From cleberrrjr@bol.com.br Thu Nov 30 20:02:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from simpson.bol.com.br (simpson.bol.com.br [200.246.116.94]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6F92D21B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.10.4.123] (200.246.116.72) by simpson.bol.com.br (NPlex 4.5.050) id 39B4BED5004EA346 for gnome-db-list@gnome.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:02:20 -0300 Message-ID: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200011291624.RAA21740@ulises.openresources.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 02:59:32 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender-IP: 200.194.96.204 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Preocupado com v=EDrus?=20 > Crie seu e-mail gr=E1tis do BOL com antiv=EDrus! > http://www.bol.com.br >=20 >=20 > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > Hi all! > > >=20 > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects i= n > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQ= L, > > > of course, if Vivien > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > >=20 > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > >=20 > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My tim= e is > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page mainte= nance > > alwell, no problemo! > >=20 > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in >=20 > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > Portuguese (which, for > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > go into the > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. >=20 > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > Spanish people on this > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > no up-to-date > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > great if somebody wanted > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. >=20 > Well, and any other language, of course. >=20 > cheers There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/i= ndex.php), assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translatin= g the following part of the index.php page: "please tell us and we'll inc= lude it here." I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then conta= ct the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating som= e docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some = people won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer= myself to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like = to volunteer themselves aswell. This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documen= tation part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page,= listing the languages and who to talk to. Just my sleepy ideas at 11:00 PM. Cheers. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 04:50:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4382D06C for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 04:50:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (10-MADR-X11.libre.retevision.es [62.83.0.10]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDDF54A5F; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:48:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Rodrigo Moya To: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 08:45:10 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001201094819.9DDDF54A5F@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects in > > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQL, > > > > of course, if Vivien > > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > > > > > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > > > > > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My time is > > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page maintenance > > > alwell, no problemo! > > > > > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in > > > > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > > Portuguese (which, for > > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > > go into the > > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. > > > > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > > Spanish people on this > > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > > no up-to-date > > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > > great if somebody wanted > > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. > > > > Well, and any other language, of course. > > > > cheers > > There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't > think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the > original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/index.php), > assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for > each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs > will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. > yes, the doc hierarchy is going to be the same (manual/ etc). > I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translating > the following part of the index.php page: > > "please tell us and we'll include it here." > > I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then contact > the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating some > docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some people > won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer myself > to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like to volunteer > themselves aswell. > > This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documentation > part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page, listing > the languages and who to talk to. > yes, this is a good idea. So, Carlos, could you add an alias for Cleber? let's call it, for example, portuguese@gnome-db.org? or what name do you prefer. (How do you say Portuguese in Portuguese? cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 05:08:16 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (unknown [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FCE2E2D9 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA01449; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:48 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA27707; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:08:56 +0900 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:07:41 +0900 Message-ID: <877l5ksbde.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 30 Nov 2000 10:37:26 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. >> RM> ok, so what do you suggest? to just have in ftp.gnome-db.org the woody RM> debs so that people can download them? or not have a debian/ directory RM> at all? Hmm, I don't know which well. if it's meaningful that we provide debs on ftp.gnome-db.org, I think that we might provide it. Well, we put debs on ftp.gnome-db.org in the meantime, and we check the number of user. if it isn't meaningful, we don't have it. Do you think it? Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Fri Dec 1 15:21:13 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (f-131-156.essen.ipdial.viaginterkom.de [62.180.156.131]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA2B2BC51 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:19:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925C100F0 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:20:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 971E3E0F6; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Rodrigo Moya > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > Precedence: bulk > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> Hi all! > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > RM> packages in > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > RM> version's debs, > RM> or a good aptable source? I recommend a tree like dists/potato/main/binary-i386 In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp environment). > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato has been released with october gnome (1.0). But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also contains Helixcode (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): - bonobo 0.28 - gconf 0.11 - oaf 0.6.1 - unixodbc 1.8.13 - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. An apt.sources would read like: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise on Licence policies. ;-) > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > isn't almost different from woody. The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are 5 MB. Ciao, Holger --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: gda-mysql Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libmysqlclient6, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-mysql_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 13694 MD5sum: 41e20a4b3ea65361a40607b3d8db9f8d Description: GDA backend server for MySQL This package uses MySQL backend. installed-size: 61 source: libgda Package: gda-odbc Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, unixodbc, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-odbc_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 16710 MD5sum: 78a20cb5b87066a5f073626e131a1340 Description: GDA backend server for ODBC This package uses ODBC backend. installed-size: 69 source: libgda Package: gda-postgres Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpgsql2 (>= 7.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-postgres_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 25572 MD5sum: b78e711c163e89e1c70c481ccb574fdf Description: GDA backend server for PostgreSQL This package uses PostgreSQL backend. installed-size: 89 source: libgda Package: gda-sybase Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-sybase_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 23614 MD5sum: 70f683d5beb38a227997ed182e9bfb5e Description: GDA backend server for Sybase This package uses Sybase OpenClient library 11.1.1 installed-size: 85 source: libgda Package: gnome-db Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgal1, libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libgda0, libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglade-gnome0, libglade0, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libunicode0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Recommends: gda-mysql | gda-postgres | gda-odbc Replaces: gnome-db-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 159520 MD5sum: 30f03f69a81a8db1429a0311d651ad57 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains the core components of GNOME-DB. installed-size: 609 Package: gnome-db-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gnome-db (= 0.2.0-1), libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 86556 MD5sum: d1a26966faf6633154585b92291a7e72 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME -- development files. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains libraries, header files and tools to let you develop GNOME-DB applications. installed-size: 437 source: gnome-db Package: libgda-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 210080 MD5sum: c420a07e088621cb4e066aa45c184a6d Description: GNU data access library -- development files. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 988 source: libgda Package: libgda0 Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Suggests: gda-mysql (= 0.2.0-1), gda-postgres (= 0.2.0-1), gda-odbc (= 0.2.0-1) Replaces: libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda0_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 225662 MD5sum: 6c34e551cf2a63f7e8e3a64639af529b Description: GNU Data Access library. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 978 source: libgda --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: bonobo Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libefs1, libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/bonobo_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 347688 MD5sum: 48ad8d108c7feb6fe9f4b1a52a0dd814 Description: The GNOME Bonobo System. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 2044 Package: godbcconfig Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8-4), libart2 (>= 1.0.56-3), libaudiofile0, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.7-1), libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/godbcconfig_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 8354 MD5sum: 4bb47c549d3e859564a2679ff3c00593 Description: GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI - part of the unixODBC tools installed-size: 96 source: unixodbc Package: libbonobo-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: bonobo (=0.28-1), libbonobo2 (=0.28-1), libefs-dev, libgnomeprint-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 394212 MD5sum: ffcf03d7a977745e120fe03f262b0d4d Description: The GNOME Bonobo library - development files. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 1527 source: bonobo Package: libbonobo2 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Recommends: bonobo Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<= 0.12-3) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo2_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 300018 MD5sum: 6b342ab379c39330acbc4a4470fa68d5 Description: The GNOME Bonobo library. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 723 source: bonobo Package: libefs-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libefs1 (=0.28-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 118868 MD5sum: 8d2b2cfb96fa20b93edfe3b9f87f0fd9 Description: Embedded File System library - development files. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 185 source: bonobo Package: libefs1 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libefs1, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libz1 Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs1_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 120544 MD5sum: c84884b1aebdeece600324c4e7efc294 Description: Embedded File System library. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 173 source: bonobo Package: libgconf-dev Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libgconf11 (=0.11-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf-dev_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 155398 MD5sum: 9a727adb23b92e822d64f114a8ccdfab Description: GNOME onfiguration database system development files. GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain development files. installed-size: 556 source: gconf Package: libgconf11 Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.11), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libgconf10 Replaces: libgconf10 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf11_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 317676 MD5sum: 93e45a096900ddc9d6823e9f509f4e56 Description: GNOME configuration database system libraries GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain shared libraries. installed-size: 996 source: gconf Package: liboaf-dev Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: liboaf0 (=0.6.1-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf-dev_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 34526 MD5sum: a4f3a141e8ce98633ac63ccbe1be8b3b Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework - development files. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 158 source: oaf Package: liboaf0 Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0, liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf0_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 122952 MD5sum: f7ceb3ae956b67c291b96d7ecc9785f5 Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 410 source: oaf Package: sybase-ase Version: 11.9.2-SWR-9223 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-ase_11.9.2-SWR-9223_i386.deb Size: 2458 MD5sum: 12f3e59f2a4ff43253fdff6cf4c4c676 Description: Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise Sybase(R) Adaptive Server(R) Enterprise is the industry-leading structured query Language database server. It supports ANSI-92 SQL with Sybase stored procedures. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-common Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-common_11.9.2-2_i386.deb Size: 2506 MD5sum: cdef9787718e364d3f15081bb2d36a3e Description: Sybase Enterprise Software Common Files Supporting files which apply to the Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise shared between the SQL Server and Open Client/ Server development environment . System information on the Software License Agreement governing use of Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise for Linux 2.2.x can be found on http://linux.sybase.com . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-doc Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Suggests: sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1) Architecture: all Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-doc_11.9.2-2_all.deb Size: 2448 MD5sum: eabf8a2bceaf9852f295da42457660b7 Description: Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents for Adaptive Server Enterprise and Open CLient / Server related products. The documents contained on the CDROM are listed in the CONTENTS file on your CDROM. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-openclient Version: 11.1.1-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Suggests: sybase-doc (>= 11.9.2) Provides: sybase-openclient Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-openclient_11.1.1-2_i386.deb Size: 2524 MD5sum: 65a9da9f2eb7f912099bcf36335b03ff Description: Sybase Open Client Development Libraries (dummy package) Sybase Connectivity Open Client(tm) is the industry-leading network oriented application development environment with tools to maintain and administrate the Adaptive Server Enterprise platform. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: unixodbc Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Suggests: libmyodbc2.50.32 Conflicts: odbc-postgresql Provides: odbc-postgresql Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 360430 MD5sum: d5e79fb3b63cdffc5e41a7f72dacf90e Description: ODBC tools libraries Binaries and libraries from the unixODBC package. COMPONENTS: . libodbc.so (ODBC Driver Manager) libodbcinst.so (ODBC Installer/Setup) odbcinst (cmd line UI for libodbcinst.so) libini.a (ini file handler) liblog.a (log handler) libodbcdrvcfg1S.so (GUI config for server based sources... basic) libodbcdrvcfg2S.so (GUI config for file based sources... basic) liboplodbcS.so (GUI config for OpenLink's opl driver) libodbcminiS.so (GUI config for MiniSQL driver) libodbcmyS.so (GUI config for MySQL driver) libodbcpgsqlS.so (GUI config for PostgreSQL driver) libodbcmini.so (driver for MiniSQL) libodbcmy.so (driver for MySQL - Still need libmyodbc2.50.26 ) libodbcpgsql.so (driver for PostgreSQL) libodbctxt.so (driver for Text files) dltest (simple cmd line tool) isql (cmd line tool... batch & interactive SQL) Driver Template (a template for Driver programmers) liblst.so (list handler) installed-size: 1060 conffiles: /etc/odbcinst.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /etc/odbc.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e Package: unixodbc-bin Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgl1, libjpeg62, libmng, libpng2, libqt2.2 (>= 2:2.2.1-6.potato.2), libstdc++2.10, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-bin_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 297492 MD5sum: 850d41290c67414a91b9db1ea1b71e20 Description: QT based GUI ODBC tools QT based GUI Binaries from the unixODBC package. . ODBCConfig (GUI Setup using libodbcinst.so) DataManager (GUI to explore ODBC Data Sources) installed-size: 1320 source: unixodbc Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1), libc6-dev Conflicts: libiodbc2-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-dev_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 450104 MD5sum: 790ef530172737c0bcba54a0d56c927e Description: ODBC libraries for UNIX (development files) development headers for unixODBC installed-size: 2140 source: unixodbc --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 16:53:00 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411B32D2D2 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from 237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.6.237]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05208; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:41:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012012141.NAA05208@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 20:49:05 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 01 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, Holger Thon wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > > From: Akira TAGOH > > To: Rodrigo Moya > > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > Precedence: bulk > > > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > RM> Hi all! > > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > > RM> packages in > > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > > RM> version's debs, > > RM> or a good aptable source? > > I recommend a tree like > > dists/potato/main/binary-i386 > > In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. > It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. > a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp > environment). > > > > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato > has been released with october gnome (1.0). > > But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode > (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). > - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode > - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also > contains Helixcode > (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) > > So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > - bonobo 0.28 > - gconf 0.11 > - oaf 0.6.1 > - unixodbc 1.8.13 > - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > An apt.sources would read like: > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra > > The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise > on Licence policies. ;-) > > > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > > isn't almost different from woody. > > The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In > actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary > tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and > let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread > "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) > > As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > 5 MB. > ok, I agree with everything. Packages for potato should be available. So Holger please, upload them to ftp.gnome-db.org. But remember that the top-level directory for gnome-db stuff in that machine is /pub/gnome-db/, and not /pub/. There are other web sites there, so we've got a separated directory for us. You can upload them, can't you? If not, send them to me and I'll do it myself. cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 23:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8122BC78 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C72FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 Message-ID: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. HT> No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato HT> has been released with october gnome (1.0). HT> But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode HT> (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). HT> - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode HT> - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also HT> contains Helixcode HT> (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the time. HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): HT> - bonobo 0.28 HT> - gconf 0.11 HT> - oaf 0.6.1 HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. HT> An apt.sources would read like: if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict with all the things that those packages are provided. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. HT> The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In HT> actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary HT> tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and HT> let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread HT> "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the environment for which to become stable? if so, you are understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the tree? HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are HT> 5 MB. the people who use woody are the same, too :) Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Sat Dec 2 04:38:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (dsbg-d9312b46.pool.mediaWays.net [217.49.43.70]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63C2BC6C for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:38:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (linux2.cluster-dynip.de [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD66100F0 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:38:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A30D6431C0; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Holger Thon > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: OT: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, > >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: > > HT> Hi! > HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> > >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed > Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the > time. Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... But still there are the 2 other sources: - Linuxland distribution http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ or ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw > > HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > HT> - bonobo 0.28 > HT> - gconf 0.11 > HT> - oaf 0.6.1 > HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 > HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > HT> An apt.sources would read like: > > if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should > change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict > with all the things that those packages are provided. It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). > > >> > >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > >> isn't almost different from woody. > > potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the > environment for which to become stable? if so, you are > understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the > tree? Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by the other packages. Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages which i know of. :-) It's the same question for using rawhide or Redhat 7, Mandrake ß or Mandrake 7.x and so on... ;-) > > HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > HT> 5 MB. > > the people who use woody are the same, too :) Sure. I dist-upgraded to potato in March last year. Ciao, Holger From at@gclab.org Sat Dec 2 06:26:48 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31152BAF1 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 06:26:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140682FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 Message-ID: <87zoif9i8b.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed >> Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the >> time. HT> Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... HT> But still there are the 2 other sources: HT> - Linuxland distribution HT> http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify HT> - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ HT> or HT> ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw Sorry, because I don't know it, I can't comment. >> if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should >> change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict >> with all the things that those packages are provided. HT> It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should HT> be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). Don't you make those a deb packages, and put it on ftp.gnome-db.org? I thought so... but if so, the people which download those patch will end up by compile. >> potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the >> environment for which to become stable? if so, you are >> understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the >> tree? HT> Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there HT> is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. HT> And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by HT> the other packages. HT> Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages HT> which i know of. :-) gcc is not unstable for woody. gcc contatined in woody is the same as potato. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Mon Dec 4 12:30:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A6E2CFA2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id JAA27751; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:37 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: rodrigo@gnome-db.org Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Message-ID: <20001204091737.A26932@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access the list archive): * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like gal-0.2.2 (the latest version) produces a libgal.so.1.0.2. I simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we can all test it. Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:16:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD01D2DF46 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:16:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31113; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:04:23 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041804.KAA31113@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: GNOME Photo Collector From: Rodrigo Moya To: tflorac@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:12:13 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Thierry! I've seen in the GPC home page that you intend to convert to the usage of GNOME-DB for your data access needs. This makes us (GNOME-DB developers) very happy, so count on us on any help you may need. As a first thing, you could subscribe to the gnome-db mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list/), so that we can all of us answer the questions you may have. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:21:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D4C2BD08 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:21:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31529 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:09:46 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Hi! > > I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have > (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access > the list archive): > > * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, > components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. > this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a Debian machine. So, it would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done with: rpm --rebuild file.src.rpm when you've got them, please send them to me and I'll upload them (if gnome-db.org is up, since it's been down all the weekend) > * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like > simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. > it should work, as I don't make use of the latest GAL additions. But again, this shouldn't happen, so please rebuild the RPMs. > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > can all test it. > great! cheers From stephane.anes@free.fr Sun Dec 3 14:02:11 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from postfix2.free.fr (postfix2.free.fr [212.27.32.74]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FB82DE6D for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 14:02:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc300.sa (paris11-nas3-20-151.dial.proxad.net [213.228.20.151]) by postfix2.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id E1156740C2 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:02:09 +0100 (MET) From: Stéphane ANES Reply-To: stephane.anes@free.fr To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: SUSCRIBE Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-mysql=/usr No error detect with configure but with make I get: undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext --> poptGetNextOpt --> poptFreeContext GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... popt is 1.2. and is in /usr Can you help me ? Many thanks ! Stéphane From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 15:13:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65EF2BAB1 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:13:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es [62.83.25.229]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA07221; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:01:06 -0800 Message-Id: <200012042001.MAA07221@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: SUSCRIBE From: Rodrigo Moya To: stephane.anes@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 19:05:46 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 03 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100, St=E9phane ANES wrote: > Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... > I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with >=20 > ./configure --prefix=3D/usr --with-mysql=3D/usr=20 >=20 > No error detect with configure but with make I get: >=20 > undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext > --> poptGetNextOpt > --> poptFreeContext >=20 > GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. >=20 > Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... >=20 > popt is 1.2. and is in /usr >=20 > Can you help me ? >=20 this is a problem reported the other day by another person. I don't know wh= y, but in my machine, libpopt is automatically included (??), and in others not. The solution is to add, to the libgda/lib/gda-server/Makefile.am libgda_server_la_LIBADD =3D -lpopt and of course, you should have libpopt installed on your system. I'll fix this in CVS. Thanks for the report. cheers From at@gclab.org Mon Dec 4 23:11:14 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F72BAC2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:09:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03937; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:08:26 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA24733; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:09:24 +0900 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900 Message-ID: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a RM> Debian machine. So, it RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done RM> with: I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment which use chroot or other machine. I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that I may build the RPMs on this environment. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 5 12:48:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937682BA98 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:48:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from 27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es [62.83.46.27]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA23887; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:34:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a > RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db > RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a > RM> Debian machine. So, it > RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done > RM> with: > > I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment > which use chroot or other machine. > yes, I am preparing a clean environment to build the RPMs, but last time, I didn't have another one, so I thought it was better to have them that way instead of nothing. > I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > I may build the RPMs on this environment. > it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please do so. cheers From at@gclab.org Tue Dec 5 23:48:38 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C4F2BA9A for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:47:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27526; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:45:50 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA06459; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:46:46 +0900 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900 Message-ID: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.4 (Smooth) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. >> RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please RM> do so. That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? if you also say ok, I can do it. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From DieringG@eba-haus.de Wed Dec 6 03:23:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailproxy.de.uu.net (mailproxy.de.uu.net [192.76.144.34]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A891F2E122 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 03:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from kopo001 ([149.228.241.249]) by mailproxy.de.uu.net (5.5.5/5.5.5) with SMTP id JAA20027 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:23:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from EBA_DO-Message_Server by kopo001 with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:45 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100 From: "Gerhard Dieringer" To: Cc: "<" Subject: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr = >>> > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, = and > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > can all test it. > > > great! Hi Rodrigo, as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It = implements the features: 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like = this. To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something = done at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? Gerhard P.S. This email address will only be valid until Fr. 08.Dec 2000, because = I'm going to start a new job at 02. Jan 2001 If you want to reply after this = date, please use my private address GDieringer@compuserve.com or gerhard@gnome-db.org. =20 From mbatle@iname.com Thu Dec 7 10:47:33 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.jet.es (unknown [194.179.100.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6112D21F for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:47:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from iname.com (usuario1-36-128-34.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.34]) by smtp.jet.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA24999 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:51:02 +0100 X-Envelope-To: X-Mozilla-Status: 0801 Message-ID: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100 From: Mateu Batle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0 X-Accept-Language: ca, es, en, de-DE MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: libgda - GNOME dependencies Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking for :) But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, it does not have many of the libraries required, or if it has they are a bit older. Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be to do it ? Thanks and best regards, Mateu From mike@mjv.com Thu Dec 7 11:35:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from IMGate.wts.net (imgate.wts.net [209.144.22.55]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61FB2BAF1 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:35:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from comanchetx.com (mail.comanchetx.com [63.64.122.61]) by IMGate.wts.net (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 700F251646 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from mjv.com [63.64.123.6] by comanchetx.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.05) id AA97645401A4; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:28:07 -0600 Message-ID: <3A2FB958.21BF75F5@mjv.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:22:48 -0600 From: Michael Vanecek X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies References: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I upgraded to the latest Helix-Gnome and don't recall any problems with libgda. gnome-db itself requires some bleeding edge libraries (read - libs that can change at any given moment depending on the developer's desires), but all of it is still very much in feverish development so it's all fairly bleeding edge... Mike Mateu Batle wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > > Thanks and best regards, > Mateu > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 16:48:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5D72E4F0 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:48:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA14702; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:35:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082135.NAA14702@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 20:43:26 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > >> > >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. > >> > RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please > RM> do so. > > That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? > if you also say ok, I can do it. > yes, please do them From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 17:39:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EF2CA07 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:39:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA18105; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:27:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082227.OAA18105@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies From: Rodrigo Moya To: Mateu Batle Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 21:34:38 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100, Mateu Batle wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > libgda's dependencies are: * GLib >= 0.99 * GTK+ >= 1.2.x * libxml >= 1.8.x * OAF >= 0.5.x * ORBit >= 0.5.x * GConf >= 0.9 GLib, GTK+, libxml and ORBit are just included with any decent version of GNOME (helix gnome should work perfectly). OAF and GConf can be found at ftp://ftp.gnome.org or at spidermonkey.helixcode.com And libgda is based on CORBA, so it's not possible to compile without CORBA support, but you can do so without any GNOME library (except for GTK+, a dependency which is going to be removed for GLib 2.0). For GNOME-DB the thing is different because of Bonobo, which may cause many problems due to version mismatch, but if you use GNOME-DB >= 0.2.x, any Bonobo version >= 0.28 should work. If you're having any problem compiling, please tell us what those problems are so that we can try to help you cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 9 10:11:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9902BA9A for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:11:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from 19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es [62.83.4.19]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06164; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:59:03 -0800 Message-Id: <200012091459.GAA06164@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Gerhard Dieringer Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 09 Dec 2000 14:06:58 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100, Gerhard Dieringer wrote: > >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr >>> > > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > > can all test it. > > > > > great! > > Hi Rodrigo, > > as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It implements > the features: > 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) > 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls > 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 > 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) > well, this is great! The only problem I see is the use of libxml2, which won't be considered a stable version until GNOME 2.0. So, would it be easy to make it compile with both versions of libxml (libxml 1.8 & libxml2)? > Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step > would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) > > If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like this. > To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something done > at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? > yes, the idea is to be able to make all sorts of commands through XML. What I talked about was about having a modifySchema IDL method, which will use the current GDA_Connection_Constraints to be able to send DDL commands. So, what I think we should do is to have the Gda_XmlQuery object call this modifySchema method after having parsed the XML command. I suggest you have a look at the GDA_Connection_Constraint stuff (openSchema() function) so that we can start discussing how to extend it to fit all the DDL commands. and please, commit your xmlquery stuff to CVS (have you got a CVS account?). This should go to the libgda/lib/gda-common/gda-xml-query* files. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 10:02:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4588E2BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:02:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8AA54A65 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:47:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 15:57:30 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite often. So, as I've just now added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some bonobo-related bugs, I think it's time to do a new release. I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Tue Dec 12 11:39:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057772E059 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:39:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-72.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.72]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBCGcw413439; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:39:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 145sRo-0000BM-00; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Tue Dec 12 12:01:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D743A2BAB6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:01:30 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id IAA28606; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:53 -0800 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release Message-ID: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com>; from Rodrigo Moya on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi! > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > often. So, as I've just now > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > bonobo-related bugs, I think > it's time to do a new release. > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those sources! BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:20:22 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD7E2E087 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:20:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816A054A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:05:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:15:09 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212170526.816A054A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: > On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: >=20 > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? >=20 > As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less > bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) >=20 ok, so tomorrow, or after tomorrow it will be done cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:25:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA83C2CE2D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:25:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF3354A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:10:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:19:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > Hi! > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > often. So, as I've just now > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > sources! > they are in: ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll start making the packages tonight at home. > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do something, so we'll have to wait for a little. cheers From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 12 13:44:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86AB72BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 13:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 22291 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by himail.edinfo.es with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Subject: Re: New release From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: Vivien Malerba , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 17:37:37 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212184405.86AB72BB92@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > > often. So, as I've just now > > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > > sources! > > > > they are in: > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db > > But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll > start making the packages > tonight at home. > > > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > > > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked > > about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do > something, so we'll have > to wait for a little. > Well, at this moment the alldns guys are stupid and they have change the domains's name servers to the old ones. Please don't use alldns.com to register your domains :-( > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 17:07:07 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368702D47E; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:04:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es (224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es [62.83.7.224]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF20A54A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:49:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 22:59:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. GNOME-DB/libGDA are a complete framewok for developing database-oriented applications, and actually allow access to PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, Sybase and ODBC data sources. Apart from this development framework, it also includes several applications and utilities which make it quite suitable for many database-related taks. This release is the first one in a series of more regular releases, since we're approaching a good deal of performance/stability/functionality, and we want people to be able to easily follow the development. * Added/Implemented stuff: Better Bonobo support - now works great with Bonobo! (Rodrigo) Packages for Debian Potato (Holger) Portuguese page for the web site (Cleber) Started implementation for database: monikers (Rodrigo) Started PrimeBase data source provider (Holger) Started Perl bindings for libGDA (Rodrigo) * Bugs fixed: Bonobo toolbar/menubar now works perfectly well (at last) Some build problems in different configurations solved To install this new version, you'll need: * libgda: ORBit, OAF, GConf >= 0.9, libxml * gnome-db: libgda and dependencies, Bonobo >= 0.29, gnome-libs, libgal, gtkhtml GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in the same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe to the GNOME-DB mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list) From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:14:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC832E16B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:14:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B3654A64 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:59:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:08:47 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213105914.00B3654A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi RPMS and SRPMS are now available in: ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db/ ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db/ cheers From gperez@gio.ingor.upm.es Wed Dec 13 06:28:49 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es (glo.gio.ingor.upm.es [138.100.17.