVMA0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no>; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:58:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:56:55 +0200 From: Kjartan Maraas To: Gnome i18n List , gnome-doc-list Message-id: <1146837415.3343.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-3) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.579 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.579 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-release-team Subject: GConf has branched X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 13:58:48 -0000 Hi. I found out that Mark had gone through a bunch of patches for GConf and marked them for commital, so I branched GConf before commiting the ones that only made sense on HEAD. gnome-2-14 is the name. Cheers Kjartan From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 5 10:47:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A2E3B083A for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10433-10 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301A13B0871 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so852412pye for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dGi9lxrWzEHmKnGoJ03UijDJqrMhqNnnCttIsJrd1Mjbuz5IhiWMcb8Q0m/aTezpCyi7+mHZuVlMYInBVmIveymrKKXuurKtOc1wlsLPsvA84+r5WGVpiwldiqfYUhq5paYl+IMUQqKR57EJOn3B3PvNad0lFDkRAeS9iu8tk8A= Received: by 10.35.109.2 with SMTP id l2mr775941pym; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.117.14 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:47:08 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.318 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.318 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: UI freeze break request for libgnomeui X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:47:13 -0000 Bug 340478 [1] contains a small patch that provides some much needed fixes for GnomeIconEntry/GnomeFileEntry: * update icon list when a new dir is selected * disable preview area in file chooser, not needed as we're selecting a directory * filter out non-directory items in the file chooser These changes make the GnomeIconEntry dialog much easier to use/understand. The patch has already been commited to HEAD, I would like to commit to libgnomeui-2-14 as well. -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 5 10:47:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D4B3B0871 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10531-09 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001043B07E4 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so509609pye for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZA7i+UedNfn7B2YINaau8UaDVXcsu97d9HHOgsUEaclquf0OsO+E9rXPwCAEMp5xpVmMlAGxooHaVdXfdNA++PIaKVWLJd1jMdLOEOBZmLPw02YaXterRBkW1hK42nVcA7CzDWa7fD6gUjF/q4G3LASc/AE4xAprkfi5s4+Fr+Q= Received: by 10.35.60.15 with SMTP id n15mr1142355pyk; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.117.14 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:47:41 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.324 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.199, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.324 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Re: UI freeze break request for libgnomeui X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:47:45 -0000 Oops [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D340478 -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From fherrera@gmail.com Tue May 9 02:38:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971E63B065C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16766-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.201]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B813B0917 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2595774nzk for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=W1fdl0+edVlpVbzhHu7W4HVoAuVzD99U2tMrF2wLVZZBalYm4lfO1IkaKbkAg/juojaRqgWkxCvZmgPt3LcJ+5ax3HsuYg+DBoVAwFjjb5RH92br7485UP8K7E54U6vou8u/5ZuwGinFmFOAzn14cmO2BICKblYVBqX+eWCTCxc= Received: by 10.36.222.1 with SMTP id u1mr4815004nzg; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.58.3 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58d389c20605082338g7e21455bh9d3df38869d692a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 08:38:31 +0200 From: "Fernando Herrera" Sender: fherrera@gmail.com To: release-team@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, gnome-i18n@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: bfc31d52d39a2a13 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: gconf-editor branched X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 06:38:39 -0000 Hi all, I've just branched gconf-editor for gnome-2-14. New development (mostly bug fixes and maybe some minor features) are going to happen on HEAD. Salu2 From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 20:31:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDE63B1044 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19047-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B343B02AF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2923602nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ImwCoUf5W5NDDQxLwO31K0U72w7kjS9PnQt9pzyC6pybRRRFqZ59pjFKdLyVHpr6PV7QIV8ucSa+Fg+QxvhhjrxkBFpxuapHsMAgt8/jtYeOaHT8HJxparUfY1OaIDUwn+PU+EIsYYUJUo6zPVtOgzGmCnBLXocM5vb+bz3PNGo= Received: by 10.36.135.10 with SMTP id i10mr6126773nzd; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:26 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_JH=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Subject: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:31:30 -0000 I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs a) contain no translations at all b) require a cvs version of intltool this may not affect English-speaking jhbuild users much, but it pretty much precludes packaging 2.15, thus reducing the test base considerably. Can we please try to ensure for 2.15.2 that a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions b) make sure that tarballs contain translations Thank Matthias Clasen From newren@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:17:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1EF3B026F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21253-07 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD203B0246 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2933181nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dxRAxLYWO8WeHLDgoFQfapjF6IPIBGCb7vqjQDYtyyUtoyGveQejj3VrYsh4JCUgoNuIA2k+v4eVI5GZ7YhcmFhxEJcYQHA0GYspu/Z94c5lbxrk0LNszGyqhLlsrps/K6z7YN6BRdC+wlQRDp1eg+iyhNdkQ8QulzlWwgFVWaw= Received: by 10.36.251.60 with SMTP id y60mr5862538nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:17:26 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:17:34 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > a) contain no translations at all > b) require a cvs version of intltool I thought (a) was resolved in this thread: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00478.html (though I don't know whether all relevant modules got updated...).=20 Was I mistaken? Either way, we should probably follow up to make sure the incompatiblity with solaris-sh was actually fixed, so that people don't need to remember the workaround in order to get translations in their tarballs. For (b), both Vincent and I built from the 2.15.1 tarballs without a cvs version of intltool. Did we do something funny or did you? From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:32:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3943B03B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21816-08 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5388F3B0352 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so1544496nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OCQcS+ttTSTjMG8Nkk6UcTXWSQUuoscniGEmRfYPOjoMSZRcZqX1Lw+oV3Mb7u+si6jbKnnd4FKR9Flgw8eLg6yMGpYabogafW2XPa9QpS5Mj6I1of9sKgg13tV+xON5OYiWOUUMDyyQS95OFfB5lsf+p2RKLHtn5bMVws85F38= Received: by 10.36.247.21 with SMTP id u21mr6222239nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:31 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:32:35 -0000 On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > > > a) contain no translations at all > > b) require a cvs version of intltool > > I thought (a) was resolved in this thread: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00478.htm= l > (though I don't know whether all relevant modules got updated...). > Was I mistaken? Either way, we should probably follow up to make sure > the incompatiblity with solaris-sh was actually fixed, so that people > don't need to remember the workaround in order to get translations in > their tarballs. > > For (b), both Vincent and I built from the 2.15.1 tarballs without a > cvs version of intltool. Did we do something funny or did you? > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. Unfortunately (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the translation= s are missing. Matthias From newren@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:43:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69703B0263 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22368-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FC03B02B3 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2938014nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ETpFWzuBRepklO0CvhChgrRzHeEkGG6t6waopR64fYKM2+w6HLPMo3L1MwTfY5pSRaJtbp8tw+BRy21Z0zpJgv4htWsiPOdlZy6IrM+m4lnuhr4LIIxha3R5+U4/BVkpwUYcgn3925AWiNcSl25AXrIcqlUdpAbGN+/dZtcNhqU= Received: by 10.36.250.69 with SMTP id x69mr3690951nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:43:36 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.538 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.538 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:43:40 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > Unfortunately > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the translati= ons > are missing. So to verify, you're saying that > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions isn't a problem after all. Correct? And that > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find out once we realized that it hit multiple modules)? Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. Thanks! Elijah From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:52:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B203B03EF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22763-08 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5053C3B03B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2939755nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LXcpEH8nhwgB1RAH8oO5DJYF8cbKTsncy7khrVay1AtFBU3VfCE4ghAesqRDtadXmojYgW2DaFYF6ST51CAhXf2xCINLZDqvvn0T5N+0qUFJzPepnFh7S7R/Fh5uY7hGhtCjc1cn4aYXiKKjeOpJEcrWMK+WatYnQsg5PlnP5yk= Received: by 10.36.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr5924715nzd; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:48 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:52:51 -0000 On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > > Unfortunately > > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the transla= tions > > are missing. > > So to verify, you're saying that > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > isn't a problem after all. Correct? Well, it becomes a problem as soon as you have to regenerate configure from the tarball. I helped myself by pushing a cvs snapshot of intltool into rawhide, but thats clearly not ideal. > And that > > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations > was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had > missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find > out once that it hit multiple modules)? > > Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, > from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the > necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. I did not get very far. At this time, I can add vte 0.13.0 and gedit 2.15.1 to the list of translation-deprived modules. Matthias From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Wed May 10 00:30:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295D43B0410 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30262-08 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9A23B04BA for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2989051nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W+rYM7tp/31XIcizPavWtKvPK67zEAZ0pIDpQzQgkvm9eMF8w3J/V2Q80TORWAPr/lIqCXbboMC14A5Lu5zZiLjvg/nMevydVfVVY3P/lANocuTKN/64ZpynTYV9yYLHEoTPQnjmitkooAHW4rt7J4AjXiFExBszyzot5+d6NfY= Received: by 10.36.119.2 with SMTP id r2mr64981nzc; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:20 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:30:22 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > > > Unfortunately > > > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the trans= lations > > > are missing. > > > > So to verify, you're saying that > > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > > isn't a problem after all. Correct? > > Well, it becomes a problem as soon as you have to regenerate configure > from the tarball. I helped myself by pushing a cvs snapshot of intltool > into rawhide, but thats clearly not ideal. > > > And that > > > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations > > was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had > > missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find > > out once that it hit multiple modules)? > > > > Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, > > from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the > > necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. > > I did not get very far. At this time, I can add vte 0.13.0 and > gedit 2.15.1 to the list of translation-deprived modules. zenity 2.15.1 and gnome-system-monitor 2.14.2 are also affected. From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 12 05:18:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F55D3B2538 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13999-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4423C3B252F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E0A53984; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:18:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: David Bolter In-Reply-To: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:18:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.566 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:18:45 -0000 Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > Hi. > > We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. > > A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! > > What is it ? > ================= > GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. > > What's New? > =========== > This is a bugfix release. Hi David, it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 (ie the goption usage in gok). Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) Thanks you in advance. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 09:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095593B26A2 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30677-03 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAD63B0935 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 53886]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25039-24237>; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:44:59 -0400 Message-ID: <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:44:54 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.568 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:45:22 -0000 Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > >> Hi. >> >> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. >> >> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! >> >> What is it ? >> ================= >> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. >> >> What's New? >> =========== >> This is a bugfix release. >> > > Hi David, > > it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 > (ie the goption usage in gok). > > Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and > the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. > > Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are > numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) > > Thanks you in advance. > > Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this is obvious. cheers, D From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 12 10:06:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25513B26E0 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32076-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFB93B26BB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC533DD; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:06:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: David Bolter In-Reply-To: <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:06:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.567 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:06:25 -0000 Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > > > >> Hi. > >> > >> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. > >> > >> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! > >> > >> What is it ? > >> ================= > >> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. > >> > >> What's New? > >> =========== > >> This is a bugfix release. > >> > > > > Hi David, > > > > it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 > > (ie the goption usage in gok). > > > > Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and > > the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. > > > > Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are > > numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) > > > > Thanks you in advance. > > > > > Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want > to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, > shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this > is obvious. There are no stupid question :) If you plan to do other releases in the future for 2.14.x, you should definitively create a branch without the goption part and it would probably be easier to start this branch just before goption was added in CVS. To be clear, the problem in goption patch is usage of 'G_OPTION_ARG_DOUBLE' which is glib 2.11.x material. If you don't plan to do any 2.14.x releases, don't bother creating 2.14 branch, but it would be great for distributions packagers (and probably other people) so change gok versioning so people knows they are using an "unstable" release. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 10:34:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437E13B0FF5 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01517-03 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC943B1058 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 47758]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <24863-28393>; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:18 -0400 Message-ID: <44649CA1.6060502@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:05 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.57 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.57 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:34:02 -0000 Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > >> Frederic Crozat wrote: >> >>> Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : >>> >>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. >>>> >>>> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! >>>> >>>> What is it ? >>>> ================= >>>> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. >>>> >>>> What's New? >>>> =========== >>>> This is a bugfix release. >>>> >>>> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 >>> (ie the goption usage in gok). >>> >>> Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and >>> the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. >>> >>> Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are >>> numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) >>> >>> Thanks you in advance. >>> >>> >>> >> Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want >> to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, >> shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this >> is obvious. >> > > There are no stupid question :) > > If you plan to do other releases in the future for 2.14.x, you should > definitively create a branch without the goption part and it would > probably be easier to start this branch just before goption was added in > CVS. To be clear, the problem in goption patch is usage of > 'G_OPTION_ARG_DOUBLE' which is glib 2.11.x material. > > If you don't plan to do any 2.14.x releases, don't bother creating 2.14 > branch, but it would be great for distributions packagers (and probably > other people) so change gok versioning so people knows they are using an > "unstable" release. > > For sure. I will try to pay attention to the versioning expectations from now on. cheers, D From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 14:59:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFB13B0332 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18780-08 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2399B3B000C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 44109]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25629-14425>; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:41 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.571 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:59:57 -0000 [snip] > There are no stupid question :) > In that case... :-) What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to distinguish? Does anyone do both? cheers, David From jdub@waugh.id.au Fri May 12 15:10:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088B63B10D1 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19473-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node.waugh.id.au (node.waugh.id.au [70.85.31.216]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B5D3B0632 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from home.waugh.id.au (ppp121-112.static.internode.on.net [150.101.121.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by node.waugh.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C413C2F0; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:50 +1000 (EST) Received: by home.waugh.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B61103F72; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:39 +1000 From: Jeff Waugh To: David Bolter Message-ID: <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> Mail-Followup-To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> Reply-By: Tue May 16 05:09:50 EST 2006 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-21-686 i686 X-Message-Flag: Cranky? Try Free Software instead! X-Uptime: 05:09:50 up 4 days, 19:32, 8 users, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.444 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.444 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:10:55 -0000 > What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are > module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome > 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to > distinguish? Does anyone do both? You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them into the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball's source directory, whatever the version. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "So: Stop selling software. Give it away. Work out some other way to make money, because pretending it's not replicable is not it. Profit." - Martin Pool From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 15:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AE43B1130 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19851-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:18:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244B13B039C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 42161]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25259-14421>; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:15:56 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.573 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.573 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:18:11 -0000 Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > >> What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are >> module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome >> 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to >> distinguish? Does anyone do both? >> > > You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them into > the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball's > source directory, whatever the version. :-) > > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 ? Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? shrug, David From jdub@waugh.id.au Fri May 12 15:21:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170093B0141 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20170-02 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node.waugh.id.au (node.waugh.id.au [70.85.31.216]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30AF3B0632 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from home.waugh.id.au (ppp121-112.static.internode.on.net [150.101.121.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by node.waugh.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5F53C2FA; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:24 +1000 (EST) Received: by home.waugh.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58E6D3F72; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:13 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:13 +1000 From: Jeff Waugh To: David Bolter Message-ID: <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> Mail-Followup-To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> Reply-By: Tue May 16 05:19:43 EST 2006 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-21-686 i686 X-Message-Flag: Cranky? Try Free Software instead! X-Uptime: 05:19:43 up 4 days, 19:42, 8 users, load average: 0.12, 0.04, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.445 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:21:27 -0000 > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally > mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: > > put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and > put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 > ? You could do it that way (the release team will generally know, based on your release patterns and announcements anyway), or... > Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? > Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? That's generally the easiest way to do it. Reduces margin for human error. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "Funny, I have no trouble distinguishing my mobile phone from the others because it's in my _own fucking pocket_!" - Mobile Rage From newren@gmail.com Fri May 12 15:32:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6E63B0AF4 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20687-07 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41D03B02C7 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so728708nzk for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NjrulOiENXGm+Z5hUcdMwoTSZukd6WD8aMCx6ZX4QvgJL6diAVXoOCu4hLQj7XO9B0daX8Yg4Pd3NFirhFHoEfblFSTWC+In+7J/305Bwe+6/yHngzv4PV4fb3HFw5Uc6LUiLt9kQ8JZPNNfjk6ti7kks+dRKkvYpZjFaiIbWYU= Received: by 10.36.250.45 with SMTP id x45mr123738nzh; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605121232k4381d802i6ce133a811108298@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:39 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "David Bolter" In-Reply-To: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:32:42 -0000 On 5/12/06, David Bolter wrote: > >> What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Did you mean 'using the install-module script on the gnome servers' or something else? This is probably something that should show up on http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner; I've been meaning to write up a more thorough expectations-of-maintainers kind of document for a while now, someday I might just get around to it. > >> Are module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for > >> gnome 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? If your module has no code changes and no documentation updates/additions and no translation updates, then it's okay to ignore a given 2.x.y release. Otherwise, you should try to make a release with each gnome 2.x.y release, both stable and unstable. We understand that it's sometimes difficult and not all modules (even those that attempt to follow the gnome release schedule) do that yet. > >> And if both, how are we supposed to distinguish? Does anyone do both? I'd say that most modules probably do both. Modules which use the same 2.x versioning of Gnome tend to be the easiest to distinguish and cause the fewest errors on our part. Of course, not all modules do that and there have been multiple cases where it has been difficult for us to determine which module releases to use in a Gnome release (we do anything from looking at ChangeLogs to pinging maintainers to try to figure it out). > > You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them= into > > the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball'= s > > source directory, whatever the version. :-) > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally > mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: > > put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and > put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 > ? Yes. We've often tried to sort things out by hand and even checked ChangeLogs and such to try to figure out these kinds of things on our own before. Being told which versions map to what definitely helps. > Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? That would make things much easier for us, and reduce the likelihood of errors on our part. > Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? I don't see why it would; it's just a version number. Unless you had a special meaning associated with the number that others were already relying upon, that is. Hope that helps, Elijah From vuntz@gnome.org Sat May 13 17:42:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C36C3B11AD for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30418-01 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:42:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABAE3B03CF for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:41:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C045911268D; Sat, 13 May 2006 23:41:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Matthias Clasen In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:43:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1147556595.12491.123.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.521 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_JH=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.521 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:42:01 -0000 Le mardi 09 mai 2006 à 20:31 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > a) contain no translations at all > b) require a cvs version of intltool > > this may not affect English-speaking jhbuild users much, but > it pretty much precludes packaging 2.15, thus reducing the > test base considerably. Can we please try to ensure for > 2.15.2 that > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations Yesterday, I talked with Rodney about getting a new intltool release for 2.15.2 and asked what's blocking it. He'd like to fix a bug [1] before the release. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323968 Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Mon May 15 12:20:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C27C3B080E for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08439-05 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528BB3B0805 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so213410nzh for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hK6RaHoOBaKmt9xwXHV+RysiMo2JXgLHDaYptt+nSm/nUvN2wGvDSw3dHIebolATWcMye1j/DJxeDWKC5vrai1cquF0Ou/P/71XCn3+t5crHFFztmNohe84A3rqxUVWltfoeRL71RyZZXCyRLd0O1uval5JPPKouCz2r0pt0M48= Received: by 10.36.49.6 with SMTP id w6mr3071198nzw; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:13 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Release the hounds!" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.415, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.997] X-Spam-Score: -2.018 X-Spam-Level: Subject: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:20:15 -0000 I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to get one done tomorrow. GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. Matthias From vuntz@gnome.org Mon May 15 13:00:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0C03B1ADE for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11368-04 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7DF3B1AA0 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5449C11268D; Mon, 15 May 2006 19:00:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Matthias Clasen In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:01:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.559 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.559 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:00:51 -0000 Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 12:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to > get one done tomorrow. > > GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. Thanks for letting us know! Do you strongly advise us to wait for 2.9.1 or is it okay to use 2.9.0? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Mon May 15 13:14:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AFA3B1AF1 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12356-02 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0473B0817 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so101300nzf for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Dh72kv5Uz1wXGWaTQZhCXVeM7iwafxDbub7XiNx6ZLxu0tO3f0RdEp6ecY0pOgoweT+DpKmi4y2eaZsDQt0R2Kzj7xniYltTuSoTkMnbIaCqVTElY6T8osbg3abU7KIHb9EdImltHv3iYYfBtbazfMucvtCR7oobcB9z11og1ik= Received: by 10.36.79.12 with SMTP id c12mr1731319nzb; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:45 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Vincent Untz" In-Reply-To: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.516 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.516 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:14:50 -0000 On 5/15/06, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le lundi 15 mai 2006 =E0 12:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a =E9crit : > > I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to > > get one done tomorrow. > > > > GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. > > Thanks for letting us know! > Do you strongly advise us to wait for 2.9.1 or is it okay to use 2.9.0? > 2.9.0 has a deadlock in the printing code... of course, there are not that many apps (=3D=3D none) using the printing stuff yet, so its not terribly important. Other than that, going with 2.9.0 should be pretty ok. You're missing quite a few bug fixes, but 2.9.1 will be out shortly anyway... Matthias From kaffeetisch@gmx.de Mon May 15 14:23:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3D93B1B5F for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17193-07 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 863E33B1B67 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 May 2006 18:23:34 -0000 Received: from port-212-202-210-90.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) [212.202.210.90] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 15 May 2006 20:23:34 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2092818 From: Torsten Schoenfeld To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:23:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1147717414.12928.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.467 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.467 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Gtk2-Perl 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:23:37 -0000 Aloha, the tarballs that make up Gtk2-Perl 2.15.2 can be found at /home/users/tsch/gtk2-perl/2.15.2 on master.gnome.org. -- Bye, -Torsten From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Mon May 15 14:31:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF18D3B1B5A for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17830-03 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CE33B08D6 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 60886]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25615-18495>; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:30:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:30:49 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.574 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.574 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: gok 1.0.10 uploaded (was Re: gok 1.0.9 available!) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:31:49 -0000 Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > >> OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally >> mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: >> >> put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and >> put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 >> ? >> > > You could do it that way (the release team will generally know, based on > your release patterns and announcements anyway), or... > > Thanks all... I've just uploaded a 1.0.10 tarball to resolve some naughtiness in 1.0.9., and this is for the 2.14 branch. Here's the plan: gok-1.0.x == 2.14 (happening on a gok cvs gnome-2-14 branch) and gok-1.1.x == 2.15 (on head) at least for this cycle. (I plan to move to matching gnome versions on the next cycle but am waiting for a response from some GOK people). cheers, David >> Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? >> Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? >> > > That's generally the easiest way to do it. Reduces margin for human error. > :-) > > - Jeff > > From newren@gmail.com Mon May 15 14:51:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525A13B0409 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19517-02 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0763B07ED for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x7so206723nzc for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sjHTCwZZEHmAJ0VuZhF7GqvUiH6znEp5yz69F+hyEsSp3EXR9fcs85V2VPYjKjU8YX2JkMmMb4cY5FuF94tuW1AlcMD4UZrsnwr0YaOKSu7HxUdifXU1X/ctsSTccjX8BaEBxQNTwIfH8VDYlj06XGpQ09mM7bHvIhe85rEe2Ek= Received: by 10.37.15.59 with SMTP id s59mr6089045nzi; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605151151p30f1bd8avf31a40884f483dd5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:51:21 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "David Bolter" In-Reply-To: <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.10 uploaded (was Re: gok 1.0.9 available!) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:51:25 -0000 On 5/15/06, David Bolter wrote: > Thanks all... > > I've just uploaded a 1.0.10 tarball to resolve some naughtiness in > 1.0.9., and this is for the 2.14 branch. > > Here's the plan: > > gok-1.0.x =3D=3D 2.14 (happening on a gok cvs gnome-2-14 branch) > and > gok-1.1.x =3D=3D 2.15 (on head) > > at least for this cycle. (I plan to move to matching gnome versions on > the next cycle but am waiting for a response from some GOK people). Awesome, thanks for all your work. :) Elijah From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 02:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663923B1DAD for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24775-04 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CE23B1DA1 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id z3so170066nzf for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Foc9gW/8Xcb2Bib3AEpJ/5Da7DxwNezz3uRQIVG1DfDOiZ0WLOfoqPZ+fd/6vTG8R9jMmuSIG/yi9IslLVWCF8S4V+dtp8FQC/QkNtOEOh3CNAz0F/AHOrFVSPJB7gBdX7WAjNAMa35KlgsQgNptYO5DFKnYNzZ6KLbRrzHk0cc= Received: by 10.36.66.3 with SMTP id o3mr6730229nza; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 00:24:35 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Gnome Release Team" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Subject: 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:24:39 -0000 If anyone else wants to help smoketest 2.15.2, or even better be in charge of it, I've got modulesets up at http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.15.2. You may need to apply the configure patch from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D340163 to both libxml2 and libxslt. I've run into some other build problem with gnome-desktop (can't import libxml2), but am heading to bed now. From vuntz@gnome.org Tue May 16 04:24:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397343B1E1E for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32494-02 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F073B1E22 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 9B678112692; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 129.88.39.24 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vuntz) by vuntz.net with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42192.129.88.39.24.1147767841.squirrel@vuntz.net> In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "Vincent Untz" To: release-team@gnome.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.483 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.483 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:24:04 -0000 On Tue, May 16, 2006 08:24, Elijah Newren wrote: > If anyone else wants to help smoketest 2.15.2, or even better be in > charge of it, I've got modulesets up at > http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.15.2. You may need to apply > the configure patch from > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340163 to both libxml2 and > libxslt. I've run into some other build problem with gnome-desktop > (can't import libxml2), but am heading to bed now. The libxml2 bindings are not installed where they should. I added a comment to the bug. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 16 22:59:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDFC3B207F for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31959-10 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F72A3B2021 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so80555nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hB47R93IsJ3qdii/len3jyxjVRUZa8F97UYCtfQmLLhB9bAZdP6sV5DWLPv29jBEmac7s21T3VqiydQs3nLjI/uk/K7T6Yd2ZzJfkmcrVf01YLv6zoPxdZ9mmZ21dOAakNBaS32eZHIkWB2WI1o+q6UXhAs7IsE5o1f7ew5JX9I= Received: by 10.36.220.69 with SMTP id s69mr270615nzg; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:19 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Release the hounds!" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.518 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.518 X-Spam-Level: Subject: more po/LINGUAS disaster X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 02:59:21 -0000 I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... Matthias From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 23:22:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95C3B0259 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00788-07 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8A93B1657 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so84312nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rnze/V6WlV3W3C6oni+td4IJb2zH3CKBwpGyqvkTccsbcSenoTX0I2/rXitYoakGvfR2CVNsobFKPXmM0jUUtAdDgbmdyJxW0wjuVm39IOs+caADPIzTLBqOhJOmxFfWk5zOjSzaj5FIZellQA8lcFTOsIAPKHhfanjCiXnWgZ0= Received: by 10.36.221.31 with SMTP id t31mr339136nzg; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:22:26 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" , "Gnome Desktop Development List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: more po/LINGUAS disaster -- we need re-rolled tarballs before 2.15.2 goes out X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:22:30 -0000 On 5/16/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance > is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... Indeed, it looks like we'll either have to use lots of 2.14.x tarballs or else get lots of new re-rolled ones. We may need to hold up the 2.15.2 release. Could the affected maintainers (see below) roll new releases after upgrading their local copy of intltool[1], or contact the release-team and ask us if you need us to roll it for you? We may contact individuals soonish if you don't contact us. Thanks, and sorry for the headache. In the directory with my latest testing build for gnome2.15.2, I find: 1055 newren@amr:newrenTemp/tarball-gnome$ for i in `find . -type d -name po -maxdepth 2`; do echo $(ls -l $i | wc -l) $i; done | sort -n -r 10 ./gnome-system-monitor-2.14.2/po 10 ./gnome-games-2.15.2/po 10 ./fast-user-switch-applet-2.15.1/po 10 ./deskbar-applet-2.15.1/po 9 ./vte-0.13.0/po 9 ./totem-1.5.0/po 9 ./sound-juicer-2.15.2/po 9 ./gnome-terminal-2.15.0/po 8 ./evolution-webcal-2.7.0/po 1 ./libglade-2.5.1/po 1 ./dbus-0.61/po Looking at these, it appears that gnome-system-monitor, gnome-games, fast-user-switch-applet, deskbar-applet, vte, totem, sound-juicer, gnome-terminal, and evolution-webcal were rolled without translations (libglade and dbus don't have any translations, just a stub of a directory, so they're merely false positives). Thanks. [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-May/msg00009.htm= l, http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-May/msg00016.html From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 23:41:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9A63B0EEE for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01776-05 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798E23B0ECD for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so87311nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=btMc1xOh1AAwWhEtL2qHAQ51qu/rPBnTzOXMLLFFd/0+jtB1l/Ll8BqXT+SFQvX35OwoHyAXEjXBvBB1hR/1MbedtxA+LvCy+sjak+v0Y+VOIejjOOLtgm/3GbO5r7lRbPYvGM8WZUo+TATJ3IfebKPLjGXMtdarHsCdAgX9W4A= Received: by 10.36.12.16 with SMTP id 16mr546141nzl; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605162041v4be85c8ej6115381a77acb9d8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:41:56 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Release the hounds!" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Matthias Clasen Subject: Re: more po/LINGUAS disaster -- we need re-rolled tarballs before 2.15.2 goes out X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:41:59 -0000 On 5/16/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/16/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance > > is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... > > Indeed, it looks like we'll either have to use lots of 2.14.x tarballs > or else get lots of new re-rolled ones. We may need to hold up the > 2.15.2 release. Could the affected maintainers (see below) roll new > releases after upgrading their local copy of intltool[1], or contact > the release-team and ask us if you need us to roll it for you? We may > contact individuals soonish if you don't contact us. Thanks, and > sorry for the headache. Since not everyone reads d-d-l: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342061 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342062 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342063 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342064 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342065 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342066 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342067 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342068 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342069 I'm a SPAM-o-matic machine! :-) From newren@gmail.com Wed May 17 13:01:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5803B1084 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14934-05 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317133B1073 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id v1so56678nzb for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Q/CJgFYcaQgfKPHtt0wGGyeSiM6TEcAYVgV5XiPJ0m16TYc1AZR3AOtBHV7Pq0EaD8OU4yjr1qbTXu4vc8LLoLcstUBg2ofOT3IcvfpKtO5LEOSgdFcPcSxG8KPmrusDMPLyrd4AQzqZSzDoz9lYA8xHqpyAjpxl9gwrVGil6gU= Received: by 10.36.32.12 with SMTP id f12mr1123614nzf; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:01:04 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: veillard@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:01:06 -0000 Hi Daniel, The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the headache. Thanks for all your time and effort. :) Elijah [1] We also have patches up at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/2.15.2/ for the most recent tarballs; bug-340163.patch applies to both modules, while fix-python-path.patch just applies to libxml2. From carlos_garnacho@yahoo.es Wed May 17 16:42:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056A93B0492; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28883-04; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (174.Red-83-46-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.46.28.174]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCDA3B0332; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94E3E13F54; Wed, 17 May 2006 22:42:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Carlos Garnacho To: release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1147884171.7850.59.camel@localhost> References: <1147884171.7850.59.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:42:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1147898530.7850.65.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.642 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 1.642 X-Spam-Level: * Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, system-tools-list@gnome.org Subject: gnome-system-tools branched for 2.14 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:42:15 -0000 Resent, it seems it didn't arrive, apologies for any duplicate... On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:42 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hello all, > > As usual, there's now a gnome-2-14 branch, which will be left in the > cold, being fed with small maintenance patches until it finally dies. > > HEAD will get all the love, the big plan for it is to get rid of the > cranky XML interface and use liboobs to communicate with > system-tools-backends HEAD through DBus. PolicyKit will be studied in > depth to replace the g-s-t handmade auth method. > > Regards > From newren@gmail.com Wed May 17 19:43:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69033B0544 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04373-10 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A713B04A2 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so289655nzh for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lMigi3RXNrZwCqwBzMBNmk3T5VVbRdRznh25jX1YmpsfUz3skQwr5yE085StB/1egzoLzuZb9zy8m6elTPJLTKKNV0sCM+ioK0e1mbp0HHJwzz2urSF7qpsEeI5sBUJ1OVObnWQt4XOg5ZXMni8zOsLcVaHkALqMvtLKy9Wjpk8= Received: by 10.37.2.66 with SMTP id e66mr1816263nzi; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:43:22 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: thomas@apestaart.org, "Gnome Release Team" , gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:43:24 -0000 Hi, I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on ftp.gnome.org? - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause potential problems of some kind? Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192= .html. Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release set altogether and be considered an external dependency? Thanks, Elijah From vuntz@gnome.org Thu May 18 02:24:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114C43B2482 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21540-10 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA7B3B10B2 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8D2112699; Thu, 18 May 2006 08:24:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Elijah Newren In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:25:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: Cc: thomas@apestaart.org, gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 06:24:18 -0000 Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 17:43 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > Hi, > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > ftp.gnome.org? > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > potential problems of some kind? I'll let GStreamer people answer this :-) > Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from > last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192.html. > Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release > set altogether and be considered an external dependency? I strongly oppose to those solutions: we want GStreamer in our platform (so the external dependency way is not a solution), but it means API/ABI guarantee, which only GStreamer 1.0 will offer. I'd obviously like this to be ASAP, but I guess GStreamer people are already doing their best :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From vuntz@gnome.org Thu May 18 05:48:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFFE3B0850 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32633-04 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903053B0E64 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 635B6112698; Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 129.88.39.24 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vuntz) by vuntz.net with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53341.129.88.39.24.1147945684.squirrel@vuntz.net> In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) From: "Vincent Untz" To: "Elijah Newren" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: thomas@apestaart.org, gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:48:08 -0000 On Thu, May 18, 2006 01:43, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi, > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > ftp.gnome.org? > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > potential problems of some kind? After having asked Christian, I'm uploading the tarballs to ftp.gnome.org right now. I'll finish the 2.15.2 release after this. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From thomas@apestaart.org Thu May 18 06:46:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786A3B11C0; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03148-05; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.es6.egwn.net (server02.es6.egwn.net [195.10.6.12]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543503B11E1; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.fr4.egwn.net (server07.fr4.egwn.net [62.39.85.77]) by mx1.es6.egwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469A44F8301; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.fr4.egwn.net (spiffy mail daemon) with ESMTP id 46FC583B82; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.fr4.egwn.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server07.fr4.egwn.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14871-08; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thread.fluendo.lan (core.fluendo.com [195.10.6.237]) by mx1.fr4.egwn.net (spiffy mail daemon) with ESMTP id D6BB583B6B; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thomas.fluendo.lan (thomas.fluendo.lan [192.168.1.10]) by thread.fluendo.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0183F106354; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Vander Stichele To: Vincent Untz In-Reply-To: <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1147949202.2630.219.camel@otto.amantes> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned: By amavis at egwn.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_SBL=3.16] X-Spam-Score: 0.616 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team , gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:46:50 -0000 On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 08:25 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 17:43 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > > ftp.gnome.org? > > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > > potential problems of some kind? sorry. It's just our fault, simple human error. We were uploading tarballs before just fine, but due to a) a change in how we release stuff (automate more, write more scripts, ...) and b) us trying to get more people involved in actually releasing this just fell of the radar. I personally would proceed as we did before. We should upload these tarballs. > > Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from > > last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192.html. > > Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release > > set altogether and be considered an external dependency? > > I strongly oppose to those solutions: we want GStreamer in our platform > (so the external dependency way is not a solution), but it means API/ABI > guarantee, which only GStreamer 1.0 will offer. I'd obviously like this > to be ASAP, but I guess GStreamer people are already doing their > best :-) I would also not change anything here. Every GStreamer stable series offers a stable API/ABI. Every time we feel GNOME should move to a new one (which isn't very often - once every sixteen months on average looking at the history) we will discuss it with GNOME and work something out together. Thomas From veillard@redhat.com Thu May 18 09:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F823B124D for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11530-02 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948CD3B0E49 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5mYc031886; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:48 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5hIY007374; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5ho2007519; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k4ID5hP1007393; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:42 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: Elijah Newren Message-ID: <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> References: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.367 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:05:52 -0000 On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; > it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build > problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both > addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but > is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if > they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the > headache. I'm on vacations, with very very limited IP access, sorry I can't work on this before I come back at the end of the month ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From newren@gmail.com Thu May 18 09:45:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1787C3B255B for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13857-02 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E73F3B0FB2 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id n1so335698nzf for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uGMnGN8gFpGPkyql5scsS9IBVfi1drqjqE8jQFXOglk8TbmC7vEmtJPRHkviUc9c31EDBdo0VSsOnNL3EwnRR/dJJBK5Z1j/D9BghZm94yExV1IPnFEA5AlWnlq+cYr1MfY41D80pRcFoH0/8vPeGDkbBSrFAJ+ZaUaFBy133iI= Received: by 10.36.224.62 with SMTP id w62mr532207nzg; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605180645g6a3a98ebtc32ae8d6154cbce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:45:33 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: veillard@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:45:36 -0000 On 5/18/06, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; > > it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build > > problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both > > addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but > > is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if > > they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the > > headache. > > I'm on vacations, with very very limited IP access, sorry I can't work > on this before I come back at the end of the month ! That's okay, we can work around it for now. I hope you enjoy your well deserved vacation. :-) Cheers, Elijah From jacofishburn@healys.com Thu May 18 12:30:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9246D3B25D4 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24110-01 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fwtinc.com (adsl-068-157-239-053.sip.mem.bellsouth.net [68.157.239.53]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FC733B25CB for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000001c67a97$cf0fd710$d0bfa8c0@mqe23> From: "Jacopo Fishburn" To: release-team@gnome.org Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:26:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.71 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, HTML_40_50=0.496, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, TW_PR=0.077] X-Spam-Score: 0.71 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: crdit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jacopo Fishburn List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:30:07 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Home 0vvner, Your crredit doesn't matter to us! If you OVVN reeal essttate and want IMMEDlATE cassh to sppend ANY way you like, or simply wish to LOVVER your monthly paayments by a third or more, here are the deeals we have TOdDAY: $ 490 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 65 % $ 370 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 90 % $ 250 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 35 % $ 200 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 55 % go to the web site =20 Jacopo Fishburn , Apprroval Mannager =20 again. In the end they decided to mince them fine and boil them. So they got a black pot, and they took out their knives. No good boiling =18em! We aint got no water, and its a long way to the well and all, said a voice. Bert and William thought it was Toms. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Home 0vvner,

Your crredit doesn't matter to us!