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957072CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:28:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es ([138.100.21.98]) by gio.ingor.upm.es (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA13113; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:24 +0100 Message-ID: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100 From: "Guille (bisho)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-6.1.1 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001119 X-Accept-Language: es-es, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. Great! [...] > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > the > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > to the GNOME-DB mailing list Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a name-based virtual web server? -- \|||||||/ Guillermo Pérez Pérez < o o > - bisho@onirica.com \ L / - bisho@eurielec.etsit.upm.es -oOOo-------oOOo- From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:43:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA062CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192554A64; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: Guille "(bisho)" Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:38:20 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213112845.9192554A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100, Guille (bisho) wrote: > > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. > > Great! > > [...] > > > > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > > the > > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > > to the GNOME-DB mailing list > > Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a > name-based virtual web server? > well, I think it was 213.0.69.70, but you won't be able to access it, since it's down. Anyway, I've just put RPMS and SRPMS in ftp.gnome.org, so you may want to download them from there. And if what you're looking for is for the web pages, they're on CVS, under the gnome-db/www directory. It's in PHP so to see them in your browser you'll have to install them on an Apache www directory, and, of course, install the mod_php module. The documentation is included in both the tarballs and the RPMS/SRPMS cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 07:13:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D5C2E276 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:13:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA31246 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 04:01:24 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 13:08:42 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're approaching a big amount of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on adding missing things and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, hopefully, included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the beginning of next year The things I've thought about: * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as LDAP, etc * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser widget to allow calls to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, since the only one which is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget * Report engine: make it work * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very little to offer * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc * Bonobo monikers * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it would be great if we could also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people * and more things that I can't remember right now As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to help, please just say where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 09:17:09 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1392E335 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:17:09 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id GAA05349; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:40 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi all! > > Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're > approaching a big amount > of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on > adding missing things > and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, > hopefully, > included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the > beginning of next year > > The things I've thought about: > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > LDAP, etc Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one implementation). > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > widget to allow calls > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > since the only one which > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ write the implementations. I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings with the schemas... > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > * Report engine: make it work > * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very > little to offer > * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc > * Bonobo monikers > * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it > would be great if we could > also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started > * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people > * and more things that I can't remember right now > > As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to > help, please just say > where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) > > cheers > Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:44:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432D32E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:44:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06855; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:32:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:39:24 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > The things I've thought about: > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > LDAP, etc > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > implementation). > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both projects. What I was thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > widget to allow calls > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there may be times when you want to create database objects from the source code of your program. And, of course, we need to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of the schemas. So, what do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML queries? > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > since the only one which > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > write the implementations. > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > with the schemas... > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the list. And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the supplied fields are NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, such as the object name, etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other fields may be NULL. > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen myself? cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:55:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9CB2E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:55:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA07398 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:00 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:50:10 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening brackets are in the same line as the statement): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it when you hack. cheers From cuenca@celium.net Wed Dec 13 10:11:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from ns1.axinet.fr (ns1.axinet.fr [193.45.10.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E2B2E27A for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:11:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from name (AMontsouris-101-2-2-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.253.183.169]) by ns1.axinet.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id eBDFBVN15437 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:11:31 +0100 From: "Joaquin Cuenca Abela" To: "gnome-db list" Subject: RE: HACKING guide Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". It would do the conversion of all your files for you. Cheers, -- Joaquin Cuenca Abela cuenca@celium.net > -----Message d'origine----- > De : gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org > [mailto:gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org]De la part de Rodrigo Moya > Envoyé : mercredi 13 décembre 2000 15:50 > À : gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Objet : HACKING guide > > > Hi all! > > I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll > find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. > Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the > same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. > > 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are > 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): > > if (whatever) > { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) > { > case ... > } > } > > and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening > brackets are in the same line as the statement): > > if (whatever) { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) { > case ... > } > } > > so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to > comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change > this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all > of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. > > I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, > but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of > the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding > style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it > when you hack. > > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:30:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98932E148 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA09777; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:17:55 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131517.HAA09777@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: RE: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joaquin Cuenca Abela Cc: gnome-db list In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:24:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote: > Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". > It would do the conversion of all your files for you. > ok, great! thanks, I'll have a look at it cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 10:52:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992AE2E35B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:52:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id HAA10976; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:47 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:32 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > The things I've thought about: > > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > > LDAP, etc > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > implementation). > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > projects. What I was > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example in MS access or some other projects. > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > widget to allow calls > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > may be times when you > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > And, of course, we need > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > the schemas. So, what > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > queries? Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice the same things. > > > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > > since the only one which > > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > > write the implementations. > > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > > with the schemas... > > > > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the > list. > > And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the > supplied fields are > NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, > such as the object name, > etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other > fields may be NULL. > Ok, I will do it. > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > myself? yes, the e-table one. > > cheers Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:59:25 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7B32BCA5 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA11358; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:46:57 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131546.HAA11358@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:54:07 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > > implementation). > > > > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > > projects. What I was > > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) > > Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > perfect! > > > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > > > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, > then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more > complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example > in MS access or some other projects. > well, that's great! > > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > > widget to allow calls > > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > > may be times when you > > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > > And, of course, we need > > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > > the schemas. So, what > > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > > queries? > > Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to > work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice > the same things. > ok, you're right. I started to think about the modifySchema stuff when we didn't have XML queries, so now I also think it's better to have them as XML. So, I'll remove the modifySchema soon > > > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > > myself? > > yes, the e-table one. > ok, I'll have a look at it again, since the last time I looked at it, it seemed to me quite tricky to use, but maybe I didn't look too much. cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 14 15:29:08 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3522DFE1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:29:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-149-161.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.149.161]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBEKT1i07847; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:29:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 146ezq-0000Ew-00; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: We're starting to develop the logger Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, with no major efforts.=20 The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. I have only one question about the design of the logger: * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use libgda if it will be part of libgda... Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database own data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of code would be replicated. This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From tagoh@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 15 00:40:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA02CE94 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20629 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:27 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA06062 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:40:56 +0900 Message-Id: <200012150540.OAA06062@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: GNOME-DB 0.2.1 deb is now available From: Akira TAGOH To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 14:40:23 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I made the debs of latest version. if you think the useful, you can add to the apt-line as following: deb http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ deb-src http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ Regards, -- Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Fri Dec 15 11:13:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 675CB2CECA for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:13:54 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 8134 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Subject: The gnome-db.org domain From: Carlos Perello Marin To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 15:13:24 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001215161354.675CB2CECA@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Well, I think that it's running again. Excuse me for all this troubles. I have lose the mail alias at gnome-db.org, please resend me the alias at gnome-db.org and the destination one. Thanks. P.S.: I think that this week i will restart my contributions to the report engine. I was very busy at work, sorry (well I'm very busy, but i think i could do things at gnome-db also). Bye From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 16 19:35:27 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541782D4BB for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 19:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from 7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es (7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es [62.83.43.199]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC8854867; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:15:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 01:24:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi all. >=20 > It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 >=20 > The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going > to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its > functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. >=20 > We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, > with no major efforts.=20 >=20 > The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the > ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. >=20 this is great David!!! > I have only one question about the design of the logger: >=20 > * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use > libgda if it will be part of libgda... >=20 > Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database ow= n > data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a > different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of > code would be replicated. >=20 > This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. >=20 well, clearly, the logger must have access to the underlying database direc= tly, so the best option, IMO, is to add a new CORBA interface to the IDL files, called Logger, which will implement the logger stuff for each provider (=3D each provider should implement it). This way, we can use it optionally in the client side, and also implement it optionally in the provider side. So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we need for the clients to access, and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which functions/methods would a client need to interface with the logger. Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to use or not the logging stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO cheers and thanks for the help From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 05:24:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078B2DBD0 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 05:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-144-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.144.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHAOP417284 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147azP-0002sc-00 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda documentation... But the links are wrong. Could anyone correct them? Thank you. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sun Dec 17 07:18:15 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9931E2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from 190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.190]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCF454A08; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:03:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 13:12:39 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217120313.ADCF454A08@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda > documentation... But the links are wrong. >=20 > Could anyone correct them? >=20 they don't exist yet :( But thank you for reminding me that I must add them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 07:23:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6206B2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:23:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-131-210.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.131.210]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHCNl420379; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147cqv-0004e0-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo Moya wrote: (...) >=20 > So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we > need for the clients to access, > and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which > functions/methods would > a client need to interface with the logger. OK. On next week, we will design the logger interface >=20 > Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to > use or not the logging > stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). >=20 > Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO >=20 > cheers and thanks for the help >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 >=20 --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 18 15:37:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BA32BB53 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from 136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es (136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es [62.83.22.136]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531295485B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 21:22:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've changed the names of the .oafinfo files. This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, the OAFIIDs are now of the form: OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since this has been decided in gnome-components-list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for programmers. Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo ... The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we can create any subsubnamespace as we like. All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs cheers From Philipp.Leusmann@post.rwth-aachen.de Mon Dec 18 16:13:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (nets5.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.13]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C542BB7B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from marvin (pec-33-208.tnt5.me2.uunet.de [149.225.33.208]) by nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.10.1/8.10.1/5) with ESMTP id eBILDhm14721 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:13:43 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> From: "Philipp Leusmann" To: Subject: Compiling libgda Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi, i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first use in this function) GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 Could someone please tell me how to fix this? Thanks, Philipp From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 18 16:37:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2F22CF17 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:37:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from 60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.60]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6345485B; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:22:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Compiling libgda From: Rodrigo Moya To: Philipp Leusmann Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 22:30:51 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218212243.9C6345485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100, Philipp Leusmann wrote: > Hi, > > i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are > fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ > usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ > opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl > ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ > glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom > e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u > sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c > GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo > GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': > GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' > GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) > GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' > GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' > make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > > > Could someone please tell me how to fix this? > > yes, that's a known problem caused by different versions of ORBit. The solution is easy though: just remove the GDA* files and rerun make. Those files should be re-generated with you orbit-idl compiler, so there shouldn't be any problem after removing them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 04:47:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15602CCB8 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 04:47:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.166.129.137]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5V1U601.5RJ for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03535 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Doubts about making a gda-client Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I started to program using the headers... Then I met the gda_connection_new function... Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? Greetings From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 05:36:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4042BCBB for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 05:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (212-7-53-64.WolNet.worldonline.es [212.7.53.64]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F785485B; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:21:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Doubts about making a gda-client From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 11:29:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220102120.C0F785485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in > RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: >=20 > gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio >=20 don't use gda-buildclient, it does not work. And it's not intended to generate a client skeleton, it's intended to be used to compile/link a GDA client. But as I said, it does not work yet You should use instead gda-config to retrieve the CFLAGS and LIBS needed for your GDA client application to compile/link. >=20 > Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I > started to program using the headers... > Then I met the gda_connection_new function... >=20 > Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); >=20 > What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? >=20 just call gda_corba_get_orb(): Gda_Connection* cnc =3D gda_connection_new(gda_corba_get_orb()); cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 12:27:53 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6EA2DEEA for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.73.59.6]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5VN3U03.03Z for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:18 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04233 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [es] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Types of commands. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda instead of libpq. I've found the next undocumented functions: gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong flags); How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? Thank you. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 13:49:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0942BB01 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:49:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (119-MADR-X34.libre.retevision.es [62.83.3.119]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1554866; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:34:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Types of commands. From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 19:41:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220183420.A7D1554866@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda > instead of libpq. >=20 > I've found the next undocumented functions: >=20 > gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); > void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong > flags); >=20 > How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? >=20 In libgda/idl/GDA.idl, there is an enum: enum CommandType { CMD_TEXT1, CMD_TABLE, CMD_TABLEDIRECT, CMD_STOREDPROCEDURE, CMD_FILE }; which is the type of the command, but, sorry, this is not implemented yet. I had forgotten about it, but now that you've reminded it to me, I'll look at what needs to be done. And, in fact, thanks David, since I think this can be used for the XML queries: that is, we can add a CMD_XML value to the enum, and then, have the provider act as needed depending on the command's type. How does this sound? What I don't know/remember is what CMD_TABLEDIRECT is for. Any ideas? David, for the moment, forget about the command type. cheers > Thank you. >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Thu Dec 21 14:33:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBDA2E062 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:33:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (194-MAD2-X26.libre.retevision.es [62.83.136.194]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDA95485B for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:18:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Gnome CVS User ] GNOME CVS: libgda rodrigo From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 21 Dec 2000 20:25:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001221191832.1DDA95485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just checked in the changes needed for supporting the CommandType attribute in GDA::Command objects. What I've done is: 1) "create" new enum type in IDL: enum CommandType { COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLEDIRECT, COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE, COMMAND_TYPE_FILE }; I'll add a COMMAND_TYPE_XML soon. 2) changed type attribute in GDA::Command: it was a unsigned long, now it's a GDA_CommandType 3) changes all over to adapt to new attribute type (BTW, by making this change, I found a bug in the (I think) 0.2.1 released version, which was that I forgot to add a pointer to a function in an ORBit structure, and thus the following function pointers in the structure were displaced, so there were some CORBA exceptions when executing some CORBA calls. Has anybody experienced this? So now, you can: gda_command_set_cmd_type(GDA_COMMAND(cmd), GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE); By default, providers' GDA::Command will have the CmdType set to TEXT (== SQL or whatever language is used). But now, we must adapt/extend the providers to support this new feature. As a first measure, we must, in gda_*_command_execute, add a switch like: switch (gda_server_command_get_cmd_type(cmd)) { case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT : -> execute SQL as now case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE : -> return a SELECT * FROM $table case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE : -> exec procedure case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_FILE : -> load file and execute } So please, Vivien, Nick, Holger, can you update your providers? I'll do the others. The switch is needed only in gda-*-command.c, in the gda_*_command_execute function. For the moment, just respond to the TYPE_TEXT command type, or, if you feel like doing it, implement the other ones. cheers Forwarded message: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: rodrigo 00/12/21 12:20:57 > > Modified files: > . : ChangeLog > bindings/c++ : gdaCommand.cpp gdaCommand.h gdaConnection.cpp > gdaConnection.h > idl : GDA.idl GDA_Command.idl GDA_Connection.idl > lib/gda-client : gda-command.c gda-command.h gda-connection.c > gda-connection.h > lib/gda-server : gda-server-command.c gda-server-impl-command.c > gda-server-impl-command.h > gda-server-impl-connection.c > gda-server-impl-connection.h gda-server-impl.h > > Log message: > 2000-12-21 Rodrigo Moya > > * added support for the GDA_CommandType stuff, which will > allow to treat commands in different ways (SQL, TABLE, > XML, etc) > > > _______________________________________________ > cvs-commits-list mailing list > cvs-commits-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-commits-list > From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 26 18:44:18 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.61]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E72D362 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:39:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.182.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBQNdZw05512 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:39:36 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello world!! I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is enough to run with apt). Bye. --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From tagoh@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 27 02:09:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4329D2CCCE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA23788; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:54 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA27100; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:09:47 +0900 Message-Id: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Akira TAGOH To: Carlos =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?Perell=1B=24BC3=1B=28B_Mar=1B=24BC-=1B=28Bn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Carlos, On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > Hello world!! >=20 >=20 > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! >=20 >=20 > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ >=20 > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > enough to run with apt). good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ Regards, --=20 Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Wed Dec 27 05:18:57 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C26702CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:18:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 9624 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > Hi Carlos, >=20 > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > Hello world!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > >=20 > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > enough to run with apt). >=20 > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: >=20 > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ >=20 Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all correct. Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > --=20 > Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org > tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group > tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project > tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. >=20 From mvali@hot.ee Wed Dec 27 08:45:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (adsl395.estpak.ee [213.168.17.141]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38642D2D8 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:45:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (IDENT:mvali@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA03553 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 From: Margus Vali To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: notices on front end Message-ID: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.0 Lines: 39 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello! I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. some problems/notices: - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are installed - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first time. - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 messages like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, then clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make it a whole lot more usable?) regards, mv From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 28 11:31:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0711E2BCBB for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-144.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.144]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBSGVOi19336; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:31:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14Ba6h-0003Xg-00; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: james@daa.com.au Cc: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi. Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-db widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. Greetings. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM ASPL Fact Official Programmer "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 17:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3C92BC2D for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:41:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18335 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Unable to use anything in gnome-db Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda compiled using mysql. Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in any of the gnome-db applications does anything. Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. Cheers, -Jason Netconcepts Inc. Auckland, New Zealand From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 19:39:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9D02BD65 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:39:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18767 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 jm@netconcepts.com wrote: > Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda > compiled using mysql. > > Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... > if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in > any of the gnome-db applications does anything. > > Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. > > Cheers, > -Jason > > Netconcepts Inc. > Auckland, New Zealand > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list > From karlheg@bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net Wed Dec 27 02:47:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bittersweet.intra (bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.27.231]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136472CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:47:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from karlheg by bittersweet.intra with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14BBIy-0005EQ-00 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: tools/gda-buildserver: unexpanded @macro@'s From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) Date: 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 Message-ID: <87vgs6486r.fsf@bittersweet.intra> Lines: 8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Package: libgda Version: 0.2.0 There are several unexpanded AC_OUTPUT macros after building libgda-0.2.0 from the Debian package source. Perhaps you've omitted something from the configure.in? [ I am not subscribed to the list ] From carlos@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 25 16:02:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F042C828 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:02:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es [62.37.133.185]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBPL1k425184; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 22:01:46 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Evolution: 00000002-0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > Hi all! >=20 > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. >=20 > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: >=20 > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] >=20 > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > programmers. >=20 > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: >=20 > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > ... >=20 > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. >=20 Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use the traditional GDA_* names? > All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, > you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and > $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the > GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all > your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs >=20 > cheers >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:35:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5672BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:35:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC7454867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:20:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=C3=B3_Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:27:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142021.DAC7454867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > > Hi all! > >=20 > > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. > >=20 > > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is= , > > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: > >=20 > > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] > >=20 > > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible= ] > > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, whic= h > > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable an= d > > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > > programmers. > >=20 > > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: > >=20 > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > > ... > >=20 > > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use > the traditional GDA_* names? >=20 for the moment, I have just changed the GNOME part (GNOME::DB), so you can continue using GDA_. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:37:58 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0902BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:37:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AED54867 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:22:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: libgda lxhispano From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001226041715.9B9F93360B2@cvs.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:29:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142221.A8AED54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 23:17:15 -0500, Gnome CVS User wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: lxhispano 00/12/25 23:17:15 >=20 > Modified files: > report : ChangeLog Makefile.am gda-report-stream.c=20 > gda-report-stream.h=20 >=20 > Log message: > 2000-12-25 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn >=20 > * updated gda-report-stream.[ch] to make them compile again. > * included the lib/gda-client directory for header files in > Makefile.am >=20 Carlos, you should remove this. The report client IS NOT a GDA client. Of c= ourse, an app can be both a GDA and a report client, but we don't want to add unneeded dependencies to this library, so that it can be used, for example, in a report-generation-dedicated machine,=20 without any other stuff. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:58:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EFA2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:58:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7BC5488D; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos Perello Marin Cc: Akira TAGOH , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:50:04 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231144252.0B7BC5488D@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100, Carlos Perello Marin wrote: > El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > > Hi Carlos, > >=20 > > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > > Hello world!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > > >=20 > > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > > enough to run with apt). > >=20 > > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: > >=20 > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all > correct. >=20 > Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 yes, in gnome-db/www cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:08:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A4D2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19654867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:52:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: notices on front end From: Rodrigo Moya To: Margus Vali Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:59:28 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231145240.7B19654867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200, Margus Vali wrote: > Hello! > I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 > upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). > Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some > packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. > > some problems/notices: > - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are > installed ok, I'll work on this soon. > - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just > on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? well, I plan to have an integrated help system. To be included in the front end. But I'm sorry it does not work very well. But I'll work on it soon > - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) > - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like > down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. > kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. this part also needs some fixes. Thanks for noting them > - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow > leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but > the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only > happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first > time. hmm, strange. I'll have a look also at that code. It happened sometimes to me, but it stopped some time ago. > - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two > Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: > IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 > messages > like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, > then > clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. > As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the > appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? with the ones you've got it's ok. The problem is one I found the other day which I was not sure if it was included in the 0.2.1 release. So please, get sources from CVS and compile them. I'll make a release in a couple of days. > gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the > table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). > - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be > modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make > it a whole lot more usable?) > we plan to change the GnomeDbGrid widget to use the etable widget. But, well, about updatable recordsets, we had a discussion about them some time ago (look in the archives). If you can add something to the discussion (== a solution) it will be welcome. I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't made much progress, but I'll fix all this next century :) cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:28:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3653B2BBB2 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:28:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF5C54867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:12:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn_Carre=C3=B1o?= Cc: james@daa.com.au, gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:19:56 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231151246.0DF5C54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi. >=20 > Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-d= b > widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. >=20 great! If you find any strange thing/bug in the GNOME-DB widgets API, pleas= e tell me. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:40:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109BB2BB58 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:40:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8B054867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:25:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: jm@netconcepts.com Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:32:12 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231152502.2A8B054867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300, wrote: > Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. > > you can do that, or even better, go to settings, and, in the components tab, select the components you want loaded when you start the front-end. cheers From cleberrrjr@bol.com.br Thu Nov 30 20:02:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from simpson.bol.com.br (simpson.bol.com.br [200.246.116.94]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6F92D21B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.10.4.123] (200.246.116.72) by simpson.bol.com.br (NPlex 4.5.050) id 39B4BED5004EA346 for gnome-db-list@gnome.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:02:20 -0300 Message-ID: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200011291624.RAA21740@ulises.openresources.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 02:59:32 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender-IP: 200.194.96.204 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Preocupado com v=EDrus?=20 > Crie seu e-mail gr=E1tis do BOL com antiv=EDrus! > http://www.bol.com.br >=20 >=20 > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > Hi all! > > >=20 > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects i= n > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQ= L, > > > of course, if Vivien > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > >=20 > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > >=20 > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My tim= e is > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page mainte= nance > > alwell, no problemo! > >=20 > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in >=20 > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > Portuguese (which, for > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > go into the > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. >=20 > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > Spanish people on this > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > no up-to-date > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > great if somebody wanted > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. >=20 > Well, and any other language, of course. >=20 > cheers There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/i= ndex.php), assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translatin= g the following part of the index.php page: "please tell us and we'll inc= lude it here." I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then conta= ct the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating som= e docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some = people won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer= myself to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like = to volunteer themselves aswell. This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documen= tation part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page,= listing the languages and who to talk to. Just my sleepy ideas at 11:00 PM. Cheers. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 04:50:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4382D06C for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 04:50:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (10-MADR-X11.libre.retevision.es [62.83.0.10]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDDF54A5F; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:48:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Rodrigo Moya To: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 08:45:10 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001201094819.9DDDF54A5F@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects in > > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQL, > > > > of course, if Vivien > > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > > > > > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > > > > > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My time is > > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page maintenance > > > alwell, no problemo! > > > > > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in > > > > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > > Portuguese (which, for > > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > > go into the > > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. > > > > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > > Spanish people on this > > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > > no up-to-date > > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > > great if somebody wanted > > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. > > > > Well, and any other language, of course. > > > > cheers > > There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't > think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the > original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/index.php), > assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for > each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs > will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. > yes, the doc hierarchy is going to be the same (manual/ etc). > I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translating > the following part of the index.php page: > > "please tell us and we'll include it here." > > I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then contact > the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating some > docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some people > won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer myself > to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like to volunteer > themselves aswell. > > This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documentation > part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page, listing > the languages and who to talk to. > yes, this is a good idea. So, Carlos, could you add an alias for Cleber? let's call it, for example, portuguese@gnome-db.org? or what name do you prefer. (How do you say Portuguese in Portuguese? cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 05:08:16 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (unknown [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FCE2E2D9 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA01449; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:48 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA27707; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:08:56 +0900 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:07:41 +0900 Message-ID: <877l5ksbde.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 30 Nov 2000 10:37:26 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. >> RM> ok, so what do you suggest? to just have in ftp.gnome-db.org the woody RM> debs so that people can download them? or not have a debian/ directory RM> at all? Hmm, I don't know which well. if it's meaningful that we provide debs on ftp.gnome-db.org, I think that we might provide it. Well, we put debs on ftp.gnome-db.org in the meantime, and we check the number of user. if it isn't meaningful, we don't have it. Do you think it? Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Fri Dec 1 15:21:13 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (f-131-156.essen.ipdial.viaginterkom.de [62.180.156.131]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA2B2BC51 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:19:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925C100F0 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:20:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 971E3E0F6; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Rodrigo Moya > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > Precedence: bulk > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> Hi all! > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > RM> packages in > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > RM> version's debs, > RM> or a good aptable source? I recommend a tree like dists/potato/main/binary-i386 In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp environment). > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato has been released with october gnome (1.0). But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also contains Helixcode (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): - bonobo 0.28 - gconf 0.11 - oaf 0.6.1 - unixodbc 1.8.13 - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. An apt.sources would read like: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise on Licence policies. ;-) > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > isn't almost different from woody. The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are 5 MB. Ciao, Holger --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: gda-mysql Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libmysqlclient6, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-mysql_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 13694 MD5sum: 41e20a4b3ea65361a40607b3d8db9f8d Description: GDA backend server for MySQL This package uses MySQL backend. installed-size: 61 source: libgda Package: gda-odbc Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, unixodbc, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-odbc_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 16710 MD5sum: 78a20cb5b87066a5f073626e131a1340 Description: GDA backend server for ODBC This package uses ODBC backend. installed-size: 69 source: libgda Package: gda-postgres Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpgsql2 (>= 7.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-postgres_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 25572 MD5sum: b78e711c163e89e1c70c481ccb574fdf Description: GDA backend server for PostgreSQL This package uses PostgreSQL backend. installed-size: 89 source: libgda Package: gda-sybase Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-sybase_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 23614 MD5sum: 70f683d5beb38a227997ed182e9bfb5e Description: GDA backend server for Sybase This package uses Sybase OpenClient library 11.1.1 installed-size: 85 source: libgda Package: gnome-db Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgal1, libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libgda0, libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglade-gnome0, libglade0, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libunicode0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Recommends: gda-mysql | gda-postgres | gda-odbc Replaces: gnome-db-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 159520 MD5sum: 30f03f69a81a8db1429a0311d651ad57 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains the core components of GNOME-DB. installed-size: 609 Package: gnome-db-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gnome-db (= 0.2.0-1), libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 86556 MD5sum: d1a26966faf6633154585b92291a7e72 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME -- development files. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains libraries, header files and tools to let you develop GNOME-DB applications. installed-size: 437 source: gnome-db Package: libgda-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 210080 MD5sum: c420a07e088621cb4e066aa45c184a6d Description: GNU data access library -- development files. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 988 source: libgda Package: libgda0 Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Suggests: gda-mysql (= 0.2.0-1), gda-postgres (= 0.2.0-1), gda-odbc (= 0.2.0-1) Replaces: libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda0_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 225662 MD5sum: 6c34e551cf2a63f7e8e3a64639af529b Description: GNU Data Access library. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 978 source: libgda --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: bonobo Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libefs1, libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/bonobo_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 347688 MD5sum: 48ad8d108c7feb6fe9f4b1a52a0dd814 Description: The GNOME Bonobo System. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 2044 Package: godbcconfig Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8-4), libart2 (>= 1.0.56-3), libaudiofile0, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.7-1), libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/godbcconfig_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 8354 MD5sum: 4bb47c549d3e859564a2679ff3c00593 Description: GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI - part of the unixODBC tools installed-size: 96 source: unixodbc Package: libbonobo-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: bonobo (=0.28-1), libbonobo2 (=0.28-1), libefs-dev, libgnomeprint-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 394212 MD5sum: ffcf03d7a977745e120fe03f262b0d4d Description: The GNOME Bonobo library - development files. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 1527 source: bonobo Package: libbonobo2 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Recommends: bonobo Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<= 0.12-3) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo2_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 300018 MD5sum: 6b342ab379c39330acbc4a4470fa68d5 Description: The GNOME Bonobo library. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 723 source: bonobo Package: libefs-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libefs1 (=0.28-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 118868 MD5sum: 8d2b2cfb96fa20b93edfe3b9f87f0fd9 Description: Embedded File System library - development files. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 185 source: bonobo Package: libefs1 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libefs1, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libz1 Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs1_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 120544 MD5sum: c84884b1aebdeece600324c4e7efc294 Description: Embedded File System library. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 173 source: bonobo Package: libgconf-dev Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libgconf11 (=0.11-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf-dev_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 155398 MD5sum: 9a727adb23b92e822d64f114a8ccdfab Description: GNOME onfiguration database system development files. GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain development files. installed-size: 556 source: gconf Package: libgconf11 Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.11), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libgconf10 Replaces: libgconf10 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf11_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 317676 MD5sum: 93e45a096900ddc9d6823e9f509f4e56 Description: GNOME configuration database system libraries GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain shared libraries. installed-size: 996 source: gconf Package: liboaf-dev Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: liboaf0 (=0.6.1-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf-dev_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 34526 MD5sum: a4f3a141e8ce98633ac63ccbe1be8b3b Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework - development files. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 158 source: oaf Package: liboaf0 Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0, liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf0_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 122952 MD5sum: f7ceb3ae956b67c291b96d7ecc9785f5 Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 410 source: oaf Package: sybase-ase Version: 11.9.2-SWR-9223 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-ase_11.9.2-SWR-9223_i386.deb Size: 2458 MD5sum: 12f3e59f2a4ff43253fdff6cf4c4c676 Description: Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise Sybase(R) Adaptive Server(R) Enterprise is the industry-leading structured query Language database server. It supports ANSI-92 SQL with Sybase stored procedures. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-common Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-common_11.9.2-2_i386.deb Size: 2506 MD5sum: cdef9787718e364d3f15081bb2d36a3e Description: Sybase Enterprise Software Common Files Supporting files which apply to the Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise shared between the SQL Server and Open Client/ Server development environment . System information on the Software License Agreement governing use of Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise for Linux 2.2.x can be found on http://linux.sybase.com . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-doc Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Suggests: sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1) Architecture: all Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-doc_11.9.2-2_all.deb Size: 2448 MD5sum: eabf8a2bceaf9852f295da42457660b7 Description: Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents for Adaptive Server Enterprise and Open CLient / Server related products. The documents contained on the CDROM are listed in the CONTENTS file on your CDROM. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-openclient Version: 11.1.1-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Suggests: sybase-doc (>= 11.9.2) Provides: sybase-openclient Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-openclient_11.1.1-2_i386.deb Size: 2524 MD5sum: 65a9da9f2eb7f912099bcf36335b03ff Description: Sybase Open Client Development Libraries (dummy package) Sybase Connectivity Open Client(tm) is the industry-leading network oriented application development environment with tools to maintain and administrate the Adaptive Server Enterprise platform. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: unixodbc Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Suggests: libmyodbc2.50.32 Conflicts: odbc-postgresql Provides: odbc-postgresql Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 360430 MD5sum: d5e79fb3b63cdffc5e41a7f72dacf90e Description: ODBC tools libraries Binaries and libraries from the unixODBC package. COMPONENTS: . libodbc.so (ODBC Driver Manager) libodbcinst.so (ODBC Installer/Setup) odbcinst (cmd line UI for libodbcinst.so) libini.a (ini file handler) liblog.a (log handler) libodbcdrvcfg1S.so (GUI config for server based sources... basic) libodbcdrvcfg2S.so (GUI config for file based sources... basic) liboplodbcS.so (GUI config for OpenLink's opl driver) libodbcminiS.so (GUI config for MiniSQL driver) libodbcmyS.so (GUI config for MySQL driver) libodbcpgsqlS.so (GUI config for PostgreSQL driver) libodbcmini.so (driver for MiniSQL) libodbcmy.so (driver for MySQL - Still need libmyodbc2.50.26 ) libodbcpgsql.so (driver for PostgreSQL) libodbctxt.so (driver for Text files) dltest (simple cmd line tool) isql (cmd line tool... batch & interactive SQL) Driver Template (a template for Driver programmers) liblst.so (list handler) installed-size: 1060 conffiles: /etc/odbcinst.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /etc/odbc.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e Package: unixodbc-bin Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgl1, libjpeg62, libmng, libpng2, libqt2.2 (>= 2:2.2.1-6.potato.2), libstdc++2.10, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-bin_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 297492 MD5sum: 850d41290c67414a91b9db1ea1b71e20 Description: QT based GUI ODBC tools QT based GUI Binaries from the unixODBC package. . ODBCConfig (GUI Setup using libodbcinst.so) DataManager (GUI to explore ODBC Data Sources) installed-size: 1320 source: unixodbc Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1), libc6-dev Conflicts: libiodbc2-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-dev_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 450104 MD5sum: 790ef530172737c0bcba54a0d56c927e Description: ODBC libraries for UNIX (development files) development headers for unixODBC installed-size: 2140 source: unixodbc --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 16:53:00 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411B32D2D2 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from 237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.6.237]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05208; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:41:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012012141.NAA05208@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 20:49:05 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 01 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, Holger Thon wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > > From: Akira TAGOH > > To: Rodrigo Moya > > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > Precedence: bulk > > > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > RM> Hi all! > > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > > RM> packages in > > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > > RM> version's debs, > > RM> or a good aptable source? > > I recommend a tree like > > dists/potato/main/binary-i386 > > In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. > It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. > a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp > environment). > > > > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato > has been released with october gnome (1.0). > > But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode > (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). > - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode > - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also > contains Helixcode > (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) > > So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > - bonobo 0.28 > - gconf 0.11 > - oaf 0.6.1 > - unixodbc 1.8.13 > - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > An apt.sources would read like: > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra > > The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise > on Licence policies. ;-) > > > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > > isn't almost different from woody. > > The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In > actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary > tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and > let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread > "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) > > As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > 5 MB. > ok, I agree with everything. Packages for potato should be available. So Holger please, upload them to ftp.gnome-db.org. But remember that the top-level directory for gnome-db stuff in that machine is /pub/gnome-db/, and not /pub/. There are other web sites there, so we've got a separated directory for us. You can upload them, can't you? If not, send them to me and I'll do it myself. cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 23:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8122BC78 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C72FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 Message-ID: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. HT> No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato HT> has been released with october gnome (1.0). HT> But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode HT> (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). HT> - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode HT> - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also HT> contains Helixcode HT> (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the time. HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): HT> - bonobo 0.28 HT> - gconf 0.11 HT> - oaf 0.6.1 HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. HT> An apt.sources would read like: if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict with all the things that those packages are provided. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. HT> The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In HT> actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary HT> tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and HT> let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread HT> "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the environment for which to become stable? if so, you are understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the tree? HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are HT> 5 MB. the people who use woody are the same, too :) Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Sat Dec 2 04:38:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (dsbg-d9312b46.pool.mediaWays.net [217.49.43.70]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63C2BC6C for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:38:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (linux2.cluster-dynip.de [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD66100F0 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:38:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A30D6431C0; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Holger Thon > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: OT: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, > >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: > > HT> Hi! > HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> > >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed > Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the > time. Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... But still there are the 2 other sources: - Linuxland distribution http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ or ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw > > HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > HT> - bonobo 0.28 > HT> - gconf 0.11 > HT> - oaf 0.6.1 > HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 > HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > HT> An apt.sources would read like: > > if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should > change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict > with all the things that those packages are provided. It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). > > >> > >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > >> isn't almost different from woody. > > potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the > environment for which to become stable? if so, you are > understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the > tree? Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by the other packages. Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages which i know of. :-) It's the same question for using rawhide or Redhat 7, Mandrake ß or Mandrake 7.x and so on... ;-) > > HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > HT> 5 MB. > > the people who use woody are the same, too :) Sure. I dist-upgraded to potato in March last year. Ciao, Holger From at@gclab.org Sat Dec 2 06:26:48 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31152BAF1 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 06:26:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140682FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 Message-ID: <87zoif9i8b.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed >> Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the >> time. HT> Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... HT> But still there are the 2 other sources: HT> - Linuxland distribution HT> http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify HT> - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ HT> or HT> ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw Sorry, because I don't know it, I can't comment. >> if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should >> change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict >> with all the things that those packages are provided. HT> It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should HT> be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). Don't you make those a deb packages, and put it on ftp.gnome-db.org? I thought so... but if so, the people which download those patch will end up by compile. >> potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the >> environment for which to become stable? if so, you are >> understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the >> tree? HT> Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there HT> is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. HT> And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by HT> the other packages. HT> Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages HT> which i know of. :-) gcc is not unstable for woody. gcc contatined in woody is the same as potato. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Mon Dec 4 12:30:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A6E2CFA2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id JAA27751; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:37 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: rodrigo@gnome-db.org Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Message-ID: <20001204091737.A26932@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access the list archive): * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like gal-0.2.2 (the latest version) produces a libgal.so.1.0.2. I simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we can all test it. Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:16:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD01D2DF46 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:16:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31113; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:04:23 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041804.KAA31113@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: GNOME Photo Collector From: Rodrigo Moya To: tflorac@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:12:13 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Thierry! I've seen in the GPC home page that you intend to convert to the usage of GNOME-DB for your data access needs. This makes us (GNOME-DB developers) very happy, so count on us on any help you may need. As a first thing, you could subscribe to the gnome-db mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list/), so that we can all of us answer the questions you may have. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:21:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D4C2BD08 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:21:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31529 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:09:46 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Hi! > > I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have > (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access > the list archive): > > * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, > components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. > this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a Debian machine. So, it would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done with: rpm --rebuild file.src.rpm when you've got them, please send them to me and I'll upload them (if gnome-db.org is up, since it's been down all the weekend) > * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like > simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. > it should work, as I don't make use of the latest GAL additions. But again, this shouldn't happen, so please rebuild the RPMs. > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > can all test it. > great! cheers From stephane.anes@free.fr Sun Dec 3 14:02:11 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from postfix2.free.fr (postfix2.free.fr [212.27.32.74]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FB82DE6D for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 14:02:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc300.sa (paris11-nas3-20-151.dial.proxad.net [213.228.20.151]) by postfix2.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id E1156740C2 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:02:09 +0100 (MET) From: Stéphane ANES Reply-To: stephane.anes@free.fr To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: SUSCRIBE Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-mysql=/usr No error detect with configure but with make I get: undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext --> poptGetNextOpt --> poptFreeContext GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... popt is 1.2. and is in /usr Can you help me ? Many thanks ! Stéphane From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 15:13:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65EF2BAB1 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:13:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es [62.83.25.229]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA07221; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:01:06 -0800 Message-Id: <200012042001.MAA07221@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: SUSCRIBE From: Rodrigo Moya To: stephane.anes@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 19:05:46 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 03 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100, St=E9phane ANES wrote: > Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... > I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with >=20 > ./configure --prefix=3D/usr --with-mysql=3D/usr=20 >=20 > No error detect with configure but with make I get: >=20 > undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext > --> poptGetNextOpt > --> poptFreeContext >=20 > GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. >=20 > Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... >=20 > popt is 1.2. and is in /usr >=20 > Can you help me ? >=20 this is a problem reported the other day by another person. I don't know wh= y, but in my machine, libpopt is automatically included (??), and in others not. The solution is to add, to the libgda/lib/gda-server/Makefile.am libgda_server_la_LIBADD =3D -lpopt and of course, you should have libpopt installed on your system. I'll fix this in CVS. Thanks for the report. cheers From at@gclab.org Mon Dec 4 23:11:14 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F72BAC2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:09:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03937; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:08:26 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA24733; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:09:24 +0900 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900 Message-ID: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a RM> Debian machine. So, it RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done RM> with: I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment which use chroot or other machine. I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that I may build the RPMs on this environment. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 5 12:48:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937682BA98 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:48:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from 27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es [62.83.46.27]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA23887; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:34:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a > RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db > RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a > RM> Debian machine. So, it > RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done > RM> with: > > I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment > which use chroot or other machine. > yes, I am preparing a clean environment to build the RPMs, but last time, I didn't have another one, so I thought it was better to have them that way instead of nothing. > I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > I may build the RPMs on this environment. > it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please do so. cheers From at@gclab.org Tue Dec 5 23:48:38 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C4F2BA9A for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:47:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27526; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:45:50 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA06459; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:46:46 +0900 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900 Message-ID: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.4 (Smooth) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. >> RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please RM> do so. That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? if you also say ok, I can do it. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From DieringG@eba-haus.de Wed Dec 6 03:23:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailproxy.de.uu.net (mailproxy.de.uu.net [192.76.144.34]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A891F2E122 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 03:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from kopo001 ([149.228.241.249]) by mailproxy.de.uu.net (5.5.5/5.5.5) with SMTP id JAA20027 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:23:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from EBA_DO-Message_Server by kopo001 with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:45 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100 From: "Gerhard Dieringer" To: Cc: "<" Subject: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr = >>> > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, = and > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > can all test it. > > > great! Hi Rodrigo, as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It = implements the features: 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like = this. To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something = done at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? Gerhard P.S. This email address will only be valid until Fr. 08.Dec 2000, because = I'm going to start a new job at 02. Jan 2001 If you want to reply after this = date, please use my private address GDieringer@compuserve.com or gerhard@gnome-db.org. =20 From mbatle@iname.com Thu Dec 7 10:47:33 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.jet.es (unknown [194.179.100.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6112D21F for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:47:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from iname.com (usuario1-36-128-34.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.34]) by smtp.jet.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA24999 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:51:02 +0100 X-Envelope-To: X-Mozilla-Status: 0801 Message-ID: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100 From: Mateu Batle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0 X-Accept-Language: ca, es, en, de-DE MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: libgda - GNOME dependencies Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking for :) But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, it does not have many of the libraries required, or if it has they are a bit older. Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be to do it ? Thanks and best regards, Mateu From mike@mjv.com Thu Dec 7 11:35:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from IMGate.wts.net (imgate.wts.net [209.144.22.55]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61FB2BAF1 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:35:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from comanchetx.com (mail.comanchetx.com [63.64.122.61]) by IMGate.wts.net (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 700F251646 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from mjv.com [63.64.123.6] by comanchetx.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.05) id AA97645401A4; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:28:07 -0600 Message-ID: <3A2FB958.21BF75F5@mjv.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:22:48 -0600 From: Michael Vanecek X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies References: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I upgraded to the latest Helix-Gnome and don't recall any problems with libgda. gnome-db itself requires some bleeding edge libraries (read - libs that can change at any given moment depending on the developer's desires), but all of it is still very much in feverish development so it's all fairly bleeding edge... Mike Mateu Batle wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > > Thanks and best regards, > Mateu > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 16:48:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5D72E4F0 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:48:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA14702; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:35:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082135.NAA14702@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 20:43:26 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > >> > >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. > >> > RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please > RM> do so. > > That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? > if you also say ok, I can do it. > yes, please do them From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 17:39:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EF2CA07 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:39:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA18105; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:27:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082227.OAA18105@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies From: Rodrigo Moya To: Mateu Batle Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 21:34:38 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100, Mateu Batle wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > libgda's dependencies are: * GLib >= 0.99 * GTK+ >= 1.2.x * libxml >= 1.8.x * OAF >= 0.5.x * ORBit >= 0.5.x * GConf >= 0.9 GLib, GTK+, libxml and ORBit are just included with any decent version of GNOME (helix gnome should work perfectly). OAF and GConf can be found at ftp://ftp.gnome.org or at spidermonkey.helixcode.com And libgda is based on CORBA, so it's not possible to compile without CORBA support, but you can do so without any GNOME library (except for GTK+, a dependency which is going to be removed for GLib 2.0). For GNOME-DB the thing is different because of Bonobo, which may cause many problems due to version mismatch, but if you use GNOME-DB >= 0.2.x, any Bonobo version >= 0.28 should work. If you're having any problem compiling, please tell us what those problems are so that we can try to help you cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 9 10:11:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9902BA9A for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:11:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from 19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es [62.83.4.19]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06164; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:59:03 -0800 Message-Id: <200012091459.GAA06164@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Gerhard Dieringer Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 09 Dec 2000 14:06:58 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100, Gerhard Dieringer wrote: > >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr >>> > > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > > can all test it. > > > > > great! > > Hi Rodrigo, > > as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It implements > the features: > 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) > 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls > 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 > 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) > well, this is great! The only problem I see is the use of libxml2, which won't be considered a stable version until GNOME 2.0. So, would it be easy to make it compile with both versions of libxml (libxml 1.8 & libxml2)? > Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step > would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) > > If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like this. > To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something done > at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? > yes, the idea is to be able to make all sorts of commands through XML. What I talked about was about having a modifySchema IDL method, which will use the current GDA_Connection_Constraints to be able to send DDL commands. So, what I think we should do is to have the Gda_XmlQuery object call this modifySchema method after having parsed the XML command. I suggest you have a look at the GDA_Connection_Constraint stuff (openSchema() function) so that we can start discussing how to extend it to fit all the DDL commands. and please, commit your xmlquery stuff to CVS (have you got a CVS account?). This should go to the libgda/lib/gda-common/gda-xml-query* files. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 10:02:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4588E2BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:02:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8AA54A65 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:47:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 15:57:30 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite often. So, as I've just now added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some bonobo-related bugs, I think it's time to do a new release. I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Tue Dec 12 11:39:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057772E059 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:39:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-72.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.72]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBCGcw413439; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:39:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 145sRo-0000BM-00; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Tue Dec 12 12:01:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D743A2BAB6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:01:30 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id IAA28606; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:53 -0800 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release Message-ID: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com>; from Rodrigo Moya on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi! > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > often. So, as I've just now > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > bonobo-related bugs, I think > it's time to do a new release. > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those sources! BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:20:22 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD7E2E087 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:20:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816A054A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:05:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:15:09 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212170526.816A054A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: > On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: >=20 > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? >=20 > As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less > bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) >=20 ok, so tomorrow, or after tomorrow it will be done cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:25:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA83C2CE2D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:25:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF3354A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:10:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:19:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > Hi! > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > often. So, as I've just now > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > sources! > they are in: ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll start making the packages tonight at home. > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do something, so we'll have to wait for a little. cheers From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 12 13:44:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86AB72BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 13:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 22291 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by himail.edinfo.es with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Subject: Re: New release From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: Vivien Malerba , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 17:37:37 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212184405.86AB72BB92@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > > often. So, as I've just now > > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > > sources! > > > > they are in: > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db > > But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll > start making the packages > tonight at home. > > > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > > > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked > > about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do > something, so we'll have > to wait for a little. > Well, at this moment the alldns guys are stupid and they have change the domains's name servers to the old ones. Please don't use alldns.com to register your domains :-( > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 17:07:07 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368702D47E; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:04:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es (224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es [62.83.7.224]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF20A54A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:49:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 22:59:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. GNOME-DB/libGDA are a complete framewok for developing database-oriented applications, and actually allow access to PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, Sybase and ODBC data sources. Apart from this development framework, it also includes several applications and utilities which make it quite suitable for many database-related taks. This release is the first one in a series of more regular releases, since we're approaching a good deal of performance/stability/functionality, and we want people to be able to easily follow the development. * Added/Implemented stuff: Better Bonobo support - now works great with Bonobo! (Rodrigo) Packages for Debian Potato (Holger) Portuguese page for the web site (Cleber) Started implementation for database: monikers (Rodrigo) Started PrimeBase data source provider (Holger) Started Perl bindings for libGDA (Rodrigo) * Bugs fixed: Bonobo toolbar/menubar now works perfectly well (at last) Some build problems in different configurations solved To install this new version, you'll need: * libgda: ORBit, OAF, GConf >= 0.9, libxml * gnome-db: libgda and dependencies, Bonobo >= 0.29, gnome-libs, libgal, gtkhtml GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in the same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe to the GNOME-DB mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list) From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:14:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC832E16B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:14:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B3654A64 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:59:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:08:47 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213105914.00B3654A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi RPMS and SRPMS are now available in: ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db/ ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db/ cheers From gperez@gio.ingor.upm.es Wed Dec 13 06:28:49 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es (glo.gio.ingor.upm.es [138.100.17.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957072CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:28:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es ([138.100.21.98]) by gio.ingor.upm.es (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA13113; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:24 +0100 Message-ID: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100 From: "Guille (bisho)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-6.1.1 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001119 X-Accept-Language: es-es, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. Great! [...] > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > the > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > to the GNOME-DB mailing list Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a name-based virtual web server? -- \|||||||/ Guillermo Pérez Pérez < o o > - bisho@onirica.com \ L / - bisho@eurielec.etsit.upm.es -oOOo-------oOOo- From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:43:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA062CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192554A64; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: Guille "(bisho)" Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:38:20 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213112845.9192554A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100, Guille (bisho) wrote: > > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. > > Great! > > [...] > > > > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > > the > > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > > to the GNOME-DB mailing list > > Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a > name-based virtual web server? > well, I think it was 213.0.69.70, but you won't be able to access it, since it's down. Anyway, I've just put RPMS and SRPMS in ftp.gnome.org, so you may want to download them from there. And if what you're looking for is for the web pages, they're on CVS, under the gnome-db/www directory. It's in PHP so to see them in your browser you'll have to install them on an Apache www directory, and, of course, install the mod_php module. The documentation is included in both the tarballs and the RPMS/SRPMS cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 07:13:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D5C2E276 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:13:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA31246 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 04:01:24 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 13:08:42 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're approaching a big amount of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on adding missing things and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, hopefully, included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the beginning of next year The things I've thought about: * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as LDAP, etc * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser widget to allow calls to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, since the only one which is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget * Report engine: make it work * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very little to offer * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc * Bonobo monikers * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it would be great if we could also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people * and more things that I can't remember right now As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to help, please just say where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 09:17:09 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1392E335 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:17:09 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id GAA05349; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:40 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi all! > > Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're > approaching a big amount > of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on > adding missing things > and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, > hopefully, > included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the > beginning of next year > > The things I've thought about: > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > LDAP, etc Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one implementation). > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > widget to allow calls > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > since the only one which > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ write the implementations. I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings with the schemas... > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > * Report engine: make it work > * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very > little to offer > * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc > * Bonobo monikers > * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it > would be great if we could > also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started > * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people > * and more things that I can't remember right now > > As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to > help, please just say > where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) > > cheers > Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:44:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432D32E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:44:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06855; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:32:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:39:24 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > The things I've thought about: > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > LDAP, etc > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > implementation). > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both projects. What I was thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > widget to allow calls > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there may be times when you want to create database objects from the source code of your program. And, of course, we need to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of the schemas. So, what do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML queries? > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > since the only one which > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > write the implementations. > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > with the schemas... > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the list. And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the supplied fields are NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, such as the object name, etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other fields may be NULL. > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen myself? cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:55:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9CB2E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:55:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA07398 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:00 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:50:10 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening brackets are in the same line as the statement): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it when you hack. cheers From cuenca@celium.net Wed Dec 13 10:11:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from ns1.axinet.fr (ns1.axinet.fr [193.45.10.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E2B2E27A for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:11:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from name (AMontsouris-101-2-2-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.253.183.169]) by ns1.axinet.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id eBDFBVN15437 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:11:31 +0100 From: "Joaquin Cuenca Abela" To: "gnome-db list" Subject: RE: HACKING guide Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". It would do the conversion of all your files for you. Cheers, -- Joaquin Cuenca Abela cuenca@celium.net > -----Message d'origine----- > De : gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org > [mailto:gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org]De la part de Rodrigo Moya > Envoyé : mercredi 13 décembre 2000 15:50 > À : gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Objet : HACKING guide > > > Hi all! > > I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll > find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. > Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the > same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. > > 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are > 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): > > if (whatever) > { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) > { > case ... > } > } > > and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening > brackets are in the same line as the statement): > > if (whatever) { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) { > case ... > } > } > > so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to > comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change > this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all > of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. > > I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, > but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of > the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding > style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it > when you hack. > > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:30:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98932E148 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA09777; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:17:55 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131517.HAA09777@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: RE: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joaquin Cuenca Abela Cc: gnome-db list In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:24:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote: > Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". > It would do the conversion of all your files for you. > ok, great! thanks, I'll have a look at it cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 10:52:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992AE2E35B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:52:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id HAA10976; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:47 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:32 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > The things I've thought about: > > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > > LDAP, etc > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > implementation). > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > projects. What I was > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example in MS access or some other projects. > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > widget to allow calls > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > may be times when you > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > And, of course, we need > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > the schemas. So, what > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > queries? Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice the same things. > > > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > > since the only one which > > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > > write the implementations. > > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > > with the schemas... > > > > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the > list. > > And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the > supplied fields are > NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, > such as the object name, > etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other > fields may be NULL. > Ok, I will do it. > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > myself? yes, the e-table one. > > cheers Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:59:25 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7B32BCA5 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA11358; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:46:57 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131546.HAA11358@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:54:07 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > > implementation). > > > > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > > projects. What I was > > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) > > Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > perfect! > > > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > > > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, > then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more > complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example > in MS access or some other projects. > well, that's great! > > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > > widget to allow calls > > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > > may be times when you > > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > > And, of course, we need > > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > > the schemas. So, what > > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > > queries? > > Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to > work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice > the same things. > ok, you're right. I started to think about the modifySchema stuff when we didn't have XML queries, so now I also think it's better to have them as XML. So, I'll remove the modifySchema soon > > > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > > myself? > > yes, the e-table one. > ok, I'll have a look at it again, since the last time I looked at it, it seemed to me quite tricky to use, but maybe I didn't look too much. cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 14 15:29:08 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3522DFE1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:29:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-149-161.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.149.161]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBEKT1i07847; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:29:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 146ezq-0000Ew-00; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: We're starting to develop the logger Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, with no major efforts.=20 The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. I have only one question about the design of the logger: * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use libgda if it will be part of libgda... Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database own data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of code would be replicated. This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From tagoh@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 15 00:40:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA02CE94 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20629 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:27 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA06062 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:40:56 +0900 Message-Id: <200012150540.OAA06062@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: GNOME-DB 0.2.1 deb is now available From: Akira TAGOH To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 14:40:23 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I made the debs of latest version. if you think the useful, you can add to the apt-line as following: deb http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ deb-src http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ Regards, -- Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Fri Dec 15 11:13:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 675CB2CECA for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:13:54 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 8134 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Subject: The gnome-db.org domain From: Carlos Perello Marin To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 15:13:24 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001215161354.675CB2CECA@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Well, I think that it's running again. Excuse me for all this troubles. I have lose the mail alias at gnome-db.org, please resend me the alias at gnome-db.org and the destination one. Thanks. P.S.: I think that this week i will restart my contributions to the report engine. I was very busy at work, sorry (well I'm very busy, but i think i could do things at gnome-db also). Bye From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 16 19:35:27 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541782D4BB for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 19:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from 7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es (7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es [62.83.43.199]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC8854867; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:15:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 01:24:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi all. >=20 > It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 >=20 > The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going > to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its > functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. >=20 > We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, > with no major efforts.=20 >=20 > The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the > ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. >=20 this is great David!!! > I have only one question about the design of the logger: >=20 > * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use > libgda if it will be part of libgda... >=20 > Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database ow= n > data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a > different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of > code would be replicated. >=20 > This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. >=20 well, clearly, the logger must have access to the underlying database direc= tly, so the best option, IMO, is to add a new CORBA interface to the IDL files, called Logger, which will implement the logger stuff for each provider (=3D each provider should implement it). This way, we can use it optionally in the client side, and also implement it optionally in the provider side. So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we need for the clients to access, and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which functions/methods would a client need to interface with the logger. Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to use or not the logging stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO cheers and thanks for the help From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 05:24:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078B2DBD0 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 05:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-144-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.144.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHAOP417284 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147azP-0002sc-00 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda documentation... But the links are wrong. Could anyone correct them? Thank you. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sun Dec 17 07:18:15 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9931E2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from 190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.190]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCF454A08; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:03:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 13:12:39 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217120313.ADCF454A08@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda > documentation... But the links are wrong. >=20 > Could anyone correct them? >=20 they don't exist yet :( But thank you for reminding me that I must add them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 07:23:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6206B2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:23:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-131-210.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.131.210]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHCNl420379; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147cqv-0004e0-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo Moya wrote: (...) >=20 > So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we > need for the clients to access, > and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which > functions/methods would > a client need to interface with the logger. OK. On next week, we will design the logger interface >=20 > Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to > use or not the logging > stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). >=20 > Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO >=20 > cheers and thanks for the help >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 >=20 --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 18 15:37:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BA32BB53 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from 136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es (136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es [62.83.22.136]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531295485B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 21:22:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've changed the names of the .oafinfo files. This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, the OAFIIDs are now of the form: OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since this has been decided in gnome-components-list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for programmers. Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo ... The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we can create any subsubnamespace as we like. All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs cheers From Philipp.Leusmann@post.rwth-aachen.de Mon Dec 18 16:13:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (nets5.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.13]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C542BB7B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from marvin (pec-33-208.tnt5.me2.uunet.de [149.225.33.208]) by nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.10.1/8.10.1/5) with ESMTP id eBILDhm14721 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:13:43 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> From: "Philipp Leusmann" To: Subject: Compiling libgda Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi, i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first use in this function) GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 Could someone please tell me how to fix this? Thanks, Philipp From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 18 16:37:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2F22CF17 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:37:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from 60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.60]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6345485B; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:22:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Compiling libgda From: Rodrigo Moya To: Philipp Leusmann Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 22:30:51 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218212243.9C6345485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100, Philipp Leusmann wrote: > Hi, > > i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are > fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ > usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ > opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl > ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ > glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom > e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u > sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c > GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo > GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': > GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' > GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) > GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' > GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' > make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > > > Could someone please tell me how to fix this? > > yes, that's a known problem caused by different versions of ORBit. The solution is easy though: just remove the GDA* files and rerun make. Those files should be re-generated with you orbit-idl compiler, so there shouldn't be any problem after removing them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 04:47:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15602CCB8 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 04:47:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.166.129.137]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5V1U601.5RJ for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03535 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Doubts about making a gda-client Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I started to program using the headers... Then I met the gda_connection_new function... Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? Greetings From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 05:36:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4042BCBB for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 05:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (212-7-53-64.WolNet.worldonline.es [212.7.53.64]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F785485B; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:21:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Doubts about making a gda-client From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 11:29:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220102120.C0F785485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in > RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: >=20 > gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio >=20 don't use gda-buildclient, it does not work. And it's not intended to generate a client skeleton, it's intended to be used to compile/link a GDA client. But as I said, it does not work yet You should use instead gda-config to retrieve the CFLAGS and LIBS needed for your GDA client application to compile/link. >=20 > Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I > started to program using the headers... > Then I met the gda_connection_new function... >=20 > Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); >=20 > What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? >=20 just call gda_corba_get_orb(): Gda_Connection* cnc =3D gda_connection_new(gda_corba_get_orb()); cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 12:27:53 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6EA2DEEA for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.73.59.6]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5VN3U03.03Z for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:18 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04233 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [es] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Types of commands. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda instead of libpq. I've found the next undocumented functions: gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong flags); How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? Thank you. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 13:49:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0942BB01 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:49:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (119-MADR-X34.libre.retevision.es [62.83.3.119]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1554866; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:34:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Types of commands. From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 19:41:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220183420.A7D1554866@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda > instead of libpq. >=20 > I've found the next undocumented functions: >=20 > gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); > void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong > flags); >=20 > How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? >=20 In libgda/idl/GDA.idl, there is an enum: enum CommandType { CMD_TEXT1, CMD_TABLE, CMD_TABLEDIRECT, CMD_STOREDPROCEDURE, CMD_FILE }; which is the type of the command, but, sorry, this is not implemented yet. I had forgotten about it, but now that you've reminded it to me, I'll look at what needs to be done. And, in fact, thanks David, since I think this can be used for the XML queries: that is, we can add a CMD_XML value to the enum, and then, have the provider act as needed depending on the command's type. How does this sound? What I don't know/remember is what CMD_TABLEDIRECT is for. Any ideas? David, for the moment, forget about the command type. cheers > Thank you. >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Thu Dec 21 14:33:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBDA2E062 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:33:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (194-MAD2-X26.libre.retevision.es [62.83.136.194]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDA95485B for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:18:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Gnome CVS User ] GNOME CVS: libgda rodrigo From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 21 Dec 2000 20:25:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001221191832.1DDA95485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just checked in the changes needed for supporting the CommandType attribute in GDA::Command objects. What I've done is: 1) "create" new enum type in IDL: enum CommandType { COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLEDIRECT, COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE, COMMAND_TYPE_FILE }; I'll add a COMMAND_TYPE_XML soon. 2) changed type attribute in GDA::Command: it was a unsigned long, now it's a GDA_CommandType 3) changes all over to adapt to new attribute type (BTW, by making this change, I found a bug in the (I think) 0.2.1 released version, which was that I forgot to add a pointer to a function in an ORBit structure, and thus the following function pointers in the structure were displaced, so there were some CORBA exceptions when executing some CORBA calls. Has anybody experienced this? So now, you can: gda_command_set_cmd_type(GDA_COMMAND(cmd), GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE); By default, providers' GDA::Command will have the CmdType set to TEXT (== SQL or whatever language is used). But now, we must adapt/extend the providers to support this new feature. As a first measure, we must, in gda_*_command_execute, add a switch like: switch (gda_server_command_get_cmd_type(cmd)) { case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT : -> execute SQL as now case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE : -> return a SELECT * FROM $table case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE : -> exec procedure case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_FILE : -> load file and execute } So please, Vivien, Nick, Holger, can you update your providers? I'll do the others. The switch is needed only in gda-*-command.c, in the gda_*_command_execute function. For the moment, just respond to the TYPE_TEXT command type, or, if you feel like doing it, implement the other ones. cheers Forwarded message: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: rodrigo 00/12/21 12:20:57 > > Modified files: > . : ChangeLog > bindings/c++ : gdaCommand.cpp gdaCommand.h gdaConnection.cpp > gdaConnection.h > idl : GDA.idl GDA_Command.idl GDA_Connection.idl > lib/gda-client : gda-command.c gda-command.h gda-connection.c > gda-connection.h > lib/gda-server : gda-server-command.c gda-server-impl-command.c > gda-server-impl-command.h > gda-server-impl-connection.c > gda-server-impl-connection.h gda-server-impl.h > > Log message: > 2000-12-21 Rodrigo Moya > > * added support for the GDA_CommandType stuff, which will > allow to treat commands in different ways (SQL, TABLE, > XML, etc) > > > _______________________________________________ > cvs-commits-list mailing list > cvs-commits-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-commits-list > From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 26 18:44:18 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.61]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E72D362 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:39:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.182.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBQNdZw05512 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:39:36 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello world!! I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is enough to run with apt). Bye. --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From tagoh@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 27 02:09:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4329D2CCCE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA23788; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:54 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA27100; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:09:47 +0900 Message-Id: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Akira TAGOH To: Carlos =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?Perell=1B=24BC3=1B=28B_Mar=1B=24BC-=1B=28Bn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Carlos, On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > Hello world!! >=20 >=20 > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! >=20 >=20 > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ >=20 > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > enough to run with apt). good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ Regards, --=20 Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Wed Dec 27 05:18:57 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C26702CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:18:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 9624 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > Hi Carlos, >=20 > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > Hello world!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > >=20 > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > enough to run with apt). >=20 > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: >=20 > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ >=20 Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all correct. Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > --=20 > Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org > tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group > tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project > tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. >=20 From mvali@hot.ee Wed Dec 27 08:45:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (adsl395.estpak.ee [213.168.17.141]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38642D2D8 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:45:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (IDENT:mvali@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA03553 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 From: Margus Vali To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: notices on front end Message-ID: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.0 Lines: 39 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello! I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. some problems/notices: - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are installed - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first time. - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 messages like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, then clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make it a whole lot more usable?) regards, mv From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 28 11:31:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0711E2BCBB for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-144.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.144]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBSGVOi19336; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:31:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14Ba6h-0003Xg-00; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: james@daa.com.au Cc: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi. Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-db widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. Greetings. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM ASPL Fact Official Programmer "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 17:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3C92BC2D for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:41:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18335 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Unable to use anything in gnome-db Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda compiled using mysql. Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in any of the gnome-db applications does anything. Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. Cheers, -Jason Netconcepts Inc. Auckland, New Zealand From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 19:39:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9D02BD65 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:39:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18767 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 jm@netconcepts.com wrote: > Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda > compiled using mysql. > > Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... > if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in > any of the gnome-db applications does anything. > > Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. > > Cheers, > -Jason > > Netconcepts Inc. > Auckland, New Zealand > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list > From karlheg@bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net Wed Dec 27 02:47:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bittersweet.intra (bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.27.231]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136472CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:47:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from karlheg by bittersweet.intra with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14BBIy-0005EQ-00 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: tools/gda-buildserver: unexpanded @macro@'s From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) Date: 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 Message-ID: <87vgs6486r.fsf@bittersweet.intra> Lines: 8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Package: libgda Version: 0.2.0 There are several unexpanded AC_OUTPUT macros after building libgda-0.2.0 from the Debian package source. Perhaps you've omitted something from the configure.in? [ I am not subscribed to the list ] From carlos@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 25 16:02:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F042C828 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:02:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es [62.37.133.185]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBPL1k425184; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 22:01:46 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Evolution: 00000002-0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > Hi all! >=20 > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. >=20 > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: >=20 > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] >=20 > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > programmers. >=20 > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: >=20 > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > ... >=20 > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. >=20 Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use the traditional GDA_* names? > All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, > you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and > $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the > GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all > your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs >=20 > cheers >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:35:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5672BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:35:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC7454867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:20:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=C3=B3_Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:27:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142021.DAC7454867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > > Hi all! > >=20 > > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. > >=20 > > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is= , > > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: > >=20 > > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] > >=20 > > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible= ] > > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, whic= h > > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable an= d > > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > > programmers. > >=20 > > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: > >=20 > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > > ... > >=20 > > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use > the traditional GDA_* names? >=20 for the moment, I have just changed the GNOME part (GNOME::DB), so you can continue using GDA_. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:37:58 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0902BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:37:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AED54867 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:22:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: libgda lxhispano From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001226041715.9B9F93360B2@cvs.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:29:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142221.A8AED54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 23:17:15 -0500, Gnome CVS User wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: lxhispano 00/12/25 23:17:15 >=20 > Modified files: > report : ChangeLog Makefile.am gda-report-stream.c=20 > gda-report-stream.h=20 >=20 > Log message: > 2000-12-25 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn >=20 > * updated gda-report-stream.[ch] to make them compile again. > * included the lib/gda-client directory for header files in > Makefile.am >=20 Carlos, you should remove this. The report client IS NOT a GDA client. Of c= ourse, an app can be both a GDA and a report client, but we don't want to add unneeded dependencies to this library, so that it can be used, for example, in a report-generation-dedicated machine,=20 without any other stuff. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:58:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EFA2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:58:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7BC5488D; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos Perello Marin Cc: Akira TAGOH , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:50:04 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231144252.0B7BC5488D@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100, Carlos Perello Marin wrote: > El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > > Hi Carlos, > >=20 > > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > > Hello world!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > > >=20 > > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > > enough to run with apt). > >=20 > > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: > >=20 > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all > correct. >=20 > Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 yes, in gnome-db/www cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:08:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A4D2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19654867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:52:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: notices on front end From: Rodrigo Moya To: Margus Vali Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:59:28 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231145240.7B19654867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200, Margus Vali wrote: > Hello! > I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 > upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). > Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some > packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. > > some problems/notices: > - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are > installed ok, I'll work on this soon. > - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just > on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? well, I plan to have an integrated help system. To be included in the front end. But I'm sorry it does not work very well. But I'll work on it soon > - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) > - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like > down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. > kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. this part also needs some fixes. Thanks for noting them > - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow > leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but > the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only > happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first > time. hmm, strange. I'll have a look also at that code. It happened sometimes to me, but it stopped some time ago. > - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two > Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: > IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 > messages > like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, > then > clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. > As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the > appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? with the ones you've got it's ok. The problem is one I found the other day which I was not sure if it was included in the 0.2.1 release. So please, get sources from CVS and compile them. I'll make a release in a couple of days. > gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the > table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). > - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be > modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make > it a whole lot more usable?) > we plan to change the GnomeDbGrid widget to use the etable widget. But, well, about updatable recordsets, we had a discussion about them some time ago (look in the archives). If you can add something to the discussion (== a solution) it will be welcome. I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't made much progress, but I'll fix all this next century :) cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:28:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3653B2BBB2 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:28:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF5C54867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:12:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn_Carre=C3=B1o?= Cc: james@daa.com.au, gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:19:56 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231151246.0DF5C54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi. >=20 > Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-d= b > widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. >=20 great! If you find any strange thing/bug in the GNOME-DB widgets API, pleas= e tell me. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:40:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109BB2BB58 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:40:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8B054867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:25:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: jm@netconcepts.com Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:32:12 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231152502.2A8B054867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300, wrote: > Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. > > you can do that, or even better, go to settings, and, in the components tab, select the components you want loaded when you start the front-end. cheers From cleberrrjr@bol.com.br Thu Nov 30 20:02:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from simpson.bol.com.br (simpson.bol.com.br [200.246.116.94]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6F92D21B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.10.4.123] (200.246.116.72) by simpson.bol.com.br (NPlex 4.5.050) id 39B4BED5004EA346 for gnome-db-list@gnome.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:02:20 -0300 Message-ID: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200011291624.RAA21740@ulises.openresources.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 02:59:32 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender-IP: 200.194.96.204 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Preocupado com v=EDrus?=20 > Crie seu e-mail gr=E1tis do BOL com antiv=EDrus! > http://www.bol.com.br >=20 >=20 > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > Hi all! > > >=20 > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects i= n > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQ= L, > > > of course, if Vivien > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > >=20 > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > >=20 > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My tim= e is > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page mainte= nance > > alwell, no problemo! > >=20 > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in >=20 > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > Portuguese (which, for > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > go into the > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. >=20 > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > Spanish people on this > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > no up-to-date > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > great if somebody wanted > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. >=20 > Well, and any other language, of course. >=20 > cheers There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/i= ndex.php), assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translatin= g the following part of the index.php page: "please tell us and we'll inc= lude it here." I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then conta= ct the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating som= e docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some = people won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer= myself to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like = to volunteer themselves aswell. This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documen= tation part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page,= listing the languages and who to talk to. Just my sleepy ideas at 11:00 PM. Cheers. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 04:50:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4382D06C for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 04:50:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (10-MADR-X11.libre.retevision.es [62.83.0.10]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDDF54A5F; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:48:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Rodrigo Moya To: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 08:45:10 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001201094819.9DDDF54A5F@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects in > > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQL, > > > > of course, if Vivien > > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > > > > > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > > > > > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My time is > > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page maintenance > > > alwell, no problemo! > > > > > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in > > > > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > > Portuguese (which, for > > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > > go into the > > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. > > > > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > > Spanish people on this > > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > > no up-to-date > > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > > great if somebody wanted > > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. > > > > Well, and any other language, of course. > > > > cheers > > There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't > think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the > original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/index.php), > assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for > each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs > will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. > yes, the doc hierarchy is going to be the same (manual/ etc). > I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translating > the following part of the index.php page: > > "please tell us and we'll include it here." > > I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then contact > the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating some > docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some people > won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer myself > to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like to volunteer > themselves aswell. > > This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documentation > part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page, listing > the languages and who to talk to. > yes, this is a good idea. So, Carlos, could you add an alias for Cleber? let's call it, for example, portuguese@gnome-db.org? or what name do you prefer. (How do you say Portuguese in Portuguese? cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 05:08:16 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (unknown [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FCE2E2D9 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA01449; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:48 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA27707; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:08:56 +0900 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:07:41 +0900 Message-ID: <877l5ksbde.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 30 Nov 2000 10:37:26 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. >> RM> ok, so what do you suggest? to just have in ftp.gnome-db.org the woody RM> debs so that people can download them? or not have a debian/ directory RM> at all? Hmm, I don't know which well. if it's meaningful that we provide debs on ftp.gnome-db.org, I think that we might provide it. Well, we put debs on ftp.gnome-db.org in the meantime, and we check the number of user. if it isn't meaningful, we don't have it. Do you think it? Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Fri Dec 1 15:21:13 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (f-131-156.essen.ipdial.viaginterkom.de [62.180.156.131]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA2B2BC51 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:19:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925C100F0 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:20:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 971E3E0F6; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Rodrigo Moya > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > Precedence: bulk > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> Hi all! > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > RM> packages in > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > RM> version's debs, > RM> or a good aptable source? I recommend a tree like dists/potato/main/binary-i386 In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp environment). > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato has been released with october gnome (1.0). But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also contains Helixcode (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): - bonobo 0.28 - gconf 0.11 - oaf 0.6.1 - unixodbc 1.8.13 - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. An apt.sources would read like: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise on Licence policies. ;-) > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > isn't almost different from woody. The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are 5 MB. Ciao, Holger --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: gda-mysql Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libmysqlclient6, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-mysql_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 13694 MD5sum: 41e20a4b3ea65361a40607b3d8db9f8d Description: GDA backend server for MySQL This package uses MySQL backend. installed-size: 61 source: libgda Package: gda-odbc Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, unixodbc, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-odbc_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 16710 MD5sum: 78a20cb5b87066a5f073626e131a1340 Description: GDA backend server for ODBC This package uses ODBC backend. installed-size: 69 source: libgda Package: gda-postgres Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpgsql2 (>= 7.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-postgres_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 25572 MD5sum: b78e711c163e89e1c70c481ccb574fdf Description: GDA backend server for PostgreSQL This package uses PostgreSQL backend. installed-size: 89 source: libgda Package: gda-sybase Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-sybase_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 23614 MD5sum: 70f683d5beb38a227997ed182e9bfb5e Description: GDA backend server for Sybase This package uses Sybase OpenClient library 11.1.1 installed-size: 85 source: libgda Package: gnome-db Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgal1, libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libgda0, libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglade-gnome0, libglade0, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libunicode0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Recommends: gda-mysql | gda-postgres | gda-odbc Replaces: gnome-db-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 159520 MD5sum: 30f03f69a81a8db1429a0311d651ad57 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains the core components of GNOME-DB. installed-size: 609 Package: gnome-db-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gnome-db (= 0.2.0-1), libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 86556 MD5sum: d1a26966faf6633154585b92291a7e72 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME -- development files. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains libraries, header files and tools to let you develop GNOME-DB applications. installed-size: 437 source: gnome-db Package: libgda-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 210080 MD5sum: c420a07e088621cb4e066aa45c184a6d Description: GNU data access library -- development files. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 988 source: libgda Package: libgda0 Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Suggests: gda-mysql (= 0.2.0-1), gda-postgres (= 0.2.0-1), gda-odbc (= 0.2.0-1) Replaces: libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda0_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 225662 MD5sum: 6c34e551cf2a63f7e8e3a64639af529b Description: GNU Data Access library. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 978 source: libgda --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: bonobo Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libefs1, libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/bonobo_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 347688 MD5sum: 48ad8d108c7feb6fe9f4b1a52a0dd814 Description: The GNOME Bonobo System. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 2044 Package: godbcconfig Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8-4), libart2 (>= 1.0.56-3), libaudiofile0, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.7-1), libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/godbcconfig_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 8354 MD5sum: 4bb47c549d3e859564a2679ff3c00593 Description: GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI - part of the unixODBC tools installed-size: 96 source: unixodbc Package: libbonobo-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: bonobo (=0.28-1), libbonobo2 (=0.28-1), libefs-dev, libgnomeprint-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 394212 MD5sum: ffcf03d7a977745e120fe03f262b0d4d Description: The GNOME Bonobo library - development files. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 1527 source: bonobo Package: libbonobo2 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Recommends: bonobo Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<= 0.12-3) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo2_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 300018 MD5sum: 6b342ab379c39330acbc4a4470fa68d5 Description: The GNOME Bonobo library. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 723 source: bonobo Package: libefs-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libefs1 (=0.28-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 118868 MD5sum: 8d2b2cfb96fa20b93edfe3b9f87f0fd9 Description: Embedded File System library - development files. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 185 source: bonobo Package: libefs1 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libefs1, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libz1 Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs1_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 120544 MD5sum: c84884b1aebdeece600324c4e7efc294 Description: Embedded File System library. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 173 source: bonobo Package: libgconf-dev Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libgconf11 (=0.11-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf-dev_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 155398 MD5sum: 9a727adb23b92e822d64f114a8ccdfab Description: GNOME onfiguration database system development files. GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain development files. installed-size: 556 source: gconf Package: libgconf11 Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.11), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libgconf10 Replaces: libgconf10 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf11_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 317676 MD5sum: 93e45a096900ddc9d6823e9f509f4e56 Description: GNOME configuration database system libraries GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain shared libraries. installed-size: 996 source: gconf Package: liboaf-dev Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: liboaf0 (=0.6.1-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf-dev_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 34526 MD5sum: a4f3a141e8ce98633ac63ccbe1be8b3b Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework - development files. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 158 source: oaf Package: liboaf0 Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0, liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf0_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 122952 MD5sum: f7ceb3ae956b67c291b96d7ecc9785f5 Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 410 source: oaf Package: sybase-ase Version: 11.9.2-SWR-9223 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-ase_11.9.2-SWR-9223_i386.deb Size: 2458 MD5sum: 12f3e59f2a4ff43253fdff6cf4c4c676 Description: Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise Sybase(R) Adaptive Server(R) Enterprise is the industry-leading structured query Language database server. It supports ANSI-92 SQL with Sybase stored procedures. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-common Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-common_11.9.2-2_i386.deb Size: 2506 MD5sum: cdef9787718e364d3f15081bb2d36a3e Description: Sybase Enterprise Software Common Files Supporting files which apply to the Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise shared between the SQL Server and Open Client/ Server development environment . System information on the Software License Agreement governing use of Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise for Linux 2.2.x can be found on http://linux.sybase.com . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-doc Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Suggests: sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1) Architecture: all Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-doc_11.9.2-2_all.deb Size: 2448 MD5sum: eabf8a2bceaf9852f295da42457660b7 Description: Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents for Adaptive Server Enterprise and Open CLient / Server related products. The documents contained on the CDROM are listed in the CONTENTS file on your CDROM. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-openclient Version: 11.1.1-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Suggests: sybase-doc (>= 11.9.2) Provides: sybase-openclient Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-openclient_11.1.1-2_i386.deb Size: 2524 MD5sum: 65a9da9f2eb7f912099bcf36335b03ff Description: Sybase Open Client Development Libraries (dummy package) Sybase Connectivity Open Client(tm) is the industry-leading network oriented application development environment with tools to maintain and administrate the Adaptive Server Enterprise platform. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: unixodbc Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Suggests: libmyodbc2.50.32 Conflicts: odbc-postgresql Provides: odbc-postgresql Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 360430 MD5sum: d5e79fb3b63cdffc5e41a7f72dacf90e Description: ODBC tools libraries Binaries and libraries from the unixODBC package. COMPONENTS: . libodbc.so (ODBC Driver Manager) libodbcinst.so (ODBC Installer/Setup) odbcinst (cmd line UI for libodbcinst.so) libini.a (ini file handler) liblog.a (log handler) libodbcdrvcfg1S.so (GUI config for server based sources... basic) libodbcdrvcfg2S.so (GUI config for file based sources... basic) liboplodbcS.so (GUI config for OpenLink's opl driver) libodbcminiS.so (GUI config for MiniSQL driver) libodbcmyS.so (GUI config for MySQL driver) libodbcpgsqlS.so (GUI config for PostgreSQL driver) libodbcmini.so (driver for MiniSQL) libodbcmy.so (driver for MySQL - Still need libmyodbc2.50.26 ) libodbcpgsql.so (driver for PostgreSQL) libodbctxt.so (driver for Text files) dltest (simple cmd line tool) isql (cmd line tool... batch & interactive SQL) Driver Template (a template for Driver programmers) liblst.so (list handler) installed-size: 1060 conffiles: /etc/odbcinst.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /etc/odbc.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e Package: unixodbc-bin Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgl1, libjpeg62, libmng, libpng2, libqt2.2 (>= 2:2.2.1-6.potato.2), libstdc++2.10, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-bin_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 297492 MD5sum: 850d41290c67414a91b9db1ea1b71e20 Description: QT based GUI ODBC tools QT based GUI Binaries from the unixODBC package. . ODBCConfig (GUI Setup using libodbcinst.so) DataManager (GUI to explore ODBC Data Sources) installed-size: 1320 source: unixodbc Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1), libc6-dev Conflicts: libiodbc2-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-dev_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 450104 MD5sum: 790ef530172737c0bcba54a0d56c927e Description: ODBC libraries for UNIX (development files) development headers for unixODBC installed-size: 2140 source: unixodbc --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 16:53:00 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411B32D2D2 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from 237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.6.237]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05208; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:41:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012012141.NAA05208@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 20:49:05 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 01 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, Holger Thon wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > > From: Akira TAGOH > > To: Rodrigo Moya > > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > Precedence: bulk > > > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > RM> Hi all! > > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > > RM> packages in > > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > > RM> version's debs, > > RM> or a good aptable source? > > I recommend a tree like > > dists/potato/main/binary-i386 > > In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. > It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. > a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp > environment). > > > > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato > has been released with october gnome (1.0). > > But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode > (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). > - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode > - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also > contains Helixcode > (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) > > So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > - bonobo 0.28 > - gconf 0.11 > - oaf 0.6.1 > - unixodbc 1.8.13 > - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > An apt.sources would read like: > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra > > The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise > on Licence policies. ;-) > > > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > > isn't almost different from woody. > > The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In > actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary > tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and > let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread > "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) > > As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > 5 MB. > ok, I agree with everything. Packages for potato should be available. So Holger please, upload them to ftp.gnome-db.org. But remember that the top-level directory for gnome-db stuff in that machine is /pub/gnome-db/, and not /pub/. There are other web sites there, so we've got a separated directory for us. You can upload them, can't you? If not, send them to me and I'll do it myself. cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 23:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8122BC78 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C72FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 Message-ID: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. HT> No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato HT> has been released with october gnome (1.0). HT> But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode HT> (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). HT> - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode HT> - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also HT> contains Helixcode HT> (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the time. HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): HT> - bonobo 0.28 HT> - gconf 0.11 HT> - oaf 0.6.1 HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. HT> An apt.sources would read like: if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict with all the things that those packages are provided. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. HT> The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In HT> actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary HT> tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and HT> let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread HT> "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the environment for which to become stable? if so, you are understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the tree? HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are HT> 5 MB. the people who use woody are the same, too :) Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Sat Dec 2 04:38:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (dsbg-d9312b46.pool.mediaWays.net [217.49.43.70]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63C2BC6C for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:38:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (linux2.cluster-dynip.de [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD66100F0 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:38:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A30D6431C0; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Holger Thon > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: OT: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, > >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: > > HT> Hi! > HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> > >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed > Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the > time. Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... But still there are the 2 other sources: - Linuxland distribution http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ or ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw > > HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > HT> - bonobo 0.28 > HT> - gconf 0.11 > HT> - oaf 0.6.1 > HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 > HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > HT> An apt.sources would read like: > > if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should > change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict > with all the things that those packages are provided. It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). > > >> > >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > >> isn't almost different from woody. > > potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the > environment for which to become stable? if so, you are > understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the > tree? Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by the other packages. Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages which i know of. :-) It's the same question for using rawhide or Redhat 7, Mandrake ß or Mandrake 7.x and so on... ;-) > > HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > HT> 5 MB. > > the people who use woody are the same, too :) Sure. I dist-upgraded to potato in March last year. Ciao, Holger From at@gclab.org Sat Dec 2 06:26:48 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31152BAF1 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 06:26:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140682FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 Message-ID: <87zoif9i8b.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed >> Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the >> time. HT> Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... HT> But still there are the 2 other sources: HT> - Linuxland distribution HT> http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify HT> - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ HT> or HT> ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw Sorry, because I don't know it, I can't comment. >> if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should >> change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict >> with all the things that those packages are provided. HT> It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should HT> be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). Don't you make those a deb packages, and put it on ftp.gnome-db.org? I thought so... but if so, the people which download those patch will end up by compile. >> potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the >> environment for which to become stable? if so, you are >> understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the >> tree? HT> Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there HT> is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. HT> And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by HT> the other packages. HT> Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages HT> which i know of. :-) gcc is not unstable for woody. gcc contatined in woody is the same as potato. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Mon Dec 4 12:30:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A6E2CFA2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id JAA27751; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:37 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: rodrigo@gnome-db.org Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Message-ID: <20001204091737.A26932@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access the list archive): * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like gal-0.2.2 (the latest version) produces a libgal.so.1.0.2. I simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we can all test it. Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:16:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD01D2DF46 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:16:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31113; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:04:23 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041804.KAA31113@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: GNOME Photo Collector From: Rodrigo Moya To: tflorac@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:12:13 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Thierry! I've seen in the GPC home page that you intend to convert to the usage of GNOME-DB for your data access needs. This makes us (GNOME-DB developers) very happy, so count on us on any help you may need. As a first thing, you could subscribe to the gnome-db mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list/), so that we can all of us answer the questions you may have. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:21:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D4C2BD08 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:21:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31529 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:09:46 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Hi! > > I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have > (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access > the list archive): > > * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, > components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. > this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a Debian machine. So, it would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done with: rpm --rebuild file.src.rpm when you've got them, please send them to me and I'll upload them (if gnome-db.org is up, since it's been down all the weekend) > * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like > simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. > it should work, as I don't make use of the latest GAL additions. But again, this shouldn't happen, so please rebuild the RPMs. > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > can all test it. > great! cheers From stephane.anes@free.fr Sun Dec 3 14:02:11 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from postfix2.free.fr (postfix2.free.fr [212.27.32.74]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FB82DE6D for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 14:02:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc300.sa (paris11-nas3-20-151.dial.proxad.net [213.228.20.151]) by postfix2.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id E1156740C2 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:02:09 +0100 (MET) From: Stéphane ANES Reply-To: stephane.anes@free.fr To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: SUSCRIBE Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-mysql=/usr No error detect with configure but with make I get: undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext --> poptGetNextOpt --> poptFreeContext GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... popt is 1.2. and is in /usr Can you help me ? Many thanks ! Stéphane From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 15:13:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65EF2BAB1 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:13:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es [62.83.25.229]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA07221; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:01:06 -0800 Message-Id: <200012042001.MAA07221@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: SUSCRIBE From: Rodrigo Moya To: stephane.anes@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 19:05:46 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 03 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100, St=E9phane ANES wrote: > Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... > I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with >=20 > ./configure --prefix=3D/usr --with-mysql=3D/usr=20 >=20 > No error detect with configure but with make I get: >=20 > undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext > --> poptGetNextOpt > --> poptFreeContext >=20 > GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. >=20 > Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... >=20 > popt is 1.2. and is in /usr >=20 > Can you help me ? >=20 this is a problem reported the other day by another person. I don't know wh= y, but in my machine, libpopt is automatically included (??), and in others not. The solution is to add, to the libgda/lib/gda-server/Makefile.am libgda_server_la_LIBADD =3D -lpopt and of course, you should have libpopt installed on your system. I'll fix this in CVS. Thanks for the report. cheers From at@gclab.org Mon Dec 4 23:11:14 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F72BAC2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:09:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03937; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:08:26 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA24733; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:09:24 +0900 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900 Message-ID: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a RM> Debian machine. So, it RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done RM> with: I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment which use chroot or other machine. I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that I may build the RPMs on this environment. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 5 12:48:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937682BA98 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:48:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from 27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es [62.83.46.27]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA23887; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:34:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a > RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db > RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a > RM> Debian machine. So, it > RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done > RM> with: > > I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment > which use chroot or other machine. > yes, I am preparing a clean environment to build the RPMs, but last time, I didn't have another one, so I thought it was better to have them that way instead of nothing. > I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > I may build the RPMs on this environment. > it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please do so. cheers From at@gclab.org Tue Dec 5 23:48:38 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C4F2BA9A for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:47:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27526; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:45:50 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA06459; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:46:46 +0900 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900 Message-ID: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.4 (Smooth) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. >> RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please RM> do so. That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? if you also say ok, I can do it. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From DieringG@eba-haus.de Wed Dec 6 03:23:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailproxy.de.uu.net (mailproxy.de.uu.net [192.76.144.34]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A891F2E122 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 03:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from kopo001 ([149.228.241.249]) by mailproxy.de.uu.net (5.5.5/5.5.5) with SMTP id JAA20027 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:23:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from EBA_DO-Message_Server by kopo001 with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:45 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100 From: "Gerhard Dieringer" To: Cc: "<" Subject: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr = >>> > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, = and > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > can all test it. > > > great! Hi Rodrigo, as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It = implements the features: 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like = this. To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something = done at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? Gerhard P.S. This email address will only be valid until Fr. 08.Dec 2000, because = I'm going to start a new job at 02. Jan 2001 If you want to reply after this = date, please use my private address GDieringer@compuserve.com or gerhard@gnome-db.org. =20 From mbatle@iname.com Thu Dec 7 10:47:33 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.jet.es (unknown [194.179.100.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6112D21F for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:47:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from iname.com (usuario1-36-128-34.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.34]) by smtp.jet.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA24999 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:51:02 +0100 X-Envelope-To: X-Mozilla-Status: 0801 Message-ID: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100 From: Mateu Batle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0 X-Accept-Language: ca, es, en, de-DE MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: libgda - GNOME dependencies Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking for :) But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, it does not have many of the libraries required, or if it has they are a bit older. Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be to do it ? Thanks and best regards, Mateu From mike@mjv.com Thu Dec 7 11:35:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from IMGate.wts.net (imgate.wts.net [209.144.22.55]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61FB2BAF1 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:35:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from comanchetx.com (mail.comanchetx.com [63.64.122.61]) by IMGate.wts.net (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 700F251646 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from mjv.com [63.64.123.6] by comanchetx.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.05) id AA97645401A4; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:28:07 -0600 Message-ID: <3A2FB958.21BF75F5@mjv.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:22:48 -0600 From: Michael Vanecek X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies References: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I upgraded to the latest Helix-Gnome and don't recall any problems with libgda. gnome-db itself requires some bleeding edge libraries (read - libs that can change at any given moment depending on the developer's desires), but all of it is still very much in feverish development so it's all fairly bleeding edge... Mike Mateu Batle wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > > Thanks and best regards, > Mateu > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 16:48:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5D72E4F0 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:48:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA14702; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:35:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082135.NAA14702@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 20:43:26 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > >> > >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. > >> > RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please > RM> do so. > > That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? > if you also say ok, I can do it. > yes, please do them From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 17:39:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EF2CA07 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:39:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA18105; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:27:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082227.OAA18105@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies From: Rodrigo Moya To: Mateu Batle Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 21:34:38 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100, Mateu Batle wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > libgda's dependencies are: * GLib >= 0.99 * GTK+ >= 1.2.x * libxml >= 1.8.x * OAF >= 0.5.x * ORBit >= 0.5.x * GConf >= 0.9 GLib, GTK+, libxml and ORBit are just included with any decent version of GNOME (helix gnome should work perfectly). OAF and GConf can be found at ftp://ftp.gnome.org or at spidermonkey.helixcode.com And libgda is based on CORBA, so it's not possible to compile without CORBA support, but you can do so without any GNOME library (except for GTK+, a dependency which is going to be removed for GLib 2.0). For GNOME-DB the thing is different because of Bonobo, which may cause many problems due to version mismatch, but if you use GNOME-DB >= 0.2.x, any Bonobo version >= 0.28 should work. If you're having any problem compiling, please tell us what those problems are so that we can try to help you cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 9 10:11:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9902BA9A for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:11:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from 19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es [62.83.4.19]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06164; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:59:03 -0800 Message-Id: <200012091459.GAA06164@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Gerhard Dieringer Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 09 Dec 2000 14:06:58 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100, Gerhard Dieringer wrote: > >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr >>> > > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > > can all test it. > > > > > great! > > Hi Rodrigo, > > as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It implements > the features: > 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) > 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls > 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 > 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) > well, this is great! The only problem I see is the use of libxml2, which won't be considered a stable version until GNOME 2.0. So, would it be easy to make it compile with both versions of libxml (libxml 1.8 & libxml2)? > Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step > would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) > > If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like this. > To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something done > at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? > yes, the idea is to be able to make all sorts of commands through XML. What I talked about was about having a modifySchema IDL method, which will use the current GDA_Connection_Constraints to be able to send DDL commands. So, what I think we should do is to have the Gda_XmlQuery object call this modifySchema method after having parsed the XML command. I suggest you have a look at the GDA_Connection_Constraint stuff (openSchema() function) so that we can start discussing how to extend it to fit all the DDL commands. and please, commit your xmlquery stuff to CVS (have you got a CVS account?). This should go to the libgda/lib/gda-common/gda-xml-query* files. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 10:02:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4588E2BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:02:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8AA54A65 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:47:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 15:57:30 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite often. So, as I've just now added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some bonobo-related bugs, I think it's time to do a new release. I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Tue Dec 12 11:39:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057772E059 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:39:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-72.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.72]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBCGcw413439; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:39:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 145sRo-0000BM-00; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Tue Dec 12 12:01:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D743A2BAB6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:01:30 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id IAA28606; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:53 -0800 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release Message-ID: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com>; from Rodrigo Moya on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi! > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > often. So, as I've just now > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > bonobo-related bugs, I think > it's time to do a new release. > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those sources! BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:20:22 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD7E2E087 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:20:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816A054A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:05:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:15:09 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212170526.816A054A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: > On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: >=20 > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? >=20 > As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less > bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) >=20 ok, so tomorrow, or after tomorrow it will be done cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:25:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA83C2CE2D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:25:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF3354A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:10:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:19:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > Hi! > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > often. So, as I've just now > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > sources! > they are in: ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll start making the packages tonight at home. > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do something, so we'll have to wait for a little. cheers From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 12 13:44:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86AB72BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 13:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 22291 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by himail.edinfo.es with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Subject: Re: New release From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: Vivien Malerba , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 17:37:37 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212184405.86AB72BB92@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > > often. So, as I've just now > > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > > sources! > > > > they are in: > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db > > But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll > start making the packages > tonight at home. > > > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > > > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked > > about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do > something, so we'll have > to wait for a little. > Well, at this moment the alldns guys are stupid and they have change the domains's name servers to the old ones. Please don't use alldns.com to register your domains :-( > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 17:07:07 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368702D47E; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:04:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es (224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es [62.83.7.224]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF20A54A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:49:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 22:59:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. GNOME-DB/libGDA are a complete framewok for developing database-oriented applications, and actually allow access to PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, Sybase and ODBC data sources. Apart from this development framework, it also includes several applications and utilities which make it quite suitable for many database-related taks. This release is the first one in a series of more regular releases, since we're approaching a good deal of performance/stability/functionality, and we want people to be able to easily follow the development. * Added/Implemented stuff: Better Bonobo support - now works great with Bonobo! (Rodrigo) Packages for Debian Potato (Holger) Portuguese page for the web site (Cleber) Started implementation for database: monikers (Rodrigo) Started PrimeBase data source provider (Holger) Started Perl bindings for libGDA (Rodrigo) * Bugs fixed: Bonobo toolbar/menubar now works perfectly well (at last) Some build problems in different configurations solved To install this new version, you'll need: * libgda: ORBit, OAF, GConf >= 0.9, libxml * gnome-db: libgda and dependencies, Bonobo >= 0.29, gnome-libs, libgal, gtkhtml GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in the same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe to the GNOME-DB mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list) From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:14:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC832E16B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:14:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B3654A64 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:59:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:08:47 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213105914.00B3654A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi RPMS and SRPMS are now available in: ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db/ ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db/ cheers From gperez@gio.ingor.upm.es Wed Dec 13 06:28:49 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es (glo.gio.ingor.upm.es [138.100.17.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957072CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:28:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es ([138.100.21.98]) by gio.ingor.upm.es (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA13113; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:24 +0100 Message-ID: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100 From: "Guille (bisho)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-6.1.1 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001119 X-Accept-Language: es-es, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. Great! [...] > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > the > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > to the GNOME-DB mailing list Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a name-based virtual web server? -- \|||||||/ Guillermo Pérez Pérez < o o > - bisho@onirica.com \ L / - bisho@eurielec.etsit.upm.es -oOOo-------oOOo- From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:43:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA062CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192554A64; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: Guille "(bisho)" Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:38:20 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213112845.9192554A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100, Guille (bisho) wrote: > > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. > > Great! > > [...] > > > > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > > the > > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > > to the GNOME-DB mailing list > > Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a > name-based virtual web server? > well, I think it was 213.0.69.70, but you won't be able to access it, since it's down. Anyway, I've just put RPMS and SRPMS in ftp.gnome.org, so you may want to download them from there. And if what you're looking for is for the web pages, they're on CVS, under the gnome-db/www directory. It's in PHP so to see them in your browser you'll have to install them on an Apache www directory, and, of course, install the mod_php module. The documentation is included in both the tarballs and the RPMS/SRPMS cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 07:13:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D5C2E276 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:13:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA31246 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 04:01:24 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 13:08:42 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're approaching a big amount of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on adding missing things and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, hopefully, included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the beginning of next year The things I've thought about: * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as LDAP, etc * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser widget to allow calls to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, since the only one which is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget * Report engine: make it work * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very little to offer * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc * Bonobo monikers * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it would be great if we could also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people * and more things that I can't remember right now As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to help, please just say where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 09:17:09 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1392E335 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:17:09 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id GAA05349; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:40 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi all! > > Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're > approaching a big amount > of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on > adding missing things > and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, > hopefully, > included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the > beginning of next year > > The things I've thought about: > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > LDAP, etc Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one implementation). > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > widget to allow calls > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > since the only one which > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ write the implementations. I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings with the schemas... > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > * Report engine: make it work > * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very > little to offer > * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc > * Bonobo monikers > * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it > would be great if we could > also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started > * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people > * and more things that I can't remember right now > > As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to > help, please just say > where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) > > cheers > Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:44:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432D32E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:44:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06855; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:32:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:39:24 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > The things I've thought about: > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > LDAP, etc > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > implementation). > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both projects. What I was thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > widget to allow calls > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there may be times when you want to create database objects from the source code of your program. And, of course, we need to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of the schemas. So, what do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML queries? > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > since the only one which > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > write the implementations. > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > with the schemas... > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the list. And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the supplied fields are NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, such as the object name, etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other fields may be NULL. > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen myself? cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:55:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9CB2E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:55:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA07398 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:00 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:50:10 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening brackets are in the same line as the statement): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it when you hack. cheers From cuenca@celium.net Wed Dec 13 10:11:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from ns1.axinet.fr (ns1.axinet.fr [193.45.10.