If you OVVN reeal essttate and want
IMMEDlATE cassh to sppend ANY=20 way you like,
or simply wish to LOVVER your monthly paayments
=20 by a third or more,
here are the deeals we have TOdDAY:

$ 490 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 65 %
$ 370 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 90 %
$ 250 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 35 %
$ 200 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 55 %

go to the web = site

Jacopo Fishburn , Apprroval Mannager
 
again. In the end they decided to mince them fine and boil them. So = they
got a black pot, and they took out their knives.
No good boiling =80=98em! We aint got no water, and its a long way = to
the well and all, said a voice. Bert and William thought it was = Toms.
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10-- From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 19 10:49:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75943B28B5 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26426-06 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856193B28A8 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D1E37C; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:49:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: alleykat@gmail.com, Mark McLoughlin Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:49:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.569 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: gnome-menus 2.14.x X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:49:54 -0000 Hi guys, while checking alacarte 0.9.1, I noticed some problems with gnome-menus in CVS : -alacarte 0.9.1 requires some api added after 2.14.0 release was done, which is in CVS HEAD -alacarte 0.9.1 only requires gnome-menus >= 2.14 (but won't build with it) -there has been no branching in gnome-menus for 2.14, so I don't know if this api addition is supposed to be in 2.14.x or is only 2.15 material. Could you enlighten us about those small issues ? Thanks you. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 19 16:01:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B823B17AA for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16410-10 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761DB3B17DC for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x29so265001nfb for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fvthcN+VHNJSI99ciHpYBcSU5y7Lx/5dYgu3NaUmCl/RJfpbzaSaLUDkq3gbH6RSKyZQqBZBVrplkLwJFJpUXIq+XROnv+MGKizTksrUkUg90cy5H5OLQ3oYdKuYb9Jz0eAQcLg1KHDf1zOZORhEozmQPxpTjLENWZfoWkYUbEM= Received: by 10.49.87.3 with SMTP id p3mr1720393nfl; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.30.1 with HTTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:01:12 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: "Frederic Crozat" In-Reply-To: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.622 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.558, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -1.622 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: gnome-menus 2.14.x X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:01:24 -0000 On 5/19/06, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Hi guys, > > while checking alacarte 0.9.1, I noticed some problems with gnome-menus > in CVS : > -alacarte 0.9.1 requires some api added after 2.14.0 release was done, > which is in CVS HEAD > -alacarte 0.9.1 only requires gnome-menus >=3D 2.14 (but won't build with > it) Yeah, that's my goof. I use gnome-menus 2.14.0 with the patches I provided that are in HEAD so my copy is still 2.14.0. > -there has been no branching in gnome-menus for 2.14, so I don't know if > this api addition is supposed to be in 2.14.x or is only 2.15 material. > > Could you enlighten us about those small issues ? > I see no reason why it couldn't be in 2.14.x but that's up to Mark. > Thanks you. > -- > Frederic Crozat > Mandriva > > --=20 Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From rosechr@gmail.com Sun May 21 16:33:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4D13B0E0B for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30068-05 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F673B0FC6 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so1274772pye for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kqMI89e3/CVg6/j5eHVD/drKL1+Z4JNEPL0SsNtQT+wSRlC8Lo3rDq04m7xTMg0t7eY42H8UjCEtzLZKOfLXdwMde88Hkfm26bUq3QpA1bFh5C7bxwimH07x20zoVnj5pdfo+yZCEMgGx9Bp9PjfB8e1GyJvEKaUHLPFYHFrFTI= Received: by 10.35.9.2 with SMTP id m2mr2138297pyi; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.30.14 with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 22:33:28 +0200 From: "Christian Rose" Sender: rosechr@gmail.com To: "ash@contact.bg" In-Reply-To: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> X-Google-Sender-Auth: bb5bae8fb296523f X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.187, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.413 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:33:31 -0000 On 5/19/06, ash@contact.bg wrote: > Hi, > I took the liberty of fixing a simple typo in Deskbar. > It will make a string per language fuzzy. > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/deskbar/handlers/desklicious.= py?r1=3D1.2&r2=3D1.3&sortby=3Ddate While I agree that fixing typos and other string changing bugs is important, technically they are string freeze breaks, and as such they require approval. So while I am perfectly happy with giving you a post approval for this particular change, please *ask in advance* for approval for string freeze breaking bug fix patches in the future. Thanks, Christian From ash@contact.bg Sun May 21 17:07:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259E73B0C83; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31730-08; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (unknown [85.187.24.218]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293D33B0752; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (Stamat.Minka.Localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4LL6nEV014927; Mon, 22 May 2006 00:06:49 +0300 From: Alexander Shopov To: Christian Rose In-Reply-To: <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 00:06:49 +0300 Message-Id: <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.284 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.315, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.284 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:07:18 -0000 While Christian is right that this would be a string break - deskbar has been branched for gnome-2-14: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/?only_with_tag=gnome-2-14 The branching was done in the early April. The commit has not been made to the gnome-2-14 branch, just to HEAD. I wanted to inform people just in case builds broke due to my commit who would be to blame. Maybe I left you with the impression that I committed to gnome-2-14. Now - looking at the statistics page - I see that gnome-2-14 still lists HEAD as the branch for stable po's. That may need a change. Kind regards: al_shopov Ð’ нд, 2006-05-21 в 22:33 +0200, Christian Rose напиÑа: > On 5/19/06, ash@contact.bg wrote: > > Hi, > > I took the liberty of fixing a simple typo in Deskbar. > > It will make a string per language fuzzy. > > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/deskbar/handlers/desklicious.py?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&sortby=date > > While I agree that fixing typos and other string changing bugs is > important, technically they are string freeze breaks, and as such they > require approval. > So while I am perfectly happy with giving you a post approval for this > particular change, please *ask in advance* for approval for string > freeze breaking bug fix patches in the future. > > Thanks, > Christian > From rosechr@gmail.com Sun May 21 17:30:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12AE3B0E86 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01019-10 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000533B0E79 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so1280351pye for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OQ+6lq6GPPpkYkenrDWIAetG3josKPWaa5vi3LUrgRnmBtLQSyZzceqhCWNmSajxnv3Bruo2B3DdYBwXSQ7ya+mXQ4bsnLdpRWvpSyu0zGv1W3bN/k1Yb2Hfs++HlwjfMobwuZt/mPe0uz6WtCIIhF9FwT3I3qO+w1DgLFh/siQ= Received: by 10.35.111.7 with SMTP id o7mr3049771pym; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.30.14 with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97da516f0605211430s2df2e6b4ldbc70114bc5d723d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 23:30:46 +0200 From: "Christian Rose" Sender: rosechr@gmail.com To: "Alexander Shopov" In-Reply-To: <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cefbe8646eb8a0ea X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.415 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.415 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:30:48 -0000 On 5/21/06, Alexander Shopov wrote: > While Christian is right that this would be a string break - deskbar has > been branched for gnome-2-14: > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/?only_with_tag=3Dgnome-2-14 > The branching was done in the early April. > > The commit has not been made to the gnome-2-14 branch, just to HEAD. [...] > Maybe I left you with the impression that I committed to gnome-2-14. Yes, sorry, I assumed wrong. My apologies. > Now - looking at the statistics page - I see that gnome-2-14 still lists > HEAD as the branch for stable po's. That may need a change. Are you sure? According to http://l10n-status.gnome.org/gnome-2.14/sv/desktop/index.html , the stable deskbar-applet is gnome-2-14, and Danilo's ChangeLog entry for the change is dated March 13th. Christian From vuntz@gnome.org Fri May 26 10:50:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870313B0934 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32175-04 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7723B042F for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC124112693 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 16:50:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:52:04 +0200 Message-Id: <1148655124.5506.149.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [Fwd: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release] X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:50:29 -0000 Hey, Any volunteer to drive this release? :-) (I should be able to do some smoketesting) Cheers, -------- Message transféré -------- De: Vincent Untz Répondre à: gnome-hackers@gnome.org À: devel-announce-list@gnome.org Sujet: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:50:29 +0200 Hi everyone, If you think it's not useful to make a tarball for your module because no code changed, please look at the translations: many translation teams would love to see their work used by the users ;-) Of course, everyone is also welcome to help smoketest the release. To learn how to do this, see: http://live.gnome.org/Smoketesting The release team will be pleased to see other people join the smoketesting effort :-) Tarballs are due on Monday May 29th (next Monday) before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Please make sure that your tarballs will be uploaded before Monday 23:59 UTC: tarballs uploaded later than that will probably be too late to get in 2.14.2. If you are not able to make a tarball before Monday or if you think you'll be late, please send a mail to the release team and we'll find someone to roll the tarball for you! The schedule for 2.14 stable releases and more informations about making releases can be seen on the 2.15 page on the wiki: http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointFifteen Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From kaffeetisch@gmx.de Mon May 29 15:02:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E61A3B043D for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00520-06 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E06A33B0516 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 May 2006 19:02:53 -0000 Received: from port-212-202-210-207.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) [212.202.210.207] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 29 May 2006 21:02:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2092818 From: Torsten Schoenfeld To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:02:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1148929373.4443.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.533 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.533 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Gtk2-Perl 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:02:56 -0000 Aloha, the tarballs that make up Gtk2-Perl 2.14.2 can be found at /home/users/tsch/gtk2-perl/2.14.2 on master.gnome.org. -- Bye, -Torsten From mclasen@redhat.com Tue May 30 00:31:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E673B00FB for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28667-04 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB873B00BD for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4U4Vpmm020426 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:51 -0400 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4U4VpXC015941; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:51 -0400 Received: from [172.16.83.134] (vpn83-134.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.134]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4U4VoND014151; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:50 -0400 From: Matthias Clasen To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 00:33:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1148963591.2923.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.2.1 (2.7.2.1-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.542 X-Spam-Level: Cc: alexl@redhat.com Subject: gnome-panel 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 04:31:54 -0000 Just to let you know: gnome-panel 2.14.2 requires gnome-vfs 2.14.2, which does not exist yet. I can ask Alex to do a gnome-vfs release tomorrow. Actually, I'll just cc him. Matthias From mclasen@redhat.com Tue May 30 15:42:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9CD3B01D5 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25449-10 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF9C3B0426 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4UJgcPV005645 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Received: from mail.boston.redhat.com (mail.boston.redhat.com [172.16.76.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4UJgcxa017224 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Received: from golem.boston.redhat.com (golem.boston.redhat.com [172.16.80.24]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4UJgcWc002213 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 From: Matthias Clasen To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1149018158.21661.15.camel@golem.boston.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.1 (2.7.1-1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.543 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.543 X-Spam-Level: Subject: gnome-backgrounds 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:42:41 -0000 Another victim of the po/LINGUAS disaster. gnome-backgrounds-2.14.2 comes with zero translations... Matthias From rabble@illustrationfriday.com Tue May 30 19:06:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7804A3B04E7; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:06:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05110-10; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:06:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ftth-59-153-126-86.rdspt.ro (unknown [82.79.128.59]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 750873B029E; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:05:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:06:05 +0000 From: "rory grabiela" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5.0.10) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <19134489.20060106000802@82.79.128.59> To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----------53D40CE1F627A89B" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER MIME error: error: part did not end with expected boundary X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.841, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 1.844 X-Spam-Level: * Subject: The total of bad luck in the universe is a constant X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rabble@illustrationfriday.com List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:06:07 -0000 ------------53D40CE1F627A89B Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit dilator Welcome!

nifed[dot]com


----

is not to pay attention," and he began to get ready to drive into town, and again to his mother's to get her signature to the deeds. She heard the sound of his steps about the study and the dining room. At the drawing room he stood still. But he did not turn in to see her, he merely gave an order that the horse should be given to Voytov if he came while he was away. Then she heard the carriage brought round, the door opened, and he came out again. But he went back into the porch again, and someone was running upstairs. It was the valet running up for his gloves that had been forgotten. She went to the window and saw him take the gloves without looking, and touching the coachman on the back he said something to him. Then without looking up at the window he settled himself in his usual attitude in the carriage, with his legs crossed, and drawing on his gloves he vanished round the corner. Chapter 27 "He has gone! It is over!" Anna said to herself, standing at the window; and in answer to this statement the impression of the darkness when the candle had flickered out, and of her fearful dream mingling into one, filled her heart with cold terror. "No, that cannot be!" she cried, and crossing the room she rang the bell. She was so afraid now of being alone, that without waiting for the servant to come in, she went out to meet him. "Inquire where the count has gone," she said. The servant answered that the count had gone to the stable. "His honor left word that if you cared to drive out, the carriage would be back immediately." "Very good. Wait a minute. I'll write a note at once. Send Mihail with the note to the stables. Make haste." She sat down and wrote:


------------53D40CE1F627A89B Content-Type: image/gif; name="tfdsgtuo.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <53D40CE1.F627A89B.53D40CE1.F627A89B_csseditor> R0lGODdhIgJrAcIAAP///8x4edzc3OgFJAAAAAICAgZg5uEJCSwAAAAAIgJrAQAD/gi63P4w ikirXfPqDTL/lAeOjEie5gmm6se22gtf8hzaeC7pXM2Xv1jQ4ht2jDfkTvkoDp0/KHN6pDak OmzWCuRivAptTmwjl8FVNNo8Y7fcjYF8EJ/PwwC7naFf6O9CG3t8dIQKf3IdiIZ+hYeFiJB9 Hn2PdY9/CwSbm01ranAoaqCkYKF5jqiNhhOJEK6qsSNQsLK1sbdhtbC7qa65jEe9lsHEmgTH DqezpV7LoyvNXKfDxqqtqcW/2RScyEednA/VssTAArfbjbySFLDYjOnZwMlXn/fO0KbSVqG5 6qvgjeNmrdu3ThO8dbrE0Jajc/JW5TlkjJ4xdAQLRoSw/tDePnzT9OUD2Q/GP0mVsGXC1Gtl g44ANiX89oobO4moMmHURkcdO5eydtZcVIwBzC4jPyYVOeVZNKUnTlpLJHDoTQswZcakOdDB VYdNiK7y+TDjxZ/tigI7ijQkSSpOmRLhB9ekzbSNqlYAWCErgZnu7hoiV+KrJV9gI7zbuBGn Ua4el7qV3E+A5cuYM2vezLmz58+gQ4seTbo0ZzmYUVtWfVk168yvXQ8ILfNy7dqdY89OPVv3 6d2rgQcXPoe359cYjSdX3lq46efQo0ufTr06dbp1oUb1VZZVuWCGDSpAuHUvd6+NC8873/B7 Q718NRJk+0V7Sftyn2Bn8mzQ/rpBKlWSU0sCOuANHvShRw8g/+0hFHiCNQiITg069t1akLV1 H3785dfUfkrE1cNb2VFW4mQmduhhiCAiIeIGL9LQohExysihiimuOMaM+pGIY44u8hhEjXPd qOMZPrKYZJBL0ihkFE/yQOSRUyYBJJNXOmkklih2eeKRUka5RZM9bllmlkOKuSOYaZLZpplv ogmlm3PCWacz1uWp55589unnn4AGKuighBZq6KGdqbmmnHduyOiYdoZJp6RsUvroopfiUOUS mWo6qaWOVurppyoUUICGoS5gqhGratBqGzy8yqkCsv6wqgC1/ujlh6Kq2sCpT8UK7KysDpsG FbdC/pBrrhW0+iqzqg67rLEw/kotCNBq6Oy1DGTrwLYdgKtrqrz2CoCs3BYpbAWbnmtsu548 MO0Jz6ZLq7T2BouDt3h0m6+/I9wqrpKRQtqrqdJGW6+7DIswMML43mstwve+iivF8mLsbr0a A1yxsRArzO2qJOO78AQQA5vyx9SWzDDDK688cckac3xtzAvDrHLHIb+8MbUZyGwzyzNH3PDA XO46LpunOivxyy4nG+3T4iL9NNQ7Xz21sln7vLWpKHf99c1Nl0111hefrfa3Zldt9LxrW+0x 2FgTPXfLXcsadtx5j9y3xGl7rWXBmIqa9d86Nzzz2Gt7XPfjjouM+N17/v8sOdmJ/wxu4G5r PbXLkMuds9vMblu51ULjzfK7j2/bc+mICyx20uQuDabJfCduQs+tz35154ILDjzcdA8dPMCg z8t57H5n/rDvPgNvubX3nj679I3bMzzmbOe+fLmdwrqGaQVgBvbFlp2P/vqbqb/++fCXn5n6 8acvv/v2z3///vnr3z/+9Utf+/jXP1z9j4ABxN9lAvg++TVQM/RDoAMLuEAJHtB8FsRgASd4 wQcKkH0a9CADEUXCEprQMgH7lcju1q/ITc9uE/sYBni3OLuJzmQ49Be0kMa7ZKXud8Qz2sYg p8PeybB77rKe52Q2PePV54dHrFjRGPc921mR/nbmUsHu/jWq8InPc2dSGsH2xcVj1e6Kg8si DLYIvjOyiIZYbOOXZsCvFopxjG5U44hI1UUvvkFRSCJcH++YRj2Kgo+B9KMWAflFRR5SkIk0 JAkMoABKWqCM1XLVojBJr8jYilgt4KQZ50hKNBaylEeyZCUniZ2E1UmUKURVDuwVipvZKHyw jJcjH0lID6kSAL/kQDDJ5UpK5fIDQGMVKLH1rVv2UllrRGQkUamjX6rSANhkADatuc1VVjKb zZQi29JFMVz5KmUU2xm6OlbEMPSwZnXkGcaAZU5xvnCI9rynwlYYRXyGrGyuU4Y/ffXCHmIN ZD7kGD/h6AJpNjKP/jQyzTa3aRkDXMaiAsBoRit6UY5mRqML/OBnOGhAATrwfiH94ElFStKS lnSlLkWpSEfK0prOz6YrhSlMOSPTl6ZUpz9NqUuFitOgqnSnPZ3pTWOq1BM69alQ/cwIrOlN YFbVkte8ajdVeLx+0qoEriymyggaVtc57avnIitDayjWtC6UrFN0q1x1OFa0lnWecIWhO0GW V7eGla5iC9xb7RpNSE5TjmyiqlW9mdXFLharCxgmQsM5V7S6s69/Jaxlu0XZuvpVk5qVa9MI +tnQbtaytgwXaldbWdGyNl5nLa1sPdtawFENs6dlhmEfSs0VKbaxwI0sY4XLVdKSNrXn/qrn bHHr2s6yNrPN5WxoQeYB6Hp2tNMNZz2t+1zmVra63c3uXIv5VfA2F7q1Vdcz4wTR/CgWmOD8 JjfBec2tSped/Ixh2EaHXbHi154XcyLPMubE5NL1tfBEKOzMml98SuxtuQrwgQtasxiKU8KD FS1tM7lLEsDLk5LU7W6h6UzKyuuPSkFuo0gsXV52Ul/tZW9vQ8wuRo6Tw+1ksYtLpGJQ6Ti3 DQ2lhx1a2A6r8cMgnnEYlSxjxDoZjzH2MY1xvF4pPzmOpmzylU/JZCtPuUhl3DAzkfxEUR4z ybNcppPPTOVJYnWYECCzHatssGkIqqVE7QyeyWedPYPGzy31/jNUBR3VPBf6oxjFpmYUfehG O1pPTOBW0C7AZhXWkhn5GlmRPxnn/VS6xG7+ZiCMDOMui+Sf61SnOoMmT+sy+L80bHURX/cs wQVYnV41KGFpRk8Hm83C91xrghV8TlW/toj7zeE++5ngYn9gopF9swPoC+0HVBu+9sU2nNWc 5RUz7bjh5Sp3S9sycFt6uectblk9oenajrvW5V03Ba57bLRul7nwdm27DTzu++K2rGygtqgb IHD4TlvaBk94wUFt6sJVqq2a2+zr8G1XvtY7rSgL9/UkB+QjKFjM6TZtwm4N8iP2m+Pnnbi5 0+o3hGVcvE3sqw1HaYGJIjy+0R44/s51fvM3X1u9dHb4t8O9cnqHfLLRteXLTx7bHn8B4vs2 usUx7nSNX7zXRJc4uPftcYqLt9znFmbPB67NsRPc7Avf44gXmUWoe1fqeQU7xDm7dO/C3Oh4 cLtzQ75a5Zb83ca1N9xFblxyqurl6Ab8V/866YsXPO08J3vOFW52x/5LznNuODTmLk+Ty1qz Fb765+3ZeV8bF/EUrqHJW3yq/QZ+wv5dcNHzzewIlJPvyo79sjGOYGtXG/KUl3y047vwn1/e xij+cpDXzgHWEZntMJi6lYIu9G572/rKrw/zQat9UqudBANmOPbrrPlBlr8Mj06/+tfP/va7 //3wFw3y/pNPffNvmcvjrz6Uz7/p7Is//4d1f1oGgLzFf/RXfwXof9y2fwSYgAzYgAcYZeRn gNCngEAngfr3gFimgfgHgRWIgP1ngQu4gR3IgUtGgTuGgkP2fCkoggLFgiu4fSLmfW2mgjMI ghHogi8og6Vmgz0ogNfngS0ohDGog50GgzeIgfYHhF5mggPohEFohDTHhBNIhRlIgidohUtI hEkIF/H3hWAYhmI4hmRYhpkxfx/ogz8IhVFYglj4hG/YhjqIeVPIhk3ohngIh3koh1loh/5H h5gHiEjYhVxIiH54hX0ohYLIg2sYh3z4iJBYhYW4fFK4gzQ4apf4f4cYgJP4/n04mIZTZhHd RwLxUWMgIIo2gooaoIq6wIqImIh7GImvqIe0KBcAUYqe4IoSgYtXQQa4aBWzURCkaBbtkR0M 0ok1qIWcuIkOqCO3iBc7oIvoIYy9OALSaA7QuB2rSIz6kY2xKInMGIJq6ImV8owswR1UUSCq kAjm6B696B8DQggTUhbA0I58AY8VwhIKsg03wRj02B2oIALXCIrImIzhKI4FGQPPgRoMCRyy oRkPCZG9MZHBUZHLwRt6YJERuZG7gRwX2Rwa2ZEiaZGbwZEkCZIhORzIYZLLEZEnaYYwGZMy ORrD6BL3aAd6MRY9kRa8CJD2yJN4oY4DEoy4AJT1/giU1OiT3vgfuwiUGTCQOZiQmviN4EiV +jCPSomNOXkYO4mNSdmUXlmUYdmT9dGO8cgQZokTaVkHV/GMT8mNdwiLVrmMjliVzgiNP7mV YSmW7piVfPmTe4kTbxmYfTmWEfKXxFgNbomGRfiJQ3iQBMkm8XGTxYEJ05gYZEkMGEEg8kiZ UtEvaIESGSEg+DgVDCKK8kAgRAmVkVmXdlmLsriFisiYhgiZULmImTiVcrmbsal8uOmYj3kB t0mbjeiasmmcdDmHxEmJwFmbyNmMz4mQUmmKlWiJzVmccwmd2SmdkBmc2xmV5gKXutQsHQda rfdpjmWQ+7dtzUedsdSY/ieWXpc0npeEnt1XdbBin3UkSyRWV8cEiNLRG+gAQeYDHYRGGkkF HSAVfwu6UQbaZyREaIA2HTuFoJ5xoHqCoRc6KAkKf3ZBENJXh8VFR6rVAuw5goMzTCdKntM3 b3HJRZlGny5anjN6n3WBnrkkBiWHiWrUExMxorizezGXT3FHWMpVdpA1XNn0c8TlWPYVXDuH bcNXXzi3VdBGSb8XpaQnQ7fnYEMER8Y2bEPEah+HWgxmeqIlA/OETri2eGWKpuTWai23QnUH ZPhFa5nVegcWev75VgGVbF76X9CQEegkeFbXWqnVp1Q3bcIFXI2Vno0aWRmQpI+1opR6qd6U /lFXtalVFZ94Vz58Z6e9l3SIN3j+ZnV6yqKcB0bfRW5eh6iYVarymVt6N1YOY26KKnUjI6um ZS4WR0+mel13ynKueqSd6qSd+qja5KSTyqns+XvE5ahWGq1TCmcqJ1a8ii6eiqvHlWzBilcz t3h1qHIaBq4mNnG/ancaJ6vkNKwzN1qpOqq5mnUQw6t+ZZ9WkK4lqnjkJa79FW+MuqzD1aRw hqWSOrCPBQHBhbBJ6gELC6nqdnf2CjXbeqj8tnfB6lzxGrFJZ2Ks13WBarHcSivsGp+wSqvE urG1CnoyJy32inQHc6r39nUX17GLSnCRirDIam3a1Kw7u20Pi6mL/qWpP0uwGItgEytbp4p7 h8e0iTey9nay6BaqH1uniie114V6hoeyo+pWtxpe80p4JGuzr3c7rJdqsNdgRQewB0ellKpt ERBM2QatCmulTzq3VWqwPLdt19qtpLdO4ga1LptP5PpOW0pQqJdhB1W2Z9N0dwdr+QaqITph LRayUbu2rlquG1avNiuokvSbRhBMTqGiKAqbcakDvYavzAl+paa67rkvF1idIhqdwmSdJhqw MqqMyZlmlzVintuirvu6obSfADqTxnu8yJu8yguTy7m6uqudpvuavbm70wu91SsS4mm7/cm6 aDadEDuK46gBlCQFYcajlVu9csMuwaue/rP6gesbBD7KDSEKBesbiFO1Aexpv1MguivKuI3Z r6CCSQA8o0SSLz7wviB7vncJoudLv6fbm/3bpNrrvQKLARHcvsw5wIUjwP4bnwXcoh7rKfhp ixMhv2dLbBkmqH1rpij8sYfbWhlFfDJMbUtKeco6fEYrX40qtwRLfNQapXc7w/MlXwabpdY6 esYmMg6TTqO3p2i7VwBFNqqGp7Pmcrracij8T3AVUHYqYLJ2ayy3pgisAoQqNL17ta+Xp696 YnrXWlkVtFqVw6TbAULrqAq7swnLWJbqrNTKsHScwy6sxtO1O4K7d0+rwE7LtMC6WgDcyPLa bjHqtIPbb2OM/roym7Gae7SLR6bpK64ie6xwjMdFi7N/vEpu+7Y4+6h1HLfT6sfahqlE+8oY u8KzRcjPxVBtvHHj5LjhirgJM8WGXLgyN6RshW+c62q/mx/6OrOH7MjZBarpVTqd+3o87MrK +rDEFct6C7HPiserzLPW3McVPL43zLGJGqscq7TBzFqnY7KYe76L7MmRfMihil6Hil7Z2sFH ssyYjHdQy3vR1XFT58+bGsrXLM7Z/F6jfMdyjNDjzMfhvEraLMH3vK7pTNDTfLkgR8n/1rtd W8gZnXWSjM4crSl/MkEn5T4uV0Hww9KBttIorT8pvWcctNL2o0AxrFEU5VEOGsM9/l1RjPbT FxXUPA3UOu0ZC7rTRp1onTFRSz3URK3UPq3TiUbULo1BQMVSNq1BSIXTSMXSYF1BEEQ/RLXV Ng02MR3WSxVTZ70/LY3VHXprNz3TKK3S5ZPSN70nzRvC4LsBlQa6t2u+NYe75BhpgP283OnX fM2flRgjv2sGn3bYrMS+4FzBhT0EXcqIl02EI5x5sivZ3emd0TuLD3y9rUm7p62cg+i8iJ3a vFnasE3asX2c5eicw4xMbFsq2FlzF+xYgVjJIExp3HlmZaS/mk3ZRxK/59q9i826xvqeyE0B vV1Vo8thwI240A2fiCzcsUvBpWvao3CMhcfcIxp9Jarb/qyNv8/W1yfQ2+alBFiH2+CJwT92 hLnZ3aENBsoNpEIqpyxcsX363KjWwrr3LY0Hp9RixEjapA47rTS84HBLBFFMpBQebGbld276 wis0ehjmVX9bYGK6exW2n/Z938GdRWWscsxsqmnMsjfrwif7qWwM0g8d0VVgx5wqsO6N0e58 dYZacRUL4/3c4jTLtdwlb6I92tQbBSddoEz15Fkt1zd11z5V5U7+5FJO5S4daFjeUyRF1Ttt c0XN00wN1UHt1EKd10uF1zy11TaV5UKVoPU6VG/u5UXVVClz52z91lY+13G9vGaoTHm14mDb 4vBqpMj1btrqormMu3NcwT6b/sfHutASflrLQuSHjOHjdduNnsiYPuS92tmC3dpJrkf8XNEB jbnnuc5Ht3JgFcjU3NAIG+lva9AwImaJrsmlpekDzbUjDXMgfbX0Zs+2/drSa+onnGPELGzc KuCzx8te+urKzlBDjMPUPaWgnLcyTAMRo8LumsnVQ8yrd9G71+H69MKfaq5BCqelPttLroCg 7SLXXeKTDt7tLtvHnu/6TtsuGO+CrhTZ9p3zLfCube/a7d0e4u/Gvu/vzvDWa/C7reQPD+97 PeoIP8EXT96ofe/4zu8iqPASP/Ed7/Hu3vAkX/KJXdsRv6PcverlXd+b3d4WDwLdjGbzbtw0 6vAp/r/wJ58FATqgzjFUGrrW1dGhBzr00oGhDXpCDbr0SC8aTw8oUQ/oVF8oH+rOycTdNuDy 2/3yMe/1lS28P/DoXY/e7P1Gxz3zG3/worLflbvugaru0py5XN9gfAprxxW5bMUsVLrgExDw A9v3WkXDPhdMuoaon8c7ZPrsznZj+wTGSezhxQ7xEY/y2Ms1Kg7qChy2dY/qA4xdvIfRcyfO bzvRpJykC2vr6xx1WZfPX7e1iOr6U1vwlj/wPB+zg675uJyyiD7L4Pr5rlWnWBvrP6tKOQ3E VqW3NmfjqNx7rE+1L6u5tCXGNiP7PF75Or/zlC8Xp/7rjnzon+XsvTr7/ufkK8Kf67kltKIW yzxbxJP+zZIu5O62xgn8y5gewpP8qvaJ89eZ3lPW/QhQsArtLMpFn43i1Q1lu1SoKUIHilwX GgvbhgAruDH83vXt0jvV2ycVDESElYIjjmaorBybnpRtSgWUqtis1rrteinXr7gaHpvP5iSj MGKL2J8KfHqKZ4CpuUdPH7rlf35rSzgGhj6HXIY0MDwriTkxi4ULM4wOfBNME5mBV5lCmEFA gaIFnwpxnKBnZWhmrq9jsbJetLW4uVS3uli8XoR4Rr1iv7WXIcabucrEYGm4zc5c01vSztfV 2r7bWdlUwSg2373kW5NkwMTm0V+srd3p8bvz/lPs0QL5+vv8/f7/AAMKHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiw ocOHECNKnEixosWLCOvZ0ziOYzKPH0FSE3lPVkmTIkeCPImGZcoFA2B1UZUl3DCSvZBVObWs m0t1z2aWM6FJls0jNqv9lInz5auYUIUVlZa01SV0LSBJ8lEFEg1XOr2EpTfKTyl4Gu3UlLKz SxmatY5WVfpyaTGnsgbo7cOWKjGskX7k+DHWa1CuaMZuLCsu1CyOarEwlupN3Fyg9i5jq5vS LseoMXtaKNVJz+hgp+0xchRYR6QpLASjWxQbcewdhjepOgUn1bsif/jUCdS7T3DSwZsUF2XW N/IPoHY/Iap71QU3/qOWC8e0LDWnm01X4s0LrreqOypowi1Kfddq24i3vrZRO9IV2bZ1Coby YXp6qdDl8R0E05VFHBQCEuUfgGy1ZxkDBbK324AHOobef9wZl+Aonn3RoVvjTaNGA+gVEcUg hATo3grw4ZAfbC/wMFt8+0mSCDKpQNAfho4tJ0Qd6WnXYBumqUEdCRkyaN16EeTI04RMOEkh CsFcaKKGU07FWXgh6jJiJeplaeAbqrHomosxojnYYPdRcqabOOpogn9jiibgBW8N2ZggGEaW ZILtMSlnKhH2OGiWg2S2YVtA8ljJluJ12cuXVoTZ54B7OmbFe29e9SaNO7TZ2qes6VQH/p16 2qlJEoUaCuiJR6qU4qKwdscFlLYi6iCYtILTmKWHRSrsShidoo+xGbCxDxzLMpvBsc4um0+0 +9BmgD6LVGtIP9fmsy232HZrybeWeJvtDPzQ5q0/yLYL7bPT9oPssfxQCy+07sZbb73KTtuv v/22y9u//N4r8L8E62uwvvPSq3Cy+Src8L0QO/xPw9T2htHGHHe8D6TDcvQhiFx6NLIWJ6P8 imYbdeaypPWkXFnJIr9Mc8wgi8FyyzfPIzPMwZpsc8ga/SwP0UUPLXTPQK+Tc9JKQ820T0/j HLXVTW9jND1TU9211ldjvfTXdGUNdtjxbM3z2Ej7XLXbaHtt/nbZZE+jdkd12x233Gz3LfXc m+2tzd3g+f13zYLT3XbagCtuONx5O5243pMHHvlQnXms+eacd+7556CHLvropHP8NuSPo474 5boQHtLijLPeuDWn85267avfjrvYug8+u+Wwny17O5VLPnwtrgd9+O/I1y588L4Xj/nxKEnf OvPTQ+947tx3z7v3qoMfO/bEU/9K8o+af77116vfEvvkr9379st/X3/494+vPeXxV7HXzPP4 X/rq8T+ZCbBw2zjgLw5ovPnRD3/2g6DZ/kfB0DBwIxcEgAAz6IUKSkMvIERDATtowdCEAIQb NCECteFBLHCwfA7kXwyBJ760JUQv/vnAoQB0qMOB9HAfPfzhDQcwRCAuRIgQ4SERd7jE0ClR IEgsnRSnSMUqhs4MFYRJCUNIARRaAYUq1KAJU3hAL3bRjDjUYgY5aEYxulGMXGQiGVOoRRtk 8Y0thGMY3biXOZ6Riyds4x/9CMMa7k6C+jNk0/oIlTGW0I5EfCMMwHjHSj4Sj5EMJCSnYMkQ WrKOmATlBT+JyRK8kJGhTOUoM6lJVe6RKfuToSKjF8suUZKOkgSjKV+JS1L6MpNg3CQcRXlJ YhrTlaAMJCAtucs1NhKZqQxkLH5ZyPwl0pqHvGbjuLjMS7bQmWc8JjXFuMtkhlOcxYTmOFcp zDwKso6o/lTnHtM4SW+m833uQ0stGzhLoN0RnVospzDlCVByRvOcBD3nOu05UIWWsAzgzCVD JXnGaU70n4/JJyxnyE9sZg2j/9SlGuuJUEGaFI3AfKcau4nLQYZGjo4saCtnKlKVHnOlDuXk KlkaU31yNHv9lKVH+6cy+DXPqNXT6F2Quj6m4pOoT91n+5TqIefRUqrMsOoDoUoyqtpCq0Id algjqE2yZtOGVkyrWtfK1ra69a1wbQguXllULQgKKCTYGTTwlhblbeEySVEGrpL6OL1u9K9Z dapPyQcayizBL16q1BkM+7ptnMAcgOXGWjIV1dxNBqi+6slhxUfZr0IVkHt6/qxQInshnTW1 G5fd62a5JhnRdvZvn51qbW27VKaVtqvxa6yqmAOINyQnUcKAUl5J8RwUMRdXPCFurqSbnTlo rLh0OE5zMcUs7D6IR++g7lmcW5rTAMu45C3vBsYrnPZutzjOgU44TMMrUwDiOvJFL3JFgQrt 5jexpy2PkCR7qVpJ6ER2mBWsBGUiC6AKD42qU4Fd9SoE9yq5C04VB1rLXQxHATW36nCfqmKp K5W4wqEg0Yn3cGFNZdhRAOYqX05UIgSphxVSmhCHJ8xgGxPIFCCOsIaJ4CM5/Oq+TTLucUIb ByKxVw07bpR9LwXiVhGZvgJesQkGHKgir0EcNX6x/pNV9GUlI2q8hJWxqlR85hdTSU4KUnCg 2MPjH5MYvJgC1F3JVGfpquAtCv4vnfnE5ulqucl9sDKCGtTmCfdqLscN85x/VB4+m7goaF6s mqVwnkO7+chRiLKPNXWlDjzYsaMG9aT5culVLyHQbrZJp5U0aSkzQdFiDm2tR91qF1NH0lqG 8asbLeejbnq46kVykNAsZFFbh89mpjQ1wpvi56AmR89mrp6xvOz+spq7zN6uoZVta7OQaTif 1Y57iXRuI/vZu1P2kbzNvd/yAgs7mdZ00eL61okpxN/8Dvi/SzcxgHOu4AJvK1jHurJ8D3C3 HTXrWVcGQNhSZnXFpqFY/o/tV4lf9acxBnk1Nx5xj2+V4/ILaskR+TyRGxurIzc5w1HOV5i/ 3OVpVjloSb5zmWucsaNlMsUJ9NumFt2nR69qXztuYWYkXd+5CCxifc1ZKfDi6UcLrga3PtyH QxwXy5UtU7Cu9EG7tq7z0EAz9jxbMJC9t86Qul3NvtpHgfjjjM2gkbzeFtaWtuifGNbTL3M3 tU/97+N4e9njrtnNHt3wdz854ISbWnjbO9vViVWUk+1l+D4n8JhX9XY+HF3nWv5A5hm2dvX7 bu8WuciFUu5z9Qv7K7Pey+Aud70XXKFuZ7fUpl+2fPMaHddfHu39o2vqJQBsXR04VkRXEvBF /vxd3cO5z3/I06dZTOdSgP46jOa11aE/WGInPtfbT3Kjhb4r6MM483KGLicWJP70p3zfF5mX sfLFf4cdDOG8AS/79zASU4AUYzERozHPon8KuC8JaIAAx38NqID6xy78EjAXmDAAM4AMYzH0 EoAcyIHS0oEk6ID4EjAU6IEfiIAGmIHxAoIn+ILNYi8bWIIsKID+l4PyAoE6eIBWZFnf1XwF NiZSEmfSt2h6RiGksRZCBiva136lFnkO8H289Wh59gRFWH7Yl3i9N2RY0meglmNKaCSx0GBH yGP0h36r1ng0RylCaIbdtyjOtmu0tmLWJ210KCv15yBSGF1hImGe/hYUTRh/zkdggTgZRnJe 1DeIKAaHYXhmaZiHikhbbfgr4hZvyjZu0WdoyKGJmBh6onV8D/CE3mF6rzZs0SZe88Vt5hUS jMiJbZAMtmd8+XaKo4h7U+YoXHYatDBghCh881dmedB7rYh8NJd1OPdaYpdRNndzPBd+VVdZ OjdZ92cUtHOMxviMIecOOedzP8dyfReOyKiNwJBpS0FtK4SNNZeMt0WOzuiO3eiNPQeOkqeO 6KMS06hb+biN8jiPE9dy8DgedFVxu1V0CfZ1pOBr4fCEbqN41xiNU7dZ14BoCWkNbFeQdCeN 7nh06HOP5BEVXYeP4hgXBKZrF9d2ehh1/tkIN7nFaPeWjkKXcd7weFW4jjzXkitZVj7jECBk gSpoEAY3cD44gj5ZEEEZlAiBlAT3k0U5gg+4EAOIcAehlAKBMQkXEBFzlZ/zkVxXefvlZ7vI bE0Xds2BXfAVfPG1e+/3ev71XLjWeuBFjM/gee9FbWJIel+Ji+S2XWHGluwVa95Hi7/nHLc3 eqTWln65XoTQkTKmfObBfId4krK3iY+ohvKnaJEXbHmAa4yBbWAIemuZkXe5ZVYIcZfWl6nG H9QHmnlGfaN2B5kpYkRGifvYOG4YmcG3XnB2kLnymFsofH84Y5oZjOCHIkFWmtO2bcfFKNcH F77ZkuY1fGEX/ojV9yM+ggqqloSmuGGeWZkjxm022Y+/c5vmF5pZiAG/mJ6qiQFHFpuOtpn/ AZ14xiOg2Wp3VoR8SGu6lnGomX67sYQ1t5y/KIm84p5NCJGMiY3k+ZudKYfqaZkZ1iouZp/C uSCJaJK9Vp97GI6Usn776WP9uYZjCSiuMIkHaimRCIbDyXT/SFSJeIlhKZZTsmO5aJiHJmh7 J3qd2BwWSm8zlpd8EAbYMYzEkRRIgGnW1nbJFqLFWJ2h523wpp2faGoK2YnoBo0Jqo7jGJDt mJFGwRKUdY9ZWnfv2JBeBVxaGp7iGXMOmSgnUVpiOjnoyIwm06YPyY79E6dniqZc/tqlOvmn ANmnQRczWlmohnqoiJqoito5C3eScFebZQqogUqP9ViplvqNaSqSKEl1bDhLbTqmeDqolIqp knqpKPcNMsmnJvepigV1pWqq/tiiM6dm65aJxHWW6raKJVarTSJoqggmRdqWcPmogiqqsjqr eFesxKqgkFmernZxFMp976laEMqPo0qqk3qtsZqtx9o/A/aGu7gkKXKhv2mcwvgnEHOj1vqq yAqr2+qu+qisMGMib3iGnJoh0Zqf2WVpG/onrtqtKwew79qu8Bpzm0avuPms7EegeIiKe8gk SQeqkKqMoUqnFbusHJerTQqWnrl62gaswlqjPupebseK/kY2p6qqrQOLrdzasi5bsPhwcDs4 OlK5qDZ7szibs6QDEiQCjduTqvGosuvKrgErsENrtAabpnrajEGLtEn7sjDbtE4rtfbYqCvL slFLtVlLsfK6eBOLFwPZqX1nkOgJGXxXNHr1dEsrIlv6o0frcDWppmgAt0wHtHP3Z466SFu3 RzkKWSpJoxFprD6RtoFbjZFFm8RwFGQ6tISbstQ4E1eXt3c7ipLrT3qXKX4LdiV5dv86uJyL kHKrkog7KW1buf/auHdKkpA7kve6sGX4O5THaafnZKA4opRpq0VyFr6hlhATpbm3KN6XmOTG FrmKZLy6ex57lmXrsR+bi86b/l7sNobC6XrEm7u3J33JpoqEGW+o95zBeqW/hyBCSrKtmRKO +a0JmyqyN4crKqPr0aAneq71xbDXJ3oQ4qxk9l3/kSwopr8mOr+wJqLqB4baOX1FgJmp9pJJ Unr1l1u4oqG2YqeHS2MJi3t3yZve2WPRlr++GSWlWSX5WpzdoR0QfGXLuZ3f0VodvMGp2axL MsArrJseKq7mSmFq8b4JLJsiML4Cuge/gWWUG5eoF7MWUYELc8T9d8TSAoM46INJ3MT7coMM SIA7+JRPHMVQLILu4m9Z2YJaTMVGnMU9OJRS3IM1+8T7hzBVqcRfjMU1+5NoTIBxXIJXbMU6 eJR3/jyzYiyDDwGEUFCvTUdqDmqvGpwlVDho5Dp9JUmdE7ohJbyhvUaWoVmtYBatk7gqLTyf BtwECBxrOuwE5QmITuihEjzBy8Z6U4qLzTagpRGKQHyJrky7mpKuqPx6O4GjJZy9tjgazsVh 4RWuuenCwPidIxmkFlzLXTi8dBKsBXy9lpa74Dt77cHDG1vKQnu0ybqpnXu3FguR2Ly1rAuT RFu02Qy68bO2Okd2JfFbkQu1WLuMhju1WkuwPss86Ny1psW0XLumT1vO4xyvmXq2/DzP9EzO /uzO75zQCn21HHfPA03QBg3OgovQDF3R33yMDn3N/SzRE83R3fzQ+6zR/lyV0f8M0CIN0RZ9 0Qud0pGKVjr70jAd0zI9055jtSyN0jcd0iftpyW90R7ttQEt0Du9zQdd1EZd0BG90ibd0zJG 0vKs00/N0xSd01I91Sp9qjZ91Um91Vy91EyN015t1Wrm1GLt00qt1WFd1mCN1mw91llt1mfd 0lHd0T+dz/pM1Bj91nKt1lA91x8N0niN1GmNjWR91ILd1nBN1VVd13b9tXmqM1hHON3lDpEt IlWBqnTLJxo5KQup15k9uvXw2V3dOsUiMA2BgkZJlRujgQCBMKrN2qgtL6ot2w8R28mS2p1j 2+wy26HD2kXM21UJ3AXDb5bFyyy6r4ltFD1b/hPGbVeBJdozcdmUnQaLWdy0Cd19LRnsPN1R Z5Bhqo5Firv2RmaqvLGZqJfyBs1PgmN0maRAJggx/L2DKYx+WYz4Zl3VjHu0bKv8fV/krd5o ubtLJs3Kgq/p3V7nTZd2t27SKc3v7d/PJcsxnJMylnrQgRRlNuADDm3uln0V2eHjestlxr/+ usD5m+HXVikpXuLu1uIgrtko/uIGLr8jseHaXZEavt40buD4TeO6q+MzHuQ5HuPcQeJDzuLP TORPpuQn7rgVbtwFfuRH/uDPXOBlSeSp+ODZt3yaveHeu68kTmg/3OUam+D0LZ0qMl7pOnxZ FuJC/uUQ7q/lXaQY/v7mTK5uMb7mad7kNSzlbu7ndB0/4Y0JdQ7odk7m4TblG7znwHrjTI7l ZBLm0GbBp4jlB87okJ7pQf68my7jx1GiUH7i6F0khY7piv7okv7oOG7qTW7o2C3UTw7ipa7q py7nsobpyH3kYe7mh27jRpbq8rvkSZ4kde7poa4ErS7qf77sKP59x17icPvpvc7qyJ7nFVLr 067prv7dCtrc9a1k/83eKFKGx3flfd6zo767Jk6+v/5uIXvl38vmAX7m4s0Kax7Mcd4c4R69 cM7hWe69DN7i6Z3nNRruEW7plH7msEzhWlrYjO3kfJ3d4PzqoP7hiL3XDw84Dn/YFy/x/hlP kJNlWBUP48k92BxPxDSd8iq/8izf8vyg1xh/8jEf1zM/2h2/2B8vtkF9Mg4nsdwd6CKOsUMN 9En96iVe2L6O8zTH802OnWDH55pajko/6SIP8y6eujU06M599Zpq9BiL7UR/bEyv817S2XO7 3WOg9Y3t2Njt1Grv6EeP3C6b9IGdsT+M37J87ntZw/gO350n4E2Kb5s+5/J97j3e6Qk+5uv+ 7IIPaFPe3vL+3ih76W1+X/3lX+ru64/Zwfsd3/su4+eW+bi+1k0N7dSe7Rni9IZeaSwu+H7e 428/7Ntu7Kuu7aef43MwvmIe7Ix/4UjO+z5++7he64Pu4ZqO/vpJ7/qnX/PHNuGvXySqrvp7 rpfHr/yqnpvljeJ4PvjmTevXVvzLX+PlPvDGuefFPt+2r/3Qz/39beIj3u/mvvonK/rHH/ZP fv7eX/tBLv31r/9+j/oIAFBc+s09xaisc90NpcYZJnLZ541Wqk3CFHWgqa7h1salTOM7CbS9 GehVGpJQtGKjo0K6HBWkM0elAqvYrHbL7VpuHmYweSwrgFKfT8xrnsxMnhy+cAvD7fH0ydev r2IzfUYQbmCCNXaJY3V+gUmLjoxKg3SVbGteJYCanZsCoKGio6SlpqURBaQMoKwCrq8Noqmt qrWuuLawEaGwvbaxwL+1s7LEw7G3/sLFxsHAub+qvr6jvMfUyNHCtMmozcfKzOHXuuWr39bn zenQt93g6t277Njv48rL5Mjtp/3+/wADcvJE8EfBg2cO5tEyEKGXhZ4gPmhYRaIXio8cToyk EdLGiGE6YaRikcvIjlZQqly5iWWXk1lCXnQZc4nKkjD7aDxZUmQIlERagjyYUyfCoiyR0lyK RelKpyihRmXalGpVqzmkdtTqkGtXrFnBit3i9ehYFmfRpjW4lm3askTbwi0411PdtgR5yuyE 5K6mum1s2vQ7U+7QuCwtcrJoswsINHuZEn6JF69eh32BvrmKmU6MySYtcwzUsw1oxYsCR675 sedUj1RB/lcmyxph5o6uAcsk9PGtaKOkV49OmFg4cUw5XOuEfJa5WNmzs+htrGPFCMGWLFAn kopM46A18nS3nor7dygbjGw//3lLUCfv2V+P0X289vQ44J9HdP+N+jnrYUfffsTZl0aAKESR XWzR+YbFHj0skYYil0gyyYXDTegdciagp8geTsCkIYhlHALbhrBBKImGFaZhInB3fOiDcyPC MZ+HGEpmmUA89mgKP9xMY8476RSjjzzPDKlNPdwYiSQ481gjpJRDUlOeOvlceY+VQVaZD5FK dvnjOl7Cc2Q7/GTjpDO5UHnOmWU+aY8zavpo5514ivJbRTauoaEzyfUZo0cQ/kFYY3CUZGQh f27xGShvirKSI2+HbhKfjInW+KKiKML4GKYrZscLo0tB12BKDwoKyZ8nhjpofidkupuqnfoZ 66Jk9OYoBaCS9sWkm7na0oC9cuhiintBqsYMNKpaKR+mcnYqVpd5h114mYmnRoDW+heZfU9c 22l1sFLqLQxh5HRpt+iiiweAjBiIw6bVdfjofx3Qqx1H4K3Lln7i/pfJCs6BFe20aq0Vi4MK G5aWpAor9xrDmu16MKoIW3WxFRLvtGdza0H8VsceN4wbdYluLFTGDDpMMcgmxwyzzGOpvPLM LJf6cc07P9ezwT9TG7TGObdMs88u46w00kcDnTTP/kXr/DTTL1O9tNNNCz011m/l6fXXYIct 9thkl2322WinrfbabLet9tBEZ6111VbXbffcdOMd9VNw67i13lDnDTjXVw++d8lyGy244oXH nbjfj0t9ON9/O7445JdLnjlNNmfQua6Tb9W35o0zHnjpphN++uqhf1V56qrHLrvlqJPO+uyt 2zU657u79DnodxtO++3C5+7T65jXzjvytgcPe/HJG/9QedRXb/312Gev/fbcd+/99+CHL/74 5Jdv/vnop6++9qLL5fb78Mcv//z012///fjn70/vvjPfPPTRw93zBkjA/0nvL/yjXOSWt8D+ +c+BDUzKAV0XQQVuDoIX/pTgAzVYQZX8bjYfbBTxAMjADFpQeRhEIQcnmJcEetCFEzPhCzd4 whEWkIXSUmENnRdAARpweD78YQ9xSBsazrCDMdThEWWYRBsOkYjSgWH7kDhFJlZRiU3koRCh iDGmECArX3xZGLEwRrNoooxcIAAagRBGNG7BjaGpghvhqDs5FoSOCbPjGA/AxxIcYAt8PAAb AYBHMhIyB19M5M2cKBn9kUKNkFRj2QhQP0oGxJJrwyQmL9kPS26yko/MZJ4+eSdKYlKQpUBl KkehSlOOgpSlcGUoPenI+fGvkHU8pNVwOQFeRvGND/BlL8OiS2EiDpElMOYvkXlHhgAzjH/M /kE0pZkBQR5yjmnUZTC1uUYjclGEhgymGplZTHF+UQCJhGQyx6mAMbaRkGh8JzfZCU961rOd 9WyjPbeJz3bSU50ZiGQ+e7nPgdZzkPN0Zz/lKVBzuhGd9myoQdPpzzIC9J4/gKNF4VlRh/IT ox0NKRamqYBATjOQJUVpSTHS0It6oowfDOEtP4rNhfbzDPIMKD8VytFk2pSQCOVpPG/K02Ha 9ApFpelOP6rUn+aUoU5d6k1781Si+rOpQ2WBRgmKVakaNYzo5GYWSHrSkj4gmiQFgDXtaFWC wNSbXERKUbcq1DGGVZtGLedPfapIfQK0rl91aE2LSUnB+rStkRys/lD3+s6+MratWv2rV3Oa T31yFXhTtWhLJytZtiR2rBMoq1rPatbQjmSuzcQsCb+Zxyyglq9MHeddt/pYvA7TsUDVaWah OtXD4pWdhXxtcLuq13Litqpi1W1xkbtRRGr2OMr9rW95q1eEAjK0pB1tadO6Viq89qWt1SJr w8vW5PrWtuekLHGLO91gBpWpev1uU3EK2fkiN6+LXa59EQvf5OaXvUlFL33P21z9Ghisiuyt H7G73exy97TzrUJamRrT8VImm+YsL2ERLM51aha45f2wR0XqTr96968RLehV56riD79XpOa9 r0QnItEadzbDJKbnXdtL0BL/c8QgdSkV/rirUrX28awnPQlwVbzg84IziBZ+MpRXiMUrLuWh lTOmMlU7Uod01yrdpCIUQ1hhuB7TJUKGrg2FuWU1A/LInQjkxrAs5p3U8s54zrOe98znPvv5 bFK08pSpLN4SMnKLhj50CqPcxSqfWdGELnSkB71ER1OQ0VUgs5kfTelKS3rSQOy0oDFNXlFz 2tSXtrQZ67xqK56a1G7+tKdlnUVUt1rViGF1rmG9SEjv0Na7xjVdAp1qX8+a11JeLahDzexm P/GGi6b1qHmtaV0HW9rThna0lb3sZ2O62q5+tbYnYAADFBvY10b3sK1Nlz+7+916Lje8503v epuN2Ofm9q+d/k2Fcueb34jetr5rTW18p1vdufSCv2+NbXF7O+Dd/rbB183uhHdh4QcHeKIR bvGG4xDcwqZ4lTEucmMfW+MCHzdrQW5ygqtcASRvYcU7zvHjhfvjE5f5zBHYiZjTfOAuf/jG gT7mnP+c6P/Ggs9tHnKdN/3oL4+r0Zn+dJ5rYulWr3rWW55toVuY5R5nuKixXpibix3pSfd6 UuzN9ravTd5uj7vc5w6KqVM97BmPOtkvbPa8q33fUS/6ps+Odr8/wNyHRzzMof73kwfe4RAf L9hrvvVCY/zyii+71jXPdcgPveCDN3zkHU/uhZt+75kOvehT/njCw3ryhV99xBNvhW5/lzvz nMd7yXXv9M7jXPW9973sAXD74uM+95RHfux3n/zJwR7ls2d9CYx/fOVDH/CND/rov/n81ru+ 8cX//va1//nrkz/K3c9+18eP+iL2nfnLD37zTUL3+tv//vjPv9ztXvn5u3/zfAeAcfR+8hd/ xpN+47d+5ed98GeA/ed/y5QWCQAAOw== ----------53D40CE1F627A89B-- ------------53D40CE1F627A89B--From hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk Tue May 2 07:57:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC6F3B1484 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04399-06 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vdsexch.vds.org.uk (unknown [80.175.191.212]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E183B025A for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail pickup service by vdsexch.vds.org.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 2 May 2006 12:57:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:57:30 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Returned mail: Data format error thread-index: AcZt35be+QebDUYLQHSYCLVV1s9OCQAAAAVD From: "Hazel McAlpine" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2006 11:57:31.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[97B31B70:01C66DDF] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 11:57:36 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am on Leave and will be back in the office on Tuesday 2nd May 2006 thanks Hazel McAlpine Training and Events Co-Ordinator Volunteer Development Scotland Unit 157/158, Stirling Enterprise Park Stirling, FK7 7RP Tel: (01786) 479593 Fax: (01786) 449285 Email:hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk =20 Disclaimer - 5/2/2006=20 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and = intended solely for release-team@gnome.org. If you are not the named = addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this = email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of = the author and might not represent those of Volunteer Development = Scotland. Warning: Although Volunteer Development Scotland has taken = reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, = the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising = from the use of this email or attachments. It is recommended by = Volunteer Development Scotland that you scan any E-mail attachments = prior to opening.=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error