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E2B2E27A for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:11:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from name (AMontsouris-101-2-2-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.253.183.169]) by ns1.axinet.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id eBDFBVN15437 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:11:31 +0100 From: "Joaquin Cuenca Abela" To: "gnome-db list" Subject: RE: HACKING guide Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". It would do the conversion of all your files for you. Cheers, -- Joaquin Cuenca Abela cuenca@celium.net > -----Message d'origine----- > De : gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org > [mailto:gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org]De la part de Rodrigo Moya > Envoyé : mercredi 13 décembre 2000 15:50 > À : gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Objet : HACKING guide > > > Hi all! > > I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll > find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. > Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the > same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. > > 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are > 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): > > if (whatever) > { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) > { > case ... > } > } > > and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening > brackets are in the same line as the statement): > > if (whatever) { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) { > case ... > } > } > > so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to > comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change > this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all > of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. > > I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, > but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of > the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding > style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it > when you hack. > > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:30:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98932E148 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA09777; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:17:55 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131517.HAA09777@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: RE: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joaquin Cuenca Abela Cc: gnome-db list In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:24:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote: > Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". > It would do the conversion of all your files for you. > ok, great! thanks, I'll have a look at it cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 10:52:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992AE2E35B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:52:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id HAA10976; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:47 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:32 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > The things I've thought about: > > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > > LDAP, etc > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > implementation). > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > projects. What I was > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example in MS access or some other projects. > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > widget to allow calls > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > may be times when you > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > And, of course, we need > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > the schemas. So, what > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > queries? Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice the same things. > > > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > > since the only one which > > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > > write the implementations. > > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > > with the schemas... > > > > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the > list. > > And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the > supplied fields are > NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, > such as the object name, > etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other > fields may be NULL. > Ok, I will do it. > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > myself? yes, the e-table one. > > cheers Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:59:25 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7B32BCA5 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA11358; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:46:57 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131546.HAA11358@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:54:07 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > > implementation). > > > > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > > projects. What I was > > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) > > Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > perfect! > > > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > > > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, > then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more > complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example > in MS access or some other projects. > well, that's great! > > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > > widget to allow calls > > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > > may be times when you > > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > > And, of course, we need > > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > > the schemas. So, what > > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > > queries? > > Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to > work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice > the same things. > ok, you're right. I started to think about the modifySchema stuff when we didn't have XML queries, so now I also think it's better to have them as XML. So, I'll remove the modifySchema soon > > > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > > myself? > > yes, the e-table one. > ok, I'll have a look at it again, since the last time I looked at it, it seemed to me quite tricky to use, but maybe I didn't look too much. cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 14 15:29:08 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3522DFE1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:29:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-149-161.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.149.161]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBEKT1i07847; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:29:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 146ezq-0000Ew-00; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: We're starting to develop the logger Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, with no major efforts.=20 The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. I have only one question about the design of the logger: * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use libgda if it will be part of libgda... Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database own data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of code would be replicated. This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From tagoh@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 15 00:40:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA02CE94 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20629 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:27 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA06062 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:40:56 +0900 Message-Id: <200012150540.OAA06062@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: GNOME-DB 0.2.1 deb is now available From: Akira TAGOH To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 14:40:23 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I made the debs of latest version. if you think the useful, you can add to the apt-line as following: deb http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ deb-src http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ Regards, -- Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Fri Dec 15 11:13:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 675CB2CECA for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:13:54 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 8134 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Subject: The gnome-db.org domain From: Carlos Perello Marin To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 15:13:24 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001215161354.675CB2CECA@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Well, I think that it's running again. Excuse me for all this troubles. I have lose the mail alias at gnome-db.org, please resend me the alias at gnome-db.org and the destination one. Thanks. P.S.: I think that this week i will restart my contributions to the report engine. I was very busy at work, sorry (well I'm very busy, but i think i could do things at gnome-db also). Bye From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 16 19:35:27 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541782D4BB for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 19:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from 7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es (7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es [62.83.43.199]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC8854867; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:15:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 01:24:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi all. >=20 > It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 >=20 > The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going > to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its > functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. >=20 > We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, > with no major efforts.=20 >=20 > The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the > ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. >=20 this is great David!!! > I have only one question about the design of the logger: >=20 > * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use > libgda if it will be part of libgda... >=20 > Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database ow= n > data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a > different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of > code would be replicated. >=20 > This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. >=20 well, clearly, the logger must have access to the underlying database direc= tly, so the best option, IMO, is to add a new CORBA interface to the IDL files, called Logger, which will implement the logger stuff for each provider (=3D each provider should implement it). This way, we can use it optionally in the client side, and also implement it optionally in the provider side. So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we need for the clients to access, and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which functions/methods would a client need to interface with the logger. Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to use or not the logging stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO cheers and thanks for the help From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 05:24:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078B2DBD0 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 05:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-144-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.144.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHAOP417284 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147azP-0002sc-00 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda documentation... But the links are wrong. Could anyone correct them? Thank you. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sun Dec 17 07:18:15 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9931E2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from 190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.190]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCF454A08; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:03:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 13:12:39 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217120313.ADCF454A08@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda > documentation... But the links are wrong. >=20 > Could anyone correct them? >=20 they don't exist yet :( But thank you for reminding me that I must add them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 07:23:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6206B2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:23:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-131-210.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.131.210]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHCNl420379; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147cqv-0004e0-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo Moya wrote: (...) >=20 > So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we > need for the clients to access, > and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which > functions/methods would > a client need to interface with the logger. OK. On next week, we will design the logger interface >=20 > Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to > use or not the logging > stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). >=20 > Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO >=20 > cheers and thanks for the help >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 >=20 --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 18 15:37:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BA32BB53 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from 136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es (136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es [62.83.22.136]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531295485B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 21:22:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've changed the names of the .oafinfo files. This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, the OAFIIDs are now of the form: OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since this has been decided in gnome-components-list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for programmers. Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo ... The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we can create any subsubnamespace as we like. All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs cheers From Philipp.Leusmann@post.rwth-aachen.de Mon Dec 18 16:13:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (nets5.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.13]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C542BB7B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from marvin (pec-33-208.tnt5.me2.uunet.de [149.225.33.208]) by nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.10.1/8.10.1/5) with ESMTP id eBILDhm14721 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:13:43 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> From: "Philipp Leusmann" To: Subject: Compiling libgda Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi, i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first use in this function) GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 Could someone please tell me how to fix this? Thanks, Philipp From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 18 16:37:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2F22CF17 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:37:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from 60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.60]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6345485B; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:22:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Compiling libgda From: Rodrigo Moya To: Philipp Leusmann Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 22:30:51 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218212243.9C6345485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100, Philipp Leusmann wrote: > Hi, > > i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are > fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ > usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ > opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl > ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ > glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom > e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u > sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c > GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo > GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': > GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' > GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) > GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' > GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' > make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > > > Could someone please tell me how to fix this? > > yes, that's a known problem caused by different versions of ORBit. The solution is easy though: just remove the GDA* files and rerun make. Those files should be re-generated with you orbit-idl compiler, so there shouldn't be any problem after removing them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 04:47:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15602CCB8 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 04:47:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.166.129.137]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5V1U601.5RJ for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03535 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Doubts about making a gda-client Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I started to program using the headers... Then I met the gda_connection_new function... Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? Greetings From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 05:36:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4042BCBB for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 05:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (212-7-53-64.WolNet.worldonline.es [212.7.53.64]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F785485B; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:21:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Doubts about making a gda-client From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 11:29:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220102120.C0F785485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in > RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: >=20 > gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio >=20 don't use gda-buildclient, it does not work. And it's not intended to generate a client skeleton, it's intended to be used to compile/link a GDA client. But as I said, it does not work yet You should use instead gda-config to retrieve the CFLAGS and LIBS needed for your GDA client application to compile/link. >=20 > Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I > started to program using the headers... > Then I met the gda_connection_new function... >=20 > Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); >=20 > What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? >=20 just call gda_corba_get_orb(): Gda_Connection* cnc =3D gda_connection_new(gda_corba_get_orb()); cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 12:27:53 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6EA2DEEA for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.73.59.6]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5VN3U03.03Z for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:18 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04233 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [es] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Types of commands. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda instead of libpq. I've found the next undocumented functions: gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong flags); How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? Thank you. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 13:49:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0942BB01 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:49:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (119-MADR-X34.libre.retevision.es [62.83.3.119]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1554866; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:34:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Types of commands. From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 19:41:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220183420.A7D1554866@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda > instead of libpq. >=20 > I've found the next undocumented functions: >=20 > gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); > void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong > flags); >=20 > How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? >=20 In libgda/idl/GDA.idl, there is an enum: enum CommandType { CMD_TEXT1, CMD_TABLE, CMD_TABLEDIRECT, CMD_STOREDPROCEDURE, CMD_FILE }; which is the type of the command, but, sorry, this is not implemented yet. I had forgotten about it, but now that you've reminded it to me, I'll look at what needs to be done. And, in fact, thanks David, since I think this can be used for the XML queries: that is, we can add a CMD_XML value to the enum, and then, have the provider act as needed depending on the command's type. How does this sound? What I don't know/remember is what CMD_TABLEDIRECT is for. Any ideas? David, for the moment, forget about the command type. cheers > Thank you. >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Thu Dec 21 14:33:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBDA2E062 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:33:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (194-MAD2-X26.libre.retevision.es [62.83.136.194]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDA95485B for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:18:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Gnome CVS User ] GNOME CVS: libgda rodrigo From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 21 Dec 2000 20:25:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001221191832.1DDA95485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just checked in the changes needed for supporting the CommandType attribute in GDA::Command objects. What I've done is: 1) "create" new enum type in IDL: enum CommandType { COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLEDIRECT, COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE, COMMAND_TYPE_FILE }; I'll add a COMMAND_TYPE_XML soon. 2) changed type attribute in GDA::Command: it was a unsigned long, now it's a GDA_CommandType 3) changes all over to adapt to new attribute type (BTW, by making this change, I found a bug in the (I think) 0.2.1 released version, which was that I forgot to add a pointer to a function in an ORBit structure, and thus the following function pointers in the structure were displaced, so there were some CORBA exceptions when executing some CORBA calls. Has anybody experienced this? So now, you can: gda_command_set_cmd_type(GDA_COMMAND(cmd), GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE); By default, providers' GDA::Command will have the CmdType set to TEXT (== SQL or whatever language is used). But now, we must adapt/extend the providers to support this new feature. As a first measure, we must, in gda_*_command_execute, add a switch like: switch (gda_server_command_get_cmd_type(cmd)) { case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT : -> execute SQL as now case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE : -> return a SELECT * FROM $table case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE : -> exec procedure case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_FILE : -> load file and execute } So please, Vivien, Nick, Holger, can you update your providers? I'll do the others. The switch is needed only in gda-*-command.c, in the gda_*_command_execute function. For the moment, just respond to the TYPE_TEXT command type, or, if you feel like doing it, implement the other ones. cheers Forwarded message: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: rodrigo 00/12/21 12:20:57 > > Modified files: > . : ChangeLog > bindings/c++ : gdaCommand.cpp gdaCommand.h gdaConnection.cpp > gdaConnection.h > idl : GDA.idl GDA_Command.idl GDA_Connection.idl > lib/gda-client : gda-command.c gda-command.h gda-connection.c > gda-connection.h > lib/gda-server : gda-server-command.c gda-server-impl-command.c > gda-server-impl-command.h > gda-server-impl-connection.c > gda-server-impl-connection.h gda-server-impl.h > > Log message: > 2000-12-21 Rodrigo Moya > > * added support for the GDA_CommandType stuff, which will > allow to treat commands in different ways (SQL, TABLE, > XML, etc) > > > _______________________________________________ > cvs-commits-list mailing list > cvs-commits-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-commits-list > From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 26 18:44:18 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.61]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E72D362 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:39:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.182.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBQNdZw05512 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:39:36 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello world!! I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is enough to run with apt). Bye. --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From tagoh@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 27 02:09:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4329D2CCCE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA23788; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:54 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA27100; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:09:47 +0900 Message-Id: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Akira TAGOH To: Carlos =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?Perell=1B=24BC3=1B=28B_Mar=1B=24BC-=1B=28Bn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Carlos, On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > Hello world!! >=20 >=20 > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! >=20 >=20 > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ >=20 > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > enough to run with apt). good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ Regards, --=20 Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Wed Dec 27 05:18:57 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C26702CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:18:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 9624 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > Hi Carlos, >=20 > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > Hello world!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > >=20 > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > enough to run with apt). >=20 > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: >=20 > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ >=20 Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all correct. Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > --=20 > Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org > tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group > tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project > tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. >=20 From mvali@hot.ee Wed Dec 27 08:45:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (adsl395.estpak.ee [213.168.17.141]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38642D2D8 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:45:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (IDENT:mvali@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA03553 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 From: Margus Vali To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: notices on front end Message-ID: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.0 Lines: 39 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello! I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. some problems/notices: - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are installed - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first time. - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 messages like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, then clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make it a whole lot more usable?) regards, mv From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 28 11:31:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0711E2BCBB for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-144.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.144]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBSGVOi19336; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:31:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14Ba6h-0003Xg-00; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: james@daa.com.au Cc: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi. Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-db widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. Greetings. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM ASPL Fact Official Programmer "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 17:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3C92BC2D for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:41:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18335 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Unable to use anything in gnome-db Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda compiled using mysql. Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in any of the gnome-db applications does anything. Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. Cheers, -Jason Netconcepts Inc. Auckland, New Zealand From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 19:39:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9D02BD65 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:39:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18767 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 jm@netconcepts.com wrote: > Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda > compiled using mysql. > > Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... > if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in > any of the gnome-db applications does anything. > > Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. > > Cheers, > -Jason > > Netconcepts Inc. > Auckland, New Zealand > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list > From karlheg@bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net Wed Dec 27 02:47:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bittersweet.intra (bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.27.231]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136472CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:47:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from karlheg by bittersweet.intra with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14BBIy-0005EQ-00 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: tools/gda-buildserver: unexpanded @macro@'s From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) Date: 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 Message-ID: <87vgs6486r.fsf@bittersweet.intra> Lines: 8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Package: libgda Version: 0.2.0 There are several unexpanded AC_OUTPUT macros after building libgda-0.2.0 from the Debian package source. Perhaps you've omitted something from the configure.in? [ I am not subscribed to the list ] From carlos@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 25 16:02:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F042C828 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:02:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es [62.37.133.185]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBPL1k425184; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 22:01:46 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Evolution: 00000002-0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > Hi all! >=20 > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. >=20 > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: >=20 > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] >=20 > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > programmers. >=20 > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: >=20 > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > ... >=20 > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. >=20 Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use the traditional GDA_* names? > All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, > you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and > $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the > GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all > your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs >=20 > cheers >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:35:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5672BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:35:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC7454867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:20:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=C3=B3_Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:27:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142021.DAC7454867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > > Hi all! > >=20 > > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. > >=20 > > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is= , > > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: > >=20 > > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] > >=20 > > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible= ] > > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, whic= h > > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable an= d > > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > > programmers. > >=20 > > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: > >=20 > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > > ... > >=20 > > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use > the traditional GDA_* names? >=20 for the moment, I have just changed the GNOME part (GNOME::DB), so you can continue using GDA_. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:37:58 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0902BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:37:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AED54867 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:22:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: libgda lxhispano From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001226041715.9B9F93360B2@cvs.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:29:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142221.A8AED54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 23:17:15 -0500, Gnome CVS User wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: lxhispano 00/12/25 23:17:15 >=20 > Modified files: > report : ChangeLog Makefile.am gda-report-stream.c=20 > gda-report-stream.h=20 >=20 > Log message: > 2000-12-25 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn >=20 > * updated gda-report-stream.[ch] to make them compile again. > * included the lib/gda-client directory for header files in > Makefile.am >=20 Carlos, you should remove this. The report client IS NOT a GDA client. Of c= ourse, an app can be both a GDA and a report client, but we don't want to add unneeded dependencies to this library, so that it can be used, for example, in a report-generation-dedicated machine,=20 without any other stuff. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:58:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EFA2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:58:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7BC5488D; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos Perello Marin Cc: Akira TAGOH , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:50:04 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231144252.0B7BC5488D@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100, Carlos Perello Marin wrote: > El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > > Hi Carlos, > >=20 > > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > > Hello world!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > > >=20 > > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > > enough to run with apt). > >=20 > > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: > >=20 > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all > correct. >=20 > Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 yes, in gnome-db/www cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:08:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A4D2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19654867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:52:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: notices on front end From: Rodrigo Moya To: Margus Vali Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:59:28 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231145240.7B19654867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200, Margus Vali wrote: > Hello! > I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 > upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). > Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some > packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. > > some problems/notices: > - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are > installed ok, I'll work on this soon. > - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just > on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? well, I plan to have an integrated help system. To be included in the front end. But I'm sorry it does not work very well. But I'll work on it soon > - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) > - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like > down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. > kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. this part also needs some fixes. Thanks for noting them > - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow > leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but > the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only > happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first > time. hmm, strange. I'll have a look also at that code. It happened sometimes to me, but it stopped some time ago. > - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two > Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: > IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 > messages > like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, > then > clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. > As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the > appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? with the ones you've got it's ok. The problem is one I found the other day which I was not sure if it was included in the 0.2.1 release. So please, get sources from CVS and compile them. I'll make a release in a couple of days. > gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the > table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). > - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be > modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make > it a whole lot more usable?) > we plan to change the GnomeDbGrid widget to use the etable widget. But, well, about updatable recordsets, we had a discussion about them some time ago (look in the archives). If you can add something to the discussion (== a solution) it will be welcome. I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't made much progress, but I'll fix all this next century :) cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:28:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3653B2BBB2 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:28:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF5C54867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:12:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn_Carre=C3=B1o?= Cc: james@daa.com.au, gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:19:56 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231151246.0DF5C54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi. >=20 > Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-d= b > widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. >=20 great! If you find any strange thing/bug in the GNOME-DB widgets API, pleas= e tell me. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:40:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109BB2BB58 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:40:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8B054867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:25:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: jm@netconcepts.com Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:32:12 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231152502.2A8B054867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300, wrote: > Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. > > you can do that, or even better, go to settings, and, in the components tab, select the components you want loaded when you start the front-end. cheers From cleberrrjr@bol.com.br Thu Nov 30 20:02:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from simpson.bol.com.br (simpson.bol.com.br [200.246.116.94]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6F92D21B for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:02:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.10.4.123] (200.246.116.72) by simpson.bol.com.br (NPlex 4.5.050) id 39B4BED5004EA346 for gnome-db-list@gnome.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 22:02:20 -0300 Message-ID: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200011291624.RAA21740@ulises.openresources.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 02:59:32 +0300 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender-IP: 200.194.96.204 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Preocupado com v=EDrus?=20 > Crie seu e-mail gr=E1tis do BOL com antiv=EDrus! > http://www.bol.com.br >=20 >=20 > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > Hi all! > > >=20 > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects i= n > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQ= L, > > > of course, if Vivien > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > >=20 > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > >=20 > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My tim= e is > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page mainte= nance > > alwell, no problemo! > >=20 > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in >=20 > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > Portuguese (which, for > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > go into the > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. >=20 > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > Spanish people on this > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > no up-to-date > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > great if somebody wanted > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. >=20 > Well, and any other language, of course. >=20 > cheers There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/i= ndex.php), assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translatin= g the following part of the index.php page: "please tell us and we'll inc= lude it here." I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then conta= ct the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating som= e docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some = people won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer= myself to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like = to volunteer themselves aswell. This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documen= tation part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page,= listing the languages and who to talk to. Just my sleepy ideas at 11:00 PM. Cheers. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 04:50:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4382D06C for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 04:50:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (10-MADR-X11.libre.retevision.es [62.83.0.10]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDDF54A5F; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:48:19 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: www.gnome-db.org/projects From: Rodrigo Moya To: Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <39B4BED5004EA346@simpson.bol.com.br> (added by postmaster@simpson.bol.com.br) Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 08:45:10 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001201094819.9DDDF54A5F@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > On 29 Nov 2000 15:49:48 +0300, Cleber Rodrigues Rosa Junior wrote: > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > I wanted to propose the inclusion of gnome-db/libgda based projects in > > > > gnome-db.org domain, to > > > > have a better web site. And, as the first inclusion, I'd propose gASQL, > > > > of course, if Vivien > > > > wants and Carlos agrees in having more load in the good old > > > > TorresQuevedo machine. > > > > > > > > Another candidate could be the PHP GDA bindings Cleber talked about. > > > > > > That sounds great to me. Please don't think I've abandoned this. My time is > > > a bit short but I am working on it. You could assign me the page maintenance > > > alwell, no problemo! > > > > > what I'd really like you to do, when you've got time, is to add a page in > > > > portuguese to serve as an index for all the documentation available in > > Portuguese (which, for > > the moment, is just the libgda manual you translated). This page would > > go into the > > gnome-db/www/docs/pt_BR/ directory. > > > > The same applies for Spanish, if somebody (as it seems there are many > > Spanish people on this > > list) wants to do so, this would go to gnome-db/www/docs/es. There are > > no up-to-date > > documents in Spanish, so there's no rush in doing this, but it would be > > great if somebody wanted > > to take over this, and update the Spanish docs. > > > > Well, and any other language, of course. > > > > cheers > > There you go buddy, I'll send the file to you in another mail (I don't > think everybody in the list needs it!). I've left the links just like the > original ones (this is a translated/modified version of gnome-db/www/docs/index.php), > assuming that the doc directory hierarchy is going to be duplicated for > each language. I'd also like to inform that very soon the Gnome-db docs > will be available in Brazilian Portuguese aswell, I'm working on them. > yes, the doc hierarchy is going to be the same (manual/ etc). > I'd also like to propose an idea that came to my mind when I was translating > the following part of the index.php page: > > "please tell us and we'll include it here." > > I believe each language should have a contact person, that would then contact > the webmaster. This is for obvious reasons (maybe the person indicating some > docs just won't write English). It also creates a kind ombudsman that some people > won't be afraid to contact, ask quenstions, all that. I'd like to volunteer myself > to take care of the Portuguese portion. Maybe some other people would like to volunteer > themselves aswell. > > This could go both here in the index page for the language specific documentation > part, and in a 'Contact Us' or 'Ask Questions' or something like that page, listing > the languages and who to talk to. > yes, this is a good idea. So, Carlos, could you add an alias for Cleber? let's call it, for example, portuguese@gnome-db.org? or what name do you prefer. (How do you say Portuguese in Portuguese? cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 05:08:16 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (unknown [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FCE2E2D9 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA01449; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 05:07:48 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA27707; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:08:56 +0900 Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:07:41 +0900 Message-ID: <877l5ksbde.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200011301138.MAA26039@ulises.openresources.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 30 Nov 2000 10:37:26 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. >> RM> ok, so what do you suggest? to just have in ftp.gnome-db.org the woody RM> debs so that people can download them? or not have a debian/ directory RM> at all? Hmm, I don't know which well. if it's meaningful that we provide debs on ftp.gnome-db.org, I think that we might provide it. Well, we put debs on ftp.gnome-db.org in the meantime, and we check the number of user. if it isn't meaningful, we don't have it. Do you think it? Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Fri Dec 1 15:21:13 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (f-131-156.essen.ipdial.viaginterkom.de [62.180.156.131]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA2B2BC51 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:19:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (unknown [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925C100F0 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 21:20:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 971E3E0F6; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi! On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Rodrigo Moya > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > Precedence: bulk > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> Hi all! > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > RM> packages in > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > RM> version's debs, > RM> or a good aptable source? I recommend a tree like dists/potato/main/binary-i386 In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp environment). > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato has been released with october gnome (1.0). But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also contains Helixcode (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): - bonobo 0.28 - gconf 0.11 - oaf 0.6.1 - unixodbc 1.8.13 - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. An apt.sources would read like: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise on Licence policies. ;-) > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > isn't almost different from woody. The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are 5 MB. Ciao, Holger --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: gda-mysql Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libmysqlclient6, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-mysql_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 13694 MD5sum: 41e20a4b3ea65361a40607b3d8db9f8d Description: GDA backend server for MySQL This package uses MySQL backend. installed-size: 61 source: libgda Package: gda-odbc Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, unixodbc, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-odbc_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 16710 MD5sum: 78a20cb5b87066a5f073626e131a1340 Description: GDA backend server for ODBC This package uses ODBC backend. installed-size: 69 source: libgda Package: gda-postgres Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpgsql2 (>= 7.