I am on Leave and will be back in the office on = Tuesday 2nd May 2006
thanks




Hazel = McAlpine

Training and = Events Co-Ordinator
Volunteer Development Scotland
Unit 157/158, = Stirling Enterprise Park
Stirling, FK7 7RP

Tel: (01786) 479593
Fax: (01786) = 449285

Email:hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk
http://www.vds.org.uk =



Disclaimer - 5/2/2006

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely = for release-team@gnome.org. If you are not the named addressee you = should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views = or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and = might not represent those of Volunteer Development Scotland. Warning: = Although Volunteer Development Scotland has taken reasonable precautions = to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot = accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of = this email or attachments.  It is recommended by Volunteer = Development Scotland that you scan any E-mail = attachments prior to opening.  ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC-- From kmaraas@broadpark.no Fri May 5 09:58:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80C93B0351; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08056-07; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453A83B017C; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYS001EGPHHOQC0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no>; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:58:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Unknown-00-11-0a-80-83-b7.lan ([80.203.243.165]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYS002C9PHHVMA0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no>; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:58:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:56:55 +0200 From: Kjartan Maraas To: Gnome i18n List , gnome-doc-list Message-id: <1146837415.3343.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-3) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.579 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.579 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-release-team Subject: GConf has branched X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 13:58:48 -0000 Hi. I found out that Mark had gone through a bunch of patches for GConf and marked them for commital, so I branched GConf before commiting the ones that only made sense on HEAD. gnome-2-14 is the name. Cheers Kjartan From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 5 10:47:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A2E3B083A for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10433-10 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301A13B0871 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so852412pye for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dGi9lxrWzEHmKnGoJ03UijDJqrMhqNnnCttIsJrd1Mjbuz5IhiWMcb8Q0m/aTezpCyi7+mHZuVlMYInBVmIveymrKKXuurKtOc1wlsLPsvA84+r5WGVpiwldiqfYUhq5paYl+IMUQqKR57EJOn3B3PvNad0lFDkRAeS9iu8tk8A= Received: by 10.35.109.2 with SMTP id l2mr775941pym; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.117.14 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:47:08 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.318 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.318 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: UI freeze break request for libgnomeui X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:47:13 -0000 Bug 340478 [1] contains a small patch that provides some much needed fixes for GnomeIconEntry/GnomeFileEntry: * update icon list when a new dir is selected * disable preview area in file chooser, not needed as we're selecting a directory * filter out non-directory items in the file chooser These changes make the GnomeIconEntry dialog much easier to use/understand. The patch has already been commited to HEAD, I would like to commit to libgnomeui-2-14 as well. -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 5 10:47:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D4B3B0871 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10531-09 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001043B07E4 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so509609pye for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZA7i+UedNfn7B2YINaau8UaDVXcsu97d9HHOgsUEaclquf0OsO+E9rXPwCAEMp5xpVmMlAGxooHaVdXfdNA++PIaKVWLJd1jMdLOEOBZmLPw02YaXterRBkW1hK42nVcA7CzDWa7fD6gUjF/q4G3LASc/AE4xAprkfi5s4+Fr+Q= Received: by 10.35.60.15 with SMTP id n15mr1142355pyk; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.117.14 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:47:41 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.324 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.199, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.324 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Re: UI freeze break request for libgnomeui X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:47:45 -0000 Oops [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D340478 -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From fherrera@gmail.com Tue May 9 02:38:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971E63B065C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16766-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.201]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B813B0917 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2595774nzk for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=W1fdl0+edVlpVbzhHu7W4HVoAuVzD99U2tMrF2wLVZZBalYm4lfO1IkaKbkAg/juojaRqgWkxCvZmgPt3LcJ+5ax3HsuYg+DBoVAwFjjb5RH92br7485UP8K7E54U6vou8u/5ZuwGinFmFOAzn14cmO2BICKblYVBqX+eWCTCxc= Received: by 10.36.222.1 with SMTP id u1mr4815004nzg; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.58.3 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58d389c20605082338g7e21455bh9d3df38869d692a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 08:38:31 +0200 From: "Fernando Herrera" Sender: fherrera@gmail.com To: release-team@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, gnome-i18n@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: bfc31d52d39a2a13 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: gconf-editor branched X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 06:38:39 -0000 Hi all, I've just branched gconf-editor for gnome-2-14. New development (mostly bug fixes and maybe some minor features) are going to happen on HEAD. Salu2 From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 20:31:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDE63B1044 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19047-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B343B02AF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2923602nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ImwCoUf5W5NDDQxLwO31K0U72w7kjS9PnQt9pzyC6pybRRRFqZ59pjFKdLyVHpr6PV7QIV8ucSa+Fg+QxvhhjrxkBFpxuapHsMAgt8/jtYeOaHT8HJxparUfY1OaIDUwn+PU+EIsYYUJUo6zPVtOgzGmCnBLXocM5vb+bz3PNGo= Received: by 10.36.135.10 with SMTP id i10mr6126773nzd; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:26 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_JH=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Subject: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:31:30 -0000 I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs a) contain no translations at all b) require a cvs version of intltool this may not affect English-speaking jhbuild users much, but it pretty much precludes packaging 2.15, thus reducing the test base considerably. Can we please try to ensure for 2.15.2 that a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions b) make sure that tarballs contain translations Thank Matthias Clasen From newren@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:17:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1EF3B026F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21253-07 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD203B0246 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2933181nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dxRAxLYWO8WeHLDgoFQfapjF6IPIBGCb7vqjQDYtyyUtoyGveQejj3VrYsh4JCUgoNuIA2k+v4eVI5GZ7YhcmFhxEJcYQHA0GYspu/Z94c5lbxrk0LNszGyqhLlsrps/K6z7YN6BRdC+wlQRDp1eg+iyhNdkQ8QulzlWwgFVWaw= Received: by 10.36.251.60 with SMTP id y60mr5862538nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:17:26 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:17:34 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > a) contain no translations at all > b) require a cvs version of intltool I thought (a) was resolved in this thread: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00478.html (though I don't know whether all relevant modules got updated...).=20 Was I mistaken? Either way, we should probably follow up to make sure the incompatiblity with solaris-sh was actually fixed, so that people don't need to remember the workaround in order to get translations in their tarballs. For (b), both Vincent and I built from the 2.15.1 tarballs without a cvs version of intltool. Did we do something funny or did you? From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:32:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3943B03B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21816-08 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5388F3B0352 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so1544496nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OCQcS+ttTSTjMG8Nkk6UcTXWSQUuoscniGEmRfYPOjoMSZRcZqX1Lw+oV3Mb7u+si6jbKnnd4FKR9Flgw8eLg6yMGpYabogafW2XPa9QpS5Mj6I1of9sKgg13tV+xON5OYiWOUUMDyyQS95OFfB5lsf+p2RKLHtn5bMVws85F38= Received: by 10.36.247.21 with SMTP id u21mr6222239nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:31 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:32:35 -0000 On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > > > a) contain no translations at all > > b) require a cvs version of intltool > > I thought (a) was resolved in this thread: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00478.htm= l > (though I don't know whether all relevant modules got updated...). > Was I mistaken? Either way, we should probably follow up to make sure > the incompatiblity with solaris-sh was actually fixed, so that people > don't need to remember the workaround in order to get translations in > their tarballs. > > For (b), both Vincent and I built from the 2.15.1 tarballs without a > cvs version of intltool. Did we do something funny or did you? > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. Unfortunately (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the translation= s are missing. Matthias From newren@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:43:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69703B0263 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22368-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FC03B02B3 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2938014nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ETpFWzuBRepklO0CvhChgrRzHeEkGG6t6waopR64fYKM2+w6HLPMo3L1MwTfY5pSRaJtbp8tw+BRy21Z0zpJgv4htWsiPOdlZy6IrM+m4lnuhr4LIIxha3R5+U4/BVkpwUYcgn3925AWiNcSl25AXrIcqlUdpAbGN+/dZtcNhqU= Received: by 10.36.250.69 with SMTP id x69mr3690951nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:43:36 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.538 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.538 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:43:40 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > Unfortunately > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the translati= ons > are missing. So to verify, you're saying that > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions isn't a problem after all. Correct? And that > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find out once we realized that it hit multiple modules)? Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. Thanks! Elijah From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:52:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B203B03EF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22763-08 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5053C3B03B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2939755nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LXcpEH8nhwgB1RAH8oO5DJYF8cbKTsncy7khrVay1AtFBU3VfCE4ghAesqRDtadXmojYgW2DaFYF6ST51CAhXf2xCINLZDqvvn0T5N+0qUFJzPepnFh7S7R/Fh5uY7hGhtCjc1cn4aYXiKKjeOpJEcrWMK+WatYnQsg5PlnP5yk= Received: by 10.36.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr5924715nzd; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:48 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:52:51 -0000 On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > > Unfortunately > > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the transla= tions > > are missing. > > So to verify, you're saying that > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > isn't a problem after all. Correct? Well, it becomes a problem as soon as you have to regenerate configure from the tarball. I helped myself by pushing a cvs snapshot of intltool into rawhide, but thats clearly not ideal. > And that > > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations > was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had > missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find > out once that it hit multiple modules)? > > Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, > from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the > necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. I did not get very far. At this time, I can add vte 0.13.0 and gedit 2.15.1 to the list of translation-deprived modules. Matthias From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Wed May 10 00:30:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295D43B0410 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30262-08 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9A23B04BA for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2989051nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W+rYM7tp/31XIcizPavWtKvPK67zEAZ0pIDpQzQgkvm9eMF8w3J/V2Q80TORWAPr/lIqCXbboMC14A5Lu5zZiLjvg/nMevydVfVVY3P/lANocuTKN/64ZpynTYV9yYLHEoTPQnjmitkooAHW4rt7J4AjXiFExBszyzot5+d6NfY= Received: by 10.36.119.2 with SMTP id r2mr64981nzc; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:20 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:30:22 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > > > Unfortunately > > > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the trans= lations > > > are missing. > > > > So to verify, you're saying that > > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > > isn't a problem after all. Correct? > > Well, it becomes a problem as soon as you have to regenerate configure > from the tarball. I helped myself by pushing a cvs snapshot of intltool > into rawhide, but thats clearly not ideal. > > > And that > > > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations > > was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had > > missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find > > out once that it hit multiple modules)? > > > > Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, > > from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the > > necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. > > I did not get very far. At this time, I can add vte 0.13.0 and > gedit 2.15.1 to the list of translation-deprived modules. zenity 2.15.1 and gnome-system-monitor 2.14.2 are also affected. From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 12 05:18:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F55D3B2538 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13999-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4423C3B252F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E0A53984; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:18:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: David Bolter In-Reply-To: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:18:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.566 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:18:45 -0000 Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > Hi. > > We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. > > A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! > > What is it ? > ================= > GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. > > What's New? > =========== > This is a bugfix release. Hi David, it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 (ie the goption usage in gok). Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) Thanks you in advance. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 09:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095593B26A2 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30677-03 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAD63B0935 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 53886]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25039-24237>; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:44:59 -0400 Message-ID: <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:44:54 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.568 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:45:22 -0000 Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > >> Hi. >> >> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. >> >> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! >> >> What is it ? >> ================= >> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. >> >> What's New? >> =========== >> This is a bugfix release. >> > > Hi David, > > it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 > (ie the goption usage in gok). > > Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and > the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. > > Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are > numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) > > Thanks you in advance. > > Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this is obvious. cheers, D From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 12 10:06:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25513B26E0 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32076-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFB93B26BB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC533DD; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:06:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: David Bolter In-Reply-To: <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:06:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.567 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:06:25 -0000 Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > > > >> Hi. > >> > >> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. > >> > >> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! > >> > >> What is it ? > >> ================= > >> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. > >> > >> What's New? > >> =========== > >> This is a bugfix release. > >> > > > > Hi David, > > > > it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 > > (ie the goption usage in gok). > > > > Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and > > the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. > > > > Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are > > numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) > > > > Thanks you in advance. > > > > > Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want > to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, > shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this > is obvious. There are no stupid question :) If you plan to do other releases in the future for 2.14.x, you should definitively create a branch without the goption part and it would probably be easier to start this branch just before goption was added in CVS. To be clear, the problem in goption patch is usage of 'G_OPTION_ARG_DOUBLE' which is glib 2.11.x material. If you don't plan to do any 2.14.x releases, don't bother creating 2.14 branch, but it would be great for distributions packagers (and probably other people) so change gok versioning so people knows they are using an "unstable" release. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 10:34:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437E13B0FF5 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01517-03 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC943B1058 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 47758]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <24863-28393>; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:18 -0400 Message-ID: <44649CA1.6060502@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:05 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.57 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.57 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:34:02 -0000 Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > >> Frederic Crozat wrote: >> >>> Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : >>> >>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. >>>> >>>> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! >>>> >>>> What is it ? >>>> ================= >>>> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. >>>> >>>> What's New? >>>> =========== >>>> This is a bugfix release. >>>> >>>> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 >>> (ie the goption usage in gok). >>> >>> Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and >>> the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. >>> >>> Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are >>> numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) >>> >>> Thanks you in advance. >>> >>> >>> >> Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want >> to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, >> shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this >> is obvious. >> > > There are no stupid question :) > > If you plan to do other releases in the future for 2.14.x, you should > definitively create a branch without the goption part and it would > probably be easier to start this branch just before goption was added in > CVS. To be clear, the problem in goption patch is usage of > 'G_OPTION_ARG_DOUBLE' which is glib 2.11.x material. > > If you don't plan to do any 2.14.x releases, don't bother creating 2.14 > branch, but it would be great for distributions packagers (and probably > other people) so change gok versioning so people knows they are using an > "unstable" release. > > For sure. I will try to pay attention to the versioning expectations from now on. cheers, D From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 14:59:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFB13B0332 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18780-08 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2399B3B000C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 44109]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25629-14425>; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:41 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.571 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:59:57 -0000 [snip] > There are no stupid question :) > In that case... :-) What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to distinguish? Does anyone do both? cheers, David From jdub@waugh.id.au Fri May 12 15:10:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088B63B10D1 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19473-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node.waugh.id.au (node.waugh.id.au [70.85.31.216]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B5D3B0632 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from home.waugh.id.au (ppp121-112.static.internode.on.net [150.101.121.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by node.waugh.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C413C2F0; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:50 +1000 (EST) Received: by home.waugh.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B61103F72; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:39 +1000 From: Jeff Waugh To: David Bolter Message-ID: <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> Mail-Followup-To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> Reply-By: Tue May 16 05:09:50 EST 2006 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-21-686 i686 X-Message-Flag: Cranky? Try Free Software instead! X-Uptime: 05:09:50 up 4 days, 19:32, 8 users, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.444 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.444 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:10:55 -0000 > What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are > module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome > 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to > distinguish? Does anyone do both? You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them into the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball's source directory, whatever the version. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "So: Stop selling software. Give it away. Work out some other way to make money, because pretending it's not replicable is not it. Profit." - Martin Pool From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 15:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AE43B1130 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19851-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:18:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244B13B039C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 42161]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25259-14421>; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:15:56 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.573 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.573 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:18:11 -0000 Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > >> What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are >> module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome >> 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to >> distinguish? Does anyone do both? >> > > You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them into > the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball's > source directory, whatever the version. :-) > > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 ? Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? shrug, David From jdub@waugh.id.au Fri May 12 15:21:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170093B0141 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20170-02 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node.waugh.id.au (node.waugh.id.au [70.85.31.216]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30AF3B0632 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from home.waugh.id.au (ppp121-112.static.internode.on.net [150.101.121.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by node.waugh.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5F53C2FA; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:24 +1000 (EST) Received: by home.waugh.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58E6D3F72; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:13 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:13 +1000 From: Jeff Waugh To: David Bolter Message-ID: <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> Mail-Followup-To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> Reply-By: Tue May 16 05:19:43 EST 2006 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-21-686 i686 X-Message-Flag: Cranky? Try Free Software instead! X-Uptime: 05:19:43 up 4 days, 19:42, 8 users, load average: 0.12, 0.04, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.445 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:21:27 -0000 > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally > mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: > > put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and > put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 > ? You could do it that way (the release team will generally know, based on your release patterns and announcements anyway), or... > Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? > Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? That's generally the easiest way to do it. Reduces margin for human error. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "Funny, I have no trouble distinguishing my mobile phone from the others because it's in my _own fucking pocket_!" - Mobile Rage From newren@gmail.com Fri May 12 15:32:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6E63B0AF4 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20687-07 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41D03B02C7 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so728708nzk for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NjrulOiENXGm+Z5hUcdMwoTSZukd6WD8aMCx6ZX4QvgJL6diAVXoOCu4hLQj7XO9B0daX8Yg4Pd3NFirhFHoEfblFSTWC+In+7J/305Bwe+6/yHngzv4PV4fb3HFw5Uc6LUiLt9kQ8JZPNNfjk6ti7kks+dRKkvYpZjFaiIbWYU= Received: by 10.36.250.45 with SMTP id x45mr123738nzh; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605121232k4381d802i6ce133a811108298@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:39 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "David Bolter" In-Reply-To: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:32:42 -0000 On 5/12/06, David Bolter wrote: > >> What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Did you mean 'using the install-module script on the gnome servers' or something else? This is probably something that should show up on http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner; I've been meaning to write up a more thorough expectations-of-maintainers kind of document for a while now, someday I might just get around to it. > >> Are module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for > >> gnome 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? If your module has no code changes and no documentation updates/additions and no translation updates, then it's okay to ignore a given 2.x.y release. Otherwise, you should try to make a release with each gnome 2.x.y release, both stable and unstable. We understand that it's sometimes difficult and not all modules (even those that attempt to follow the gnome release schedule) do that yet. > >> And if both, how are we supposed to distinguish? Does anyone do both? I'd say that most modules probably do both. Modules which use the same 2.x versioning of Gnome tend to be the easiest to distinguish and cause the fewest errors on our part. Of course, not all modules do that and there have been multiple cases where it has been difficult for us to determine which module releases to use in a Gnome release (we do anything from looking at ChangeLogs to pinging maintainers to try to figure it out). > > You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them= into > > the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball'= s > > source directory, whatever the version. :-) > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally > mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: > > put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and > put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 > ? Yes. We've often tried to sort things out by hand and even checked ChangeLogs and such to try to figure out these kinds of things on our own before. Being told which versions map to what definitely helps. > Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? That would make things much easier for us, and reduce the likelihood of errors on our part. > Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? I don't see why it would; it's just a version number. Unless you had a special meaning associated with the number that others were already relying upon, that is. Hope that helps, Elijah From vuntz@gnome.org Sat May 13 17:42:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C36C3B11AD for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30418-01 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:42:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABAE3B03CF for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:41:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C045911268D; Sat, 13 May 2006 23:41:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Matthias Clasen In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:43:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1147556595.12491.123.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.521 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_JH=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.521 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:42:01 -0000 Le mardi 09 mai 2006 à 20:31 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > a) contain no translations at all > b) require a cvs version of intltool > > this may not affect English-speaking jhbuild users much, but > it pretty much precludes packaging 2.15, thus reducing the > test base considerably. Can we please try to ensure for > 2.15.2 that > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations Yesterday, I talked with Rodney about getting a new intltool release for 2.15.2 and asked what's blocking it. He'd like to fix a bug [1] before the release. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323968 Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Mon May 15 12:20:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C27C3B080E for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08439-05 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528BB3B0805 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so213410nzh for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hK6RaHoOBaKmt9xwXHV+RysiMo2JXgLHDaYptt+nSm/nUvN2wGvDSw3dHIebolATWcMye1j/DJxeDWKC5vrai1cquF0Ou/P/71XCn3+t5crHFFztmNohe84A3rqxUVWltfoeRL71RyZZXCyRLd0O1uval5JPPKouCz2r0pt0M48= Received: by 10.36.49.6 with SMTP id w6mr3071198nzw; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:13 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Release the hounds!" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.415, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.997] X-Spam-Score: -2.018 X-Spam-Level: Subject: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:20:15 -0000 I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to get one done tomorrow. GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. Matthias From vuntz@gnome.org Mon May 15 13:00:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0C03B1ADE for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11368-04 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7DF3B1AA0 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5449C11268D; Mon, 15 May 2006 19:00:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Matthias Clasen In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:01:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.559 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.559 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:00:51 -0000 Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 12:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to > get one done tomorrow. > > GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. Thanks for letting us know! Do you strongly advise us to wait for 2.9.1 or is it okay to use 2.9.0? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Mon May 15 13:14:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AFA3B1AF1 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12356-02 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0473B0817 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so101300nzf for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Dh72kv5Uz1wXGWaTQZhCXVeM7iwafxDbub7XiNx6ZLxu0tO3f0RdEp6ecY0pOgoweT+DpKmi4y2eaZsDQt0R2Kzj7xniYltTuSoTkMnbIaCqVTElY6T8osbg3abU7KIHb9EdImltHv3iYYfBtbazfMucvtCR7oobcB9z11og1ik= Received: by 10.36.79.12 with SMTP id c12mr1731319nzb; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:45 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Vincent Untz" In-Reply-To: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.516 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.516 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:14:50 -0000 On 5/15/06, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le lundi 15 mai 2006 =E0 12:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a =E9crit : > > I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to > > get one done tomorrow. > > > > GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. > > Thanks for letting us know! > Do you strongly advise us to wait for 2.9.1 or is it okay to use 2.9.0? > 2.9.0 has a deadlock in the printing code... of course, there are not that many apps (=3D=3D none) using the printing stuff yet, so its not terribly important. Other than that, going with 2.9.0 should be pretty ok. You're missing quite a few bug fixes, but 2.9.1 will be out shortly anyway... Matthias From kaffeetisch@gmx.de Mon May 15 14:23:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3D93B1B5F for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17193-07 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 863E33B1B67 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 May 2006 18:23:34 -0000 Received: from port-212-202-210-90.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) [212.202.210.90] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 15 May 2006 20:23:34 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2092818 From: Torsten Schoenfeld To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:23:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1147717414.12928.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.467 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.467 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Gtk2-Perl 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:23:37 -0000 Aloha, the tarballs that make up Gtk2-Perl 2.15.2 can be found at /home/users/tsch/gtk2-perl/2.15.2 on master.gnome.org. -- Bye, -Torsten From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Mon May 15 14:31:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF18D3B1B5A for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17830-03 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CE33B08D6 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 60886]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25615-18495>; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:30:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:30:49 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.574 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.574 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: gok 1.0.10 uploaded (was Re: gok 1.0.9 available!) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:31:49 -0000 Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > >> OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally >> mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: >> >> put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and >> put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 >> ? >> > > You could do it that way (the release team will generally know, based on > your release patterns and announcements anyway), or... > > Thanks all... I've just uploaded a 1.0.10 tarball to resolve some naughtiness in 1.0.9., and this is for the 2.14 branch. Here's the plan: gok-1.0.x == 2.14 (happening on a gok cvs gnome-2-14 branch) and gok-1.1.x == 2.15 (on head) at least for this cycle. (I plan to move to matching gnome versions on the next cycle but am waiting for a response from some GOK people). cheers, David >> Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? >> Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? >> > > That's generally the easiest way to do it. Reduces margin for human error. > :-) > > - Jeff > > From newren@gmail.com Mon May 15 14:51:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525A13B0409 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19517-02 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0763B07ED for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x7so206723nzc for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sjHTCwZZEHmAJ0VuZhF7GqvUiH6znEp5yz69F+hyEsSp3EXR9fcs85V2VPYjKjU8YX2JkMmMb4cY5FuF94tuW1AlcMD4UZrsnwr0YaOKSu7HxUdifXU1X/ctsSTccjX8BaEBxQNTwIfH8VDYlj06XGpQ09mM7bHvIhe85rEe2Ek= Received: by 10.37.15.59 with SMTP id s59mr6089045nzi; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605151151p30f1bd8avf31a40884f483dd5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:51:21 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "David Bolter" In-Reply-To: <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.10 uploaded (was Re: gok 1.0.9 available!) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:51:25 -0000 On 5/15/06, David Bolter wrote: > Thanks all... > > I've just uploaded a 1.0.10 tarball to resolve some naughtiness in > 1.0.9., and this is for the 2.14 branch. > > Here's the plan: > > gok-1.0.x =3D=3D 2.14 (happening on a gok cvs gnome-2-14 branch) > and > gok-1.1.x =3D=3D 2.15 (on head) > > at least for this cycle. (I plan to move to matching gnome versions on > the next cycle but am waiting for a response from some GOK people). Awesome, thanks for all your work. :) Elijah From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 02:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663923B1DAD for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24775-04 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CE23B1DA1 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id z3so170066nzf for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Foc9gW/8Xcb2Bib3AEpJ/5Da7DxwNezz3uRQIVG1DfDOiZ0WLOfoqPZ+fd/6vTG8R9jMmuSIG/yi9IslLVWCF8S4V+dtp8FQC/QkNtOEOh3CNAz0F/AHOrFVSPJB7gBdX7WAjNAMa35KlgsQgNptYO5DFKnYNzZ6KLbRrzHk0cc= Received: by 10.36.66.3 with SMTP id o3mr6730229nza; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 00:24:35 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Gnome Release Team" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Subject: 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:24:39 -0000 If anyone else wants to help smoketest 2.15.2, or even better be in charge of it, I've got modulesets up at http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.15.2. You may need to apply the configure patch from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D340163 to both libxml2 and libxslt. I've run into some other build problem with gnome-desktop (can't import libxml2), but am heading to bed now. From vuntz@gnome.org Tue May 16 04:24:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397343B1E1E for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32494-02 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F073B1E22 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 9B678112692; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 129.88.39.24 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vuntz) by vuntz.net with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42192.129.88.39.24.1147767841.squirrel@vuntz.net> In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "Vincent Untz" To: release-team@gnome.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.483 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.483 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:24:04 -0000 On Tue, May 16, 2006 08:24, Elijah Newren wrote: > If anyone else wants to help smoketest 2.15.2, or even better be in > charge of it, I've got modulesets up at > http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.15.2. You may need to apply > the configure patch from > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340163 to both libxml2 and > libxslt. I've run into some other build problem with gnome-desktop > (can't import libxml2), but am heading to bed now. The libxml2 bindings are not installed where they should. I added a comment to the bug. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 16 22:59:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDFC3B207F for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31959-10 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F72A3B2021 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so80555nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hB47R93IsJ3qdii/len3jyxjVRUZa8F97UYCtfQmLLhB9bAZdP6sV5DWLPv29jBEmac7s21T3VqiydQs3nLjI/uk/K7T6Yd2ZzJfkmcrVf01YLv6zoPxdZ9mmZ21dOAakNBaS32eZHIkWB2WI1o+q6UXhAs7IsE5o1f7ew5JX9I= Received: by 10.36.220.69 with SMTP id s69mr270615nzg; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:19 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Release the hounds!" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.518 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.518 X-Spam-Level: Subject: more po/LINGUAS disaster X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 02:59:21 -0000 I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... Matthias From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 23:22:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95C3B0259 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00788-07 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8A93B1657 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so84312nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rnze/V6WlV3W3C6oni+td4IJb2zH3CKBwpGyqvkTccsbcSenoTX0I2/rXitYoakGvfR2CVNsobFKPXmM0jUUtAdDgbmdyJxW0wjuVm39IOs+caADPIzTLBqOhJOmxFfWk5zOjSzaj5FIZellQA8lcFTOsIAPKHhfanjCiXnWgZ0= Received: by 10.36.221.31 with SMTP id t31mr339136nzg; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:22:26 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" , "Gnome Desktop Development List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: more po/LINGUAS disaster -- we need re-rolled tarballs before 2.15.2 goes out X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:22:30 -0000 On 5/16/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance > is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... Indeed, it looks like we'll either have to use lots of 2.14.x tarballs or else get lots of new re-rolled ones. We may need to hold up the 2.15.2 release. Could the affected maintainers (see below) roll new releases after upgrading their local copy of intltool[1], or contact the release-team and ask us if you need us to roll it for you? We may contact individuals soonish if you don't contact us. Thanks, and sorry for the headache. In the directory with my latest testing build for gnome2.15.2, I find: 1055 newren@amr:newrenTemp/tarball-gnome$ for i in `find . -type d -name po -maxdepth 2`; do echo $(ls -l $i | wc -l) $i; done | sort -n -r 10 ./gnome-system-monitor-2.14.2/po 10 ./gnome-games-2.15.2/po 10 ./fast-user-switch-applet-2.15.1/po 10 ./deskbar-applet-2.15.1/po 9 ./vte-0.13.0/po 9 ./totem-1.5.0/po 9 ./sound-juicer-2.15.2/po 9 ./gnome-terminal-2.15.0/po 8 ./evolution-webcal-2.7.0/po 1 ./libglade-2.5.1/po 1 ./dbus-0.61/po Looking at these, it appears that gnome-system-monitor, gnome-games, fast-user-switch-applet, deskbar-applet, vte, totem, sound-juicer, gnome-terminal, and evolution-webcal were rolled without translations (libglade and dbus don't have any translations, just a stub of a directory, so they're merely false positives). Thanks. [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-May/msg00009.htm= l, http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-May/msg00016.html From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 23:41:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9A63B0EEE for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01776-05 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798E23B0ECD for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so87311nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=btMc1xOh1AAwWhEtL2qHAQ51qu/rPBnTzOXMLLFFd/0+jtB1l/Ll8BqXT+SFQvX35OwoHyAXEjXBvBB1hR/1MbedtxA+LvCy+sjak+v0Y+VOIejjOOLtgm/3GbO5r7lRbPYvGM8WZUo+TATJ3IfebKPLjGXMtdarHsCdAgX9W4A= Received: by 10.36.12.16 with SMTP id 16mr546141nzl; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605162041v4be85c8ej6115381a77acb9d8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:41:56 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Release the hounds!" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Matthias Clasen Subject: Re: more po/LINGUAS disaster -- we need re-rolled tarballs before 2.15.2 goes out X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:41:59 -0000 On 5/16/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/16/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance > > is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... > > Indeed, it looks like we'll either have to use lots of 2.14.x tarballs > or else get lots of new re-rolled ones. We may need to hold up the > 2.15.2 release. Could the affected maintainers (see below) roll new > releases after upgrading their local copy of intltool[1], or contact > the release-team and ask us if you need us to roll it for you? We may > contact individuals soonish if you don't contact us. Thanks, and > sorry for the headache. Since not everyone reads d-d-l: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342061 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342062 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342063 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342064 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342065 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342066 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342067 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342068 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342069 I'm a SPAM-o-matic machine! :-) From newren@gmail.com Wed May 17 13:01:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5803B1084 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14934-05 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317133B1073 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id v1so56678nzb for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Q/CJgFYcaQgfKPHtt0wGGyeSiM6TEcAYVgV5XiPJ0m16TYc1AZR3AOtBHV7Pq0EaD8OU4yjr1qbTXu4vc8LLoLcstUBg2ofOT3IcvfpKtO5LEOSgdFcPcSxG8KPmrusDMPLyrd4AQzqZSzDoz9lYA8xHqpyAjpxl9gwrVGil6gU= Received: by 10.36.32.12 with SMTP id f12mr1123614nzf; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:01:04 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: veillard@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:01:06 -0000 Hi Daniel, The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the headache. Thanks for all your time and effort. :) Elijah [1] We also have patches up at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/2.15.2/ for the most recent tarballs; bug-340163.patch applies to both modules, while fix-python-path.patch just applies to libxml2. From carlos_garnacho@yahoo.es Wed May 17 16:42:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056A93B0492; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28883-04; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (174.Red-83-46-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.46.28.174]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCDA3B0332; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94E3E13F54; Wed, 17 May 2006 22:42:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Carlos Garnacho To: release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1147884171.7850.59.camel@localhost> References: <1147884171.7850.59.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:42:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1147898530.7850.65.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.642 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 1.642 X-Spam-Level: * Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, system-tools-list@gnome.org Subject: gnome-system-tools branched for 2.14 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:42:15 -0000 Resent, it seems it didn't arrive, apologies for any duplicate... On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:42 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hello all, > > As usual, there's now a gnome-2-14 branch, which will be left in the > cold, being fed with small maintenance patches until it finally dies. > > HEAD will get all the love, the big plan for it is to get rid of the > cranky XML interface and use liboobs to communicate with > system-tools-backends HEAD through DBus. PolicyKit will be studied in > depth to replace the g-s-t handmade auth method. > > Regards > From newren@gmail.com Wed May 17 19:43:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69033B0544 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04373-10 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A713B04A2 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so289655nzh for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lMigi3RXNrZwCqwBzMBNmk3T5VVbRdRznh25jX1YmpsfUz3skQwr5yE085StB/1egzoLzuZb9zy8m6elTPJLTKKNV0sCM+ioK0e1mbp0HHJwzz2urSF7qpsEeI5sBUJ1OVObnWQt4XOg5ZXMni8zOsLcVaHkALqMvtLKy9Wjpk8= Received: by 10.37.2.66 with SMTP id e66mr1816263nzi; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:43:22 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: thomas@apestaart.org, "Gnome Release Team" , gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:43:24 -0000 Hi, I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on ftp.gnome.org? - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause potential problems of some kind? Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192= .html. Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release set altogether and be considered an external dependency? Thanks, Elijah From vuntz@gnome.org Thu May 18 02:24:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114C43B2482 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21540-10 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA7B3B10B2 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8D2112699; Thu, 18 May 2006 08:24:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Elijah Newren In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:25:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: Cc: thomas@apestaart.org, gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 06:24:18 -0000 Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 17:43 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > Hi, > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > ftp.gnome.org? > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > potential problems of some kind? I'll let GStreamer people answer this :-) > Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from > last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192.html. > Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release > set altogether and be considered an external dependency? I strongly oppose to those solutions: we want GStreamer in our platform (so the external dependency way is not a solution), but it means API/ABI guarantee, which only GStreamer 1.0 will offer. I'd obviously like this to be ASAP, but I guess GStreamer people are already doing their best :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From vuntz@gnome.org Thu May 18 05:48:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFFE3B0850 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32633-04 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903053B0E64 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 635B6112698; Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 129.88.39.24 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vuntz) by vuntz.net with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53341.129.88.39.24.1147945684.squirrel@vuntz.net> In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) From: "Vincent Untz" To: "Elijah Newren" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: thomas@apestaart.org, gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:48:08 -0000 On Thu, May 18, 2006 01:43, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi, > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > ftp.gnome.org? > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > potential problems of some kind? After having asked Christian, I'm uploading the tarballs to ftp.gnome.org right now. I'll finish the 2.15.2 release after this. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From thomas@apestaart.org Thu May 18 06:46:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786A3B11C0; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03148-05; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.es6.egwn.net (server02.es6.egwn.net [195.10.6.12]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543503B11E1; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.fr4.egwn.net (server07.fr4.egwn.net [62.39.85.77]) by mx1.es6.egwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469A44F8301; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.fr4.egwn.net (spiffy mail daemon) with ESMTP id 46FC583B82; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.fr4.egwn.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server07.fr4.egwn.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14871-08; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thread.fluendo.lan (core.fluendo.com [195.10.6.237]) by mx1.fr4.egwn.net (spiffy mail daemon) with ESMTP id D6BB583B6B; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thomas.fluendo.lan (thomas.fluendo.lan [192.168.1.10]) by thread.fluendo.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0183F106354; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Vander Stichele To: Vincent Untz In-Reply-To: <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1147949202.2630.219.camel@otto.amantes> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned: By amavis at egwn.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_SBL=3.16] X-Spam-Score: 0.616 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team , gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:46:50 -0000 On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 08:25 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 17:43 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > > ftp.gnome.org? > > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > > potential problems of some kind? sorry. It's just our fault, simple human error. We were uploading tarballs before just fine, but due to a) a change in how we release stuff (automate more, write more scripts, ...) and b) us trying to get more people involved in actually releasing this just fell of the radar. I personally would proceed as we did before. We should upload these tarballs. > > Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from > > last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192.html. > > Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release > > set altogether and be considered an external dependency? > > I strongly oppose to those solutions: we want GStreamer in our platform > (so the external dependency way is not a solution), but it means API/ABI > guarantee, which only GStreamer 1.0 will offer. I'd obviously like this > to be ASAP, but I guess GStreamer people are already doing their > best :-) I would also not change anything here. Every GStreamer stable series offers a stable API/ABI. Every time we feel GNOME should move to a new one (which isn't very often - once every sixteen months on average looking at the history) we will discuss it with GNOME and work something out together. Thomas From veillard@redhat.com Thu May 18 09:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F823B124D for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11530-02 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948CD3B0E49 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5mYc031886; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:48 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5hIY007374; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5ho2007519; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k4ID5hP1007393; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:42 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: Elijah Newren Message-ID: <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> References: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.367 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:05:52 -0000 On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; > it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build > problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both > addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but > is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if > they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the > headache. I'm on vacations, with very very limited IP access, sorry I can't work on this before I come back at the end of the month ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From newren@gmail.com Thu May 18 09:45:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1787C3B255B for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13857-02 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E73F3B0FB2 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id n1so335698nzf for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uGMnGN8gFpGPkyql5scsS9IBVfi1drqjqE8jQFXOglk8TbmC7vEmtJPRHkviUc9c31EDBdo0VSsOnNL3EwnRR/dJJBK5Z1j/D9BghZm94yExV1IPnFEA5AlWnlq+cYr1MfY41D80pRcFoH0/8vPeGDkbBSrFAJ+ZaUaFBy133iI= Received: by 10.36.224.62 with SMTP id w62mr532207nzg; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605180645g6a3a98ebtc32ae8d6154cbce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:45:33 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: veillard@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:45:36 -0000 On 5/18/06, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; > > it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build > > problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both > > addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but > > is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if > > they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the > > headache. > > I'm on vacations, with very very limited IP access, sorry I can't work > on this before I come back at the end of the month ! That's okay, we can work around it for now. I hope you enjoy your well deserved vacation. :-) Cheers, Elijah From jacofishburn@healys.com Thu May 18 12:30:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9246D3B25D4 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24110-01 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fwtinc.com (adsl-068-157-239-053.sip.mem.bellsouth.net [68.157.239.53]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FC733B25CB for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000001c67a97$cf0fd710$d0bfa8c0@mqe23> From: "Jacopo Fishburn" To: release-team@gnome.org Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:26:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.71 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, HTML_40_50=0.496, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, TW_PR=0.077] X-Spam-Score: 0.71 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: crdit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jacopo Fishburn List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:30:07 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Home 0vvner, Your crredit doesn't matter to us! If you OVVN reeal essttate and want IMMEDlATE cassh to sppend ANY way you like, or simply wish to LOVVER your monthly paayments by a third or more, here are the deeals we have TOdDAY: $ 490 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 65 % $ 370 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 90 % $ 250 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 35 % $ 200 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 55 % go to the web site =20 Jacopo Fishburn , Apprroval Mannager =20 again. In the end they decided to mince them fine and boil them. So they got a black pot, and they took out their knives. No good boiling =18em! We aint got no water, and its a long way to the well and all, said a voice. Bert and William thought it was Toms. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Home 0vvner,

Your crredit doesn't matter to us!

If you OVVN reeal essttate and want
IMMEDlATE cassh to sppend ANY=20 way you like,
or simply wish to LOVVER your monthly paayments
=20 by a third or more,
here are the deeals we have TOdDAY:

$ 490 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 65 %
$ 370 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 90 %
$ 250 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 35 %
$ 200 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 55 %

go to the web = site

Jacopo Fishburn , Apprroval Mannager
 
again. In the end they decided to mince them fine and boil them. So = they
got a black pot, and they took out their knives.
No good boiling =80=98em! We aint got no water, and its a long way = to
the well and all, said a voice. Bert and William thought it was = Toms.
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10-- From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 19 10:49:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75943B28B5 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26426-06 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856193B28A8 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D1E37C; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:49:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: alleykat@gmail.com, Mark McLoughlin Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:49:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.569 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: gnome-menus 2.14.x X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:49:54 -0000 Hi guys, while checking alacarte 0.9.1, I noticed some problems with gnome-menus in CVS : -alacarte 0.9.1 requires some api added after 2.14.0 release was done, which is in CVS HEAD -alacarte 0.9.1 only requires gnome-menus >= 2.14 (but won't build with it) -there has been no branching in gnome-menus for 2.14, so I don't know if this api addition is supposed to be in 2.14.x or is only 2.15 material. Could you enlighten us about those small issues ? Thanks you. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 19 16:01:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B823B17AA for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16410-10 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761DB3B17DC for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x29so265001nfb for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fvthcN+VHNJSI99ciHpYBcSU5y7Lx/5dYgu3NaUmCl/RJfpbzaSaLUDkq3gbH6RSKyZQqBZBVrplkLwJFJpUXIq+XROnv+MGKizTksrUkUg90cy5H5OLQ3oYdKuYb9Jz0eAQcLg1KHDf1zOZORhEozmQPxpTjLENWZfoWkYUbEM= Received: by 10.49.87.3 with SMTP id p3mr1720393nfl; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.30.1 with HTTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:01:12 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: "Frederic Crozat" In-Reply-To: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.622 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.558, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -1.622 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: gnome-menus 2.14.x X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:01:24 -0000 On 5/19/06, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Hi guys, > > while checking alacarte 0.9.1, I noticed some problems with gnome-menus > in CVS : > -alacarte 0.9.1 requires some api added after 2.14.0 release was done, > which is in CVS HEAD > -alacarte 0.9.1 only requires gnome-menus >=3D 2.14 (but won't build with > it) Yeah, that's my goof. I use gnome-menus 2.14.0 with the patches I provided that are in HEAD so my copy is still 2.14.0. > -there has been no branching in gnome-menus for 2.14, so I don't know if > this api addition is supposed to be in 2.14.x or is only 2.15 material. > > Could you enlighten us about those small issues ? > I see no reason why it couldn't be in 2.14.x but that's up to Mark. > Thanks you. > -- > Frederic Crozat > Mandriva > > --=20 Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From rosechr@gmail.com Sun May 21 16:33:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4D13B0E0B for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30068-05 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F673B0FC6 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so1274772pye for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kqMI89e3/CVg6/j5eHVD/drKL1+Z4JNEPL0SsNtQT+wSRlC8Lo3rDq04m7xTMg0t7eY42H8UjCEtzLZKOfLXdwMde88Hkfm26bUq3QpA1bFh5C7bxwimH07x20zoVnj5pdfo+yZCEMgGx9Bp9PjfB8e1GyJvEKaUHLPFYHFrFTI= Received: by 10.35.9.2 with SMTP id m2mr2138297pyi; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.30.14 with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 22:33:28 +0200 From: "Christian Rose" Sender: rosechr@gmail.com To: "ash@contact.bg" In-Reply-To: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> X-Google-Sender-Auth: bb5bae8fb296523f X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.187, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.413 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:33:31 -0000 On 5/19/06, ash@contact.bg wrote: > Hi, > I took the liberty of fixing a simple typo in Deskbar. > It will make a string per language fuzzy. > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/deskbar/handlers/desklicious.= py?r1=3D1.2&r2=3D1.3&sortby=3Ddate While I agree that fixing typos and other string changing bugs is important, technically they are string freeze breaks, and as such they require approval. So while I am perfectly happy with giving you a post approval for this particular change, please *ask in advance* for approval for string freeze breaking bug fix patches in the future. Thanks, Christian From ash@contact.bg Sun May 21 17:07:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259E73B0C83; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31730-08; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (unknown [85.187.24.218]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293D33B0752; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (Stamat.Minka.Localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4LL6nEV014927; Mon, 22 May 2006 00:06:49 +0300 From: Alexander Shopov To: Christian Rose In-Reply-To: <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 00:06:49 +0300 Message-Id: <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.284 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.315, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.284 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:07:18 -0000 While Christian is right that this would be a string break - deskbar has been branched for gnome-2-14: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/?only_with_tag=gnome-2-14 The branching was done in the early April. The commit has not been made to the gnome-2-14 branch, just to HEAD. I wanted to inform people just in case builds broke due to my commit who would be to blame. Maybe I left you with the impression that I committed to gnome-2-14. Now - looking at the statistics page - I see that gnome-2-14 still lists HEAD as the branch for stable po's. That may need a change. Kind regards: al_shopov Ð’ нд, 2006-05-21 в 22:33 +0200, Christian Rose напиÑа: > On 5/19/06, ash@contact.bg wrote: > > Hi, > > I took the liberty of fixing a simple typo in Deskbar. > > It will make a string per language fuzzy. > > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/deskbar/handlers/desklicious.py?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&sortby=date > > While I agree that fixing typos and other string changing bugs is > important, technically they are string freeze breaks, and as such they > require approval. > So while I am perfectly happy with giving you a post approval for this > particular change, please *ask in advance* for approval for string > freeze breaking bug fix patches in the future. > > Thanks, > Christian > From rosechr@gmail.com Sun May 21 17:30:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12AE3B0E86 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01019-10 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000533B0E79 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so1280351pye for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OQ+6lq6GPPpkYkenrDWIAetG3josKPWaa5vi3LUrgRnmBtLQSyZzceqhCWNmSajxnv3Bruo2B3DdYBwXSQ7ya+mXQ4bsnLdpRWvpSyu0zGv1W3bN/k1Yb2Hfs++HlwjfMobwuZt/mPe0uz6WtCIIhF9FwT3I3qO+w1DgLFh/siQ= Received: by 10.35.111.7 with SMTP id o7mr3049771pym; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.30.14 with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97da516f0605211430s2df2e6b4ldbc70114bc5d723d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 23:30:46 +0200 From: "Christian Rose" Sender: rosechr@gmail.com To: "Alexander Shopov" In-Reply-To: <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cefbe8646eb8a0ea X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.415 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.415 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:30:48 -0000 On 5/21/06, Alexander Shopov wrote: > While Christian is right that this would be a string break - deskbar has > been branched for gnome-2-14: > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/?only_with_tag=3Dgnome-2-14 > The branching was done in the early April. > > The commit has not been made to the gnome-2-14 branch, just to HEAD. [...] > Maybe I left you with the impression that I committed to gnome-2-14. Yes, sorry, I assumed wrong. My apologies. > Now - looking at the statistics page - I see that gnome-2-14 still lists > HEAD as the branch for stable po's. That may need a change. Are you sure? According to http://l10n-status.gnome.org/gnome-2.14/sv/desktop/index.html , the stable deskbar-applet is gnome-2-14, and Danilo's ChangeLog entry for the change is dated March 13th. Christian From vuntz@gnome.org Fri May 26 10:50:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870313B0934 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32175-04 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7723B042F for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC124112693 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 16:50:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:52:04 +0200 Message-Id: <1148655124.5506.149.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [Fwd: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release] X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:50:29 -0000 Hey, Any volunteer to drive this release? :-) (I should be able to do some smoketesting) Cheers, -------- Message transféré -------- De: Vincent Untz Répondre à: gnome-hackers@gnome.org À: devel-announce-list@gnome.org Sujet: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:50:29 +0200 Hi everyone, If you think it's not useful to make a tarball for your module because no code changed, please look at the translations: many translation teams would love to see their work used by the users ;-) Of course, everyone is also welcome to help smoketest the release. To learn how to do this, see: http://live.gnome.org/Smoketesting The release team will be pleased to see other people join the smoketesting effort :-) Tarballs are due on Monday May 29th (next Monday) before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Please make sure that your tarballs will be uploaded before Monday 23:59 UTC: tarballs uploaded later than that will probably be too late to get in 2.14.2. If you are not able to make a tarball before Monday or if you think you'll be late, please send a mail to the release team and we'll find someone to roll the tarball for you! The schedule for 2.14 stable releases and more informations about making releases can be seen on the 2.15 page on the wiki: http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointFifteen Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From kaffeetisch@gmx.de Mon May 29 15:02:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E61A3B043D for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00520-06 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E06A33B0516 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 May 2006 19:02:53 -0000 Received: from port-212-202-210-207.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) [212.202.210.207] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 29 May 2006 21:02:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2092818 From: Torsten Schoenfeld To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:02:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1148929373.4443.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.533 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.533 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Gtk2-Perl 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:02:56 -0000 Aloha, the tarballs that make up Gtk2-Perl 2.14.2 can be found at /home/users/tsch/gtk2-perl/2.14.2 on master.gnome.org. -- Bye, -Torsten From mclasen@redhat.com Tue May 30 00:31:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E673B00FB for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28667-04 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB873B00BD for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4U4Vpmm020426 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:51 -0400 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4U4VpXC015941; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:51 -0400 Received: from [172.16.83.134] (vpn83-134.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.134]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4U4VoND014151; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:50 -0400 From: Matthias Clasen To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 00:33:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1148963591.2923.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.2.1 (2.7.2.1-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.542 X-Spam-Level: Cc: alexl@redhat.com Subject: gnome-panel 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 04:31:54 -0000 Just to let you know: gnome-panel 2.14.2 requires gnome-vfs 2.14.2, which does not exist yet. I can ask Alex to do a gnome-vfs release tomorrow. Actually, I'll just cc him. Matthias From mclasen@redhat.com Tue May 30 15:42:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9CD3B01D5 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25449-10 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF9C3B0426 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4UJgcPV005645 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Received: from mail.boston.redhat.com (mail.boston.redhat.com [172.16.76.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4UJgcxa017224 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Received: from golem.boston.redhat.com (golem.boston.redhat.com [172.16.80.24]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4UJgcWc002213 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 From: Matthias Clasen To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1149018158.21661.15.camel@golem.boston.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.1 (2.7.1-1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.543 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.543 X-Spam-Level: Subject: gnome-backgrounds 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:42:41 -0000 Another victim of the po/LINGUAS disaster. gnome-backgrounds-2.14.2 comes with zero translations... Matthias From rabble@illustrationfriday.com Tue May 30 19:06:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7804A3B04E7; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:06:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05110-10; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:06:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ftth-59-153-126-86.rdspt.ro (unknown [82.79.128.59]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 750873B029E; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:05:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:06:05 +0000 From: "rory grabiela" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5.0.10) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <19134489.20060106000802@82.79.128.59> To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----------53D40CE1F627A89B" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER MIME error: error: part did not end with expected boundary X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.841, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 1.844 X-Spam-Level: * Subject: The total of bad luck in the universe is a constant X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rabble@illustrationfriday.com List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:06:07 -0000 ------------53D40CE1F627A89B Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit dilator Welcome!

nifed[dot]com


----

is not to pay attention," and he began to get ready to drive into town, and again to his mother's to get her signature to the deeds. She heard the sound of his steps about the study and the dining room. At the drawing room he stood still. But he did not turn in to see her, he merely gave an order that the horse should be given to Voytov if he came while he was away. Then she heard the carriage brought round, the door opened, and he came out again. But he went back into the porch again, and someone was running upstairs. It was the valet running up for his gloves that had been forgotten. She went to the window and saw him take the gloves without looking, and touching the coachman on the back he said something to him. Then without looking up at the window he settled himself in his usual attitude in the carriage, with his legs crossed, and drawing on his gloves he vanished round the corner. Chapter 27 "He has gone! It is over!" Anna said to herself, standing at the window; and in answer to this statement the impression of the darkness when the candle had flickered out, and of her fearful dream mingling into one, filled her heart with cold terror. "No, that cannot be!" she cried, and crossing the room she rang the bell. She was so afraid now of being alone, that without waiting for the servant to come in, she went out to meet him. "Inquire where the count has gone," she said. The servant answered that the count had gone to the stable. "His honor left word that if you cared to drive out, the carriage would be back immediately." "Very good. Wait a minute. I'll write a note at once. Send Mihail with the note to the stables. Make haste." She sat down and wrote:


------------53D40CE1F627A89B Content-Type: image/gif; name="tfdsgtuo.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <53D40CE1.F627A89B.53D40CE1.F627A89B_csseditor> R0lGODdhIgJrAcIAAP///8x4edzc3OgFJAAAAAICAgZg5uEJCSwAAAAAIgJrAQAD/gi63P4w ikirXfPqDTL/lAeOjEie5gmm6se22gtf8hzaeC7pXM2Xv1jQ4ht2jDfkTvkoDp0/KHN6pDak OmzWCuRivAptTmwjl8FVNNo8Y7fcjYF8EJ/PwwC7naFf6O9CG3t8dIQKf3IdiIZ+hYeFiJB9 Hn2PdY9/CwSbm01ranAoaqCkYKF5jqiNhhOJEK6qsSNQsLK1sbdhtbC7qa65jEe9lsHEmgTH DqezpV7LoyvNXKfDxqqtqcW/2RScyEednA/VssTAArfbjbySFLDYjOnZwMlXn/fO0KbSVqG5 6qvgjeNmrdu3ThO8dbrE0Jajc/JW5TlkjJ4xdAQLRoSw/tDePnzT9OUD2Q/GP0mVsGXC1Gtl g44ANiX89oobO4moMmHURkcdO5eydtZcVIwBzC4jPyYVOeVZNKUnTlpLJHDoTQswZcakOdDB VYdNiK7y+TDjxZ/tigI7ijQkSSpOmRLhB9ekzbSNqlYAWCErgZnu7hoiV+KrJV9gI7zbuBGn Ua4el7qV3E+A5cuYM2vezLmz58+gQ4seTbo0ZzmYUVtWfVk168yvXQ8ILfNy7dqdY89OPVv3 6d2rgQcXPoe359cYjSdX3lq46efQo0ufTr06dbp1oUb1VZZVuWCGDSpAuHUvd6+NC8873/B7 Q718NRJk+0V7Sftyn2Bn8mzQ/rpBKlWSU0sCOuANHvShRw8g/+0hFHiCNQiITg069t1akLV1 H3785dfUfkrE1cNb2VFW4mQmduhhiCAiIeIGL9LQohExysihiimuOMaM+pGIY44u8hhEjXPd qOMZPrKYZJBL0ihkFE/yQOSRUyYBJJNXOmkklih2eeKRUka5RZM9bllmlkOKuSOYaZLZpplv ogmlm3PCWacz1uWp55589unnn4AGKuighBZq6KGdqbmmnHduyOiYdoZJp6RsUvroopfiUOUS mWo6qaWOVurppyoUUICGoS5gqhGratBqGzy8yqkCsv6wqgC1/ujlh6Kq2sCpT8UK7KysDpsG FbdC/pBrrhW0+iqzqg67rLEw/kotCNBq6Oy1DGTrwLYdgKtrqrz2CoCs3BYpbAWbnmtsu548 MO0Jz6ZLq7T2BouDt3h0m6+/I9wqrpKRQtqrqdJGW6+7DIswMML43mstwve+iivF8mLsbr0a A1yxsRArzO2qJOO78AQQA5vyx9SWzDDDK688cckac3xtzAvDrHLHIb+8MbUZyGwzyzNH3PDA XO46LpunOivxyy4nG+3T4iL9NNQ7Xz21sln7vLWpKHf99c1Nl0111hefrfa3Zldt9LxrW+0x 2FgTPXfLXcsadtx5j9y3xGl7rWXBmIqa9d86Nzzz2Gt7XPfjjouM+N17/v8sOdmJ/wxu4G5r PbXLkMuds9vMblu51ULjzfK7j2/bc+mICyx20uQuDabJfCduQs+tz35154ILDjzcdA8dPMCg z8t57H5n/rDvPgNvubX3nj679I3bMzzmbOe+fLmdwrqGaQVgBvbFlp2P/vqbqb/++fCXn5n6 8acvv/v2z3///vnr3z/+9Utf+/jXP1z9j4ABxN9lAvg++TVQM/RDoAMLuEAJHtB8FsRgASd4 wQcKkH0a9CADEUXCEprQMgH7lcju1q/ITc9uE/sYBni3OLuJzmQ49Be0kMa7ZKXud8Qz2sYg p8PeybB77rKe52Q2PePV54dHrFjRGPc921mR/nbmUsHu/jWq8InPc2dSGsH2xcVj1e6Kg8si DLYIvjOyiIZYbOOXZsCvFopxjG5U44hI1UUvvkFRSCJcH++YRj2Kgo+B9KMWAflFRR5SkIk0 JAkMoABKWqCM1XLVojBJr8jYilgt4KQZ50hKNBaylEeyZCUniZ2E1UmUKURVDuwVipvZKHyw jJcjH0lID6kSAL/kQDDJ5UpK5fIDQGMVKLH1rVv2UllrRGQkUamjX6rSANhkADatuc1VVjKb zZQi29JFMVz5KmUU2xm6OlbEMPSwZnXkGcaAZU5xvnCI9rynwlYYRXyGrGyuU4Y/ffXCHmIN ZD7kGD/h6AJpNjKP/jQyzTa3aRkDXMaiAsBoRit6UY5mRqML/OBnOGhAATrwfiH94ElFStKS lnSlLkWpSEfK0prOz6YrhSlMOSPTl6ZUpz9NqUuFitOgqnSnPZ3pTWOq1BM69alQ/cwIrOlN YFbVkte8ajdVeLx+0qoEriymyggaVtc57avnIitDayjWtC6UrFN0q1x1OFa0lnWecIWhO0GW V7eGla5iC9xb7RpNSE5TjmyiqlW9mdXFLharCxgmQsM5V7S6s69/Jaxlu0XZuvpVk5qVa9MI +tnQbtaytgwXaldbWdGyNl5nLa1sPdtawFENs6dlhmEfSs0VKbaxwI0sY4XLVdKSNrXn/qrn bHHr2s6yNrPN5WxoQeYB6Hp2tNMNZz2t+1zmVra63c3uXIv5VfA2F7q1Vdcz4wTR/CgWmOD8 JjfBec2tSped/Ixh2EaHXbHi154XcyLPMubE5NL1tfBEKOzMml98SuxtuQrwgQtasxiKU8KD FS1tM7lLEsDLk5LU7W6h6UzKyuuPSkFuo0gsXV52Ul/tZW9vQ8wuRo6Tw+1ksYtLpGJQ6Ti3 DQ2lhx1a2A6r8cMgnnEYlSxjxDoZjzH2MY1xvF4pPzmOpmzylU/JZCtPuUhl3DAzkfxEUR4z ybNcppPPTOVJYnWYECCzHatssGkIqqVE7QyeyWedPYPGzy31/jNUBR3VPBf6oxjFpmYUfehG O1pPTOBW0C7AZhXWkhn5GlmRPxnn/VS6xG7+ZiCMDOMui+Sf61SnOoMmT+sy+L80bHURX/cs wQVYnV41KGFpRk8Hm83C91xrghV8TlW/toj7zeE++5ngYn9gopF9swPoC+0HVBu+9sU2nNWc 5RUz7bjh5Sp3S9sycFt6uectblk9oenajrvW5V03Ba57bLRul7nwdm27DTzu++K2rGygtqgb IHD4TlvaBk94wUFt6sJVqq2a2+zr8G1XvtY7rSgL9/UkB+QjKFjM6TZtwm4N8iP2m+Pnnbi5 0+o3hGVcvE3sqw1HaYGJIjy+0R44/s51fvM3X1u9dHb4t8O9cnqHfLLRteXLTx7bHn8B4vs2 usUx7nSNX7zXRJc4uPftcYqLt9znFmbPB67NsRPc7Avf44gXmUWoe1fqeQU7xDm7dO/C3Oh4 cLtzQ75a5Zb83ca1N9xFblxyqurl6Ab8V/866YsXPO08J3vOFW52x/5LznNuODTmLk+Ty1qz Fb765+3ZeV8bF/EUrqHJW3yq/QZ+wv5dcNHzzewIlJPvyo79sjGOYGtXG/KUl3y047vwn1/e xij+cpDXzgHWEZntMJi6lYIu9G572/rKrw/zQat9UqudBANmOPbrrPlBlr8Mj06/+tfP/va7 //3wFw3y/pNPffNvmcvjrz6Uz7/p7Is//4d1f1oGgLzFf/RXfwXof9y2fwSYgAzYgAcYZeRn gNCngEAngfr3gFimgfgHgRWIgP1ngQu4gR3IgUtGgTuGgkP2fCkoggLFgiu4fSLmfW2mgjMI ghHogi8og6Vmgz0ogNfngS0ohDGog50GgzeIgfYHhF5mggPohEFohDTHhBNIhRlIgidohUtI hEkIF/H3hWAYhmI4hmRYhpkxfx/ogz8IhVFYglj4hG/YhjqIeVPIhk3ohngIh3koh1loh/5H h5gHiEjYhVxIiH54hX0ohYLIg2sYh3z4iJBYhYW4fFK4gzQ4apf4f4cYgJP4/n04mIZTZhHd RwLxUWMgIIo2gooaoIq6wIqImIh7GImvqIe0KBcAUYqe4IoSgYtXQQa4aBWzURCkaBbtkR0M 0ok1qIWcuIkOqCO3iBc7oIvoIYy9OALSaA7QuB2rSIz6kY2xKInMGIJq6ImV8owswR1UUSCq kAjm6B696B8DQggTUhbA0I58AY8VwhIKsg03wRj02B2oIALXCIrImIzhKI4FGQPPgRoMCRyy oRkPCZG9MZHBUZHLwRt6YJERuZG7gRwX2Rwa2ZEiaZGbwZEkCZIhORzIYZLLEZEnaYYwGZMy ORrD6BL3aAd6MRY9kRa8CJD2yJN4oY4DEoy4AJT1/giU1OiT3vgfuwiUGTCQOZiQmviN4EiV +jCPSomNOXkYO4mNSdmUXlmUYdmT9dGO8cgQZokTaVkHV/GMT8mNdwiLVrmMjliVzgiNP7mV YSmW7piVfPmTe4kTbxmYfTmWEfKXxFgNbomGRfiJQ3iQBMkm8XGTxYEJ05gYZEkMGEEg8kiZ UtEvaIESGSEg+DgVDCKK8kAgRAmVkVmXdlmLsriFisiYhgiZULmImTiVcrmbsal8uOmYj3kB t0mbjeiasmmcdDmHxEmJwFmbyNmMz4mQUmmKlWiJzVmccwmd2SmdkBmc2xmV5gKXutQsHQda rfdpjmWQ+7dtzUedsdSY/ieWXpc0npeEnt1XdbBin3UkSyRWV8cEiNLRG+gAQeYDHYRGGkkF HSAVfwu6UQbaZyREaIA2HTuFoJ5xoHqCoRc6KAkKf3ZBENJXh8VFR6rVAuw5goMzTCdKntM3 b3HJRZlGny5anjN6n3WBnrkkBiWHiWrUExMxorizezGXT3FHWMpVdpA1XNn0c8TlWPYVXDuH bcNXXzi3VdBGSb8XpaQnQ7fnYEMER8Y2bEPEah+HWgxmeqIlA/OETri2eGWKpuTWai23QnUH ZPhFa5nVegcWev75VgGVbF76X9CQEegkeFbXWqnVp1Q3bcIFXI2Vno0aWRmQpI+1opR6qd6U /lFXtalVFZ94Vz58Z6e9l3SIN3j+ZnV6yqKcB0bfRW5eh6iYVarymVt6N1YOY26KKnUjI6um ZS4WR0+mel13ynKueqSd6qSd+qja5KSTyqns+XvE5ahWGq1TCmcqJ1a8ii6eiqvHlWzBilcz t3h1qHIaBq4mNnG/ancaJ6vkNKwzN1qpOqq5mnUQw6t+ZZ9WkK4lqnjkJa79FW+MuqzD1aRw hqWSOrCPBQHBhbBJ6gELC6nqdnf2CjXbeqj8tnfB6lzxGrFJZ2Ks13WBarHcSivsGp+wSqvE urG1CnoyJy32inQHc6r39nUX17GLSnCRirDIam3a1Kw7u20Pi6mL/qWpP0uwGItgEytbp4p7 h8e0iTey9nay6BaqH1uniie114V6hoeyo+pWtxpe80p4JGuzr3c7rJdqsNdgRQewB0ellKpt ERBM2QatCmulTzq3VWqwPLdt19qtpLdO4ga1LptP5PpOW0pQqJdhB1W2Z9N0dwdr+QaqITph LRayUbu2rlquG1avNiuokvSbRhBMTqGiKAqbcakDvYavzAl+paa67rkvF1idIhqdwmSdJhqw MqqMyZlmlzVintuirvu6obSfADqTxnu8yJu8yguTy7m6uqudpvuavbm70wu91SsS4mm7/cm6 aDadEDuK46gBlCQFYcajlVu9csMuwaue/rP6gesbBD7KDSEKBesbiFO1Aexpv1MguivKuI3Z r6CCSQA8o0SSLz7wviB7vncJoudLv6fbm/3bpNrrvQKLARHcvsw5wIUjwP4bnwXcoh7rKfhp ixMhv2dLbBkmqH1rpij8sYfbWhlFfDJMbUtKeco6fEYrX40qtwRLfNQapXc7w/MlXwabpdY6 esYmMg6TTqO3p2i7VwBFNqqGp7Pmcrracij8T3AVUHYqYLJ2ayy3pgisAoQqNL17ta+Xp696 YnrXWlkVtFqVw6TbAULrqAq7swnLWJbqrNTKsHScwy6sxtO1O4K7d0+rwE7LtMC6WgDcyPLa bjHqtIPbb2OM/roym7Gae7SLR6bpK64ie6xwjMdFi7N/vEpu+7Y4+6h1HLfT6sfahqlE+8oY u8KzRcjPxVBtvHHj5LjhirgJM8WGXLgyN6RshW+c62q/mx/6OrOH7MjZBarpVTqd+3o87MrK +rDEFct6C7HPiserzLPW3McVPL43zLGJGqscq7TBzFqnY7KYe76L7MmRfMihil6Hil7Z2sFH ssyYjHdQy3vR1XFT58+bGsrXLM7Z/F6jfMdyjNDjzMfhvEraLMH3vK7pTNDTfLkgR8n/1rtd W8gZnXWSjM4crSl/MkEn5T4uV0Hww9KBttIorT8pvWcctNL2o0AxrFEU5VEOGsM9/l1RjPbT FxXUPA3UOu0ZC7rTRp1onTFRSz3URK3UPq3TiUbULo1BQMVSNq1BSIXTSMXSYF1BEEQ/RLXV Ng02MR3WSxVTZ70/LY3VHXprNz3TKK3S5ZPSN70nzRvC4LsBlQa6t2u+NYe75BhpgP283OnX fM2flRgjv2sGn3bYrMS+4FzBhT0EXcqIl02EI5x5sivZ3emd0TuLD3y9rUm7p62cg+i8iJ3a vFnasE3asX2c5eicw4xMbFsq2FlzF+xYgVjJIExp3HlmZaS/mk3ZRxK/59q9i826xvqeyE0B vV1Vo8thwI240A2fiCzcsUvBpWvao3CMhcfcIxp9Jarb/qyNv8/W1yfQ2+alBFiH2+CJwT92 hLnZ3aENBsoNpEIqpyxcsX363KjWwrr3LY0Hp9RixEjapA47rTS84HBLBFFMpBQebGbld276 wis0ehjmVX9bYGK6exW2n/Z938GdRWWscsxsqmnMsjfrwif7qWwM0g8d0VVgx5wqsO6N0e58 dYZacRUL4/3c4jTLtdwlb6I92tQbBSddoEz15Fkt1zd11z5V5U7+5FJO5S4daFjeUyRF1Ttt c0XN00wN1UHt1EKd10uF1zy11TaV5UKVoPU6VG/u5UXVVClz52z91lY+13G9vGaoTHm14mDb 4vBqpMj1btrqormMu3NcwT6b/sfHutASflrLQuSHjOHjdduNnsiYPuS92tmC3dpJrkf8XNEB jbnnuc5Ht3JgFcjU3NAIG+lva9AwImaJrsmlpekDzbUjDXMgfbX0Zs+2/drSa+onnGPELGzc KuCzx8te+urKzlBDjMPUPaWgnLcyTAMRo8LumsnVQ8yrd9G71+H69MKfaq5BCqelPttLroCg 7SLXXeKTDt7tLtvHnu/6TtsuGO+CrhTZ9p3zLfCube/a7d0e4u/Gvu/vzvDWa/C7reQPD+97 PeoIP8EXT96ofe/4zu8iqPASP/Ed7/Hu3vAkX/KJXdsRv6PcverlXd+b3d4WDwLdjGbzbtw0 6vAp/r/wJ58FATqgzjFUGrrW1dGhBzr00oGhDXpCDbr0SC8aTw8oUQ/oVF8oH+rOycTdNuDy 2/3yMe/1lS28P/DoXY/e7P1Gxz3zG3/worLflbvugaru0py5XN9gfAprxxW5bMUsVLrgExDw A9v3WkXDPhdMuoaon8c7ZPrsznZj+wTGSezhxQ7xEY/y2Ms1Kg7qChy2dY/qA4xdvIfRcyfO bzvRpJykC2vr6xx1WZfPX7e1iOr6U1vwlj/wPB+zg675uJyyiD7L4Pr5rlWnWBvrP6tKOQ3E VqW3NmfjqNx7rE+1L6u5tCXGNiP7PF75Or/zlC8Xp/7rjnzon+XsvTr7/ufkK8Kf67kltKIW yzxbxJP+zZIu5O62xgn8y5gewpP8qvaJ89eZ3lPW/QhQsArtLMpFn43i1Q1lu1SoKUIHilwX GgvbhgAruDH83vXt0jvV2ycVDESElYIjjmaorBybnpRtSgWUqtis1rrteinXr7gaHpvP5iSj MGKL2J8KfHqKZ4CpuUdPH7rlf35rSzgGhj6HXIY0MDwriTkxi4ULM4wOfBNME5mBV5lCmEFA gaIFnwpxnKBnZWhmrq9jsbJetLW4uVS3uli8XoR4Rr1iv7WXIcabucrEYGm4zc5c01vSztfV 2r7bWdlUwSg2373kW5NkwMTm0V+srd3p8bvz/lPs0QL5+vv8/f7/AAMKHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiw ocOHECNKnEixosWLCOvZ0ziOYzKPH0FSE3lPVkmTIkeCPImGZcoFA2B1UZUl3DCSvZBVObWs m0t1z2aWM6FJls0jNqv9lInz5auYUIUVlZa01SV0LSBJ8lEFEg1XOr2EpTfKTyl4Gu3UlLKz SxmatY5WVfpyaTGnsgbo7cOWKjGskX7k+DHWa1CuaMZuLCsu1CyOarEwlupN3Fyg9i5jq5vS LseoMXtaKNVJz+hgp+0xchRYR6QpLASjWxQbcewdhjepOgUn1bsif/jUCdS7T3DSwZsUF2XW N/IPoHY/Iap71QU3/qOWC8e0LDWnm01X4s0LrreqOypowi1Kfddq24i3vrZRO9IV2bZ1Coby YXp6qdDl8R0E05VFHBQCEuUfgGy1ZxkDBbK324AHOobef9wZl+Aonn3RoVvjTaNGA+gVEcUg hATo3grw4ZAfbC/wMFt8+0mSCDKpQNAfho4tJ0Qd6WnXYBumqUEdCRkyaN16EeTI04RMOEkh CsFcaKKGU07FWXgh6jJiJeplaeAbqrHomosxojnYYPdRcqabOOpogn9jiibgBW8N2ZggGEaW ZILtMSlnKhH2OGiWg2S2YVtA8ljJluJ12cuXVoTZ54B7OmbFe29e9SaNO7TZ2qes6VQH/p16 2qlJEoUaCuiJR6qU4qKwdscFlLYi6iCYtILTmKWHRSrsShidoo+xGbCxDxzLMpvBsc4um0+0 +9BmgD6LVGtIP9fmsy232HZrybeWeJvtDPzQ5q0/yLYL7bPT9oPssfxQCy+07sZbb73KTtuv v/22y9u//N4r8L8E62uwvvPSq3Cy+Src8L0QO/xPw9T2htHGHHe8D6TDcvQhiFx6NLIWJ6P8 imYbdeaypPWkXFnJIr9Mc8wgi8FyyzfPIzPMwZpsc8ga/SwP0UUPLXTPQK+Tc9JKQ820T0/j HLXVTW9jND1TU9211ldjvfTXdGUNdtjxbM3z2Ej7XLXbaHtt/nbZZE+jdkd12x233Gz3LfXc m+2tzd3g+f13zYLT3XbagCtuONx5O5243pMHHvlQnXms+eacd+7556CHLvropHP8NuSPo474 5boQHtLijLPeuDWn85267avfjrvYug8+u+Wwny17O5VLPnwtrgd9+O/I1y588L4Xj/nxKEnf OvPTQ+947tx3z7v3qoMfO/bEU/9K8o+af77116vfEvvkr9379st/X3/494+vPeXxV7HXzPP4 X/rq8T+ZCbBw2zjgLw5ovPnRD3/2g6DZ/kfB0DBwIxcEgAAz6IUKSkMvIERDATtowdCEAIQb NCECteFBLHCwfA7kXwyBJ760JUQv/vnAoQB0qMOB9HAfPfzhDQcwRCAuRIgQ4SERd7jE0ClR IEgsnRSnSMUqhs4MFYRJCUNIARRaAYUq1KAJU3hAL3bRjDjUYgY5aEYxulGMXGQiGVOoRRtk 8Y0thGMY3biXOZ6Riyds4x/9CMMa7k6C+jNk0/oIlTGW0I5EfCMMwHjHSj4Sj5EMJCSnYMkQ WrKOmATlBT+JyRK8kJGhTOUoM6lJVe6RKfuToSKjF8suUZKOkgSjKV+JS1L6MpNg3CQcRXlJ YhrTlaAMJCAtucs1NhKZqQxkLH5ZyPwl0pqHvGbjuLjMS7bQmWc8JjXFuMtkhlOcxYTmOFcp zDwKso6o/lTnHtM4SW+m833uQ0stGzhLoN0RnVospzDlCVByRvOcBD3nOu05UIWWsAzgzCVD JXnGaU70n4/JJyxnyE9sZg2j/9SlGuuJUEGaFI3AfKcau4nLQYZGjo4saCtnKlKVHnOlDuXk KlkaU31yNHv9lKVH+6cy+DXPqNXT6F2Quj6m4pOoT91n+5TqIefRUqrMsOoDoUoyqtpCq0Id algjqE2yZtOGVkyrWtfK1ra69a1wbQguXllULQgKKCTYGTTwlhblbeEySVEGrpL6OL1u9K9Z dapPyQcayizBL16q1BkM+7ptnMAcgOXGWjIV1dxNBqi+6slhxUfZr0IVkHt6/qxQInshnTW1 G5fd62a5JhnRdvZvn51qbW27VKaVtqvxa6yqmAOINyQnUcKAUl5J8RwUMRdXPCFurqSbnTlo rLh0OE5zMcUs7D6IR++g7lmcW5rTAMu45C3vBsYrnPZutzjOgU44TMMrUwDiOvJFL3JFgQrt 5jexpy2PkCR7qVpJ6ER2mBWsBGUiC6AKD42qU4Fd9SoE9yq5C04VB1rLXQxHATW36nCfqmKp K5W4wqEg0Yn3cGFNZdhRAOYqX05UIgSphxVSmhCHJ8xgGxPIFCCOsIaJ4CM5/Oq+TTLucUIb ByKxVw07bpR9LwXiVhGZvgJesQkGHKgir0EcNX6x/pNV9GUlI2q8hJWxqlR85hdTSU4KUnCg 2MPjH5MYvJgC1F3JVGfpquAtCv4vnfnE5ulqucl9sDKCGtTmCfdqLscN85x/VB4+m7goaF6s mqVwnkO7+chRiLKPNXWlDjzYsaMG9aT5culVLyHQbrZJp5U0aSkzQdFiDm2tR91qF1NH0lqG 8asbLeejbnq46kVykNAsZFFbh89mpjQ1wpvi56AmR89mrp6xvOz+spq7zN6uoZVta7OQaTif 1Y57iXRuI/vZu1P2kbzNvd/yAgs7mdZ00eL61okpxN/8Dvi/SzcxgHOu4AJvK1jHurJ8D3C3 HTXrWVcGQNhSZnXFpqFY/o/tV4lf9acxBnk1Nx5xj2+V4/ILaskR+TyRGxurIzc5w1HOV5i/ 3OVpVjloSb5zmWucsaNlMsUJ9NumFt2nR69qXztuYWYkXd+5CCxifc1ZKfDi6UcLrga3PtyH QxwXy5UtU7Cu9EG7tq7z0EAz9jxbMJC9t86Qul3NvtpHgfjjjM2gkbzeFtaWtuifGNbTL3M3 tU/97+N4e9njrtnNHt3wdz854ISbWnjbO9vViVWUk+1l+D4n8JhX9XY+HF3nWv5A5hm2dvX7 bu8WuciFUu5z9Qv7K7Pey+Aud70XXKFuZ7fUpl+2fPMaHddfHu39o2vqJQBsXR04VkRXEvBF /vxd3cO5z3/I06dZTOdSgP46jOa11aE/WGInPtfbT3Kjhb4r6MM483KGLicWJP70p3zfF5mX sfLFf4cdDOG8AS/79zASU4AUYzERozHPon8KuC8JaIAAx38NqID6xy78EjAXmDAAM4AMYzH0 EoAcyIHS0oEk6ID4EjAU6IEfiIAGmIHxAoIn+ILNYi8bWIIsKID+l4PyAoE6eIBWZFnf1XwF NiZSEmfSt2h6RiGksRZCBiva136lFnkO8H289Wh59gRFWH7Yl3i9N2RY0meglmNKaCSx0GBH yGP0h36r1ng0RylCaIbdtyjOtmu0tmLWJ210KCv15yBSGF1hImGe/hYUTRh/zkdggTgZRnJe 1DeIKAaHYXhmaZiHikhbbfgr4hZvyjZu0WdoyKGJmBh6onV8D/CE3mF6rzZs0SZe88Vt5hUS jMiJbZAMtmd8+XaKo4h7U+YoXHYatDBghCh881dmedB7rYh8NJd1OPdaYpdRNndzPBd+VVdZ OjdZ92cUtHOMxviMIecOOedzP8dyfReOyKiNwJBpS0FtK4SNNZeMt0WOzuiO3eiNPQeOkqeO 6KMS06hb+biN8jiPE9dy8DgedFVxu1V0CfZ1pOBr4fCEbqN41xiNU7dZ14BoCWkNbFeQdCeN 7nh06HOP5BEVXYeP4hgXBKZrF9d2ehh1/tkIN7nFaPeWjkKXcd7weFW4jjzXkitZVj7jECBk gSpoEAY3cD44gj5ZEEEZlAiBlAT3k0U5gg+4EAOIcAehlAKBMQkXEBFzlZ/zkVxXefvlZ7vI bE0Xds2BXfAVfPG1e+/3ev71XLjWeuBFjM/gee9FbWJIel+Ji+S2XWHGluwVa95Hi7/nHLc3 eqTWln65XoTQkTKmfObBfId4krK3iY+ohvKnaJEXbHmAa4yBbWAIemuZkXe5ZVYIcZfWl6nG H9QHmnlGfaN2B5kpYkRGifvYOG4YmcG3XnB2kLnymFsofH84Y5oZjOCHIkFWmtO2bcfFKNcH F77ZkuY1fGEX/ojV9yM+ggqqloSmuGGeWZkjxm022Y+/c5vmF5pZiAG/mJ6qiQFHFpuOtpn/ AZ14xiOg2Wp3VoR8SGu6lnGomX67sYQ1t5y/KIm84p5NCJGMiY3k+ZudKYfqaZkZ1iouZp/C uSCJaJK9Vp97GI6Usn776WP9uYZjCSiuMIkHaimRCIbDyXT/SFSJeIlhKZZTsmO5aJiHJmh7 J3qd2BwWSm8zlpd8EAbYMYzEkRRIgGnW1nbJFqLFWJ2h523wpp2faGoK2YnoBo0Jqo7jGJDt mJFGwRKUdY9ZWnfv2JBeBVxaGp7iGXMOmSgnUVpiOjnoyIwm06YPyY79E6dniqZc/tqlOvmn ANmnQRczWlmohnqoiJqoito5C3eScFebZQqogUqP9ViplvqNaSqSKEl1bDhLbTqmeDqolIqp knqpKPcNMsmnJvepigV1pWqq/tiiM6dm65aJxHWW6raKJVarTSJoqggmRdqWcPmogiqqsjqr eFesxKqgkFmernZxFMp976laEMqPo0qqk3qtsZqtx9o/A/aGu7gkKXKhv2mcwvgnEHOj1vqq yAqr2+qu+qisMGMib3iGnJoh0Zqf2WVpG/onrtqtKwew79qu8Bpzm0avuPms7EegeIiKe8gk SQeqkKqMoUqnFbusHJerTQqWnrl62gaswlqjPupebseK/kY2p6qqrQOLrdzasi5bsPhwcDs4 OlK5qDZ7szibs6QDEiQCjduTqvGosuvKrgErsENrtAabpnrajEGLtEn7sjDbtE4rtfbYqCvL slFLtVlLsfK6eBOLFwPZqX1nkOgJGXxXNHr1dEsrIlv6o0frcDWppmgAt0wHtHP3Z466SFu3 RzkKWSpJoxFprD6RtoFbjZFFm8RwFGQ6tISbstQ4E1eXt3c7ipLrT3qXKX4LdiV5dv86uJyL kHKrkog7KW1buf/auHdKkpA7kve6sGX4O5THaafnZKA4opRpq0VyFr6hlhATpbm3KN6XmOTG FrmKZLy6ex57lmXrsR+bi86b/l7sNobC6XrEm7u3J33JpoqEGW+o95zBeqW/hyBCSrKtmRKO +a0JmyqyN4crKqPr0aAneq71xbDXJ3oQ4qxk9l3/kSwopr8mOr+wJqLqB4baOX1FgJmp9pJJ Unr1l1u4oqG2YqeHS2MJi3t3yZve2WPRlr++GSWlWSX5WpzdoR0QfGXLuZ3f0VodvMGp2axL MsArrJseKq7mSmFq8b4JLJsiML4Cuge/gWWUG5eoF7MWUYELc8T9d8TSAoM46INJ3MT7coMM SIA7+JRPHMVQLILu4m9Z2YJaTMVGnMU9OJRS3IM1+8T7hzBVqcRfjMU1+5NoTIBxXIJXbMU6 eJR3/jyzYiyDDwGEUFCvTUdqDmqvGpwlVDho5Dp9JUmdE7ohJbyhvUaWoVmtYBatk7gqLTyf BtwECBxrOuwE5QmITuihEjzBy8Z6U4qLzTagpRGKQHyJrky7mpKuqPx6O4GjJZy9tjgazsVh 4RWuuenCwPidIxmkFlzLXTi8dBKsBXy9lpa74Dt77cHDG1vKQnu0ybqpnXu3FguR2Ly1rAuT RFu02Qy68bO2Okd2JfFbkQu1WLuMhju1WkuwPss86Ny1psW0XLumT1vO4xyvmXq2/DzP9EzO /uzO75zQCn21HHfPA03QBg3OgovQDF3R33yMDn3N/SzRE83R3fzQ+6zR/lyV0f8M0CIN0RZ9 0Qud0pGKVjr70jAd0zI9055jtSyN0jcd0iftpyW90R7ttQEt0Du9zQdd1EZd0BG90ibd0zJG 0vKs00/N0xSd01I91Sp9qjZ91Um91Vy91EyN015t1Wrm1GLt00qt1WFd1mCN1mw91llt1mfd 0lHd0T+dz/pM1Bj91nKt1lA91x8N0niN1GmNjWR91ILd1nBN1VVd13b9tXmqM1hHON3lDpEt IlWBqnTLJxo5KQup15k9uvXw2V3dOsUiMA2BgkZJlRujgQCBMKrN2qgtL6ot2w8R28mS2p1j 2+wy26HD2kXM21UJ3AXDb5bFyyy6r4ltFD1b/hPGbVeBJdozcdmUnQaLWdy0Cd19LRnsPN1R Z5Bhqo5Firv2RmaqvLGZqJfyBs1PgmN0maRAJggx/L2DKYx+WYz4Zl3VjHu0bKv8fV/krd5o ubtLJs3Kgq/p3V7nTZd2t27SKc3v7d/PJcsxnJMylnrQgRRlNuADDm3uln0V2eHjestlxr/+ usD5m+HXVikpXuLu1uIgrtko/uIGLr8jseHaXZEavt40buD4TeO6q+MzHuQ5HuPcQeJDzuLP TORPpuQn7rgVbtwFfuRH/uDPXOBlSeSp+ODZt3yaveHeu68kTmg/3OUam+D0LZ0qMl7pOnxZ FuJC/uUQ7q/lXaQY/v7mTK5uMb7mad7kNSzlbu7ndB0/4Y0JdQ7odk7m4TblG7znwHrjTI7l ZBLm0GbBp4jlB87okJ7pQf68my7jx1GiUH7i6F0khY7piv7okv7oOG7qTW7o2C3UTw7ipa7q py7nsobpyH3kYe7mh27jRpbq8rvkSZ4kde7poa4ErS7qf77sKP59x17icPvpvc7qyJ7nFVLr 067prv7dCtrc9a1k/83eKFKGx3flfd6zo767Jk6+v/5uIXvl38vmAX7m4s0Kax7Mcd4c4R69 cM7hWe69DN7i6Z3nNRruEW7plH7msEzhWlrYjO3kfJ3d4PzqoP7hiL3XDw84Dn/YFy/x/hlP kJNlWBUP48k92BxPxDSd8iq/8izf8vyg1xh/8jEf1zM/2h2/2B8vtkF9Mg4nsdwd6CKOsUMN 9En96iVe2L6O8zTH802OnWDH55pajko/6SIP8y6eujU06M599Zpq9BiL7UR/bEyv817S2XO7 3WOg9Y3t2Njt1Grv6EeP3C6b9IGdsT+M37J87ntZw/gO350n4E2Kb5s+5/J97j3e6Qk+5uv+ 7IIPaFPe3vL+3ih76W1+X/3lX+ru64/Zwfsd3/su4+eW+bi+1k0N7dSe7Rni9IZeaSwu+H7e 428/7Ntu7Kuu7aef43MwvmIe7Ix/4UjO+z5++7he64Pu4ZqO/vpJ7/qnX/PHNuGvXySqrvp7 rpfHr/yqnpvljeJ4PvjmTevXVvzLX+PlPvDGuefFPt+2r/3Qz/39beIj3u/mvvonK/rHH/ZP fv7eX/tBLv31r/9+j/oIAFBc+s09xaisc90NpcYZJnLZ541Wqk3CFHWgqa7h1salTOM7CbS9 GehVGpJQtGKjo0K6HBWkM0elAqvYrHbL7VpuHmYweSwrgFKfT8xrnsxMnhy+cAvD7fH0ydev r2IzfUYQbmCCNXaJY3V+gUmLjoxKg3SVbGteJYCanZsCoKGio6SlpqURBaQMoKwCrq8Noqmt qrWuuLawEaGwvbaxwL+1s7LEw7G3/sLFxsHAub+qvr6jvMfUyNHCtMmozcfKzOHXuuWr39bn zenQt93g6t277Njv48rL5Mjtp/3+/wADcvJE8EfBg2cO5tEyEKGXhZ4gPmhYRaIXio8cToyk EdLGiGE6YaRikcvIjlZQqly5iWWXk1lCXnQZc4nKkjD7aDxZUmQIlERagjyYUyfCoiyR0lyK RelKpyihRmXalGpVqzmkdtTqkGtXrFnBit3i9ehYFmfRpjW4lm3askTbwi0411PdtgR5yuyE 5K6mum1s2vQ7U+7QuCwtcrJoswsINHuZEn6JF69eh32BvrmKmU6MySYtcwzUsw1oxYsCR675 sedUj1RB/lcmyxph5o6uAcsk9PGtaKOkV49OmFg4cUw5XOuEfJa5WNmzs+htrGPFCMGWLFAn kopM46A18nS3nor7dygbjGw//3lLUCfv2V+P0X289vQ44J9HdP+N+jnrYUfffsTZl0aAKESR XWzR+YbFHj0skYYil0gyyYXDTegdciagp8geTsCkIYhlHALbhrBBKImGFaZhInB3fOiDcyPC MZ+HGEpmmUA89mgKP9xMY8476RSjjzzPDKlNPdwYiSQ481gjpJRDUlOeOvlceY+VQVaZD5FK dvnjOl7Cc2Q7/GTjpDO5UHnOmWU+aY8zavpo5514ivJbRTauoaEzyfUZo0cQ/kFYY3CUZGQh f27xGShvirKSI2+HbhKfjInW+KKiKML4GKYrZscLo0tB12BKDwoKyZ8nhjpofidkupuqnfoZ 66Jk9OYoBaCS9sWkm7na0oC9cuhiintBqsYMNKpaKR+mcnYqVpd5h114mYmnRoDW+heZfU9c 22l1sFLqLQxh5HRpt+iiiweAjBiIw6bVdfjofx3Qqx1H4K3Lln7i/pfJCs6BFe20aq0Vi4MK G5aWpAor9xrDmu16MKoIW3WxFRLvtGdza0H8VsceN4wbdYluLFTGDDpMMcgmxwyzzGOpvPLM LJf6cc07P9ezwT9TG7TGObdMs88u46w00kcDnTTP/kXr/DTTL1O9tNNNCz011m/l6fXXYIct 9thkl2322WinrfbabLet9tBEZ6111VbXbffcdOMd9VNw67i13lDnDTjXVw++d8lyGy244oXH nbjfj0t9ON9/O7445JdLnjlNNmfQua6Tb9W35o0zHnjpphN++uqhf1V56qrHLrvlqJPO+uyt 2zU657u79DnodxtO++3C5+7T65jXzjvytgcPe/HJG/9QedRXb/312Gev/fbcd+/99+CHL/74 5Jdv/vnop6++9qLL5fb78Mcv//z012///fjn70/vvjPfPPTRw93zBkjA/0nvL/yjXOSWt8D+ +c+BDUzKAV0XQQVuDoIX/pTgAzVYQZX8bjYfbBTxAMjADFpQeRhEIQcnmJcEetCFEzPhCzd4 whEWkIXSUmENnRdAARpweD78YQ9xSBsazrCDMdThEWWYRBsOkYjSgWH7kDhFJlZRiU3koRCh iDGmECArX3xZGLEwRrNoooxcIAAagRBGNG7BjaGpghvhqDs5FoSOCbPjGA/AxxIcYAt8PAAb AYBHMhIyB19M5M2cKBn9kUKNkFRj2QhQP0oGxJJrwyQmL9kPS26yko/MZJ4+eSdKYlKQpUBl KkehSlOOgpSlcGUoPenI+fGvkHU8pNVwOQFeRvGND/BlL8OiS2EiDpElMOYvkXlHhgAzjH/M /kE0pZkBQR5yjmnUZTC1uUYjclGEhgymGplZTHF+UQCJhGQyx6mAMbaRkGh8JzfZCU961rOd 9WyjPbeJz3bSU50ZiGQ+e7nPgdZzkPN0Zz/lKVBzuhGd9myoQdPpzzIC9J4/gKNF4VlRh/IT ox0NKRamqYBATjOQJUVpSTHS0It6oowfDOEtP4rNhfbzDPIMKD8VytFk2pSQCOVpPG/K02Ha 9ApFpelOP6rUn+aUoU5d6k1781Si+rOpQ2WBRgmKVakaNYzo5GYWSHrSkj4gmiQFgDXtaFWC wNSbXERKUbcq1DGGVZtGLedPfapIfQK0rl91aE2LSUnB+rStkRys/lD3+s6+MratWv2rV3Oa T31yFXhTtWhLJytZtiR2rBMoq1rPatbQjmSuzcQsCb+Zxyyglq9MHeddt/pYvA7TsUDVaWah OtXD4pWdhXxtcLuq13Litqpi1W1xkbtRRGr2OMr9rW95q1eEAjK0pB1tadO6Viq89qWt1SJr w8vW5PrWtuekLHGLO91gBpWpev1uU3EK2fkiN6+LXa59EQvf5OaXvUlFL33P21z9Ghisiuyt H7G73exy97TzrUJamRrT8VImm+YsL2ERLM51aha45f2wR0XqTr96968RLehV56riD79XpOa9 r0QnItEadzbDJKbnXdtL0BL/c8QgdSkV/rirUrX28awnPQlwVbzg84IziBZ+MpRXiMUrLuWh lTOmMlU7Uod01yrdpCIUQ1hhuB7TJUKGrg2FuWU1A/LInQjkxrAs5p3U8s54zrOe98znPvv5 bFK08pSpLN4SMnKLhj50CqPcxSqfWdGELnSkB71ER1OQ0VUgs5kfTelKS3rSQOy0oDFNXlFz 2tSXtrQZ67xqK56a1G7+tKdlnUVUt1rViGF1rmG9SEjv0Na7xjVdAp1qX8+a11JeLahDzexm P/GGi6b1qHmtaV0HW9rThna0lb3sZ2O62q5+tbYnYAADFBvY10b3sK1Nlz+7+916Lje8503v epuN2Ofm9q+d/k2Fcueb34jetr5rTW18p1vdufSCv2+NbXF7O+Dd/rbB183uhHdh4QcHeKIR bvGG4xDcwqZ4lTEucmMfW+MCHzdrQW5ygqtcASRvYcU7zvHjhfvjE5f5zBHYiZjTfOAuf/jG gT7mnP+c6P/Ggs9tHnKdN/3oL4+r0Zn+dJ5rYulWr3rWW55toVuY5R5nuKixXpibix3pSfd6 UuzN9ravTd5uj7vc5w6KqVM97BmPOtkvbPa8q33fUS/6ps+Odr8/wNyHRzzMof73kwfe4RAf L9hrvvVCY/zyii+71jXPdcgPveCDN3zkHU/uhZt+75kOvehT/njCw3ryhV99xBNvhW5/lzvz nMd7yXXv9M7jXPW9973sAXD74uM+95RHfux3n/zJwR7ls2d9CYx/fOVDH/CND/rov/n81ru+ 8cX//va1//nrkz/K3c9+18eP+iL2nfnLD37zTUL3+tv//vjPv9ztXvn5u3/zfAeAcfR+8hd/ xpN+47d+5ed98GeA/ed/y5QWCQAAOw== ----------53D40CE1F627A89B-- ------------53D40CE1F627A89B-- From tml@iki.fi Thu Jun 1 04:26:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AC23B00FC for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16712-06 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:26:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32053B0102 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:26:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pettson.tml.iki.fi (MMCCCXX.tun.saunalahti.fi [213.169.31.220]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B39C139A2A; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:26:23 +0300 (EEST) From: Tor Lillqvist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17534.42104.144000.634102@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:25:28 +0300 To: Jeff Waugh In-Reply-To: <20050818211904.GE7349@localhost.localdomain> References: <17155.61017.78000.900306@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1124357051.8534.9.camel@localhost> <17156.23654.541000.948486@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1124389702.18081.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <17156.61607.290000.576353@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20050818211904.GE7349@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 13) "Rational FORTRAN" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, TW_BG=0.077, TW_GT=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.249 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Owen Taylor , release-team@gnome.org, Tor Lillqvist Subject: Re: Hosting Win32 binary packages of GNOME stuff on ftp.gnome.org? X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:26:31 -0000 Back in August: Owen Taylor writes: > > > what the directory structure should be. One possibility would > > > be to mirror sources/ [as] binaries/win32/gtk+/2.4/ I write: > > You mean the full URI to a zipfile would look like for instance > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/ORBit2/2.13/ORBit2-2.13.0.zip > > Seems OK to me. Jeff Waugh writes: > I seem to have missed most of this discussion, only finding this in my inbox > just now. I designed the current structure, so have some interest in changes > or enhancements made to it. :-) > > The tree was designed such that binaries of GNOME releases would live under > each suite's release directories, for example: > > platform/ > 2.11/ > 2.11.1/ > sources/ > ORBit2-2.13.0.tar.gz > win32/ > ORBit2-2.13.0.zip > > Obviously, this very heavily optimises for the GNOME release structure and > schedule. But that was the point! :-) Jeff's suggestion was the path taken, and has worked fine so far. The only slight misfeature has been that for packages where the version hasn't changed between releases I have (hard)linked the binaries into several places, but the mirrors of master.gnome.org won't do that, so these files end up as several copies on the mirrors.) One other problem came up recently: Where to put binaries for stuff that isn't part of the platform or desktop suite? More specifically, somebody asked for binaries of libgsf the other day. The libgsf sources are not under platform or desktop. So for this kind of packages, Owen's suggestion would have been better. My idea now is to change to using Owen's plan, but still also keep the current {platform,desktop}/2.x/2.x.y/win32 directories, but those would now then just contain symlinks to the actual stuff under binaries/win32//. For instance, /pub/gnome/platform/2.14/2.14.2/win32/glib-2.10.3.zip would be a symlink to /pub/gnome/binaries/win32/glib/2.10/glib-2.10.3.zip. And libgsf Win32 binaries would be in binaries/win32/libgsf/x.y and nowhere else, as libgsf isn't part of platform or desktop. I don't know whether the mirrors will automatically pick up such a new binaries folder, though? Jeff continues: > Tor, do you forsee the win32 releases keeping up with the GNOME release > schedule? It would be *very* exciting if that were the case. Even if your > releases were staggered, aligning the version number with the appropriate > GNOME release would still be a huge step forward, particularly for any > developers using the GNOME platform on Windows (and we want more of those). This has mostly worked out fine, yes. During the 2.12 and 2.13 phases some Win32 binaries were released with slightly skewed versions as the Win32 changes were not committed in synch with the releases, but in 2.14.0 the versions are the same in sources and win32, as far as I can recall. I didn't do any Win32 releases for 2.14.1, out of laziness, as it didn't seem to contain that many changes relevant for Win32 (the freshest gtk and glib binaries are anyway available on ftp.gtk.org), but for 2.14.2 I will build and release Win32 packages. --tml From hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk Tue May 2 07:57:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC6F3B1484 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04399-06 for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vdsexch.vds.org.uk (unknown [80.175.191.212]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E183B025A for ; Tue, 2 May 2006 07:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail pickup service by vdsexch.vds.org.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 2 May 2006 12:57:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663 Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:57:30 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Returned mail: Data format error thread-index: AcZt35be+QebDUYLQHSYCLVV1s9OCQAAAAVD From: "Hazel McAlpine" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2006 11:57:31.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[97B31B70:01C66DDF] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 11:57:36 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am on Leave and will be back in the office on Tuesday 2nd May 2006 thanks Hazel McAlpine Training and Events Co-Ordinator Volunteer Development Scotland Unit 157/158, Stirling Enterprise Park Stirling, FK7 7RP Tel: (01786) 479593 Fax: (01786) 449285 Email:hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk =20 Disclaimer - 5/2/2006=20 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and = intended solely for release-team@gnome.org. If you are not the named = addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this = email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of = the author and might not represent those of Volunteer Development = Scotland. Warning: Although Volunteer Development Scotland has taken = reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, = the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising = from the use of this email or attachments. It is recommended by = Volunteer Development Scotland that you scan any E-mail attachments = prior to opening.=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error