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-postgres_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 25572 MD5sum: b78e711c163e89e1c70c481ccb574fdf Description: GDA backend server for PostgreSQL This package uses PostgreSQL backend. installed-size: 89 source: libgda Package: gda-sybase Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gda-sybase_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 23614 MD5sum: 70f683d5beb38a227997ed182e9bfb5e Description: GDA backend server for Sybase This package uses Sybase OpenClient library 11.1.1 installed-size: 85 source: libgda Package: gnome-db Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: misc Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgal1, libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libgda0, libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglade-gnome0, libglade0, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libunicode0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Recommends: gda-mysql | gda-postgres | gda-odbc Replaces: gnome-db-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 159520 MD5sum: 30f03f69a81a8db1429a0311d651ad57 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains the core components of GNOME-DB. installed-size: 609 Package: gnome-db-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Akira TAGOH Depends: gnome-db (= 0.2.0-1), libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/gnome-db-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 86556 MD5sum: d1a26966faf6633154585b92291a7e72 Description: frontend to the GDA architecture for GNOME -- development files. GNOME is the "GNU Network OBject Model Environment" . GDA is the "GNU Data Access" . Gnome DB is a frontend to the GDA architecture, being developed as part of the GNOME project. It adds, to the already powerful GDA architecture, a nice GUI front end for users, as well as a whole set of software components intended to be reused in other unrelated applications. . This package contains libraries, header files and tools to let you develop GNOME-DB applications. installed-size: 437 source: gnome-db Package: libgda-dev Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libgda0 (= 0.2.0-1), libc6-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda-dev_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 210080 MD5sum: c420a07e088621cb4e066aa45c184a6d Description: GNU data access library -- development files. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 988 source: libgda Package: libgda0 Version: 0.2.0-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.10), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Suggests: gda-mysql (= 0.2.0-1), gda-postgres (= 0.2.0-1), gda-odbc (= 0.2.0-1) Replaces: libgda-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc/libgda0_0.2.0-1_i386.deb Size: 225662 MD5sum: 6c34e551cf2a63f7e8e3a64639af529b Description: GNU Data Access library. GNU Data Access is an attempt to provide uniform access to different kinds of data sources (databases, information servers, mail spools, etc). It is a complete architecture that provides all you need to access your data. . libgda was part of the GNOME-DB project (http://www.gnome.org/projects/gnome-db), but has been separated from it to allow non-GNOME applications to be developed based on it. installed-size: 978 source: libgda --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Packages Package: bonobo Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8), libart2 (>= 1.2.0), libaudiofile0, libbonobo2, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libefs1, libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libgdk-pixbuf2 (>= 0.9.0), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeprint11 (>= 0.24-1), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.2.0), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libjpeg62, liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpng2, libpopt0, libtiff3g, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/bonobo_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 347688 MD5sum: 48ad8d108c7feb6fe9f4b1a52a0dd814 Description: The GNOME Bonobo System. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 2044 Package: godbcconfig Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: gdk-imlib1 (>= 1.9.8-4), libart2 (>= 1.0.56-3), libaudiofile0, libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libdb2 (>= 1:2.4.14-7), libesd0 (>= 0.2.16) | libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.16), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgnome32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomesupport0 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgnomeui32 (>= 1.0.56-3), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.7-1), libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/godbcconfig_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 8354 MD5sum: 4bb47c549d3e859564a2679ff3c00593 Description: GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI GTK Based ODBC Configuration GUI - part of the unixODBC tools installed-size: 96 source: unixodbc Package: libbonobo-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: bonobo (=0.28-1), libbonobo2 (=0.28-1), libefs-dev, libgnomeprint-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 394212 MD5sum: ffcf03d7a977745e120fe03f262b0d4d Description: The GNOME Bonobo library - development files. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 1527 source: bonobo Package: libbonobo2 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Recommends: bonobo Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<= 0.12-3) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libbonobo2_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 300018 MD5sum: 6b342ab379c39330acbc4a4470fa68d5 Description: The GNOME Bonobo library. Bonobo is a set of language and system indepandant CORBA interfaces for creating reusable components (controls) and creating compound documents. . The Bonobo distribution includes a Gtk+ based implementation of the Bonobo interfaces, enabling developers to create reusable components and applications that can be used to form more complex documents. installed-size: 723 source: bonobo Package: libefs-dev Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libefs1 (=0.28-1) Replaces: libbonobo1 (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs-dev_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 118868 MD5sum: 8d2b2cfb96fa20b93edfe3b9f87f0fd9 Description: Embedded File System library - development files. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 185 source: bonobo Package: libefs1 Version: 0.28-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libefs1, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libz1 Replaces: libbonobo-dev (<< 0.26-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libefs1_0.28-1_i386.deb Size: 120544 MD5sum: c84884b1aebdeece600324c4e7efc294 Description: Embedded File System library. This is a first approach to implement a file-system-inside-a-file. The library is called libefs (EFS = Embedded File System). . This package is part of Bonobo. installed-size: 173 source: bonobo Package: libgconf-dev Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libgconf11 (=0.11-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf-dev_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 155398 MD5sum: 9a727adb23b92e822d64f114a8ccdfab Description: GNOME onfiguration database system development files. GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain development files. installed-size: 556 source: gconf Package: libgconf11 Version: 0.11-1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgconf11 (>= 0.11), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), libgtk1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0 (>= 0.6.1-1), liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4) Conflicts: libgconf10 Replaces: libgconf10 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/libgconf11_0.11-1_i386.deb Size: 317676 MD5sum: 93e45a096900ddc9d6823e9f509f4e56 Description: GNOME configuration database system libraries GConf is a configuration database system, functionally similar to the Windows registry but lots better. :-) It's being written for the GNOME desktop but does not require GNOME; configure should notice if GNOME is not installed and compile the basic GConf library anyway. . This package contain shared libraries. installed-size: 996 source: gconf Package: liboaf-dev Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: devel Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: liboaf0 (=0.6.1-1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf-dev_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 34526 MD5sum: a4f3a141e8ce98633ac63ccbe1be8b3b Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework - development files. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 158 source: oaf Package: liboaf0 Version: 0.6.1-1 Priority: extra Section: libs Maintainer: Takuo KITAME Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), liboaf0, liborbit0 (>= 0.5.0), libpopt0, libxml1, libz1 Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/liboaf0_0.6.1-1_i386.deb Size: 122952 MD5sum: f7ceb3ae956b67c291b96d7ecc9785f5 Description: The GNOME Objet Activation Framework. OAF is the new Object Activation Framework for GNOME. OAF has a similar purpose to gnorba, the GNOME 1.x CORBA activation library, and will replace it for GNOME 2.0. . It allows you to do much more powerful activation queries than gnorba. Each server is described by an XML file that defines its attributes. When querying or activating, one may specify complex requirements using the OAF query language. installed-size: 410 source: oaf Package: sybase-ase Version: 11.9.2-SWR-9223 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-ase_11.9.2-SWR-9223_i386.deb Size: 2458 MD5sum: 12f3e59f2a4ff43253fdff6cf4c4c676 Description: Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise Sybase(R) Adaptive Server(R) Enterprise is the industry-leading structured query Language database server. It supports ANSI-92 SQL with Sybase stored procedures. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-common Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-common_11.9.2-2_i386.deb Size: 2506 MD5sum: cdef9787718e364d3f15081bb2d36a3e Description: Sybase Enterprise Software Common Files Supporting files which apply to the Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise shared between the SQL Server and Open Client/ Server development environment . System information on the Software License Agreement governing use of Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise for Linux 2.2.x can be found on http://linux.sybase.com . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-doc Version: 11.9.2-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Suggests: sybase-openclient (>= 11.1.1) Architecture: all Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-doc_11.9.2-2_all.deb Size: 2448 MD5sum: eabf8a2bceaf9852f295da42457660b7 Description: Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents Sybase Enterprise Solutions Software Documents for Adaptive Server Enterprise and Open CLient / Server related products. The documents contained on the CDROM are listed in the CONTENTS file on your CDROM. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: sybase-openclient Version: 11.1.1-2 Priority: optional Section: non-free/misc Maintainer: Holger Thon Depends: sybase-common (>= 11.9.2) Suggests: sybase-doc (>= 11.9.2) Provides: sybase-openclient Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/sybase-openclient_11.1.1-2_i386.deb Size: 2524 MD5sum: 65a9da9f2eb7f912099bcf36335b03ff Description: Sybase Open Client Development Libraries (dummy package) Sybase Connectivity Open Client(tm) is the industry-leading network oriented application development environment with tools to maintain and administrate the Adaptive Server Enterprise platform. . This is a dummy package! . installed-size: 23 Package: unixodbc Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: libs Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2) Suggests: libmyodbc2.50.32 Conflicts: odbc-postgresql Provides: odbc-postgresql Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 360430 MD5sum: d5e79fb3b63cdffc5e41a7f72dacf90e Description: ODBC tools libraries Binaries and libraries from the unixODBC package. COMPONENTS: . libodbc.so (ODBC Driver Manager) libodbcinst.so (ODBC Installer/Setup) odbcinst (cmd line UI for libodbcinst.so) libini.a (ini file handler) liblog.a (log handler) libodbcdrvcfg1S.so (GUI config for server based sources... basic) libodbcdrvcfg2S.so (GUI config for file based sources... basic) liboplodbcS.so (GUI config for OpenLink's opl driver) libodbcminiS.so (GUI config for MiniSQL driver) libodbcmyS.so (GUI config for MySQL driver) libodbcpgsqlS.so (GUI config for PostgreSQL driver) libodbcmini.so (driver for MiniSQL) libodbcmy.so (driver for MySQL - Still need libmyodbc2.50.26 ) libodbcpgsql.so (driver for PostgreSQL) libodbctxt.so (driver for Text files) dltest (simple cmd line tool) isql (cmd line tool... batch & interactive SQL) Driver Template (a template for Driver programmers) liblst.so (list handler) installed-size: 1060 conffiles: /etc/odbcinst.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /etc/odbc.ini d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e Package: unixodbc-bin Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: x11 Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libgl1, libjpeg62, libmng, libpng2, libqt2.2 (>= 2:2.2.1-6.potato.2), libstdc++2.10, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-bin_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 297492 MD5sum: 850d41290c67414a91b9db1ea1b71e20 Description: QT based GUI ODBC tools QT based GUI Binaries from the unixODBC package. . ODBCConfig (GUI Setup using libodbcinst.so) DataManager (GUI to explore ODBC Data Sources) installed-size: 1320 source: unixodbc Package: unixodbc-dev Version: 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1 Priority: optional Section: devel Maintainer: Ivan E. Moore II Depends: unixodbc (= 1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1), libc6-dev Conflicts: libiodbc2-dev Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/potato/extra/binary-i386/unixodbc-dev_1.8.13-0.cvs20000926.5.potato.1_i386.deb Size: 450104 MD5sum: 790ef530172737c0bcba54a0d56c927e Description: ODBC libraries for UNIX (development files) development headers for unixODBC installed-size: 2140 source: unixodbc --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 1 16:53:00 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411B32D2D2 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:53:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from 237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@237-MADR-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.6.237]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05208; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:41:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012012141.NAA05208@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 01 Dec 2000 20:49:05 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 01 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, Holger Thon wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > > Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:23:55 +0900 > > From: Akira TAGOH > > To: Rodrigo Moya > > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > > Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > > In-Reply-To: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> > > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio-pre3) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > Precedence: bulk > > > > >>>>> On 29 Nov 2000 22:59:39 -0100, > > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > RM> Hi all! > > RM> I need some advice (specially from Akira) on how to organize the debian > > RM> packages in > > RM> ftp.gnome-db.org. That is, should we just provide a FTP area, with all > > RM> version's debs, > > RM> or a good aptable source? > > I recommend a tree like > > dists/potato/main/binary-i386 > > In which subdir this tree resides does not matter. > It'd be great, if the ftp area could also be made available via http (e.g. > a read only directory entry ftp which points to the pub dir of the ftp > environment). > > > > > Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > > That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > > bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato > has been released with october gnome (1.0). > > But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode > (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). > - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode > - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also > contains Helixcode > (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) > > So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > - bonobo 0.28 > - gconf 0.11 > - oaf 0.6.1 > - unixodbc 1.8.13 > - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > An apt.sources would read like: > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/debian potato main extra > > The sybase provider is in non-free/misc section, because Debian is very precise > on Licence policies. ;-) > > > > even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > > isn't almost different from woody. > > The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In > actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary > tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and > let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread > "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) > > As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > 5 MB. > ok, I agree with everything. Packages for potato should be available. So Holger please, upload them to ftp.gnome-db.org. But remember that the top-level directory for gnome-db stuff in that machine is /pub/gnome-db/, and not /pub/. There are other web sites there, so we've got a separated directory for us. You can upload them, can't you? If not, send them to me and I'll do it myself. cheers From at@gclab.org Fri Dec 1 23:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8122BC78 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 23:41:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80C72FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 Message-ID: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. HT> No, potato neither has gnome-db nor bonobo. You're right that official potato HT> has been released with october gnome (1.0). HT> But: - There are prepackaged versions of gnome 1.2 available from helixcode HT> (i have spidermonkey.helixcode.com in my apt.sources). HT> - Debian potato packaged by Linuxland has an additional CD with Helixcode HT> - ftp.fsn.hu's extra CD #4 containing Debian 2.2r1 fixes also HT> contains Helixcode HT> (cd are also available mounted, so it'd be an apt-get alternative) I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the time. HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): HT> - bonobo 0.28 HT> - gconf 0.11 HT> - oaf 0.6.1 HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. HT> An apt.sources would read like: if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict with all the things that those packages are provided. >> >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it >> isn't almost different from woody. HT> The problem for woody packages is, that they won't work on potato systems. In HT> actual woody tree, e.g. glibc 2.2 is used. So we'd need an additional binary HT> tree. Or, we just put the sources with the debian diffs in the sourcetree and HT> let potato users compile them. Though, that might bring up the thread HT> "gnome-db and bonobo version" again. ;-) potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the environment for which to become stable? if so, you are understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the tree? HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are HT> 5 MB. the people who use woody are the same, too :) Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From smile@uni-duisburg.de Sat Dec 2 04:38:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from linux1.cluster-dynip.de (dsbg-d9312b46.pool.mediaWays.net [217.49.43.70]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63C2BC6C for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 04:38:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from linux2.cluster-dynip.de (linux2.cluster-dynip.de [192.168.3.2]) by linux1.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD66100F0 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:38:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by linux2.cluster-dynip.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A30D6431C0; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100 From: Holger Thon To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org Message-ID: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org>; from tagoh@gnome-db.org on Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 13:41:32 +0900 > From: Akira TAGOH > To: Holger Thon > Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Subject: OT: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org > In-Reply-To: <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> > User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) > Organization: GNOME-DB Project > > >>>>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 19:40:39 +0100, > >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: > > HT> Hi! > HT> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:23:55PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> > >> Is debian's potato tree provide gnome-db? > >> That can't probably be here. because potato doesn't include > >> bonobo, and potato's GNOME is October GNOME. it's too old. > > I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed > Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the > time. Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... But still there are the 2 other sources: - Linuxland distribution http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ or ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw > > HT> So what i repackaged additionaly is (got of nautilus sources/woody sources): > HT> - bonobo 0.28 > HT> - gconf 0.11 > HT> - oaf 0.6.1 > HT> - unixodbc 1.8.13 > HT> - sybase ase 11.9.2 fake packages to meet dependencies > > HT> I suggest to put these packages into dists/potato/extra/binary-i386. > HT> The libgda stuff for potato would be in dists/potato/main/binary-i386/misc. > HT> An apt.sources would read like: > > if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should > change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict > with all the things that those packages are provided. It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). > > >> > >> even if we provide the potato's gnome-db, I think that it > >> isn't almost different from woody. > > potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the > environment for which to become stable? if so, you are > understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the > tree? Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by the other packages. Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages which i know of. :-) It's the same question for using rawhide or Redhat 7, Mandrake ß or Mandrake 7.x and so on... ;-) > > HT> As an attachment you get the packages files, so you can decide if they should > HT> come onto ftp or not. The binaries (gda stuff + additional packages) are > HT> 5 MB. > > the people who use woody are the same, too :) Sure. I dist-upgraded to potato in March last year. Ciao, Holger From at@gclab.org Sat Dec 2 06:26:48 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from crocus (fw132041.kitanet.ne.jp [210.237.132.41]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31152BAF1 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 06:26:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (crocus [127.0.0.1]) by crocus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140682FED1; Sat, 2 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2000 20:26:44 +0900 Message-ID: <87zoif9i8b.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Holger Thon Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: debian packages in ftp.gnome-db.org In-Reply-To: <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> References: <200011300000.BAA06878@ulises.openresources.com> <87pujdaek4.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001201194039.A3230@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> <87u28nph8j.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <20001202103548.B3457@linux2.cluster-dynip.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000 10:35:48 +0100, >>>>> "HT" == Holger Thon wrote: HT> Hi! HT> On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:41:32PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> I think that it doesn't label potato. people can installed >> Helix GNOME in potato. but Helix GNOME based on woody at the >> time. HT> Oops, you are right, it's just for woody. It's a deb-src line... HT> But still there are the 2 other sources: HT> - Linuxland distribution HT> http://www.linuxland.de/katalog/01_linuxdistri_bs/debian/5_debian22nurcds/framify HT> - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images-mounted/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw/ HT> or HT> ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/debian-unofficial-cd/potato-i386-extra.raw Sorry, because I don't know it, I can't comment. >> if you put those packages in ftp.gnome-db.org, you should >> change it to the debian version that it doesn't conflict >> with all the things that those packages are provided. HT> It's just a patch release more for bonobo and oaf and gconf, so there should HT> be no version conflicts (still bonobo 0.28, oaf 0.6.1 and gconf 0.11). Don't you make those a deb packages, and put it on ftp.gnome-db.org? I thought so... but if so, the people which download those patch will end up by compile. >> potato is stable version. Why do you use potato? to get the >> environment for which to become stable? if so, you are >> understood why those *unstable* packages aren't put on the >> tree? HT> Yes. The main reason why i didn't dist-upgrade to woody is, that first there HT> is an unstable gcc version and second the bleeding edge version of glibc 2.2. HT> And i couldn't just set gcc and glibc to keep, because these are needed by HT> the other packages. HT> Thus i have the stable packages installed and a handful of unstable packages HT> which i know of. :-) gcc is not unstable for woody. gcc contatined in woody is the same as potato. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Mon Dec 4 12:30:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A6E2CFA2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id JAA27751; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:38 -0800 Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 09:17:37 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: rodrigo@gnome-db.org Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Message-ID: <20001204091737.A26932@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access the list archive): * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like gal-0.2.2 (the latest version) produces a libgal.so.1.0.2. I simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we can all test it. Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:16:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD01D2DF46 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:16:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31113; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:04:23 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041804.KAA31113@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: GNOME Photo Collector From: Rodrigo Moya To: tflorac@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:12:13 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Thierry! I've seen in the GPC home page that you intend to convert to the usage of GNOME-DB for your data access needs. This makes us (GNOME-DB developers) very happy, so count on us on any help you may need. As a first thing, you could subscribe to the gnome-db mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list/), so that we can all of us answer the questions you may have. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 13:21:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D4C2BD08 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 13:21:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (4-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.68]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA31529 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 10:09:46 -0800 Message-Id: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > Hi! > > I've downloaded the RPMS for gnome-db 0.2.0, and there are two problems I have > (pardon me if the questions have already been asked, because I can't access > the list archive): > > * what is the libdb2.so.2 library for? It is linked against gnomedb-mgr, fe, > components and rolodex. I don't know it, and can't find it anywhere. > this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a Debian machine. So, it would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done with: rpm --rebuild file.src.rpm when you've got them, please send them to me and I'll upload them (if gnome-db.org is up, since it's been down all the weekend) > * the same apps are also linked with libgal.so.2, and it looks like > simply did a symlink on it, but I don't know if it works. > it should work, as I don't make use of the latest GAL additions. But again, this shouldn't happen, so please rebuild the RPMs. > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > can all test it. > great! cheers From stephane.anes@free.fr Sun Dec 3 14:02:11 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from postfix2.free.fr (postfix2.free.fr [212.27.32.74]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FB82DE6D for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 14:02:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pc300.sa (paris11-nas3-20-151.dial.proxad.net [213.228.20.151]) by postfix2.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id E1156740C2 for ; Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:02:09 +0100 (MET) From: Stéphane ANES Reply-To: stephane.anes@free.fr To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: SUSCRIBE Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-mysql=/usr No error detect with configure but with make I get: undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext --> poptGetNextOpt --> poptFreeContext GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... popt is 1.2. and is in /usr Can you help me ? Many thanks ! Stéphane From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 4 15:13:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65EF2BAB1 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 15:13:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@229-MADR-X46.libre.retevision.es [62.83.25.229]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA07221; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 12:01:06 -0800 Message-Id: <200012042001.MAA07221@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: SUSCRIBE From: Rodrigo Moya To: stephane.anes@free.fr Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <00120320174001.06222@pc300.sa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 04 Dec 2000 19:05:46 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 03 Dec 2000 20:15:12 +0100, St=E9phane ANES wrote: > Hello, I'm french so sorry for my english.... > I've trouve to compile LIBGDA-0.2.0 with >=20 > ./configure --prefix=3D/usr --with-mysql=3D/usr=20 >=20 > No error detect with configure but with make I get: >=20 > undefined reference libgda.server.so --> poptGetContext > --> poptGetNextOpt > --> poptFreeContext >=20 > GNOME is in /usr; MySql 3.23.27-beta is in /usr. >=20 > Moreover, with postgres, I have no problem to compile... >=20 > popt is 1.2. and is in /usr >=20 > Can you help me ? >=20 this is a problem reported the other day by another person. I don't know wh= y, but in my machine, libpopt is automatically included (??), and in others not. The solution is to add, to the libgda/lib/gda-server/Makefile.am libgda_server_la_LIBADD =3D -lpopt and of course, you should have libpopt installed on your system. I'll fix this in CVS. Thanks for the report. cheers From at@gclab.org Mon Dec 4 23:11:14 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9F72BAC2 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:09:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03937; Mon, 4 Dec 2000 23:08:26 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA24733; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 13:09:24 +0900 Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900 Message-ID: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a RM> Debian machine. So, it RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done RM> with: I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment which use chroot or other machine. I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that I may build the RPMs on this environment. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 5 12:48:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937682BA98 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:48:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from 27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@27-MADR-X105.libre.retevision.es [62.83.46.27]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA23887; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 09:34:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> this is linked with the GNOME libraries, that is, there is not a > RM> explicit -ldb2 in gnome-db > RM> Makefiles. I guess this is my fault, for having built the RPMs in a > RM> Debian machine. So, it > RM> would be good if you could rebuild them from the SRPM. This is done > RM> with: > > I think that you should build the valid RPMs environment > which use chroot or other machine. > yes, I am preparing a clean environment to build the RPMs, but last time, I didn't have another one, so I thought it was better to have them that way instead of nothing. > I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > I may build the RPMs on this environment. > it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please do so. cheers From at@gclab.org Tue Dec 5 23:48:38 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C4F2BA9A for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:47:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27526; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 23:45:50 -0500 Received: from crocus.lo.gclab.org (station57.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.187]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA06459; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:46:46 +0900 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900 Message-ID: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> From: Akira TAGOH To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS In-Reply-To: <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.5.4 (Smooth) EMY/1.13.9 (Art is long, life is short) FLIM/1.14.0 (Ninokuchi) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.2 (beta37) (Pan) (i386-debian-linux) Organization: GNOME-DB Project MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. >> RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please RM> do so. That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? if you also say ok, I can do it. Regards, -- Akira TAGOH From DieringG@eba-haus.de Wed Dec 6 03:23:30 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailproxy.de.uu.net (mailproxy.de.uu.net [192.76.144.34]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A891F2E122 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 03:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from kopo001 ([149.228.241.249]) by mailproxy.de.uu.net (5.5.5/5.5.5) with SMTP id JAA20027 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 09:23:28 +0100 (MET) Received: from EBA_DO-Message_Server by kopo001 with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:45 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100 From: "Gerhard Dieringer" To: Cc: "<" Subject: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr = >>> > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, = and > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > can all test it. > > > great! Hi Rodrigo, as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It = implements the features: 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like = this. To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something = done at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? Gerhard P.S. This email address will only be valid until Fr. 08.Dec 2000, because = I'm going to start a new job at 02. Jan 2001 If you want to reply after this = date, please use my private address GDieringer@compuserve.com or gerhard@gnome-db.org. =20 From mbatle@iname.com Thu Dec 7 10:47:33 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.jet.es (unknown [194.179.100.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6112D21F for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:47:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from iname.com (usuario1-36-128-34.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.34]) by smtp.jet.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA24999 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 17:51:02 +0100 X-Envelope-To: X-Mozilla-Status: 0801 Message-ID: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100 From: Mateu Batle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0 X-Accept-Language: ca, es, en, de-DE MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: libgda - GNOME dependencies Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking for :) But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, it does not have many of the libraries required, or if it has they are a bit older. Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be to do it ? Thanks and best regards, Mateu From mike@mjv.com Thu Dec 7 11:35:47 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from IMGate.wts.net (imgate.wts.net [209.144.22.55]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61FB2BAF1 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 11:35:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from comanchetx.com (mail.comanchetx.com [63.64.122.61]) by IMGate.wts.net (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 700F251646 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from mjv.com [63.64.123.6] by comanchetx.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.05) id AA97645401A4; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:28:07 -0600 Message-ID: <3A2FB958.21BF75F5@mjv.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:22:48 -0600 From: Michael Vanecek X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies References: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I upgraded to the latest Helix-Gnome and don't recall any problems with libgda. gnome-db itself requires some bleeding edge libraries (read - libs that can change at any given moment depending on the developer's desires), but all of it is still very much in feverish development so it's all fairly bleeding edge... Mike Mateu Batle wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > > Thanks and best regards, > Mateu > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 16:48:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5D72E4F0 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:48:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA14702; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:35:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082135.NAA14702@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> References: <200012041809.KAA31529@gears.linuxave.net> <87ofyrpl1m.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> <200012051734.JAA23887@gears.linuxave.net> <87itoyw41w.wl@crocus.lo.gclab.org> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 20:43:26 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 13:45:47 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 05 Dec 2000 16:42:29 -0100, > >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > RM> On 05 Dec 2000 13:08:21 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> >>>>> On 04 Dec 2000 17:17:36 -0100, > >> >>>>> "RM" == Rodrigo Moya wrote: > >> > >> I have a RH7 environment, but it isn't desirable so that > >> I may build the RPMs on this environment. > >> > RM> it would be great to also provide RH7 RPMs, so if you can do them, please > RM> do so. > > That RPMs is probably RH7 only. Do you still think so? > if you also say ok, I can do it. > yes, please do them From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Fri Dec 8 17:39:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EF2CA07 for ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:39:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from 56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@56-MADR-X102.libre.retevision.es [62.83.47.120]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA18105; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:27:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012082227.OAA18105@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: libgda - GNOME dependencies From: Rodrigo Moya To: Mateu Batle Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A2FB104.5010304@iname.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 08 Dec 2000 21:34:38 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 07 Dec 2000 16:47:16 +0100, Mateu Batle wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just discovered libgda / gnome-db and I think > it's very interesting and exactly what I was looking > for :) > > But I think it's a bit hard to compile / install, since > it requires too many dependencies. I'm only interested > in the libgda part using shared libraries, not in the > CORBA / GNOME stuff. Although I have GNOME installed, > it does not have many of the libraries required, or > if it has they are a bit older. > > Is there any way to compile only the the part of the libgda > in which I'm interested ? If it's not possible, can someone > provide some hints on how to do it and how easy it could be > to do it ? > libgda's dependencies are: * GLib >= 0.99 * GTK+ >= 1.2.x * libxml >= 1.8.x * OAF >= 0.5.x * ORBit >= 0.5.x * GConf >= 0.9 GLib, GTK+, libxml and ORBit are just included with any decent version of GNOME (helix gnome should work perfectly). OAF and GConf can be found at ftp://ftp.gnome.org or at spidermonkey.helixcode.com And libgda is based on CORBA, so it's not possible to compile without CORBA support, but you can do so without any GNOME library (except for GTK+, a dependency which is going to be removed for GLib 2.0). For GNOME-DB the thing is different because of Bonobo, which may cause many problems due to version mismatch, but if you use GNOME-DB >= 0.2.x, any Bonobo version >= 0.28 should work. If you're having any problem compiling, please tell us what those problems are so that we can try to help you cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 9 10:11:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9902BA9A for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 10:11:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from 19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es (rodrigo@19-MADR-X33.libre.retevision.es [62.83.4.19]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06164; Sat, 9 Dec 2000 06:59:03 -0800 Message-Id: <200012091459.GAA06164@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Antw: Re: gnome-db 0.2.0 RPMS From: Rodrigo Moya To: Gerhard Dieringer Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 09 Dec 2000 14:06:58 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 06 Dec 2000 09:20:37 +0100, Gerhard Dieringer wrote: > >>> Rodrigo Moya 04.12.2000 19.17 Uhr >>> > > > Also, Gerhard has made a really nice work with the XmlQuery library, and > > > there should soon be a directory for it under the gda-common one so we > > > can all test it. > > > > > great! > > Hi Rodrigo, > > as Vivien told you, my XmlQuery lib is now more or less usable. It implements > the features: > 1.) create an XmlQuery from XML (using libxml2) > 2.) create an XmlQuery with individual simple library calls > 3.) render an XmlQuery to SQL92 > 4.) render an XmlQuery to XML (using libxml2) > well, this is great! The only problem I see is the use of libxml2, which won't be considered a stable version until GNOME 2.0. So, would it be easy to make it compile with both versions of libxml (libxml 1.8 & libxml2)? > Currently it only covers DML (select,insert,update,delete). The next step > would be to extend it to DDL(create/drop/alter table/view/sequence, ....) > > If I remeber right, some months ago you announced to do something like this. > To avoid duplicate work, I would like to ask you, if you have something done > at it, or should I start with the current version of the XmlQuery DTD? > yes, the idea is to be able to make all sorts of commands through XML. What I talked about was about having a modifySchema IDL method, which will use the current GDA_Connection_Constraints to be able to send DDL commands. So, what I think we should do is to have the Gda_XmlQuery object call this modifySchema method after having parsed the XML command. I suggest you have a look at the GDA_Connection_Constraint stuff (openSchema() function) so that we can start discussing how to extend it to fit all the DDL commands. and please, commit your xmlquery stuff to CVS (have you got a CVS account?). This should go to the libgda/lib/gda-common/gda-xml-query* files. cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 10:02:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4588E2BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:02:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8AA54A65 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 15:47:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 15:57:30 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi! As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite often. So, as I've just now added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some bonobo-related bugs, I think it's time to do a new release. I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Tue Dec 12 11:39:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057772E059 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:39:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-72.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.72]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBCGcw413439; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:39:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 145sRo-0000BM-00; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Tue Dec 12 12:01:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D743A2BAB6 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:01:30 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id IAA28606; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:53 -0800 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: New release Message-ID: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com>; from Rodrigo Moya on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi! > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > often. So, as I've just now > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > bonobo-related bugs, I think > it's time to do a new release. > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those sources! BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:20:22 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD7E2E087 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:20:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816A054A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:05:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:15:09 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212170526.816A054A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 17:38:35 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: > On 12 Dec 2000, Rodrigo Moya wrote: >=20 > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? >=20 > As developer, I prefer you to make it now. It's better working with less > bugs... ;-) (And the debian packages are not in gnome-db.org...) >=20 ok, so tomorrow, or after tomorrow it will be done cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 12:25:03 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA83C2CE2D for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 12:25:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (83-MADR-X51.libre.retevision.es [62.83.20.83]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF3354A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:10:10 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New release From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 18:19:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > Hi! > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > often. So, as I've just now > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > sources! > they are in: ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll start making the packages tonight at home. > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do something, so we'll have to wait for a little. cheers From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 12 13:44:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86AB72BB92 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 13:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 22291 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by himail.edinfo.es with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 19:42:45 -0000 Subject: Re: New release From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: Vivien Malerba , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> References: <20001212144735.8C8AA54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <20001212084847.A28236@gears.linuxave.net> <20001212171010.2AF3354A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 17:37:37 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212184405.86AB72BB92@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > On 12 Dec 2000 08:48:47 -0800, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 03:57:30PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > As we talked some weeks ago, it's a good idea to make releases quite > > > often. So, as I've just now > > > added some missing things, and in the last days I've fixed some > > > bonobo-related bugs, I think > > > it's time to do a new release. > > > > > > > This is a good idea to make releases more often :) > > > > > I would suggest to make the packages just today, but as gnome-db.org is > > > still down (and we don't know when it will come back), we've got no > > > website. Of course, we can put packages and tarballs > > > in ftp.gnome.org as always. So what do you think? Should we wait for > > > gnome-db.org to come back or is it better to make now the release? > > > > > > > Can you tell me which directory it is in then? because I can't find those > > sources! > > > > they are in: > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db > ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db > > But well, of course, the new release (0.2.1) is not there yet. I'll > start making the packages > tonight at home. > > > BTW, do you know what the problem with the gnome-db.org server is? > > > yes, Carlos is having problems with his ADSL line. And last time he talked > > about this he said it had for a couple of weeks before they could do > something, so we'll have > to wait for a little. > Well, at this moment the alldns guys are stupid and they have change the domains's name servers to the old ones. Please don't use alldns.com to register your domains :-( > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Tue Dec 12 17:07:07 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368702D47E; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 17:04:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es (224-MADR-X30.libre.retevision.es [62.83.7.224]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF20A54A65; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:49:47 +0100 (CET) Subject: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 12 Dec 2000 22:59:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. GNOME-DB/libGDA are a complete framewok for developing database-oriented applications, and actually allow access to PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, Sybase and ODBC data sources. Apart from this development framework, it also includes several applications and utilities which make it quite suitable for many database-related taks. This release is the first one in a series of more regular releases, since we're approaching a good deal of performance/stability/functionality, and we want people to be able to easily follow the development. * Added/Implemented stuff: Better Bonobo support - now works great with Bonobo! (Rodrigo) Packages for Debian Potato (Holger) Portuguese page for the web site (Cleber) Started implementation for database: monikers (Rodrigo) Started PrimeBase data source provider (Holger) Started Perl bindings for libGDA (Rodrigo) * Bugs fixed: Bonobo toolbar/menubar now works perfectly well (at last) Some build problems in different configurations solved To install this new version, you'll need: * libgda: ORBit, OAF, GConf >= 0.9, libxml * gnome-db: libgda and dependencies, Bonobo >= 0.29, gnome-libs, libgal, gtkhtml GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in the same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe to the GNOME-DB mailing list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list) From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:14:06 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC832E16B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:14:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B3654A64 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 11:59:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:08:47 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213105914.00B3654A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi RPMS and SRPMS are now available in: ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/i386/gnome-db/ ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/redhat/SRPMS/gnome-db/ cheers From gperez@gio.ingor.upm.es Wed Dec 13 06:28:49 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es (glo.gio.ingor.upm.es [138.100.17.