I am on Leave and will be back in the office on = Tuesday 2nd May 2006
thanks




Hazel = McAlpine

Training and = Events Co-Ordinator
Volunteer Development Scotland
Unit 157/158, = Stirling Enterprise Park
Stirling, FK7 7RP

Tel: (01786) 479593
Fax: (01786) = 449285

Email:hazel.mcalpine@vds.org.uk
http://www.vds.org.uk =



Disclaimer - 5/2/2006

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely = for release-team@gnome.org. If you are not the named addressee you = should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views = or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and = might not represent those of Volunteer Development Scotland. Warning: = Although Volunteer Development Scotland has taken reasonable precautions = to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot = accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of = this email or attachments.  It is recommended by Volunteer = Development Scotland that you scan any E-mail = attachments prior to opening.  ------_=_NextPart_001_01C66DDF.96F465AC-- From kmaraas@broadpark.no Fri May 5 09:58:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80C93B0351; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08056-07; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453A83B017C; Fri, 5 May 2006 09:58:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYS001EGPHHOQC0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no>; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:58:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Unknown-00-11-0a-80-83-b7.lan ([80.203.243.165]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IYS002C9PHHVMA0@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no>; Fri, 05 May 2006 15:58:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 15:56:55 +0200 From: Kjartan Maraas To: Gnome i18n List , gnome-doc-list Message-id: <1146837415.3343.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-3) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.579 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.579 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-release-team Subject: GConf has branched X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 13:58:48 -0000 Hi. I found out that Mark had gone through a bunch of patches for GConf and marked them for commital, so I branched GConf before commiting the ones that only made sense on HEAD. gnome-2-14 is the name. Cheers Kjartan From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 5 10:47:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A2E3B083A for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10433-10 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301A13B0871 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so852412pye for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dGi9lxrWzEHmKnGoJ03UijDJqrMhqNnnCttIsJrd1Mjbuz5IhiWMcb8Q0m/aTezpCyi7+mHZuVlMYInBVmIveymrKKXuurKtOc1wlsLPsvA84+r5WGVpiwldiqfYUhq5paYl+IMUQqKR57EJOn3B3PvNad0lFDkRAeS9iu8tk8A= Received: by 10.35.109.2 with SMTP id l2mr775941pym; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.117.14 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2006 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:47:08 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.318 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.318 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: UI freeze break request for libgnomeui X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:47:13 -0000 Bug 340478 [1] contains a small patch that provides some much needed fixes for GnomeIconEntry/GnomeFileEntry: * update icon list when a new dir is selected * disable preview area in file chooser, not needed as we're selecting a directory * filter out non-directory items in the file chooser These changes make the GnomeIconEntry dialog much easier to use/understand. The patch has already been commited to HEAD, I would like to commit to libgnomeui-2-14 as well. -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 5 10:47:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D4B3B0871 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10531-09 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001043B07E4 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 10:47:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so509609pye for ; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZA7i+UedNfn7B2YINaau8UaDVXcsu97d9HHOgsUEaclquf0OsO+E9rXPwCAEMp5xpVmMlAGxooHaVdXfdNA++PIaKVWLJd1jMdLOEOBZmLPw02YaXterRBkW1hK42nVcA7CzDWa7fD6gUjF/q4G3LASc/AE4xAprkfi5s4+Fr+Q= Received: by 10.35.60.15 with SMTP id n15mr1142355pyk; Fri, 05 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.117.14 with HTTP; Fri, 5 May 2006 07:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 09:47:41 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.324 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.199, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.324 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Re: UI freeze break request for libgnomeui X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 14:47:45 -0000 Oops [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D340478 -- Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From fherrera@gmail.com Tue May 9 02:38:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971E63B065C for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16766-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.201]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B813B0917 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 02:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2595774nzk for ; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=W1fdl0+edVlpVbzhHu7W4HVoAuVzD99U2tMrF2wLVZZBalYm4lfO1IkaKbkAg/juojaRqgWkxCvZmgPt3LcJ+5ax3HsuYg+DBoVAwFjjb5RH92br7485UP8K7E54U6vou8u/5ZuwGinFmFOAzn14cmO2BICKblYVBqX+eWCTCxc= Received: by 10.36.222.1 with SMTP id u1mr4815004nzg; Mon, 08 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.58.3 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <58d389c20605082338g7e21455bh9d3df38869d692a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 08:38:31 +0200 From: "Fernando Herrera" Sender: fherrera@gmail.com To: release-team@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, gnome-i18n@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: bfc31d52d39a2a13 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: gconf-editor branched X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 06:38:39 -0000 Hi all, I've just branched gconf-editor for gnome-2-14. New development (mostly bug fixes and maybe some minor features) are going to happen on HEAD. Salu2 From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 20:31:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDE63B1044 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19047-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B343B02AF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2923602nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ImwCoUf5W5NDDQxLwO31K0U72w7kjS9PnQt9pzyC6pybRRRFqZ59pjFKdLyVHpr6PV7QIV8ucSa+Fg+QxvhhjrxkBFpxuapHsMAgt8/jtYeOaHT8HJxparUfY1OaIDUwn+PU+EIsYYUJUo6zPVtOgzGmCnBLXocM5vb+bz3PNGo= Received: by 10.36.135.10 with SMTP id i10mr6126773nzd; Tue, 09 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 20:31:26 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_JH=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Subject: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:31:30 -0000 I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs a) contain no translations at all b) require a cvs version of intltool this may not affect English-speaking jhbuild users much, but it pretty much precludes packaging 2.15, thus reducing the test base considerably. Can we please try to ensure for 2.15.2 that a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions b) make sure that tarballs contain translations Thank Matthias Clasen From newren@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:17:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1EF3B026F for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21253-07 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD203B0246 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:17:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2933181nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:17:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dxRAxLYWO8WeHLDgoFQfapjF6IPIBGCb7vqjQDYtyyUtoyGveQejj3VrYsh4JCUgoNuIA2k+v4eVI5GZ7YhcmFhxEJcYQHA0GYspu/Z94c5lbxrk0LNszGyqhLlsrps/K6z7YN6BRdC+wlQRDp1eg+iyhNdkQ8QulzlWwgFVWaw= Received: by 10.36.251.60 with SMTP id y60mr5862538nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:17:26 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:17:34 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > a) contain no translations at all > b) require a cvs version of intltool I thought (a) was resolved in this thread: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00478.html (though I don't know whether all relevant modules got updated...).=20 Was I mistaken? Either way, we should probably follow up to make sure the incompatiblity with solaris-sh was actually fixed, so that people don't need to remember the workaround in order to get translations in their tarballs. For (b), both Vincent and I built from the 2.15.1 tarballs without a cvs version of intltool. Did we do something funny or did you? From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:32:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3943B03B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21816-08 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5388F3B0352 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so1544496nzf for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OCQcS+ttTSTjMG8Nkk6UcTXWSQUuoscniGEmRfYPOjoMSZRcZqX1Lw+oV3Mb7u+si6jbKnnd4FKR9Flgw8eLg6yMGpYabogafW2XPa9QpS5Mj6I1of9sKgg13tV+xON5OYiWOUUMDyyQS95OFfB5lsf+p2RKLHtn5bMVws85F38= Received: by 10.36.247.21 with SMTP id u21mr6222239nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:32:31 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:32:35 -0000 On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > > > a) contain no translations at all > > b) require a cvs version of intltool > > I thought (a) was resolved in this thread: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00478.htm= l > (though I don't know whether all relevant modules got updated...). > Was I mistaken? Either way, we should probably follow up to make sure > the incompatiblity with solaris-sh was actually fixed, so that people > don't need to remember the workaround in order to get translations in > their tarballs. > > For (b), both Vincent and I built from the 2.15.1 tarballs without a > cvs version of intltool. Did we do something funny or did you? > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. Unfortunately (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the translation= s are missing. Matthias From newren@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:43:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69703B0263 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22368-05 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FC03B02B3 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2938014nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ETpFWzuBRepklO0CvhChgrRzHeEkGG6t6waopR64fYKM2+w6HLPMo3L1MwTfY5pSRaJtbp8tw+BRy21Z0zpJgv4htWsiPOdlZy6IrM+m4lnuhr4LIIxha3R5+U4/BVkpwUYcgn3925AWiNcSl25AXrIcqlUdpAbGN+/dZtcNhqU= Received: by 10.36.250.69 with SMTP id x69mr3690951nzh; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 19:43:36 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.538 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.538 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:43:40 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > Unfortunately > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the translati= ons > are missing. So to verify, you're saying that > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions isn't a problem after all. Correct? And that > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find out once we realized that it hit multiple modules)? Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. Thanks! Elijah From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 9 21:52:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B203B03EF for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22763-08 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.196]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5053C3B03B7 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2939755nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LXcpEH8nhwgB1RAH8oO5DJYF8cbKTsncy7khrVay1AtFBU3VfCE4ghAesqRDtadXmojYgW2DaFYF6ST51CAhXf2xCINLZDqvvn0T5N+0qUFJzPepnFh7S7R/Fh5uY7hGhtCjc1cn4aYXiKKjeOpJEcrWMK+WatYnQsg5PlnP5yk= Received: by 10.36.135.13 with SMTP id i13mr5924715nzd; Tue, 09 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:52:48 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 01:52:51 -0000 On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > > Unfortunately > > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the transla= tions > > are missing. > > So to verify, you're saying that > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > isn't a problem after all. Correct? Well, it becomes a problem as soon as you have to regenerate configure from the tarball. I helped myself by pushing a cvs snapshot of intltool into rawhide, but thats clearly not ideal. > And that > > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations > was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had > missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find > out once that it hit multiple modules)? > > Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, > from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the > necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. I did not get very far. At this time, I can add vte 0.13.0 and gedit 2.15.1 to the list of translation-deprived modules. Matthias From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Wed May 10 00:30:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295D43B0410 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30262-08 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9A23B04BA for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so2989051nzk for ; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W+rYM7tp/31XIcizPavWtKvPK67zEAZ0pIDpQzQgkvm9eMF8w3J/V2Q80TORWAPr/lIqCXbboMC14A5Lu5zZiLjvg/nMevydVfVVY3P/lANocuTKN/64ZpynTYV9yYLHEoTPQnjmitkooAHW4rt7J4AjXiFExBszyzot5+d6NfY= Received: by 10.36.119.2 with SMTP id r2mr64981nzc; Tue, 09 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.50.9 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2006 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 00:30:20 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Elijah Newren" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605091817r3af6b5achadb2c1c73654a4db@mail.gmail.com> <51419b2c0605091843n7138739atf6f7ee540eee4188@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.477 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.477 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 04:30:22 -0000 On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On 5/9/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > > On 5/9/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > Building works fine if you don't care that there are no translations. > > > Unfortunately > > > (or fortunately), rpmbuild is not so forgiving and fails if the trans= lations > > > are missing. > > > > So to verify, you're saying that > > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > > isn't a problem after all. Correct? > > Well, it becomes a problem as soon as you have to regenerate configure > from the tarball. I helped myself by pushing a cvs snapshot of intltool > into rawhide, but thats clearly not ideal. > > > And that > > > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations > > was likely a bigger issue than we realized (I only thought we had > > missed gdm, but I really should have put forth a bigger effort to find > > out once that it hit multiple modules)? > > > > Do you happen to have a list of modules that are missing translations, > > from your rpmbuild attempts? I'll try to follow up with all the > > necessary people to get this fixed to 2.15.2. > > I did not get very far. At this time, I can add vte 0.13.0 and > gedit 2.15.1 to the list of translation-deprived modules. zenity 2.15.1 and gnome-system-monitor 2.14.2 are also affected. From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 12 05:18:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F55D3B2538 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13999-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4423C3B252F for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 05:18:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E0A53984; Fri, 12 May 2006 11:18:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: David Bolter In-Reply-To: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 11:18:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.566 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.566 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:18:45 -0000 Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > Hi. > > We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. > > A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! > > What is it ? > ================= > GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. > > What's New? > =========== > This is a bugfix release. Hi David, it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 (ie the goption usage in gok). Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) Thanks you in advance. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 09:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095593B26A2 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30677-03 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAD63B0935 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 53886]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25039-24237>; Fri, 12 May 2006 09:44:59 -0400 Message-ID: <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:44:54 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.568 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:45:22 -0000 Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > >> Hi. >> >> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. >> >> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! >> >> What is it ? >> ================= >> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. >> >> What's New? >> =========== >> This is a bugfix release. >> > > Hi David, > > it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 > (ie the goption usage in gok). > > Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and > the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. > > Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are > numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) > > Thanks you in advance. > > Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this is obvious. cheers, D From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 12 10:06:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25513B26E0 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32076-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFB93B26BB for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:06:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC533DD; Fri, 12 May 2006 16:06:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: David Bolter In-Reply-To: <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:06:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.567 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.567 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:06:25 -0000 Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > > > >> Hi. > >> > >> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. > >> > >> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! > >> > >> What is it ? > >> ================= > >> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. > >> > >> What's New? > >> =========== > >> This is a bugfix release. > >> > > > > Hi David, > > > > it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 > > (ie the goption usage in gok). > > > > Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and > > the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. > > > > Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are > > numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) > > > > Thanks you in advance. > > > > > Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want > to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, > shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this > is obvious. There are no stupid question :) If you plan to do other releases in the future for 2.14.x, you should definitively create a branch without the goption part and it would probably be easier to start this branch just before goption was added in CVS. To be clear, the problem in goption patch is usage of 'G_OPTION_ARG_DOUBLE' which is glib 2.11.x material. If you don't plan to do any 2.14.x releases, don't bother creating 2.14 branch, but it would be great for distributions packagers (and probably other people) so change gok versioning so people knows they are using an "unstable" release. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 10:34:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437E13B0FF5 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01517-03 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:34:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC943B1058 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 47758]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <24863-28393>; Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:18 -0400 Message-ID: <44649CA1.6060502@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:33:05 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.57 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.57 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:34:02 -0000 Frederic Crozat wrote: > Le vendredi 12 mai 2006 à 09:44 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : > >> Frederic Crozat wrote: >> >>> Le jeudi 11 mai 2006 à 17:09 -0400, David Bolter a écrit : >>> >>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> We're pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.9 of GOK, the GNOME Onscreen Keyboards Suite. >>>> >>>> A huge thank you to everyone who continues to contribute to this project! >>>> >>>> What is it ? >>>> ================= >>>> GOK is designed to allow access to the GNOME desktop and other X applications by people who cannot use a physical keyboard (or mouse), or in situations where a physical keyboard is not present. >>>> >>>> What's New? >>>> =========== >>>> This is a bugfix release. >>>> >>>> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> it appears 1.0.9 is GNOME 2.15.x materiel, since it requires glib 2.11 >>> (ie the goption usage in gok). >>> >>> Unfortunately, you didn't branch gok before landing this material and >>> the versioning could let people thing it is only a minor release. >>> >>> Could you create a 2.14 branch and make sure next gok release are >>> numbered 1.1.x (or even better, 2.15.x ;) >>> >>> Thanks you in advance. >>> >>> >>> >> Sorry! Thanks for catching that and giving me some direction. I want >> to be clear on the best way to proceed... If I create a 2.14 branch, >> shall I undo (revert) the goption usage on that branch? Sorry if this >> is obvious. >> > > There are no stupid question :) > > If you plan to do other releases in the future for 2.14.x, you should > definitively create a branch without the goption part and it would > probably be easier to start this branch just before goption was added in > CVS. To be clear, the problem in goption patch is usage of > 'G_OPTION_ARG_DOUBLE' which is glib 2.11.x material. > > If you don't plan to do any 2.14.x releases, don't bother creating 2.14 > branch, but it would be great for distributions packagers (and probably > other people) so change gok versioning so people knows they are using an > "unstable" release. > > For sure. I will try to pay attention to the versioning expectations from now on. cheers, D From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 14:59:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFB13B0332 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18780-08 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2399B3B000C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 44109]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25629-14425>; Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:59:41 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Crozat References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> In-Reply-To: <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.571 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:59:57 -0000 [snip] > There are no stupid question :) > In that case... :-) What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to distinguish? Does anyone do both? cheers, David From jdub@waugh.id.au Fri May 12 15:10:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088B63B10D1 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19473-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node.waugh.id.au (node.waugh.id.au [70.85.31.216]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B5D3B0632 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:10:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from home.waugh.id.au (ppp121-112.static.internode.on.net [150.101.121.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by node.waugh.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C413C2F0; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:50 +1000 (EST) Received: by home.waugh.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B61103F72; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:39 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:10:39 +1000 From: Jeff Waugh To: David Bolter Message-ID: <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> Mail-Followup-To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> Reply-By: Tue May 16 05:09:50 EST 2006 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-21-686 i686 X-Message-Flag: Cranky? Try Free Software instead! X-Uptime: 05:09:50 up 4 days, 19:32, 8 users, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.444 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.444 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:10:55 -0000 > What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are > module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome > 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to > distinguish? Does anyone do both? You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them into the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball's source directory, whatever the version. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "So: Stop selling software. Give it away. Work out some other way to make money, because pretending it's not replicable is not it. Profit." - Martin Pool From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Fri May 12 15:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AE43B1130 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19851-09 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:18:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244B13B039C for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 42161]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25259-14421>; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:16:08 -0400 Message-ID: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:15:56 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.573 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.573 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:18:11 -0000 Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > >> What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Are >> module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for gnome >> 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? And if both, how are we supposed to >> distinguish? Does anyone do both? >> > > You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them into > the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball's > source directory, whatever the version. :-) > > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 ? Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? shrug, David From jdub@waugh.id.au Fri May 12 15:21:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170093B0141 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20170-02 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from node.waugh.id.au (node.waugh.id.au [70.85.31.216]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30AF3B0632 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from home.waugh.id.au (ppp121-112.static.internode.on.net [150.101.121.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by node.waugh.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5F53C2FA; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:24 +1000 (EST) Received: by home.waugh.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 58E6D3F72; Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:13 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 05:21:13 +1000 From: Jeff Waugh To: David Bolter Message-ID: <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> Mail-Followup-To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> Reply-By: Tue May 16 05:19:43 EST 2006 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.15-21-686 i686 X-Message-Flag: Cranky? Try Free Software instead! X-Uptime: 05:19:43 up 4 days, 19:42, 8 users, load average: 0.12, 0.04, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.445 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:21:27 -0000 > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally > mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: > > put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and > put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 > ? You could do it that way (the release team will generally know, based on your release patterns and announcements anyway), or... > Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? > Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? That's generally the easiest way to do it. Reduces margin for human error. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "Funny, I have no trouble distinguishing my mobile phone from the others because it's in my _own fucking pocket_!" - Mobile Rage From newren@gmail.com Fri May 12 15:32:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6E63B0AF4 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20687-07 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41D03B02C7 for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:32:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 40so728708nzk for ; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NjrulOiENXGm+Z5hUcdMwoTSZukd6WD8aMCx6ZX4QvgJL6diAVXoOCu4hLQj7XO9B0daX8Yg4Pd3NFirhFHoEfblFSTWC+In+7J/305Bwe+6/yHngzv4PV4fb3HFw5Uc6LUiLt9kQ8JZPNNfjk6ti7kks+dRKkvYpZjFaiIbWYU= Received: by 10.36.250.45 with SMTP id x45mr123738nzh; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605121232k4381d802i6ce133a811108298@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:39 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "David Bolter" In-Reply-To: <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.9 available! X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 19:32:42 -0000 On 5/12/06, David Bolter wrote: > >> What is the recommended procedure for uploading tarballs right now? Did you mean 'using the install-module script on the gnome servers' or something else? This is probably something that should show up on http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner; I've been meaning to write up a more thorough expectations-of-maintainers kind of document for a while now, someday I might just get around to it. > >> Are module maintainers supposed to be uploading tarball releases for > >> gnome 2.14 or gnome 2.15 or both? If your module has no code changes and no documentation updates/additions and no translation updates, then it's okay to ignore a given 2.x.y release. Otherwise, you should try to make a release with each gnome 2.x.y release, both stable and unstable. We understand that it's sometimes difficult and not all modules (even those that attempt to follow the gnome release schedule) do that yet. > >> And if both, how are we supposed to distinguish? Does anyone do both? I'd say that most modules probably do both. Modules which use the same 2.x versioning of Gnome tend to be the easiest to distinguish and cause the fewest errors on our part. Of course, not all modules do that and there have been multiple cases where it has been difficult for us to determine which module releases to use in a Gnome release (we do anything from looking at ChangeLogs to pinging maintainers to try to figure it out). > > You can upload any version of any tarball - the release team sorts them= into > > the release directories. Uploads from maintainers go into each tarball'= s > > source directory, whatever the version. :-) > OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally > mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: > > put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and > put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 > ? Yes. We've often tried to sort things out by hand and even checked ChangeLogs and such to try to figure out these kinds of things on our own before. Being told which versions map to what definitely helps. > Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? That would make things much easier for us, and reduce the likelihood of errors on our part. > Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? I don't see why it would; it's just a version number. Unless you had a special meaning associated with the number that others were already relying upon, that is. Hope that helps, Elijah From vuntz@gnome.org Sat May 13 17:42:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C36C3B11AD for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:42:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30418-01 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:42:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABAE3B03CF for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 17:41:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C045911268D; Sat, 13 May 2006 23:41:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Matthias Clasen In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 23:43:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1147556595.12491.123.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.521 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_JH=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.521 X-Spam-Level: Cc: release-team@gnome.org Subject: Re: po/LINGUAS revisited X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 21:42:01 -0000 Le mardi 09 mai 2006 à 20:31 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I tried to get Gnome 2.15.1 into rawhide today, but mostly failed. > Many of the 2.15.1 tarballs > > a) contain no translations at all > b) require a cvs version of intltool > > this may not affect English-speaking jhbuild users much, but > it pretty much precludes packaging 2.15, thus reducing the > test base considerably. Can we please try to ensure for > 2.15.2 that > > a) configure scripts do not depend on unreleased tool versions > b) make sure that tarballs contain translations Yesterday, I talked with Rodney about getting a new intltool release for 2.15.2 and asked what's blocking it. He'd like to fix a bug [1] before the release. [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323968 Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Mon May 15 12:20:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C27C3B080E for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08439-05 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528BB3B0805 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so213410nzh for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hK6RaHoOBaKmt9xwXHV+RysiMo2JXgLHDaYptt+nSm/nUvN2wGvDSw3dHIebolATWcMye1j/DJxeDWKC5vrai1cquF0Ou/P/71XCn3+t5crHFFztmNohe84A3rqxUVWltfoeRL71RyZZXCyRLd0O1uval5JPPKouCz2r0pt0M48= Received: by 10.36.49.6 with SMTP id w6mr3071198nzw; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 09:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:20:13 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Release the hounds!" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.415, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.997] X-Spam-Score: -2.018 X-Spam-Level: Subject: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:20:15 -0000 I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to get one done tomorrow. GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. Matthias From vuntz@gnome.org Mon May 15 13:00:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0C03B1ADE for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11368-04 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7DF3B1AA0 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:00:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5449C11268D; Mon, 15 May 2006 19:00:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Matthias Clasen In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:01:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.559 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.559 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:00:51 -0000 Le lundi 15 mai 2006 à 12:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to > get one done tomorrow. > > GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. Thanks for letting us know! Do you strongly advise us to wait for 2.9.1 or is it okay to use 2.9.0? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Mon May 15 13:14:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AFA3B1AF1 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12356-02 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.199]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0473B0817 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id m7so101300nzf for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Dh72kv5Uz1wXGWaTQZhCXVeM7iwafxDbub7XiNx6ZLxu0tO3f0RdEp6ecY0pOgoweT+DpKmi4y2eaZsDQt0R2Kzj7xniYltTuSoTkMnbIaCqVTElY6T8osbg3abU7KIHb9EdImltHv3iYYfBtbazfMucvtCR7oobcB9z11og1ik= Received: by 10.36.79.12 with SMTP id c12mr1731319nzb; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 10:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:14:45 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Vincent Untz" In-Reply-To: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1147712513.5307.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.516 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.516 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.9.1 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 17:14:50 -0000 On 5/15/06, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le lundi 15 mai 2006 =E0 12:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a =E9crit : > > I'll not be able to get a GTK+ release out today, but I'll try hard to > > get one done tomorrow. > > > > GLib 2.11.1 should be out later today though. > > Thanks for letting us know! > Do you strongly advise us to wait for 2.9.1 or is it okay to use 2.9.0? > 2.9.0 has a deadlock in the printing code... of course, there are not that many apps (=3D=3D none) using the printing stuff yet, so its not terribly important. Other than that, going with 2.9.0 should be pretty ok. You're missing quite a few bug fixes, but 2.9.1 will be out shortly anyway... Matthias From kaffeetisch@gmx.de Mon May 15 14:23:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3D93B1B5F for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17193-07 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 863E33B1B67 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 May 2006 18:23:34 -0000 Received: from port-212-202-210-90.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) [212.202.210.90] by mail.gmx.net (mp040) with SMTP; 15 May 2006 20:23:34 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2092818 From: Torsten Schoenfeld To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:23:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1147717414.12928.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.467 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.467 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Gtk2-Perl 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:23:37 -0000 Aloha, the tarballs that make up Gtk2-Perl 2.15.2 can be found at /home/users/tsch/gtk2-perl/2.15.2 on master.gnome.org. -- Bye, -Torsten From david.bolter@utoronto.ca Mon May 15 14:31:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF18D3B1B5A for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17830-03 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.18]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CE33B08D6 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from otter.atrc.utoronto.ca ([142.150.154.224] EHLO [142.150.154.224] ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 60886]) by bureau8.utcc.utoronto.ca with ESMTP id <25615-18495>; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:30:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 14:30:49 -0400 From: David Bolter User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Bolter , Frederic Crozat , GNOME 2 release team References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.574 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.574 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: gok 1.0.10 uploaded (was Re: gok 1.0.9 available!) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:31:49 -0000 Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > >> OK, so I suppose the module MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION is generally >> mapped to a gnome MAJOR_VERSION.MINOR_VERSION? So I could tell you guys: >> >> put gok-1.0.X tarballs in gnome 2.14 and >> put gok-1.1.X tarballs in gnome 2.15 >> ? >> > > You could do it that way (the release team will generally know, based on > your release patterns and announcements anyway), or... > > Thanks all... I've just uploaded a 1.0.10 tarball to resolve some naughtiness in 1.0.9., and this is for the 2.14 branch. Here's the plan: gok-1.0.x == 2.14 (happening on a gok cvs gnome-2-14 branch) and gok-1.1.x == 2.15 (on head) at least for this cycle. (I plan to move to matching gnome versions on the next cycle but am waiting for a response from some GOK people). cheers, David >> Perhaps it would be saner to change gok versions to 2.14.x and 2.15.x? >> Or does that cause political issues for non-gnome environments? >> > > That's generally the easiest way to do it. Reduces margin for human error. > :-) > > - Jeff > > From newren@gmail.com Mon May 15 14:51:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525A13B0409 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19517-02 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0763B07ED for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 14:51:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x7so206723nzc for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sjHTCwZZEHmAJ0VuZhF7GqvUiH6znEp5yz69F+hyEsSp3EXR9fcs85V2VPYjKjU8YX2JkMmMb4cY5FuF94tuW1AlcMD4UZrsnwr0YaOKSu7HxUdifXU1X/ctsSTccjX8BaEBxQNTwIfH8VDYlj06XGpQ09mM7bHvIhe85rEe2Ek= Received: by 10.37.15.59 with SMTP id s59mr6089045nzi; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605151151p30f1bd8avf31a40884f483dd5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 12:51:21 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "David Bolter" In-Reply-To: <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <4463A81B.8050801@utoronto.ca> <1147425520.11702.21.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <44649156.8060902@utoronto.ca> <1147442777.11702.28.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> <4464DB1D.6020508@utoronto.ca> <20060512191039.GI5213@waugh.id.au> <4464DEEC.1080408@utoronto.ca> <20060512192113.GJ5213@waugh.id.au> <4468C8D9.9010808@utoronto.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: GNOME 2 release team , Frederic Crozat Subject: Re: gok 1.0.10 uploaded (was Re: gok 1.0.9 available!) X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 18:51:25 -0000 On 5/15/06, David Bolter wrote: > Thanks all... > > I've just uploaded a 1.0.10 tarball to resolve some naughtiness in > 1.0.9., and this is for the 2.14 branch. > > Here's the plan: > > gok-1.0.x =3D=3D 2.14 (happening on a gok cvs gnome-2-14 branch) > and > gok-1.1.x =3D=3D 2.15 (on head) > > at least for this cycle. (I plan to move to matching gnome versions on > the next cycle but am waiting for a response from some GOK people). Awesome, thanks for all your work. :) Elijah From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 02:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663923B1DAD for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24775-04 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CE23B1DA1 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 02:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id z3so170066nzf for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Foc9gW/8Xcb2Bib3AEpJ/5Da7DxwNezz3uRQIVG1DfDOiZ0WLOfoqPZ+fd/6vTG8R9jMmuSIG/yi9IslLVWCF8S4V+dtp8FQC/QkNtOEOh3CNAz0F/AHOrFVSPJB7gBdX7WAjNAMa35KlgsQgNptYO5DFKnYNzZ6KLbRrzHk0cc= Received: by 10.36.66.3 with SMTP id o3mr6730229nza; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 00:24:35 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Gnome Release Team" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Subject: 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:24:39 -0000 If anyone else wants to help smoketest 2.15.2, or even better be in charge of it, I've got modulesets up at http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.15.2. You may need to apply the configure patch from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D340163 to both libxml2 and libxslt. I've run into some other build problem with gnome-desktop (can't import libxml2), but am heading to bed now. From vuntz@gnome.org Tue May 16 04:24:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397343B1E1E for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32494-02 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F073B1E22 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 04:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 9B678112692; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 129.88.39.24 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vuntz) by vuntz.net with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42192.129.88.39.24.1147767841.squirrel@vuntz.net> In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605152324g200dd23djb2776618996ac67@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:24:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "Vincent Untz" To: release-team@gnome.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.483 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.483 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: 2.15.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 08:24:04 -0000 On Tue, May 16, 2006 08:24, Elijah Newren wrote: > If anyone else wants to help smoketest 2.15.2, or even better be in > charge of it, I've got modulesets up at > http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.15.2. You may need to apply > the configure patch from > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340163 to both libxml2 and > libxslt. I've run into some other build problem with gnome-desktop > (can't import libxml2), but am heading to bed now. The libxml2 bindings are not installed where they should. I added a comment to the bug. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Tue May 16 22:59:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDFC3B207F for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31959-10 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F72A3B2021 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so80555nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=hB47R93IsJ3qdii/len3jyxjVRUZa8F97UYCtfQmLLhB9bAZdP6sV5DWLPv29jBEmac7s21T3VqiydQs3nLjI/uk/K7T6Yd2ZzJfkmcrVf01YLv6zoPxdZ9mmZ21dOAakNBaS32eZHIkWB2WI1o+q6UXhAs7IsE5o1f7ew5JX9I= Received: by 10.36.220.69 with SMTP id s69mr270615nzg; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.48.13 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 19:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:59:19 -0400 From: "Matthias Clasen" To: "Release the hounds!" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.518 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.518 X-Spam-Level: Subject: more po/LINGUAS disaster X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 02:59:21 -0000 I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... Matthias From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 23:22:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95C3B0259 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00788-07 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.204]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8A93B1657 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:22:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so84312nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=rnze/V6WlV3W3C6oni+td4IJb2zH3CKBwpGyqvkTccsbcSenoTX0I2/rXitYoakGvfR2CVNsobFKPXmM0jUUtAdDgbmdyJxW0wjuVm39IOs+caADPIzTLBqOhJOmxFfWk5zOjSzaj5FIZellQA8lcFTOsIAPKHhfanjCiXnWgZ0= Received: by 10.36.221.31 with SMTP id t31mr339136nzg; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:22:26 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Matthias Clasen" , "Gnome Desktop Development List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Release the hounds! Subject: more po/LINGUAS disaster -- we need re-rolled tarballs before 2.15.2 goes out X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:22:30 -0000 On 5/16/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance > is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... Indeed, it looks like we'll either have to use lots of 2.14.x tarballs or else get lots of new re-rolled ones. We may need to hold up the 2.15.2 release. Could the affected maintainers (see below) roll new releases after upgrading their local copy of intltool[1], or contact the release-team and ask us if you need us to roll it for you? We may contact individuals soonish if you don't contact us. Thanks, and sorry for the headache. In the directory with my latest testing build for gnome2.15.2, I find: 1055 newren@amr:newrenTemp/tarball-gnome$ for i in `find . -type d -name po -maxdepth 2`; do echo $(ls -l $i | wc -l) $i; done | sort -n -r 10 ./gnome-system-monitor-2.14.2/po 10 ./gnome-games-2.15.2/po 10 ./fast-user-switch-applet-2.15.1/po 10 ./deskbar-applet-2.15.1/po 9 ./vte-0.13.0/po 9 ./totem-1.5.0/po 9 ./sound-juicer-2.15.2/po 9 ./gnome-terminal-2.15.0/po 8 ./evolution-webcal-2.7.0/po 1 ./libglade-2.5.1/po 1 ./dbus-0.61/po Looking at these, it appears that gnome-system-monitor, gnome-games, fast-user-switch-applet, deskbar-applet, vte, totem, sound-juicer, gnome-terminal, and evolution-webcal were rolled without translations (libglade and dbus don't have any translations, just a stub of a directory, so they're merely false positives). Thanks. [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-May/msg00009.htm= l, http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-May/msg00016.html From newren@gmail.com Tue May 16 23:41:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9A63B0EEE for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01776-05 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798E23B0ECD for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 23:41:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s1so87311nze for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=btMc1xOh1AAwWhEtL2qHAQ51qu/rPBnTzOXMLLFFd/0+jtB1l/Ll8BqXT+SFQvX35OwoHyAXEjXBvBB1hR/1MbedtxA+LvCy+sjak+v0Y+VOIejjOOLtgm/3GbO5r7lRbPYvGM8WZUo+TATJ3IfebKPLjGXMtdarHsCdAgX9W4A= Received: by 10.36.12.16 with SMTP id 16mr546141nzl; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2006 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605162041v4be85c8ej6115381a77acb9d8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 21:41:56 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: "Release the hounds!" In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605162022v134a94d5i4e8108459bd92371@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Matthias Clasen Subject: Re: more po/LINGUAS disaster -- we need re-rolled tarballs before 2.15.2 goes out X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 03:41:59 -0000 On 5/16/06, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/16/06, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > I am still finding tarballs without translations, the latest instance > > is gnome-terminal 2.15.0... > > Indeed, it looks like we'll either have to use lots of 2.14.x tarballs > or else get lots of new re-rolled ones. We may need to hold up the > 2.15.2 release. Could the affected maintainers (see below) roll new > releases after upgrading their local copy of intltool[1], or contact > the release-team and ask us if you need us to roll it for you? We may > contact individuals soonish if you don't contact us. Thanks, and > sorry for the headache. Since not everyone reads d-d-l: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342061 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342062 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342063 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342064 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342065 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342066 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342067 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342068 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D342069 I'm a SPAM-o-matic machine! :-) From newren@gmail.com Wed May 17 13:01:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5803B1084 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14934-05 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.200]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317133B1073 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id v1so56678nzb for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Q/CJgFYcaQgfKPHtt0wGGyeSiM6TEcAYVgV5XiPJ0m16TYc1AZR3AOtBHV7Pq0EaD8OU4yjr1qbTXu4vc8LLoLcstUBg2ofOT3IcvfpKtO5LEOSgdFcPcSxG8KPmrusDMPLyrd4AQzqZSzDoz9lYA8xHqpyAjpxl9gwrVGil6gU= Received: by 10.36.32.12 with SMTP id f12mr1123614nzf; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 11:01:04 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: veillard@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:01:06 -0000 Hi Daniel, The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the headache. Thanks for all your time and effort. :) Elijah [1] We also have patches up at http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/2.15.2/ for the most recent tarballs; bug-340163.patch applies to both modules, while fix-python-path.patch just applies to libxml2. From carlos_garnacho@yahoo.es Wed May 17 16:42:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056A93B0492; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28883-04; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (174.Red-83-46-28.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.46.28.174]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCDA3B0332; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:42:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94E3E13F54; Wed, 17 May 2006 22:42:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Carlos Garnacho To: release-team@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <1147884171.7850.59.camel@localhost> References: <1147884171.7850.59.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:42:10 +0200 Message-Id: <1147898530.7850.65.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.642 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.946, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] X-Spam-Score: 1.642 X-Spam-Level: * Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, gnome-doc-list@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, system-tools-list@gnome.org Subject: gnome-system-tools branched for 2.14 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:42:15 -0000 Resent, it seems it didn't arrive, apologies for any duplicate... On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 18:42 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hello all, > > As usual, there's now a gnome-2-14 branch, which will be left in the > cold, being fed with small maintenance patches until it finally dies. > > HEAD will get all the love, the big plan for it is to get rid of the > cranky XML interface and use liboobs to communicate with > system-tools-backends HEAD through DBus. PolicyKit will be studied in > depth to replace the g-s-t handmade auth method. > > Regards > From newren@gmail.com Wed May 17 19:43:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69033B0544 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04373-10 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.207]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A713B04A2 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 19:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i1so289655nzh for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=lMigi3RXNrZwCqwBzMBNmk3T5VVbRdRznh25jX1YmpsfUz3skQwr5yE085StB/1egzoLzuZb9zy8m6elTPJLTKKNV0sCM+ioK0e1mbp0HHJwzz2urSF7qpsEeI5sBUJ1OVObnWQt4XOg5ZXMni8zOsLcVaHkALqMvtLKy9Wjpk8= Received: by 10.37.2.66 with SMTP id e66mr1816263nzi; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Wed, 17 May 2006 16:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:43:22 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: thomas@apestaart.org, "Gnome Release Team" , gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.576 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:43:24 -0000 Hi, I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on ftp.gnome.org? - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause potential problems of some kind? Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192= .html. Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release set altogether and be considered an external dependency? Thanks, Elijah From vuntz@gnome.org Thu May 18 02:24:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114C43B2482 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21540-10 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA7B3B10B2 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:24:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8D2112699; Thu, 18 May 2006 08:24:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: Elijah Newren In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:25:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: Cc: thomas@apestaart.org, gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 06:24:18 -0000 Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 17:43 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > Hi, > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > ftp.gnome.org? > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > potential problems of some kind? I'll let GStreamer people answer this :-) > Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from > last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192.html. > Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release > set altogether and be considered an external dependency? I strongly oppose to those solutions: we want GStreamer in our platform (so the external dependency way is not a solution), but it means API/ABI guarantee, which only GStreamer 1.0 will offer. I'd obviously like this to be ASAP, but I guess GStreamer people are already doing their best :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From vuntz@gnome.org Thu May 18 05:48:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFFE3B0850 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32633-04 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903053B0E64 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 05:48:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 635B6112698; Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 129.88.39.24 (SquirrelMail authenticated user vuntz) by vuntz.net with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53341.129.88.39.24.1147945684.squirrel@vuntz.net> In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:48:04 +0200 (CEST) From: "Vincent Untz" To: "Elijah Newren" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: thomas@apestaart.org, gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:48:08 -0000 On Thu, May 18, 2006 01:43, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi, > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > ftp.gnome.org? > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > potential problems of some kind? After having asked Christian, I'm uploading the tarballs to ftp.gnome.org right now. I'll finish the 2.15.2 release after this. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From thomas@apestaart.org Thu May 18 06:46:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4786A3B11C0; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03148-05; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.es6.egwn.net (server02.es6.egwn.net [195.10.6.12]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543503B11E1; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:46:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.fr4.egwn.net (server07.fr4.egwn.net [62.39.85.77]) by mx1.es6.egwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469A44F8301; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.fr4.egwn.net (spiffy mail daemon) with ESMTP id 46FC583B82; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.fr4.egwn.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server07.fr4.egwn.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14871-08; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thread.fluendo.lan (core.fluendo.com [195.10.6.237]) by mx1.fr4.egwn.net (spiffy mail daemon) with ESMTP id D6BB583B6B; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thomas.fluendo.lan (thomas.fluendo.lan [192.168.1.10]) by thread.fluendo.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0183F106354; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Vander Stichele To: Vincent Untz In-Reply-To: <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <51419b2c0605171643sd6a4a07p31a07bf3246345e2@mail.gmail.com> <1147933539.1151.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:46:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1147949202.2630.219.camel@otto.amantes> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned: By amavis at egwn.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.616 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, RCVD_IN_SBL=3.16] X-Spam-Score: 0.616 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team , gstreamer-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: GStreamer and the desktop release X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:46:50 -0000 On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 08:25 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le mercredi 17 mai 2006 à 17:43 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I made a dumb mistake and forgot to update my scripts to check for the > > gstreamer and gst-plugins-(base|good) versions from ftp.gnome.org > > instead of gstreamer.freedesktop.org. The latter has 1-2 newer > > versions of each module than what is found on f.g.o. Problem is, I > > already tested the 2.15.2 release with those newer tarballs. Given > > that there isn't much time left before we'd like to make the release > > (we would have liked to have made it already, in fact...), I don't > > want to rebuild everything to see if it works with older tarballs. So: > > - does anyone know if there are any desktop modules depending on > > versions of gstreamer or gst-plugins-* newer than the ones on > > ftp.gnome.org? > > - if that's a difficult question to answer, can we just get the > > newest tarballs uploaded to ftp.gnome.org? or would that cause > > potential problems of some kind? sorry. It's just our fault, simple human error. We were uploading tarballs before just fine, but due to a) a change in how we release stuff (automate more, write more scripts, ...) and b) us trying to get more people involved in actually releasing this just fell of the radar. I personally would proceed as we did before. We should upload these tarballs. > > Also, now is as good a time as any to bring up Luis' suggestion from > > last cycle: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/release-team/2006-March/msg00192.html. > > Should GStreamer be moved to the platform or removed from the release > > set altogether and be considered an external dependency? > > I strongly oppose to those solutions: we want GStreamer in our platform > (so the external dependency way is not a solution), but it means API/ABI > guarantee, which only GStreamer 1.0 will offer. I'd obviously like this > to be ASAP, but I guess GStreamer people are already doing their > best :-) I would also not change anything here. Every GStreamer stable series offers a stable API/ABI. Every time we feel GNOME should move to a new one (which isn't very often - once every sixteen months on average looking at the history) we will discuss it with GNOME and work something out together. Thomas From veillard@redhat.com Thu May 18 09:05:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F823B124D for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11530-02 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948CD3B0E49 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5mYc031886; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:48 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.1]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5hIY007374; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4ID5ho2007519; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id k4ID5hP1007393; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:05:42 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: Elijah Newren Message-ID: <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> References: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.367 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.003, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077, TW_PM=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.367 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:05:52 -0000 On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; > it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build > problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both > addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but > is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if > they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the > headache. I'm on vacations, with very very limited IP access, sorry I can't work on this before I come back at the end of the month ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From newren@gmail.com Thu May 18 09:45:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1787C3B255B for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13857-02 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.203]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E73F3B0FB2 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 09:45:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id n1so335698nzf for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uGMnGN8gFpGPkyql5scsS9IBVfi1drqjqE8jQFXOglk8TbmC7vEmtJPRHkviUc9c31EDBdo0VSsOnNL3EwnRR/dJJBK5Z1j/D9BghZm94yExV1IPnFEA5AlWnlq+cYr1MfY41D80pRcFoH0/8vPeGDkbBSrFAJ+ZaUaFBy133iI= Received: by 10.36.224.62 with SMTP id w62mr532207nzg; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.80.11 with HTTP; Thu, 18 May 2006 06:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51419b2c0605180645g6a3a98ebtc32ae8d6154cbce@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 07:45:33 -0600 From: "Elijah Newren" To: veillard@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <51419b2c0605171001s17cca6dbp5b1981d59930fa7@mail.gmail.com> <20060518130542.GD7671@redhat.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: libxml2 and libxslt compilation bugs X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:45:36 -0000 On 5/18/06, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > The most recent libxml2 and libxslt tarballs don't compile for me; > > it'd be nice to avoid shipping 2.15.2 with patches to fix the build > > problems if it's possible. It appears there are two issues, both > > addressed in bug 340163[1]. I know this is pretty short notice, but > > is there any chance you could look over the suggested changes, see if > > they are correct, and, if so, roll new tarballs? Sorry for the > > headache. > > I'm on vacations, with very very limited IP access, sorry I can't work > on this before I come back at the end of the month ! That's okay, we can work around it for now. I hope you enjoy your well deserved vacation. :-) Cheers, Elijah From jacofishburn@healys.com Thu May 18 12:30:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9246D3B25D4 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24110-01 for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fwtinc.com (adsl-068-157-239-053.sip.mem.bellsouth.net [68.157.239.53]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FC733B25CB for ; Thu, 18 May 2006 12:30:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000001c67a97$cf0fd710$d0bfa8c0@mqe23> From: "Jacopo Fishburn" To: release-team@gnome.org Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:26:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.71 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, HTML_40_50=0.496, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, TW_PR=0.077] X-Spam-Score: 0.71 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: crdit X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jacopo Fishburn List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:30:07 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Home 0vvner, Your crredit doesn't matter to us! If you OVVN reeal essttate and want IMMEDlATE cassh to sppend ANY way you like, or simply wish to LOVVER your monthly paayments by a third or more, here are the deeals we have TOdDAY: $ 490 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 65 % $ 370 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 90 % $ 250 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 35 % $ 200 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 55 % go to the web site =20 Jacopo Fishburn , Apprroval Mannager =20 again. In the end they decided to mince them fine and boil them. So they got a black pot, and they took out their knives. No good boiling =18em! We aint got no water, and its a long way to the well and all, said a voice. Bert and William thought it was Toms. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Home 0vvner,

Your crredit doesn't matter to us!

If you OVVN reeal essttate and want
IMMEDlATE cassh to sppend ANY=20 way you like,
or simply wish to LOVVER your monthly paayments
=20 by a third or more,
here are the deeals we have TOdDAY:

$ 490 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 65 %
$ 370 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 90 %
$ 250 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 35 %
$ 200 , 000 as lovv as 3 , 55 %

go to the web = site

Jacopo Fishburn , Apprroval Mannager
 
again. In the end they decided to mince them fine and boil them. So = they
got a black pot, and they took out their knives.
No good boiling =80=98em! We aint got no water, and its a long way = to
the well and all, said a voice. Bert and William thought it was = Toms.
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C67A5D.22B0FF10-- From fcrozat@mandriva.com Fri May 19 10:49:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75943B28B5 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26426-06 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from office.mandriva.com (ezoffice.mandriva.com [84.14.106.134]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856193B28A8 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 10:49:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from trinidad.mandrakesoft.com (trinidad.mandrakesoft.com [192.168.100.216]) by office.mandriva.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D1E37C; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:49:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Frederic Crozat To: alleykat@gmail.com, Mark McLoughlin Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Mandriva Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:49:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3-10mdk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.569 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Gnome Release Team Subject: gnome-menus 2.14.x X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 14:49:54 -0000 Hi guys, while checking alacarte 0.9.1, I noticed some problems with gnome-menus in CVS : -alacarte 0.9.1 requires some api added after 2.14.0 release was done, which is in CVS HEAD -alacarte 0.9.1 only requires gnome-menus >= 2.14 (but won't build with it) -there has been no branching in gnome-menus for 2.14, so I don't know if this api addition is supposed to be in 2.14.x or is only 2.15 material. Could you enlighten us about those small issues ? Thanks you. -- Frederic Crozat Mandriva From alleykat@gmail.com Fri May 19 16:01:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B823B17AA for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16410-10 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761DB3B17DC for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 16:01:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x29so265001nfb for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fvthcN+VHNJSI99ciHpYBcSU5y7Lx/5dYgu3NaUmCl/RJfpbzaSaLUDkq3gbH6RSKyZQqBZBVrplkLwJFJpUXIq+XROnv+MGKizTksrUkUg90cy5H5OLQ3oYdKuYb9Jz0eAQcLg1KHDf1zOZORhEozmQPxpTjLENWZfoWkYUbEM= Received: by 10.49.87.3 with SMTP id p3mr1720393nfl; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.30.1 with HTTP; Fri, 19 May 2006 13:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 15:01:12 -0500 From: "Travis Watkins" To: "Frederic Crozat" In-Reply-To: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148050186.3199.12.camel@trinidad.mandrakesoft.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.622 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.558, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -1.622 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: gnome-menus 2.14.x X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 20:01:24 -0000 On 5/19/06, Frederic Crozat wrote: > Hi guys, > > while checking alacarte 0.9.1, I noticed some problems with gnome-menus > in CVS : > -alacarte 0.9.1 requires some api added after 2.14.0 release was done, > which is in CVS HEAD > -alacarte 0.9.1 only requires gnome-menus >=3D 2.14 (but won't build with > it) Yeah, that's my goof. I use gnome-menus 2.14.0 with the patches I provided that are in HEAD so my copy is still 2.14.0. > -there has been no branching in gnome-menus for 2.14, so I don't know if > this api addition is supposed to be in 2.14.x or is only 2.15 material. > > Could you enlighten us about those small issues ? > I see no reason why it couldn't be in 2.14.x but that's up to Mark. > Thanks you. > -- > Frederic Crozat > Mandriva > > --=20 Travis Watkins http://www.realistanew.com From rosechr@gmail.com Sun May 21 16:33:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4D13B0E0B for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30068-05 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F673B0FC6 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 16:33:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so1274772pye for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=kqMI89e3/CVg6/j5eHVD/drKL1+Z4JNEPL0SsNtQT+wSRlC8Lo3rDq04m7xTMg0t7eY42H8UjCEtzLZKOfLXdwMde88Hkfm26bUq3QpA1bFh5C7bxwimH07x20zoVnj5pdfo+yZCEMgGx9Bp9PjfB8e1GyJvEKaUHLPFYHFrFTI= Received: by 10.35.9.2 with SMTP id m2mr2138297pyi; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.30.14 with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 13:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 22:33:28 +0200 From: "Christian Rose" Sender: rosechr@gmail.com To: "ash@contact.bg" In-Reply-To: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> X-Google-Sender-Auth: bb5bae8fb296523f X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.187, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.413 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 20:33:31 -0000 On 5/19/06, ash@contact.bg wrote: > Hi, > I took the liberty of fixing a simple typo in Deskbar. > It will make a string per language fuzzy. > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/deskbar/handlers/desklicious.= py?r1=3D1.2&r2=3D1.3&sortby=3Ddate While I agree that fixing typos and other string changing bugs is important, technically they are string freeze breaks, and as such they require approval. So while I am perfectly happy with giving you a post approval for this particular change, please *ask in advance* for approval for string freeze breaking bug fix patches in the future. Thanks, Christian From ash@contact.bg Sun May 21 17:07:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259E73B0C83; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31730-08; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (unknown [85.187.24.218]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293D33B0752; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (Stamat.Minka.Localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by Stamat.Minka.Localdomain (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4LL6nEV014927; Mon, 22 May 2006 00:06:49 +0300 From: Alexander Shopov To: Christian Rose In-Reply-To: <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 00:06:49 +0300 Message-Id: <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.284 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.315, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.284 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:07:18 -0000 While Christian is right that this would be a string break - deskbar has been branched for gnome-2-14: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/?only_with_tag=gnome-2-14 The branching was done in the early April. The commit has not been made to the gnome-2-14 branch, just to HEAD. I wanted to inform people just in case builds broke due to my commit who would be to blame. Maybe I left you with the impression that I committed to gnome-2-14. Now - looking at the statistics page - I see that gnome-2-14 still lists HEAD as the branch for stable po's. That may need a change. Kind regards: al_shopov Ð’ нд, 2006-05-21 в 22:33 +0200, Christian Rose напиÑа: > On 5/19/06, ash@contact.bg wrote: > > Hi, > > I took the liberty of fixing a simple typo in Deskbar. > > It will make a string per language fuzzy. > > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/deskbar/handlers/desklicious.py?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&sortby=date > > While I agree that fixing typos and other string changing bugs is > important, technically they are string freeze breaks, and as such they > require approval. > So while I am perfectly happy with giving you a post approval for this > particular change, please *ask in advance* for approval for string > freeze breaking bug fix patches in the future. > > Thanks, > Christian > From rosechr@gmail.com Sun May 21 17:30:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12AE3B0E86 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01019-10 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000533B0E79 for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 17:30:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id x31so1280351pye for ; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OQ+6lq6GPPpkYkenrDWIAetG3josKPWaa5vi3LUrgRnmBtLQSyZzceqhCWNmSajxnv3Bruo2B3DdYBwXSQ7ya+mXQ4bsnLdpRWvpSyu0zGv1W3bN/k1Yb2Hfs++HlwjfMobwuZt/mPe0uz6WtCIIhF9FwT3I3qO+w1DgLFh/siQ= Received: by 10.35.111.7 with SMTP id o7mr3049771pym; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.30.14 with HTTP; Sun, 21 May 2006 14:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <97da516f0605211430s2df2e6b4ldbc70114bc5d723d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 23:30:46 +0200 From: "Christian Rose" Sender: rosechr@gmail.com To: "Alexander Shopov" In-Reply-To: <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148064299.446e122b77b7f@www.contact.bg> <97da516f0605211333n1d8e52dbqe9941a8ee3d16540@mail.gmail.com> <1148245609.14675.17.camel@Stamat.Minka.Localdomain> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cefbe8646eb8a0ea X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.415 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.415 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-i18n@gnome.org, rslinckx@cvs.gnome.org, Gnome Release Team Subject: Re: Typo fix in Deskbar X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 21:30:48 -0000 On 5/21/06, Alexander Shopov wrote: > While Christian is right that this would be a string break - deskbar has > been branched for gnome-2-14: > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/deskbar-applet/?only_with_tag=3Dgnome-2-14 > The branching was done in the early April. > > The commit has not been made to the gnome-2-14 branch, just to HEAD. [...] > Maybe I left you with the impression that I committed to gnome-2-14. Yes, sorry, I assumed wrong. My apologies. > Now - looking at the statistics page - I see that gnome-2-14 still lists > HEAD as the branch for stable po's. That may need a change. Are you sure? According to http://l10n-status.gnome.org/gnome-2.14/sv/desktop/index.html , the stable deskbar-applet is gnome-2-14, and Danilo's ChangeLog entry for the change is dated March 13th. Christian From vuntz@gnome.org Fri May 26 10:50:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870313B0934 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32175-04 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fennas.vuntz.net (fennas.vuntz.net [82.228.182.88]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7723B042F for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 10:50:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from latronche.vuntz.net (latronche.vuntz.net [10.0.0.7]) by fennas.vuntz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC124112693 for ; Fri, 26 May 2006 16:50:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Vincent Untz To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:52:04 +0200 Message-Id: <1148655124.5506.149.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.56 X-Spam-Level: Subject: [Fwd: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release] X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 14:50:29 -0000 Hey, Any volunteer to drive this release? :-) (I should be able to do some smoketesting) Cheers, -------- Message transféré -------- De: Vincent Untz Répondre à: gnome-hackers@gnome.org À: devel-announce-list@gnome.org Sujet: TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 16:50:29 +0200 Hi everyone, If you think it's not useful to make a tarball for your module because no code changed, please look at the translations: many translation teams would love to see their work used by the users ;-) Of course, everyone is also welcome to help smoketest the release. To learn how to do this, see: http://live.gnome.org/Smoketesting The release team will be pleased to see other people join the smoketesting effort :-) Tarballs are due on Monday May 29th (next Monday) before 23:59 UTC for the GNOME 2.14.2 Stable Release, which will be delivered on Wednesday. Please make sure that your tarballs will be uploaded before Monday 23:59 UTC: tarballs uploaded later than that will probably be too late to get in 2.14.2. If you are not able to make a tarball before Monday or if you think you'll be late, please send a mail to the release team and we'll find someone to roll the tarball for you! The schedule for 2.14 stable releases and more informations about making releases can be seen on the 2.15 page on the wiki: http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointFifteen Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. From kaffeetisch@gmx.de Mon May 29 15:02:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E61A3B043D for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00520-06 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E06A33B0516 for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 15:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 May 2006 19:02:53 -0000 Received: from port-212-202-210-207.dynamic.qsc.de (EHLO [192.168.0.2]) [212.202.210.207] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 29 May 2006 21:02:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2092818 From: Torsten Schoenfeld To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 21:02:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1148929373.4443.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.533 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.533 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Gtk2-Perl 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 19:02:56 -0000 Aloha, the tarballs that make up Gtk2-Perl 2.14.2 can be found at /home/users/tsch/gtk2-perl/2.14.2 on master.gnome.org. -- Bye, -Torsten From mclasen@redhat.com Tue May 30 00:31:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E673B00FB for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28667-04 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB873B00BD for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4U4Vpmm020426 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:51 -0400 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4U4VpXC015941; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:51 -0400 Received: from [172.16.83.134] (vpn83-134.boston.redhat.com [172.16.83.134]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4U4VoND014151; Tue, 30 May 2006 00:31:50 -0400 From: Matthias Clasen To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 00:33:11 -0400 Message-Id: <1148963591.2923.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.2.1 (2.7.2.1-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.542 X-Spam-Level: Cc: alexl@redhat.com Subject: gnome-panel 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 04:31:54 -0000 Just to let you know: gnome-panel 2.14.2 requires gnome-vfs 2.14.2, which does not exist yet. I can ask Alex to do a gnome-vfs release tomorrow. Actually, I'll just cc him. Matthias From mclasen@redhat.com Tue May 30 15:42:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9CD3B01D5 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25449-10 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF9C3B0426 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4UJgcPV005645 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Received: from mail.boston.redhat.com (mail.boston.redhat.com [172.16.76.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k4UJgcxa017224 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Received: from golem.boston.redhat.com (golem.boston.redhat.com [172.16.80.24]) by mail.boston.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4UJgcWc002213 for ; Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 From: Matthias Clasen To: release-team@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 15:42:38 -0400 Message-Id: <1149018158.21661.15.camel@golem.boston.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.1 (2.7.1-1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.543 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.543 X-Spam-Level: Subject: gnome-backgrounds 2.14.2 X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:42:41 -0000 Another victim of the po/LINGUAS disaster. gnome-backgrounds-2.14.2 comes with zero translations... Matthias From rabble@illustrationfriday.com Tue May 30 19:06:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7804A3B04E7; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:06:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05110-10; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:06:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ftth-59-153-126-86.rdspt.ro (unknown [82.79.128.59]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 750873B029E; Tue, 30 May 2006 19:05:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:06:05 +0000 From: "rory grabiela" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5.0.10) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <19134489.20060106000802@82.79.128.59> To: release-team@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----------53D40CE1F627A89B" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER MIME error: error: part did not end with expected boundary X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.841, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 1.844 X-Spam-Level: * Subject: The total of bad luck in the universe is a constant X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rabble@illustrationfriday.com List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:06:07 -0000 ------------53D40CE1F627A89B Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit dilator Welcome!

nifed[dot]com


----

is not to pay attention," and he began to get ready to drive into town, and again to his mother's to get her signature to the deeds. She heard the sound of his steps about the study and the dining room. At the drawing room he stood still. But he did not turn in to see her, he merely gave an order that the horse should be given to Voytov if he came while he was away. Then she heard the carriage brought round, the door opened, and he came out again. But he went back into the porch again, and someone was running upstairs. It was the valet running up for his gloves that had been forgotten. She went to the window and saw him take the gloves without looking, and touching the coachman on the back he said something to him. Then without looking up at the window he settled himself in his usual attitude in the carriage, with his legs crossed, and drawing on his gloves he vanished round the corner. Chapter 27 "He has gone! It is over!" Anna said to herself, standing at the window; and in answer to this statement the impression of the darkness when the candle had flickered out, and of her fearful dream mingling into one, filled her heart with cold terror. "No, that cannot be!" she cried, and crossing the room she rang the bell. She was so afraid now of being alone, that without waiting for the servant to come in, she went out to meet him. "Inquire where the count has gone," she said. The servant answered that the count had gone to the stable. "His honor left word that if you cared to drive out, the carriage would be back immediately." "Very good. Wait a minute. I'll write a note at once. Send Mihail with the note to the stables. Make haste." She sat down and wrote:


------------53D40CE1F627A89B Content-Type: image/gif; name="tfdsgtuo.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <53D40CE1.F627A89B.53D40CE1.F627A89B_csseditor> R0lGODdhIgJrAcIAAP///8x4edzc3OgFJAAAAAICAgZg5uEJCSwAAAAAIgJrAQAD/gi63P4w ikirXfPqDTL/lAeOjEie5gmm6se22gtf8hzaeC7pXM2Xv1jQ4ht2jDfkTvkoDp0/KHN6pDak OmzWCuRivAptTmwjl8FVNNo8Y7fcjYF8EJ/PwwC7naFf6O9CG3t8dIQKf3IdiIZ+hYeFiJB9 Hn2PdY9/CwSbm01ranAoaqCkYKF5jqiNhhOJEK6qsSNQsLK1sbdhtbC7qa65jEe9lsHEmgTH DqezpV7LoyvNXKfDxqqtqcW/2RScyEednA/VssTAArfbjbySFLDYjOnZwMlXn/fO0KbSVqG5 6qvgjeNmrdu3ThO8dbrE0Jajc/JW5TlkjJ4xdAQLRoSw/tDePnzT9OUD2Q/GP0mVsGXC1Gtl g44ANiX89oobO4moMmHURkcdO5eydtZcVIwBzC4jPyYVOeVZNKUnTlpLJHDoTQswZcakOdDB VYdNiK7y+TDjxZ/tigI7ijQkSSpOmRLhB9ekzbSNqlYAWCErgZnu7hoiV+KrJV9gI7zbuBGn Ua4el7qV3E+A5cuYM2vezLmz58+gQ4seTbo0ZzmYUVtWfVk168yvXQ8ILfNy7dqdY89OPVv3 6d2rgQcXPoe359cYjSdX3lq46efQo0ufTr06dbp1oUb1VZZVuWCGDSpAuHUvd6+NC8873/B7 Q718NRJk+0V7Sftyn2Bn8mzQ/rpBKlWSU0sCOuANHvShRw8g/+0hFHiCNQiITg069t1akLV1 H3785dfUfkrE1cNb2VFW4mQmduhhiCAiIeIGL9LQohExysihiimuOMaM+pGIY44u8hhEjXPd qOMZPrKYZJBL0ihkFE/yQOSRUyYBJJNXOmkklih2eeKRUka5RZM9bllmlkOKuSOYaZLZpplv ogmlm3PCWacz1uWp55589unnn4AGKuighBZq6KGdqbmmnHduyOiYdoZJp6RsUvroopfiUOUS mWo6qaWOVurppyoUUICGoS5gqhGratBqGzy8yqkCsv6wqgC1/ujlh6Kq2sCpT8UK7KysDpsG FbdC/pBrrhW0+iqzqg67rLEw/kotCNBq6Oy1DGTrwLYdgKtrqrz2CoCs3BYpbAWbnmtsu548 MO0Jz6ZLq7T2BouDt3h0m6+/I9wqrpKRQtqrqdJGW6+7DIswMML43mstwve+iivF8mLsbr0a A1yxsRArzO2qJOO78AQQA5vyx9SWzDDDK688cckac3xtzAvDrHLHIb+8MbUZyGwzyzNH3PDA XO46LpunOivxyy4nG+3T4iL9NNQ7Xz21sln7vLWpKHf99c1Nl0111hefrfa3Zldt9LxrW+0x 2FgTPXfLXcsadtx5j9y3xGl7rWXBmIqa9d86Nzzz2Gt7XPfjjouM+N17/v8sOdmJ/wxu4G5r PbXLkMuds9vMblu51ULjzfK7j2/bc+mICyx20uQuDabJfCduQs+tz35154ILDjzcdA8dPMCg z8t57H5n/rDvPgNvubX3nj679I3bMzzmbOe+fLmdwrqGaQVgBvbFlp2P/vqbqb/++fCXn5n6 8acvv/v2z3///vnr3z/+9Utf+/jXP1z9j4ABxN9lAvg++TVQM/RDoAMLuEAJHtB8FsRgASd4 wQcKkH0a9CADEUXCEprQMgH7lcju1q/ITc9uE/sYBni3OLuJzmQ49Be0kMa7ZKXud8Qz2sYg p8PeybB77rKe52Q2PePV54dHrFjRGPc921mR/nbmUsHu/jWq8InPc2dSGsH2xcVj1e6Kg8si DLYIvjOyiIZYbOOXZsCvFopxjG5U44hI1UUvvkFRSCJcH++YRj2Kgo+B9KMWAflFRR5SkIk0 JAkMoABKWqCM1XLVojBJr8jYilgt4KQZ50hKNBaylEeyZCUniZ2E1UmUKURVDuwVipvZKHyw jJcjH0lID6kSAL/kQDDJ5UpK5fIDQGMVKLH1rVv2UllrRGQkUamjX6rSANhkADatuc1VVjKb zZQi29JFMVz5KmUU2xm6OlbEMPSwZnXkGcaAZU5xvnCI9rynwlYYRXyGrGyuU4Y/ffXCHmIN ZD7kGD/h6AJpNjKP/jQyzTa3aRkDXMaiAsBoRit6UY5mRqML/OBnOGhAATrwfiH94ElFStKS lnSlLkWpSEfK0prOz6YrhSlMOSPTl6ZUpz9NqUuFitOgqnSnPZ3pTWOq1BM69alQ/cwIrOlN YFbVkte8ajdVeLx+0qoEriymyggaVtc57avnIitDayjWtC6UrFN0q1x1OFa0lnWecIWhO0GW V7eGla5iC9xb7RpNSE5TjmyiqlW9mdXFLharCxgmQsM5V7S6s69/Jaxlu0XZuvpVk5qVa9MI +tnQbtaytgwXaldbWdGyNl5nLa1sPdtawFENs6dlhmEfSs0VKbaxwI0sY4XLVdKSNrXn/qrn bHHr2s6yNrPN5WxoQeYB6Hp2tNMNZz2t+1zmVra63c3uXIv5VfA2F7q1Vdcz4wTR/CgWmOD8 JjfBec2tSped/Ixh2EaHXbHi154XcyLPMubE5NL1tfBEKOzMml98SuxtuQrwgQtasxiKU8KD FS1tM7lLEsDLk5LU7W6h6UzKyuuPSkFuo0gsXV52Ul/tZW9vQ8wuRo6Tw+1ksYtLpGJQ6Ti3 DQ2lhx1a2A6r8cMgnnEYlSxjxDoZjzH2MY1xvF4pPzmOpmzylU/JZCtPuUhl3DAzkfxEUR4z ybNcppPPTOVJYnWYECCzHatssGkIqqVE7QyeyWedPYPGzy31/jNUBR3VPBf6oxjFpmYUfehG O1pPTOBW0C7AZhXWkhn5GlmRPxnn/VS6xG7+ZiCMDOMui+Sf61SnOoMmT+sy+L80bHURX/cs wQVYnV41KGFpRk8Hm83C91xrghV8TlW/toj7zeE++5ngYn9gopF9swPoC+0HVBu+9sU2nNWc 5RUz7bjh5Sp3S9sycFt6uectblk9oenajrvW5V03Ba57bLRul7nwdm27DTzu++K2rGygtqgb IHD4TlvaBk94wUFt6sJVqq2a2+zr8G1XvtY7rSgL9/UkB+QjKFjM6TZtwm4N8iP2m+Pnnbi5 0+o3hGVcvE3sqw1HaYGJIjy+0R44/s51fvM3X1u9dHb4t8O9cnqHfLLRteXLTx7bHn8B4vs2 usUx7nSNX7zXRJc4uPftcYqLt9znFmbPB67NsRPc7Avf44gXmUWoe1fqeQU7xDm7dO/C3Oh4 cLtzQ75a5Zb83ca1N9xFblxyqurl6Ab8V/866YsXPO08J3vOFW52x/5LznNuODTmLk+Ty1qz Fb765+3ZeV8bF/EUrqHJW3yq/QZ+wv5dcNHzzewIlJPvyo79sjGOYGtXG/KUl3y047vwn1/e xij+cpDXzgHWEZntMJi6lYIu9G572/rKrw/zQat9UqudBANmOPbrrPlBlr8Mj06/+tfP/va7 //3wFw3y/pNPffNvmcvjrz6Uz7/p7Is//4d1f1oGgLzFf/RXfwXof9y2fwSYgAzYgAcYZeRn gNCngEAngfr3gFimgfgHgRWIgP1ngQu4gR3IgUtGgTuGgkP2fCkoggLFgiu4fSLmfW2mgjMI ghHogi8og6Vmgz0ogNfngS0ohDGog50GgzeIgfYHhF5mggPohEFohDTHhBNIhRlIgidohUtI hEkIF/H3hWAYhmI4hmRYhpkxfx/ogz8IhVFYglj4hG/YhjqIeVPIhk3ohngIh3koh1loh/5H h5gHiEjYhVxIiH54hX0ohYLIg2sYh3z4iJBYhYW4fFK4gzQ4apf4f4cYgJP4/n04mIZTZhHd RwLxUWMgIIo2gooaoIq6wIqImIh7GImvqIe0KBcAUYqe4IoSgYtXQQa4aBWzURCkaBbtkR0M 0ok1qIWcuIkOqCO3iBc7oIvoIYy9OALSaA7QuB2rSIz6kY2xKInMGIJq6ImV8owswR1UUSCq kAjm6B696B8DQggTUhbA0I58AY8VwhIKsg03wRj02B2oIALXCIrImIzhKI4FGQPPgRoMCRyy oRkPCZG9MZHBUZHLwRt6YJERuZG7gRwX2Rwa2ZEiaZGbwZEkCZIhORzIYZLLEZEnaYYwGZMy ORrD6BL3aAd6MRY9kRa8CJD2yJN4oY4DEoy4AJT1/giU1OiT3vgfuwiUGTCQOZiQmviN4EiV +jCPSomNOXkYO4mNSdmUXlmUYdmT9dGO8cgQZokTaVkHV/GMT8mNdwiLVrmMjliVzgiNP7mV YSmW7piVfPmTe4kTbxmYfTmWEfKXxFgNbomGRfiJQ3iQBMkm8XGTxYEJ05gYZEkMGEEg8kiZ UtEvaIESGSEg+DgVDCKK8kAgRAmVkVmXdlmLsriFisiYhgiZULmImTiVcrmbsal8uOmYj3kB t0mbjeiasmmcdDmHxEmJwFmbyNmMz4mQUmmKlWiJzVmccwmd2SmdkBmc2xmV5gKXutQsHQda rfdpjmWQ+7dtzUedsdSY/ieWXpc0npeEnt1XdbBin3UkSyRWV8cEiNLRG+gAQeYDHYRGGkkF HSAVfwu6UQbaZyREaIA2HTuFoJ5xoHqCoRc6KAkKf3ZBENJXh8VFR6rVAuw5goMzTCdKntM3 b3HJRZlGny5anjN6n3WBnrkkBiWHiWrUExMxorizezGXT3FHWMpVdpA1XNn0c8TlWPYVXDuH bcNXXzi3VdBGSb8XpaQnQ7fnYEMER8Y2bEPEah+HWgxmeqIlA/OETri2eGWKpuTWai23QnUH ZPhFa5nVegcWev75VgGVbF76X9CQEegkeFbXWqnVp1Q3bcIFXI2Vno0aWRmQpI+1opR6qd6U /lFXtalVFZ94Vz58Z6e9l3SIN3j+ZnV6yqKcB0bfRW5eh6iYVarymVt6N1YOY26KKnUjI6um ZS4WR0+mel13ynKueqSd6qSd+qja5KSTyqns+XvE5ahWGq1TCmcqJ1a8ii6eiqvHlWzBilcz t3h1qHIaBq4mNnG/ancaJ6vkNKwzN1qpOqq5mnUQw6t+ZZ9WkK4lqnjkJa79FW+MuqzD1aRw hqWSOrCPBQHBhbBJ6gELC6nqdnf2CjXbeqj8tnfB6lzxGrFJZ2Ks13WBarHcSivsGp+wSqvE urG1CnoyJy32inQHc6r39nUX17GLSnCRirDIam3a1Kw7u20Pi6mL/qWpP0uwGItgEytbp4p7 h8e0iTey9nay6BaqH1uniie114V6hoeyo+pWtxpe80p4JGuzr3c7rJdqsNdgRQewB0ellKpt ERBM2QatCmulTzq3VWqwPLdt19qtpLdO4ga1LptP5PpOW0pQqJdhB1W2Z9N0dwdr+QaqITph LRayUbu2rlquG1avNiuokvSbRhBMTqGiKAqbcakDvYavzAl+paa67rkvF1idIhqdwmSdJhqw MqqMyZlmlzVintuirvu6obSfADqTxnu8yJu8yguTy7m6uqudpvuavbm70wu91SsS4mm7/cm6 aDadEDuK46gBlCQFYcajlVu9csMuwaue/rP6gesbBD7KDSEKBesbiFO1Aexpv1MguivKuI3Z r6CCSQA8o0SSLz7wviB7vncJoudLv6fbm/3bpNrrvQKLARHcvsw5wIUjwP4bnwXcoh7rKfhp ixMhv2dLbBkmqH1rpij8sYfbWhlFfDJMbUtKeco6fEYrX40qtwRLfNQapXc7w/MlXwabpdY6 esYmMg6TTqO3p2i7VwBFNqqGp7Pmcrracij8T3AVUHYqYLJ2ayy3pgisAoQqNL17ta+Xp696 YnrXWlkVtFqVw6TbAULrqAq7swnLWJbqrNTKsHScwy6sxtO1O4K7d0+rwE7LtMC6WgDcyPLa bjHqtIPbb2OM/roym7Gae7SLR6bpK64ie6xwjMdFi7N/vEpu+7Y4+6h1HLfT6sfahqlE+8oY u8KzRcjPxVBtvHHj5LjhirgJM8WGXLgyN6RshW+c62q/mx/6OrOH7MjZBarpVTqd+3o87MrK +rDEFct6C7HPiserzLPW3McVPL43zLGJGqscq7TBzFqnY7KYe76L7MmRfMihil6Hil7Z2sFH ssyYjHdQy3vR1XFT58+bGsrXLM7Z/F6jfMdyjNDjzMfhvEraLMH3vK7pTNDTfLkgR8n/1rtd W8gZnXWSjM4crSl/MkEn5T4uV0Hww9KBttIorT8pvWcctNL2o0AxrFEU5VEOGsM9/l1RjPbT FxXUPA3UOu0ZC7rTRp1onTFRSz3URK3UPq3TiUbULo1BQMVSNq1BSIXTSMXSYF1BEEQ/RLXV Ng02MR3WSxVTZ70/LY3VHXprNz3TKK3S5ZPSN70nzRvC4LsBlQa6t2u+NYe75BhpgP283OnX fM2flRgjv2sGn3bYrMS+4FzBhT0EXcqIl02EI5x5sivZ3emd0TuLD3y9rUm7p62cg+i8iJ3a vFnasE3asX2c5eicw4xMbFsq2FlzF+xYgVjJIExp3HlmZaS/mk3ZRxK/59q9i826xvqeyE0B vV1Vo8thwI240A2fiCzcsUvBpWvao3CMhcfcIxp9Jarb/qyNv8/W1yfQ2+alBFiH2+CJwT92 hLnZ3aENBsoNpEIqpyxcsX363KjWwrr3LY0Hp9RixEjapA47rTS84HBLBFFMpBQebGbld276 wis0ehjmVX9bYGK6exW2n/Z938GdRWWscsxsqmnMsjfrwif7qWwM0g8d0VVgx5wqsO6N0e58 dYZacRUL4/3c4jTLtdwlb6I92tQbBSddoEz15Fkt1zd11z5V5U7+5FJO5S4daFjeUyRF1Ttt c0XN00wN1UHt1EKd10uF1zy11TaV5UKVoPU6VG/u5UXVVClz52z91lY+13G9vGaoTHm14mDb 4vBqpMj1btrqormMu3NcwT6b/sfHutASflrLQuSHjOHjdduNnsiYPuS92tmC3dpJrkf8XNEB jbnnuc5Ht3JgFcjU3NAIG+lva9AwImaJrsmlpekDzbUjDXMgfbX0Zs+2/drSa+onnGPELGzc KuCzx8te+urKzlBDjMPUPaWgnLcyTAMRo8LumsnVQ8yrd9G71+H69MKfaq5BCqelPttLroCg 7SLXXeKTDt7tLtvHnu/6TtsuGO+CrhTZ9p3zLfCube/a7d0e4u/Gvu/vzvDWa/C7reQPD+97 PeoIP8EXT96ofe/4zu8iqPASP/Ed7/Hu3vAkX/KJXdsRv6PcverlXd+b3d4WDwLdjGbzbtw0 6vAp/r/wJ58FATqgzjFUGrrW1dGhBzr00oGhDXpCDbr0SC8aTw8oUQ/oVF8oH+rOycTdNuDy 2/3yMe/1lS28P/DoXY/e7P1Gxz3zG3/worLflbvugaru0py5XN9gfAprxxW5bMUsVLrgExDw A9v3WkXDPhdMuoaon8c7ZPrsznZj+wTGSezhxQ7xEY/y2Ms1Kg7qChy2dY/qA4xdvIfRcyfO bzvRpJykC2vr6xx1WZfPX7e1iOr6U1vwlj/wPB+zg675uJyyiD7L4Pr5rlWnWBvrP6tKOQ3E VqW3NmfjqNx7rE+1L6u5tCXGNiP7PF75Or/zlC8Xp/7rjnzon+XsvTr7/ufkK8Kf67kltKIW yzxbxJP+zZIu5O62xgn8y5gewpP8qvaJ89eZ3lPW/QhQsArtLMpFn43i1Q1lu1SoKUIHilwX GgvbhgAruDH83vXt0jvV2ycVDESElYIjjmaorBybnpRtSgWUqtis1rrteinXr7gaHpvP5iSj MGKL2J8KfHqKZ4CpuUdPH7rlf35rSzgGhj6HXIY0MDwriTkxi4ULM4wOfBNME5mBV5lCmEFA gaIFnwpxnKBnZWhmrq9jsbJetLW4uVS3uli8XoR4Rr1iv7WXIcabucrEYGm4zc5c01vSztfV 2r7bWdlUwSg2373kW5NkwMTm0V+srd3p8bvz/lPs0QL5+vv8/f7/AAMKHEiwoMGDCBMqXMiw ocOHECNKnEixosWLCOvZ0ziOYzKPH0FSE3lPVkmTIkeCPImGZcoFA2B1UZUl3DCSvZBVObWs m0t1z2aWM6FJls0jNqv9lInz5auYUIUVlZa01SV0LSBJ8lEFEg1XOr2EpTfKTyl4Gu3UlLKz SxmatY5WVfpyaTGnsgbo7cOWKjGskX7k+DHWa1CuaMZuLCsu1CyOarEwlupN3Fyg9i5jq5vS LseoMXtaKNVJz+hgp+0xchRYR6QpLASjWxQbcewdhjepOgUn1bsif/jUCdS7T3DSwZsUF2XW N/IPoHY/Iap71QU3/qOWC8e0LDWnm01X4s0LrreqOypowi1Kfddq24i3vrZRO9IV2bZ1Coby YXp6qdDl8R0E05VFHBQCEuUfgGy1ZxkDBbK324AHOobef9wZl+Aonn3RoVvjTaNGA+gVEcUg hATo3grw4ZAfbC/wMFt8+0mSCDKpQNAfho4tJ0Qd6WnXYBumqUEdCRkyaN16EeTI04RMOEkh CsFcaKKGU07FWXgh6jJiJeplaeAbqrHomosxojnYYPdRcqabOOpogn9jiibgBW8N2ZggGEaW ZILtMSlnKhH2OGiWg2S2YVtA8ljJluJ12cuXVoTZ54B7OmbFe29e9SaNO7TZ2qes6VQH/p16 2qlJEoUaCuiJR6qU4qKwdscFlLYi6iCYtILTmKWHRSrsShidoo+xGbCxDxzLMpvBsc4um0+0 +9BmgD6LVGtIP9fmsy232HZrybeWeJvtDPzQ5q0/yLYL7bPT9oPssfxQCy+07sZbb73KTtuv v/22y9u//N4r8L8E62uwvvPSq3Cy+Src8L0QO/xPw9T2htHGHHe8D6TDcvQhiFx6NLIWJ6P8 imYbdeaypPWkXFnJIr9Mc8wgi8FyyzfPIzPMwZpsc8ga/SwP0UUPLXTPQK+Tc9JKQ820T0/j HLXVTW9jND1TU9211ldjvfTXdGUNdtjxbM3z2Ej7XLXbaHtt/nbZZE+jdkd12x233Gz3LfXc m+2tzd3g+f13zYLT3XbagCtuONx5O5243pMHHvlQnXms+eacd+7556CHLvropHP8NuSPo474 5boQHtLijLPeuDWn85267avfjrvYug8+u+Wwny17O5VLPnwtrgd9+O/I1y588L4Xj/nxKEnf OvPTQ+947tx3z7v3qoMfO/bEU/9K8o+af77116vfEvvkr9379st/X3/494+vPeXxV7HXzPP4 X/rq8T+ZCbBw2zjgLw5ovPnRD3/2g6DZ/kfB0DBwIxcEgAAz6IUKSkMvIERDATtowdCEAIQb NCECteFBLHCwfA7kXwyBJ760JUQv/vnAoQB0qMOB9HAfPfzhDQcwRCAuRIgQ4SERd7jE0ClR IEgsnRSnSMUqhs4MFYRJCUNIARRaAYUq1KAJU3hAL3bRjDjUYgY5aEYxulGMXGQiGVOoRRtk 8Y0thGMY3biXOZ6Riyds4x/9CMMa7k6C+jNk0/oIlTGW0I5EfCMMwHjHSj4Sj5EMJCSnYMkQ WrKOmATlBT+JyRK8kJGhTOUoM6lJVe6RKfuToSKjF8suUZKOkgSjKV+JS1L6MpNg3CQcRXlJ YhrTlaAMJCAtucs1NhKZqQxkLH5ZyPwl0pqHvGbjuLjMS7bQmWc8JjXFuMtkhlOcxYTmOFcp zDwKso6o/lTnHtM4SW+m833uQ0stGzhLoN0RnVospzDlCVByRvOcBD3nOu05UIWWsAzgzCVD JXnGaU70n4/JJyxnyE9sZg2j/9SlGuuJUEGaFI3AfKcau4nLQYZGjo4saCtnKlKVHnOlDuXk KlkaU31yNHv9lKVH+6cy+DXPqNXT6F2Quj6m4pOoT91n+5TqIefRUqrMsOoDoUoyqtpCq0Id algjqE2yZtOGVkyrWtfK1ra69a1wbQguXllULQgKKCTYGTTwlhblbeEySVEGrpL6OL1u9K9Z dapPyQcayizBL16q1BkM+7ptnMAcgOXGWjIV1dxNBqi+6slhxUfZr0IVkHt6/qxQInshnTW1 G5fd62a5JhnRdvZvn51qbW27VKaVtqvxa6yqmAOINyQnUcKAUl5J8RwUMRdXPCFurqSbnTlo rLh0OE5zMcUs7D6IR++g7lmcW5rTAMu45C3vBsYrnPZutzjOgU44TMMrUwDiOvJFL3JFgQrt 5jexpy2PkCR7qVpJ6ER2mBWsBGUiC6AKD42qU4Fd9SoE9yq5C04VB1rLXQxHATW36nCfqmKp K5W4wqEg0Yn3cGFNZdhRAOYqX05UIgSphxVSmhCHJ8xgGxPIFCCOsIaJ4CM5/Oq+TTLucUIb ByKxVw07bpR9LwXiVhGZvgJesQkGHKgir0EcNX6x/pNV9GUlI2q8hJWxqlR85hdTSU4KUnCg 2MPjH5MYvJgC1F3JVGfpquAtCv4vnfnE5ulqucl9sDKCGtTmCfdqLscN85x/VB4+m7goaF6s mqVwnkO7+chRiLKPNXWlDjzYsaMG9aT5culVLyHQbrZJp5U0aSkzQdFiDm2tR91qF1NH0lqG 8asbLeejbnq46kVykNAsZFFbh89mpjQ1wpvi56AmR89mrp6xvOz+spq7zN6uoZVta7OQaTif 1Y57iXRuI/vZu1P2kbzNvd/yAgs7mdZ00eL61okpxN/8Dvi/SzcxgHOu4AJvK1jHurJ8D3C3 HTXrWVcGQNhSZnXFpqFY/o/tV4lf9acxBnk1Nx5xj2+V4/ILaskR+TyRGxurIzc5w1HOV5i/ 3OVpVjloSb5zmWucsaNlMsUJ9NumFt2nR69qXztuYWYkXd+5CCxifc1ZKfDi6UcLrga3PtyH QxwXy5UtU7Cu9EG7tq7z0EAz9jxbMJC9t86Qul3NvtpHgfjjjM2gkbzeFtaWtuifGNbTL3M3 tU/97+N4e9njrtnNHt3wdz854ISbWnjbO9vViVWUk+1l+D4n8JhX9XY+HF3nWv5A5hm2dvX7 bu8WuciFUu5z9Qv7K7Pey+Aud70XXKFuZ7fUpl+2fPMaHddfHu39o2vqJQBsXR04VkRXEvBF /vxd3cO5z3/I06dZTOdSgP46jOa11aE/WGInPtfbT3Kjhb4r6MM483KGLicWJP70p3zfF5mX sfLFf4cdDOG8AS/79zASU4AUYzERozHPon8KuC8JaIAAx38NqID6xy78EjAXmDAAM4AMYzH0 EoAcyIHS0oEk6ID4EjAU6IEfiIAGmIHxAoIn+ILNYi8bWIIsKID+l4PyAoE6eIBWZFnf1XwF NiZSEmfSt2h6RiGksRZCBiva136lFnkO8H289Wh59gRFWH7Yl3i9N2RY0meglmNKaCSx0GBH yGP0h36r1ng0RylCaIbdtyjOtmu0tmLWJ210KCv15yBSGF1hImGe/hYUTRh/zkdggTgZRnJe 1DeIKAaHYXhmaZiHikhbbfgr4hZvyjZu0WdoyKGJmBh6onV8D/CE3mF6rzZs0SZe88Vt5hUS jMiJbZAMtmd8+XaKo4h7U+YoXHYatDBghCh881dmedB7rYh8NJd1OPdaYpdRNndzPBd+VVdZ OjdZ92cUtHOMxviMIecOOedzP8dyfReOyKiNwJBpS0FtK4SNNZeMt0WOzuiO3eiNPQeOkqeO 6KMS06hb+biN8jiPE9dy8DgedFVxu1V0CfZ1pOBr4fCEbqN41xiNU7dZ14BoCWkNbFeQdCeN 7nh06HOP5BEVXYeP4hgXBKZrF9d2ehh1/tkIN7nFaPeWjkKXcd7weFW4jjzXkitZVj7jECBk gSpoEAY3cD44gj5ZEEEZlAiBlAT3k0U5gg+4EAOIcAehlAKBMQkXEBFzlZ/zkVxXefvlZ7vI bE0Xds2BXfAVfPG1e+/3ev71XLjWeuBFjM/gee9FbWJIel+Ji+S2XWHGluwVa95Hi7/nHLc3 eqTWln65XoTQkTKmfObBfId4krK3iY+ohvKnaJEXbHmAa4yBbWAIemuZkXe5ZVYIcZfWl6nG H9QHmnlGfaN2B5kpYkRGifvYOG4YmcG3XnB2kLnymFsofH84Y5oZjOCHIkFWmtO2bcfFKNcH F77ZkuY1fGEX/ojV9yM+ggqqloSmuGGeWZkjxm022Y+/c5vmF5pZiAG/mJ6qiQFHFpuOtpn/ AZ14xiOg2Wp3VoR8SGu6lnGomX67sYQ1t5y/KIm84p5NCJGMiY3k+ZudKYfqaZkZ1iouZp/C uSCJaJK9Vp97GI6Usn776WP9uYZjCSiuMIkHaimRCIbDyXT/SFSJeIlhKZZTsmO5aJiHJmh7 J3qd2BwWSm8zlpd8EAbYMYzEkRRIgGnW1nbJFqLFWJ2h523wpp2faGoK2YnoBo0Jqo7jGJDt mJFGwRKUdY9ZWnfv2JBeBVxaGp7iGXMOmSgnUVpiOjnoyIwm06YPyY79E6dniqZc/tqlOvmn ANmnQRczWlmohnqoiJqoito5C3eScFebZQqogUqP9ViplvqNaSqSKEl1bDhLbTqmeDqolIqp knqpKPcNMsmnJvepigV1pWqq/tiiM6dm65aJxHWW6raKJVarTSJoqggmRdqWcPmogiqqsjqr eFesxKqgkFmernZxFMp976laEMqPo0qqk3qtsZqtx9o/A/aGu7gkKXKhv2mcwvgnEHOj1vqq yAqr2+qu+qisMGMib3iGnJoh0Zqf2WVpG/onrtqtKwew79qu8Bpzm0avuPms7EegeIiKe8gk SQeqkKqMoUqnFbusHJerTQqWnrl62gaswlqjPupebseK/kY2p6qqrQOLrdzasi5bsPhwcDs4 OlK5qDZ7szibs6QDEiQCjduTqvGosuvKrgErsENrtAabpnrajEGLtEn7sjDbtE4rtfbYqCvL slFLtVlLsfK6eBOLFwPZqX1nkOgJGXxXNHr1dEsrIlv6o0frcDWppmgAt0wHtHP3Z466SFu3 RzkKWSpJoxFprD6RtoFbjZFFm8RwFGQ6tISbstQ4E1eXt3c7ipLrT3qXKX4LdiV5dv86uJyL kHKrkog7KW1buf/auHdKkpA7kve6sGX4O5THaafnZKA4opRpq0VyFr6hlhATpbm3KN6XmOTG FrmKZLy6ex57lmXrsR+bi86b/l7sNobC6XrEm7u3J33JpoqEGW+o95zBeqW/hyBCSrKtmRKO +a0JmyqyN4crKqPr0aAneq71xbDXJ3oQ4qxk9l3/kSwopr8mOr+wJqLqB4baOX1FgJmp9pJJ Unr1l1u4oqG2YqeHS2MJi3t3yZve2WPRlr++GSWlWSX5WpzdoR0QfGXLuZ3f0VodvMGp2axL MsArrJseKq7mSmFq8b4JLJsiML4Cuge/gWWUG5eoF7MWUYELc8T9d8TSAoM46INJ3MT7coMM SIA7+JRPHMVQLILu4m9Z2YJaTMVGnMU9OJRS3IM1+8T7hzBVqcRfjMU1+5NoTIBxXIJXbMU6 eJR3/jyzYiyDDwGEUFCvTUdqDmqvGpwlVDho5Dp9JUmdE7ohJbyhvUaWoVmtYBatk7gqLTyf BtwECBxrOuwE5QmITuihEjzBy8Z6U4qLzTagpRGKQHyJrky7mpKuqPx6O4GjJZy9tjgazsVh 4RWuuenCwPidIxmkFlzLXTi8dBKsBXy9lpa74Dt77cHDG1vKQnu0ybqpnXu3FguR2Ly1rAuT RFu02Qy68bO2Okd2JfFbkQu1WLuMhju1WkuwPss86Ny1psW0XLumT1vO4xyvmXq2/DzP9EzO /uzO75zQCn21HHfPA03QBg3OgovQDF3R33yMDn3N/SzRE83R3fzQ+6zR/lyV0f8M0CIN0RZ9 0Qud0pGKVjr70jAd0zI9055jtSyN0jcd0iftpyW90R7ttQEt0Du9zQdd1EZd0BG90ibd0zJG 0vKs00/N0xSd01I91Sp9qjZ91Um91Vy91EyN015t1Wrm1GLt00qt1WFd1mCN1mw91llt1mfd 0lHd0T+dz/pM1Bj91nKt1lA91x8N0niN1GmNjWR91ILd1nBN1VVd13b9tXmqM1hHON3lDpEt IlWBqnTLJxo5KQup15k9uvXw2V3dOsUiMA2BgkZJlRujgQCBMKrN2qgtL6ot2w8R28mS2p1j 2+wy26HD2kXM21UJ3AXDb5bFyyy6r4ltFD1b/hPGbVeBJdozcdmUnQaLWdy0Cd19LRnsPN1R Z5Bhqo5Firv2RmaqvLGZqJfyBs1PgmN0maRAJggx/L2DKYx+WYz4Zl3VjHu0bKv8fV/krd5o ubtLJs3Kgq/p3V7nTZd2t27SKc3v7d/PJcsxnJMylnrQgRRlNuADDm3uln0V2eHjestlxr/+ usD5m+HXVikpXuLu1uIgrtko/uIGLr8jseHaXZEavt40buD4TeO6q+MzHuQ5HuPcQeJDzuLP TORPpuQn7rgVbtwFfuRH/uDPXOBlSeSp+ODZt3yaveHeu68kTmg/3OUam+D0LZ0qMl7pOnxZ FuJC/uUQ7q/lXaQY/v7mTK5uMb7mad7kNSzlbu7ndB0/4Y0JdQ7odk7m4TblG7znwHrjTI7l ZBLm0GbBp4jlB87okJ7pQf68my7jx1GiUH7i6F0khY7piv7okv7oOG7qTW7o2C3UTw7ipa7q py7nsobpyH3kYe7mh27jRpbq8rvkSZ4kde7poa4ErS7qf77sKP59x17icPvpvc7qyJ7nFVLr 067prv7dCtrc9a1k/83eKFKGx3flfd6zo767Jk6+v/5uIXvl38vmAX7m4s0Kax7Mcd4c4R69 cM7hWe69DN7i6Z3nNRruEW7plH7msEzhWlrYjO3kfJ3d4PzqoP7hiL3XDw84Dn/YFy/x/hlP kJNlWBUP48k92BxPxDSd8iq/8izf8vyg1xh/8jEf1zM/2h2/2B8vtkF9Mg4nsdwd6CKOsUMN 9En96iVe2L6O8zTH802OnWDH55pajko/6SIP8y6eujU06M599Zpq9BiL7UR/bEyv817S2XO7 3WOg9Y3t2Njt1Grv6EeP3C6b9IGdsT+M37J87ntZw/gO350n4E2Kb5s+5/J97j3e6Qk+5uv+ 7IIPaFPe3vL+3ih76W1+X/3lX+ru64/Zwfsd3/su4+eW+bi+1k0N7dSe7Rni9IZeaSwu+H7e 428/7Ntu7Kuu7aef43MwvmIe7Ix/4UjO+z5++7he64Pu4ZqO/vpJ7/qnX/PHNuGvXySqrvp7 rpfHr/yqnpvljeJ4PvjmTevXVvzLX+PlPvDGuefFPt+2r/3Qz/39beIj3u/mvvonK/rHH/ZP fv7eX/tBLv31r/9+j/oIAFBc+s09xaisc90NpcYZJnLZ541Wqk3CFHWgqa7h1salTOM7CbS9 GehVGpJQtGKjo0K6HBWkM0elAqvYrHbL7VpuHmYweSwrgFKfT8xrnsxMnhy+cAvD7fH0ydev r2IzfUYQbmCCNXaJY3V+gUmLjoxKg3SVbGteJYCanZsCoKGio6SlpqURBaQMoKwCrq8Noqmt qrWuuLawEaGwvbaxwL+1s7LEw7G3/sLFxsHAub+qvr6jvMfUyNHCtMmozcfKzOHXuuWr39bn zenQt93g6t277Njv48rL5Mjtp/3+/wADcvJE8EfBg2cO5tEyEKGXhZ4gPmhYRaIXio8cToyk EdLGiGE6YaRikcvIjlZQqly5iWWXk1lCXnQZc4nKkjD7aDxZUmQIlERagjyYUyfCoiyR0lyK RelKpyihRmXalGpVqzmkdtTqkGtXrFnBit3i9ehYFmfRpjW4lm3askTbwi0411PdtgR5yuyE 5K6mum1s2vQ7U+7QuCwtcrJoswsINHuZEn6JF69eh32BvrmKmU6MySYtcwzUsw1oxYsCR675 sedUj1RB/lcmyxph5o6uAcsk9PGtaKOkV49OmFg4cUw5XOuEfJa5WNmzs+htrGPFCMGWLFAn kopM46A18nS3nor7dygbjGw//3lLUCfv2V+P0X289vQ44J9HdP+N+jnrYUfffsTZl0aAKESR XWzR+YbFHj0skYYil0gyyYXDTegdciagp8geTsCkIYhlHALbhrBBKImGFaZhInB3fOiDcyPC MZ+HGEpmmUA89mgKP9xMY8476RSjjzzPDKlNPdwYiSQ481gjpJRDUlOeOvlceY+VQVaZD5FK dvnjOl7Cc2Q7/GTjpDO5UHnOmWU+aY8zavpo5514ivJbRTauoaEzyfUZo0cQ/kFYY3CUZGQh f27xGShvirKSI2+HbhKfjInW+KKiKML4GKYrZscLo0tB12BKDwoKyZ8nhjpofidkupuqnfoZ 66Jk9OYoBaCS9sWkm7na0oC9cuhiintBqsYMNKpaKR+mcnYqVpd5h114mYmnRoDW+heZfU9c 22l1sFLqLQxh5HRpt+iiiweAjBiIw6bVdfjofx3Qqx1H4K3Lln7i/pfJCs6BFe20aq0Vi4MK G5aWpAor9xrDmu16MKoIW3WxFRLvtGdza0H8VsceN4wbdYluLFTGDDpMMcgmxwyzzGOpvPLM LJf6cc07P9ezwT9TG7TGObdMs88u46w00kcDnTTP/kXr/DTTL1O9tNNNCz011m/l6fXXYIct 9thkl2322WinrfbabLet9tBEZ6111VbXbffcdOMd9VNw67i13lDnDTjXVw++d8lyGy244oXH nbjfj0t9ON9/O7445JdLnjlNNmfQua6Tb9W35o0zHnjpphN++uqhf1V56qrHLrvlqJPO+uyt 2zU657u79DnodxtO++3C5+7T65jXzjvytgcPe/HJG/9QedRXb/312Gev/fbcd+/99+CHL/74 5Jdv/vnop6++9qLL5fb78Mcv//z012///fjn70/vvjPfPPTRw93zBkjA/0nvL/yjXOSWt8D+ +c+BDUzKAV0XQQVuDoIX/pTgAzVYQZX8bjYfbBTxAMjADFpQeRhEIQcnmJcEetCFEzPhCzd4 whEWkIXSUmENnRdAARpweD78YQ9xSBsazrCDMdThEWWYRBsOkYjSgWH7kDhFJlZRiU3koRCh iDGmECArX3xZGLEwRrNoooxcIAAagRBGNG7BjaGpghvhqDs5FoSOCbPjGA/AxxIcYAt8PAAb AYBHMhIyB19M5M2cKBn9kUKNkFRj2QhQP0oGxJJrwyQmL9kPS26yko/MZJ4+eSdKYlKQpUBl KkehSlOOgpSlcGUoPenI+fGvkHU8pNVwOQFeRvGND/BlL8OiS2EiDpElMOYvkXlHhgAzjH/M /kE0pZkBQR5yjmnUZTC1uUYjclGEhgymGplZTHF+UQCJhGQyx6mAMbaRkGh8JzfZCU961rOd 9WyjPbeJz3bSU50ZiGQ+e7nPgdZzkPN0Zz/lKVBzuhGd9myoQdPpzzIC9J4/gKNF4VlRh/IT ox0NKRamqYBATjOQJUVpSTHS0It6oowfDOEtP4rNhfbzDPIMKD8VytFk2pSQCOVpPG/K02Ha 9ApFpelOP6rUn+aUoU5d6k1781Si+rOpQ2WBRgmKVakaNYzo5GYWSHrSkj4gmiQFgDXtaFWC wNSbXERKUbcq1DGGVZtGLedPfapIfQK0rl91aE2LSUnB+rStkRys/lD3+s6+MratWv2rV3Oa T31yFXhTtWhLJytZtiR2rBMoq1rPatbQjmSuzcQsCb+Zxyyglq9MHeddt/pYvA7TsUDVaWah OtXD4pWdhXxtcLuq13Litqpi1W1xkbtRRGr2OMr9rW95q1eEAjK0pB1tadO6Viq89qWt1SJr w8vW5PrWtuekLHGLO91gBpWpev1uU3EK2fkiN6+LXa59EQvf5OaXvUlFL33P21z9Ghisiuyt H7G73exy97TzrUJamRrT8VImm+YsL2ERLM51aha45f2wR0XqTr96968RLehV56riD79XpOa9 r0QnItEadzbDJKbnXdtL0BL/c8QgdSkV/rirUrX28awnPQlwVbzg84IziBZ+MpRXiMUrLuWh lTOmMlU7Uod01yrdpCIUQ1hhuB7TJUKGrg2FuWU1A/LInQjkxrAs5p3U8s54zrOe98znPvv5 bFK08pSpLN4SMnKLhj50CqPcxSqfWdGELnSkB71ER1OQ0VUgs5kfTelKS3rSQOy0oDFNXlFz 2tSXtrQZ67xqK56a1G7+tKdlnUVUt1rViGF1rmG9SEjv0Na7xjVdAp1qX8+a11JeLahDzexm P/GGi6b1qHmtaV0HW9rThna0lb3sZ2O62q5+tbYnYAADFBvY10b3sK1Nlz+7+916Lje8503v epuN2Ofm9q+d/k2Fcueb34jetr5rTW18p1vdufSCv2+NbXF7O+Dd/rbB183uhHdh4QcHeKIR bvGG4xDcwqZ4lTEucmMfW+MCHzdrQW5ygqtcASRvYcU7zvHjhfvjE5f5zBHYiZjTfOAuf/jG gT7mnP+c6P/Ggs9tHnKdN/3oL4+r0Zn+dJ5rYulWr3rWW55toVuY5R5nuKixXpibix3pSfd6 UuzN9ravTd5uj7vc5w6KqVM97BmPOtkvbPa8q33fUS/6ps+Odr8/wNyHRzzMof73kwfe4RAf L9hrvvVCY/zyii+71jXPdcgPveCDN3zkHU/uhZt+75kOvehT/njCw3ryhV99xBNvhW5/lzvz nMd7yXXv9M7jXPW9973sAXD74uM+95RHfux3n/zJwR7ls2d9CYx/fOVDH/CND/rov/n81ru+ 8cX//va1//nrkz/K3c9+18eP+iL2nfnLD37zTUL3+tv//vjPv9ztXvn5u3/zfAeAcfR+8hd/ xpN+47d+5ed98GeA/ed/y5QWCQAAOw== ----------53D40CE1F627A89B-- ------------53D40CE1F627A89B-- From tml@iki.fi Thu Jun 1 04:26:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: release-team@gnome.org Delivered-To: release-team@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AC23B00FC for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:26:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16712-06 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:26:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32053B0102 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:26:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pettson.tml.iki.fi (MMCCCXX.tun.saunalahti.fi [213.169.31.220]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B39C139A2A; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:26:23 +0300 (EEST) From: Tor Lillqvist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17534.42104.144000.634102@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:25:28 +0300 To: Jeff Waugh In-Reply-To: <20050818211904.GE7349@localhost.localdomain> References: <17155.61017.78000.900306@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1124357051.8534.9.camel@localhost> <17156.23654.541000.948486@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1124389702.18081.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <17156.61607.290000.576353@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20050818211904.GE7349@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 13) "Rational FORTRAN" XEmacs Lucid X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, TW_BG=0.077, TW_GT=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.249 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Owen Taylor , release-team@gnome.org, Tor Lillqvist Subject: Re: Hosting Win32 binary packages of GNOME stuff on ftp.gnome.org? X-BeenThere: release-team@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Release Team discussions and coordination List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:26:31 -0000 Back in August: Owen Taylor writes: > > > what the directory structure should be. One possibility would > > > be to mirror sources/ [as] binaries/win32/gtk+/2.4/ I write: > > You mean the full URI to a zipfile would look like for instance > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/binaries/win32/ORBit2/2.13/ORBit2-2.13.0.zip > > Seems OK to me. Jeff Waugh writes: > I seem to have missed most of this discussion, only finding this in my inbox > just now. I designed the current structure, so have some interest in changes > or enhancements made to it. :-) > > The tree was designed such that binaries of GNOME releases would live under > each suite's release directories, for example: > > platform/ > 2.11/ > 2.11.1/ > sources/ > ORBit2-2.13.0.tar.gz > win32/ > ORBit2-2.13.0.zip > > Obviously, this very heavily optimises for the GNOME release structure and > schedule. But that was the point! :-) Jeff's suggestion was the path taken, and has worked fine so far. The only slight misfeature has been that for packages where the version hasn't changed between releases I have (hard)linked the binaries into several places, but the mirrors of master.gnome.org won't do that, so these files end up as several copies on the mirrors.) One other problem came up recently: Where to put binaries for stuff that isn't part of the platform or desktop suite? More specifically, somebody asked for binaries of libgsf the other day. The libgsf sources are not under platform or desktop. So for this kind of packages, Owen's suggestion would have been better. My idea now is to change to using Owen's plan, but still also keep the current {platform,desktop}/2.x/2.x.y/win32 directories, but those would now then just contain symlinks to the actual stuff under binaries/win32//. For instance, /pub/gnome/platform/2.14/2.14.2/win32/glib-2.10.3.zip would be a symlink to /pub/gnome/binaries/win32/glib/2.10/glib-2.10.3.zip. And libgsf Win32 binaries would be in binaries/win32/libgsf/x.y and nowhere else, as libgsf isn't part of platform or desktop. I don't know whether the mirrors will automatically pick up such a new binaries folder, though? Jeff continues: > Tor, do you forsee the win32 releases keeping up with the GNOME release > schedule? It would be *very* exciting if that were the case. Even if your > releases were staggered, aligning the version number with the appropriate > GNOME release would still be a huge step forward, particularly for any > developers using the GNOME platform on Windows (and we want more of those). This has mostly worked out fine, yes. During the 2.12 and 2.13 phases some Win32 binaries were released with slightly skewed versions as the Win32 changes were not committed in synch with the releases, but in 2.14.0 the versions are the same in sources and win32, as far as I can recall. I didn't do any Win32 releases for 2.14.1, out of laziness, as it didn't seem to contain that many changes relevant for Win32 (the freshest gtk and glib binaries are anyway available on ftp.gtk.org), but for 2.14.2 I will build and release Win32 packages. --tml