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957072CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:28:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from gio.ingor.upm.es ([138.100.21.98]) by gio.ingor.upm.es (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA13113; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:24 +0100 Message-ID: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100 From: "Guille (bisho)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-6.1.1 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001119 X-Accept-Language: es-es, es, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. Great! [...] > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > the > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > to the GNOME-DB mailing list Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a name-based virtual web server? -- \|||||||/ Guillermo Pérez Pérez < o o > - bisho@onirica.com \ L / - bisho@eurielec.etsit.upm.es -oOOo-------oOOo- From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 06:43:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA062CF0E; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192554A64; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 12:28:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: Guille "(bisho)" Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, gnome-announce-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> References: <20001212214948.EF20A54A65@mailer.barrapunto.com> <3A375CCA.5030507@gio.ingor.upm.es> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 12:38:20 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001213112845.9192554A64@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 12:26:02 +0100, Guille (bisho) wrote: > > GNOME-DB/libGDA 0.2.1 have been released. > > Great! > > [...] > > > > GNOME-DB web server (http://www.gnome-db.org) is now down and will be in > > the > > same state for some days, so you can only download source tarballs from > > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/gnome-db/, and, if you need > > any help in compiling/installing/using the software, please subscribe > > to the GNOME-DB mailing list > > Can you tell us the ip address of http://www.gnome-db.org, or it was a > name-based virtual web server? > well, I think it was 213.0.69.70, but you won't be able to access it, since it's down. Anyway, I've just put RPMS and SRPMS in ftp.gnome.org, so you may want to download them from there. And if what you're looking for is for the web pages, they're on CVS, under the gnome-db/www directory. It's in PHP so to see them in your browser you'll have to install them on an Apache www directory, and, of course, install the mod_php module. The documentation is included in both the tarballs and the RPMS/SRPMS cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 07:13:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D5C2E276 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:13:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (233-MADR-X48.libre.retevision.es [62.83.23.233]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA31246 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 04:01:24 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 13:08:42 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're approaching a big amount of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on adding missing things and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, hopefully, included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the beginning of next year The things I've thought about: * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as LDAP, etc * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser widget to allow calls to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, since the only one which is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget * Report engine: make it work * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very little to offer * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc * Bonobo monikers * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it would be great if we could also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people * and more things that I can't remember right now As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to help, please just say where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 09:17:09 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1392E335 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:17:09 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id GAA05349; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:04:40 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 01:08:42PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > Hi all! > > Well, as I said in the announcement for the 0.2.1 version, we're > approaching a big amount > of functionality/stability/performance, so I'd like to start working on > adding missing things > and new functionality, since, as you may know, GNOME-DB/libGDA will be, > hopefully, > included in the GNOME 1.4 extra apps releasem, which is due for the > beginning of next year > > The things I've thought about: > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > LDAP, etc Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one implementation). > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > widget to allow calls > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > since the only one which > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ write the implementations. I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings with the schemas... > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > * Report engine: make it work > * Gda_XmlDatabase: needs completion, since right now it's got very > little to offer > * more Bonobo components: export/import (XML queries), browser, etc > * Bonobo monikers > * providers: TDS, Primebase, Sybase are being worked by Holger, but it > would be great if we could > also have the MDB, LDAP and mail providers started > * database logger, as suggested by ASPL-FACT people > * and more things that I can't remember right now > > As always, I'd appreciate any help, so if there's somebody wanting to > help, please just say > where you want to help, and I'll give you lots of things to do : ) > > cheers > Cheers, Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:44:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432D32E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:44:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA06855; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:32:14 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:39:24 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > The things I've thought about: > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > LDAP, etc > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > implementation). > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both projects. What I was thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > widget to allow calls > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there may be times when you want to create database objects from the source code of your program. And, of course, we need to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of the schemas. So, what do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML queries? > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > since the only one which > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > write the implementations. > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > with the schemas... > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the list. And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the supplied fields are NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, such as the object name, etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other fields may be NULL. > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen myself? cheers From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 09:55:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9CB2E136 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 09:55:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA07398 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 06:43:00 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 15:50:10 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening brackets are in the same line as the statement): if (whatever) { do_what_you_want(); switch (..) { case ... } } so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it when you hack. cheers From cuenca@celium.net Wed Dec 13 10:11:40 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from ns1.axinet.fr (ns1.axinet.fr [193.45.10.11]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E2B2E27A for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:11:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from name (AMontsouris-101-2-2-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.253.183.169]) by ns1.axinet.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id eBDFBVN15437 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:11:31 +0100 From: "Joaquin Cuenca Abela" To: "gnome-db list" Subject: RE: HACKING guide Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200012131443.GAA07398@gears.linuxave.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". It would do the conversion of all your files for you. Cheers, -- Joaquin Cuenca Abela cuenca@celium.net > -----Message d'origine----- > De : gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org > [mailto:gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org]De la part de Rodrigo Moya > Envoyé : mercredi 13 décembre 2000 15:50 > À : gnome-db-list@gnome.org > Objet : HACKING guide > > > Hi all! > > I've just added a HACKING file to both gnome-db and libGDA where you'll > find the guide for people contributing code to gnome-db/libgda. > Specially important is the coding style, which will be, from now, the > same one used in the GNOME project, for consistency and clarity. > > 99% of the code is using "my" old style, which is (note indentations are > 2 spaces, and opening brackets are in a line by their own): > > if (whatever) > { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) > { > case ... > } > } > > and now it should look like (note indentations are a tab, and opening > brackets are in the same line as the statement): > > if (whatever) { > do_what_you_want(); > switch (..) { > case ... > } > } > > so, this means that almost all the current code must be changed to > comply with the new coding style. I've already started myself to change > this in the files I have been hacking in the last days, so I plea to all > of you contributing code to do the same for the files you touch. > > I know this is a hard work to change all the source files we've got now, > but I think it is necessary for clarity and consistency with the rest of > the GNOME project. And it's also very important to show a unique coding > style than one per hacker, since it is clearer to read. So, please do it > when you hack. > > cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:30:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98932E148 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:30:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA09777; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:17:55 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131517.HAA09777@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: RE: HACKING guide From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joaquin Cuenca Abela Cc: gnome-db list In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:24:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 13 Dec 2000 16:06:27 +0100, Joaquin Cuenca Abela wrote: > Rodrigo, maybe you must take a look at "indent". > It would do the conversion of all your files for you. > ok, great! thanks, I'll have a look at it cheers From malerba@gears.linuxave.net Wed Dec 13 10:52:19 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992AE2E35B for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:52:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (from malerba@localhost) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) id HAA10976; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:47 -0800 Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:39:32 -0800 From: Vivien Malerba To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) Message-ID: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net>; from Rodrigo Moya on Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > > The things I've thought about: > > > * XML queries: Gerhard, can you start adding your lib to the libGDA > > > source tree? As soon as they are there, we can start implementing new > > > (awesome) stuff, such as a visual query designer, the > > > export/import stuff, and, most importantly, non-SQL providers, such as > > > LDAP, etc > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > implementation). > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > projects. What I was > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example in MS access or some other projects. > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > widget to allow calls > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > may be times when you > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > And, of course, we need > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > the schemas. So, what > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > queries? Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice the same things. > > > > from this, the schema support must be enhanced in all the providers, > > > since the only one which > > > is supporting well schemas is the postgres provider > > > > One nice thing would be to write down (more in detail than what is in the doc) > > what each schema is supposed to return, and see if everyone is happy with it. > > When we have something accepted by all, we can update the docs and update/ > > write the implementations. > > I can find some time to start writing what exactely the postgres provider > > answers for each schema and then we can work from that. What do you think? > > > > The main problems I see is for non DBMS providers to find good mappings > > with the schemas... > > > > perfect, please write down what you propose, and we'll discuss it in the > list. > > And yes, for non-DBMS providers there will be lots of cases where the > supplied fields are > NULL. So, I think we should also specify which fields must contain data, > such as the object name, > etc, so that client apps can rely on that info, knowing that the other > fields may be NULL. > Ok, I will do it. > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > myself? yes, the e-table one. > > cheers Vivien From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Wed Dec 13 10:59:25 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from gears.linuxave.net (gears.linuxave.net [208.184.88.8]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7B32BCA5 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 10:59:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (81-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.81]) by gears.linuxave.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA11358; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 07:46:57 -0800 Message-Id: <200012131546.HAA11358@gears.linuxave.net> Subject: Re: Next release (was Re: New Release) From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vivien Malerba Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> References: <200012131201.EAA31246@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213060440.A4549@gears.linuxave.net> <200012131432.GAA06855@gears.linuxave.net> <20001213073932.B4549@gears.linuxave.net> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 13 Dec 2000 16:54:07 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions > > > > > > Has anyone already started to work with a query designer? Because this > > > is what I'm doing right now in gASQL (so maybe then we could make only one > > > implementation). > > > > > > > nobody has started, so yes, please, do only one implementation for both > > projects. What I was > > thinking about was to have it as a widget (GnomeDbQueryDesigner) > > Yes, a widget and a bonobo control. > perfect! > > > > And another thing: it should support generation of XML and SQL queries > > > > Ok, what I will do then is finish it in gASQL since it's almost finished, > then you all can test it and tell me how you feel about it, because it is more > complex (and more powerfull I think) than what can be found for example > in MS access or some other projects. > well, that's great! > > > > * modifySchema: I'm working right now on rewriting the GnomeDbBrowser > > > > widget to allow calls > > > > to this function, which, as I explained, will allow for DDL > > > > (CREATE/DROP, etc) commands. Apart > > > > > > Don't you think it should be done with bonobo controls from each provider? > > > as the definition of these objects really is tied to the DBMS,... > > > > > > > having this as Bonobo components is great for visual stuff, but there > > may be times when you > > want to create database objects from the source code of your program. > > And, of course, we need > > to have a way of doing so in a non-DBMS-specific way. > > > > well, now that I think, this could be done with XML queries instead of > > the schemas. So, what > > do you think? have both XML queries and modifySchema, or just XML > > queries? > > Maybe using only XML queries would be better since Gerhard has started to > work on it in XML queries, and it would avoid having to implement twice > the same things. > ok, you're right. I started to think about the modifySchema stuff when we didn't have XML queries, so now I also think it's better to have them as XML. So, I'll remove the modifySchema soon > > > > > > * GnomeDbGrid widget: we need a better-looking grid widget > > > > > > Maybe use the new tree widget in GAL which looks very promising, no? > > > > > > > tree widget? do you mean the e-table, or a new one that I haven't seen > > myself? > > yes, the e-table one. > ok, I'll have a look at it again, since the last time I looked at it, it seemed to me quite tricky to use, but maybe I didn't look too much. cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 14 15:29:08 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3522DFE1 for ; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:29:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-149-161.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.149.161]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBEKT1i07847; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:29:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 146ezq-0000Ew-00; Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Cc: Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: We're starting to develop the logger Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, with no major efforts.=20 The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. I have only one question about the design of the logger: * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use libgda if it will be part of libgda... Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database own data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of code would be replicated. This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. Greetings --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From tagoh@gnome-db.org Fri Dec 15 00:40:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA02CE94 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA20629 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 00:40:27 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA06062 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:40:56 +0900 Message-Id: <200012150540.OAA06062@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: GNOME-DB 0.2.1 deb is now available From: Akira TAGOH To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 14:40:23 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all, I made the debs of latest version. if you think the useful, you can add to the apt-line as following: deb http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ deb-src http://www.gnome.gr.jp/~tagoh/debian ./ Regards, -- Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Fri Dec 15 11:13:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 675CB2CECA for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:13:54 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 8134 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2000 17:16:34 -0000 Subject: The gnome-db.org domain From: Carlos Perello Marin To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 15 Dec 2000 15:13:24 -0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001215161354.675CB2CECA@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Well, I think that it's running again. Excuse me for all this troubles. I have lose the mail alias at gnome-db.org, please resend me the alias at gnome-db.org and the destination one. Thanks. P.S.: I think that this week i will restart my contributions to the report engine. I was very busy at work, sorry (well I'm very busy, but i think i could do things at gnome-db also). Bye From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sat Dec 16 19:35:27 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541782D4BB for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 19:30:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from 7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es (7-MADR-X120.libre.retevision.es [62.83.43.199]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC8854867; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 01:15:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 01:24:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 14 Dec 2000 21:28:58 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi all. >=20 > It's clear that the logger for libgda isn't a trivial thing.=20 >=20 > The ASPL programming group still believe in this logger, so we are going > to start to implement a sql-parser-and-logger, and we will test its > functionality, and posible problems locally, in the client-side. >=20 > We want to make it in the way so it can be ported to libgda easily, > with no major efforts.=20 >=20 > The logger, which we call "Histrionicus project", will be part of the > ASPL-Fact project until a possible inclusion in libgda. >=20 this is great David!!! > I have only one question about the design of the logger: >=20 > * How must we make the logger to access to the database? It musn't use > libgda if it will be part of libgda... >=20 > Perhaps, it must access directly to the database, using the database ow= n > data-access libraries. In this way, each gda-provider should have a > different logger-implementation... But it is not very useful: a lot of > code would be replicated. >=20 > This is my question... Not trivial, but important for designing. >=20 well, clearly, the logger must have access to the underlying database direc= tly, so the best option, IMO, is to add a new CORBA interface to the IDL files, called Logger, which will implement the logger stuff for each provider (=3D each provider should implement it). This way, we can use it optionally in the client side, and also implement it optionally in the provider side. So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we need for the clients to access, and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which functions/methods would a client need to interface with the logger. Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to use or not the logging stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO cheers and thanks for the help From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 05:24:28 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078B2DBD0 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 05:24:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-144-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.144.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHAOP417284 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147azP-0002sc-00 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:23 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda documentation... But the links are wrong. Could anyone correct them? Thank you. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Sun Dec 17 07:18:15 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9931E2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from 190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (190-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.190]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCF454A08; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:03:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Documentation of libgda and gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.6 (Developer Preview) Date: 17 Dec 2000 13:12:39 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001217120313.ADCF454A08@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 17 Dec 2000 11:24:22 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > I'm trying to download the PS or tar.gz version of the libgda > documentation... But the links are wrong. >=20 > Could anyone correct them? >=20 they don't exist yet :( But thank you for reminding me that I must add them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Sun Dec 17 07:23:51 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6206B2DB4E for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 07:23:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-131-210.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.131.210]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBHCNl420379; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian)) id 147cqv-0004e0-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:23:45 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Re: We're starting to develop the logger In-Reply-To: <20001217001534.7AC8854867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Rodrigo Moya wrote: (...) >=20 > So, before you start, let's define well and clearly the interface we > need for the clients to access, > and then, you can start the implementation. So, please tell us which > functions/methods would > a client need to interface with the logger. OK. On next week, we will design the logger interface >=20 > Then, each provider, in its own implementation, will decide whether to > use or not the logging > stuff depending on the state of the logger (activa/inactive). >=20 > Doing it via CORBA is the best way, IMO >=20 > cheers and thanks for the help >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 >=20 --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM Programador oficial de ASPL Fact "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M Administraci=F3n de sistemas y creaci=F3n de Software. =20 From rodrigo@ulises.openresources.com Mon Dec 18 15:37:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BA32BB53 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 15:37:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from 136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es (136-MADR-X49.libre.retevision.es [62.83.22.136]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531295485B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 21:22:29 +0100 (CET) Subject: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've changed the names of the .oafinfo files. This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, the OAFIIDs are now of the form: OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since this has been decided in gnome-components-list (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for programmers. Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo ... The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we can create any subsubnamespace as we like. All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs cheers From Philipp.Leusmann@post.rwth-aachen.de Mon Dec 18 16:13:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (nets5.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.13]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C542BB7B for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:13:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from marvin (pec-33-208.tnt5.me2.uunet.de [149.225.33.208]) by nets5.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.10.1/8.10.1/5) with ESMTP id eBILDhm14721 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:13:43 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> From: "Philipp Leusmann" To: Subject: Compiling libgda Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi, i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first use in this function) GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 Could someone please tell me how to fix this? Thanks, Philipp From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 18 16:37:46 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2F22CF17 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 16:37:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from 60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es (60-MADR-X50.libre.retevision.es [62.83.21.60]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6345485B; Mon, 18 Dec 2000 22:22:43 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Compiling libgda From: Rodrigo Moya To: Philipp Leusmann Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <002301c06938$07256470$0100a8c0@marvin> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 18 Dec 2000 22:30:51 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001218212243.9C6345485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 18 Dec 2000 22:18:08 +0100, Philipp Leusmann wrote: > Hi, > > i try to compile libgda 0.2.1 on a SuSE 6.4 PPC-System. All dependencies are > fulfilled AFAIK. The compilation stops with the follwing output: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/ > usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/ > opt/gnome/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/incl > ude -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/lib/ > glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/opt/gnome/include/gnome-xml -I/opt/gnom > e/include/gconf/1 -I/usr/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include -I/u > sr/lib/glib/include -I. -I../../lib/gda-common -g -O2 -c > GDA-skels.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/GDA-skels.lo > GDA-skels.c: In function `get_skel_GDA_ConnectionFactory': > GDA-skels.c:7869: structure has no member named `ref' > GDA-skels.c:7870: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_ref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > GDA-skels.c:7870: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > GDA-skels.c:7870: for each function it appears in.) > GDA-skels.c:7875: structure has no member named `unref' > GDA-skels.c:7876: `_ORBIT_skel_GNOME_ObjectFactory_unref' undeclared (first > use in this function) > make[3]: *** [GDA-skels.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib/gda-server' > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1/lib' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/libgda-0.2.1' > make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > > > Could someone please tell me how to fix this? > > yes, that's a known problem caused by different versions of ORBit. The solution is easy though: just remove the GDA* files and rerun make. Those files should be re-generated with you orbit-idl compiler, so there shouldn't be any problem after removing them cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 04:47:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15602CCB8 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 04:47:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.166.129.137]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5V1U601.5RJ for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03535 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:46:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Doubts about making a gda-client Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I started to program using the headers... Then I met the gda_connection_new function... Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? Greetings From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 05:36:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4042BCBB for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 05:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (212-7-53-64.WolNet.worldonline.es [212.7.53.64]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F785485B; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 11:21:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Doubts about making a gda-client From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40803F.7A656276@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 11:29:03 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220102120.C0F785485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 10:47:43 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm trying to run gda-buildclient, but i get the next error message, in > RedHat 6.2 and in Debian Woody: >=20 > gcc: @GNOME_INCLUDEDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOME_LIBDIR@: No existe el fichero o el directorio > gcc: @GNOMEGNORBA_LIBS@: No existe el fichero o el directorio >=20 don't use gda-buildclient, it does not work. And it's not intended to generate a client skeleton, it's intended to be used to compile/link a GDA client. But as I said, it does not work yet You should use instead gda-config to retrieve the CFLAGS and LIBS needed for your GDA client application to compile/link. >=20 > Since I couldn't make the client skeleton with gda-buildclient, I > started to program using the headers... > Then I met the gda_connection_new function... >=20 > Gda_Connection* gda_connection_new (CORBA_ORB orb); >=20 > What is the CORBA_ORB variable orb?? How can generate it? >=20 just call gda_corba_get_orb(): Gda_Connection* cnc =3D gda_connection_new(gda_corba_get_orb()); cheers From davefx@bigfoot.com Wed Dec 20 12:27:53 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (back.airtel.net [212.73.32.158]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6EA2DEEA for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 12:27:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexus.aspl ([212.73.59.6]) by psismtp2.psi.airtel.es (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id G5VN3U03.03Z for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:18 +0100 Received: from bigfoot.com (IDENT:davefx@dolphin.aspl [192.168.1.133]) by nexus.aspl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04233 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mar=EDn?= Organization: Advanced Software Production Line, S.L. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [es] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Types of commands. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all. I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda instead of libpq. I've found the next undocumented functions: gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong flags); How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? Thank you. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 20 13:49:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0942BB01 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 13:49:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (119-MADR-X34.libre.retevision.es [62.83.3.119]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D1554866; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 19:34:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Types of commands. From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <3A40EBE8.F0D057F8@bigfoot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 20 Dec 2000 19:41:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001220183420.A7D1554866@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 20 Dec 2000 18:27:04 +0100, David Mar=EDn wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > I'm adapting our ASPL-Fact database-access module for using libgda > instead of libpq. >=20 > I've found the next undocumented functions: >=20 > gulong gda_command_get_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd); > void gda_command_set_cmd_type (Gda_Command* cmd, gulong > flags); >=20 > How many kinds of cmd_types are there? What are their meaning? >=20 In libgda/idl/GDA.idl, there is an enum: enum CommandType { CMD_TEXT1, CMD_TABLE, CMD_TABLEDIRECT, CMD_STOREDPROCEDURE, CMD_FILE }; which is the type of the command, but, sorry, this is not implemented yet. I had forgotten about it, but now that you've reminded it to me, I'll look at what needs to be done. And, in fact, thanks David, since I think this can be used for the XML queries: that is, we can add a CMD_XML value to the enum, and then, have the provider act as needed depending on the command's type. How does this sound? What I don't know/remember is what CMD_TABLEDIRECT is for. Any ideas? David, for the moment, forget about the command type. cheers > Thank you. >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list >=20 From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Thu Dec 21 14:33:50 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBDA2E062 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:33:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from txalaparta.essential.com (194-MAD2-X26.libre.retevision.es [62.83.136.194]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDA95485B for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:18:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Gnome CVS User ] GNOME CVS: libgda rodrigo From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 21 Dec 2000 20:25:54 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001221191832.1DDA95485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi all! I've just checked in the changes needed for supporting the CommandType attribute in GDA::Command objects. What I've done is: 1) "create" new enum type in IDL: enum CommandType { COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE, COMMAND_TYPE_TABLEDIRECT, COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE, COMMAND_TYPE_FILE }; I'll add a COMMAND_TYPE_XML soon. 2) changed type attribute in GDA::Command: it was a unsigned long, now it's a GDA_CommandType 3) changes all over to adapt to new attribute type (BTW, by making this change, I found a bug in the (I think) 0.2.1 released version, which was that I forgot to add a pointer to a function in an ORBit structure, and thus the following function pointers in the structure were displaced, so there were some CORBA exceptions when executing some CORBA calls. Has anybody experienced this? So now, you can: gda_command_set_cmd_type(GDA_COMMAND(cmd), GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE); By default, providers' GDA::Command will have the CmdType set to TEXT (== SQL or whatever language is used). But now, we must adapt/extend the providers to support this new feature. As a first measure, we must, in gda_*_command_execute, add a switch like: switch (gda_server_command_get_cmd_type(cmd)) { case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TEXT : -> execute SQL as now case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_TABLE : -> return a SELECT * FROM $table case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_STOREDPROCEDURE : -> exec procedure case GDA_COMMAND_TYPE_FILE : -> load file and execute } So please, Vivien, Nick, Holger, can you update your providers? I'll do the others. The switch is needed only in gda-*-command.c, in the gda_*_command_execute function. For the moment, just respond to the TYPE_TEXT command type, or, if you feel like doing it, implement the other ones. cheers Forwarded message: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: rodrigo 00/12/21 12:20:57 > > Modified files: > . : ChangeLog > bindings/c++ : gdaCommand.cpp gdaCommand.h gdaConnection.cpp > gdaConnection.h > idl : GDA.idl GDA_Command.idl GDA_Connection.idl > lib/gda-client : gda-command.c gda-command.h gda-connection.c > gda-connection.h > lib/gda-server : gda-server-command.c gda-server-impl-command.c > gda-server-impl-command.h > gda-server-impl-connection.c > gda-server-impl-connection.h gda-server-impl.h > > Log message: > 2000-12-21 Rodrigo Moya > > * added support for the GDA_CommandType stuff, which will > allow to treat commands in different ways (SQL, TABLE, > XML, etc) > > > _______________________________________________ > cvs-commits-list mailing list > cvs-commits-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-commits-list > From carlos@hispalinux.es Tue Dec 26 18:44:18 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.61]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E72D362 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 18:39:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-36-182-131.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.182.131]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBQNdZw05512 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 00:39:36 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello world!! I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is enough to run with apt). Bye. --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From tagoh@gnome-db.org Wed Dec 27 02:09:55 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (host154.207-175-42.redhat.com [207.175.42.154]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4329D2CCCE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ns.tokyo.redhat.com (IDENT:root@ns.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.254]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA23788; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:09:54 -0500 Received: from station66.tokyo.redhat.com (station66.tokyo.redhat.com [172.16.21.196]) by ns.tokyo.redhat.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA27100; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 16:09:47 +0900 Message-Id: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Akira TAGOH To: Carlos =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?Perell=1B=24BC3=1B=28B_Mar=1B=24BC-=1B=28Bn?= Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012262339.eBQNdZw05512@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi Carlos, On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > Hello world!! >=20 >=20 > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! >=20 >=20 > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ >=20 > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > enough to run with apt). good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ Regards, --=20 Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. From carlos@hispalinux.es Wed Dec 27 05:18:57 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from himail.edinfo.es (unknown [62.22.70.211]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C26702CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 05:18:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 9624 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO carlos.ibc) (62.22.70.201) by 62.22.70.211 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2000 10:17:57 -0000 Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Carlos Perello Marin To: Akira TAGOH Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <200012270709.QAA27100@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > Hi Carlos, >=20 > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > Hello world!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > >=20 > >=20 > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > >=20 > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > enough to run with apt). >=20 > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: >=20 > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ >=20 Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all correct. Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 > Regards, >=20 > --=20 > Akira TAGOH :: at@gclab.org > tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group > tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project > tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc. >=20 From mvali@hot.ee Wed Dec 27 08:45:36 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (adsl395.estpak.ee [213.168.17.141]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38642D2D8 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 08:45:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (IDENT:mvali@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA03553 for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200 From: Margus Vali To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: notices on front end Message-ID: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.0 Lines: 39 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello! I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. some problems/notices: - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are installed - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first time. - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 messages like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, then clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make it a whole lot more usable?) regards, mv From davefx@bigfoot.com Thu Dec 28 11:31:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.63]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0711E2BCBB for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:31:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from merche233 (usuario1-36-128-144.dialup.uni2.es [62.36.128.144]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBSGVOi19336; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:31:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from davefx (helo=localhost) by merche233 with local-esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14Ba6h-0003Xg-00; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_Mar=EDn_Carre=F1o?= X-Sender: davefx@merche233 To: james@daa.com.au Cc: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact Subject: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hi. Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-db widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. Greetings. --=20 David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o mmmm (aka DaveFX) ICQ UIN: 34866516 ""MM Mm http://www.bigfoot.com/~davefx mmmm mMM MM mM"""MM MM mMM ASPL Fact Official Programmer "M " mM"" http://aspl-fact.sourceforge.net mmmm =20 mM"""MM =20 Advanced Software Production Line SL "M From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 17:41:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3C92BC2D for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:41:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18335 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 10:38:29 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Unable to use anything in gnome-db Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda compiled using mysql. Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in any of the gnome-db applications does anything. Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. Cheers, -Jason Netconcepts Inc. Auckland, New Zealand From jm@netconcepts.com Thu Dec 28 19:39:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bilbo.netconcepts.com (adsl-169.world-net.co.nz [210.55.228.169]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9D02BD65 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:39:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jm@localhost) by bilbo.netconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18767 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 X-Authentication-Warning: bilbo.netconcepts.com: jm owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300 (NZDT) From: To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. On Fri, 29 Dec 2000 jm@netconcepts.com wrote: > Hello... I have the new version of gnome-db & libgda. I have libgda > compiled using mysql. > > Oddly, when I run gnome-db, I can't do anything. With the fe & builder... > if I click new... there is nothing there and nothing happens. Nothing in > any of the gnome-db applications does anything. > > Wondering if anyone else has had the same problem... or know a fix. > > Cheers, > -Jason > > Netconcepts Inc. > Auckland, New Zealand > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list > From karlheg@bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net Wed Dec 27 02:47:31 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from bittersweet.intra (bittersweet.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.27.231]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136472CEDE for ; Wed, 27 Dec 2000 02:47:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from karlheg by bittersweet.intra with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 14BBIy-0005EQ-00 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Subject: tools/gda-buildserver: unexpanded @macro@'s From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom) Date: 26 Dec 2000 23:47:24 -0800 Message-ID: <87vgs6486r.fsf@bittersweet.intra> Lines: 8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions Package: libgda Version: 0.2.0 There are several unexpanded AC_OUTPUT macros after building libgda-0.2.0 from the Debian package source. Perhaps you've omitted something from the configure.in? [ I am not subscribed to the list ] From carlos@gnome-db.org Mon Dec 25 16:02:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es (unknown [62.36.220.21]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F042C828 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 16:02:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es (usuario1-37-133-185.dialup.uni2.es [62.37.133.185]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id eBPL1k425184; Mon, 25 Dec 2000 22:01:46 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=F3_Mar=EDn?= To: Rodrigo Moya Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001218202229.531295485B@mailer.barrapunto.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Evolution: 00000002-0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100 Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > Hi all! >=20 > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. >=20 > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is, > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: >=20 > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] >=20 > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible] > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, which > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable and > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > programmers. >=20 > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: >=20 > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > ... >=20 > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. >=20 Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use the traditional GDA_* names? > All this means that before running a GNOME-DB/libGDA version from CVS, > you must remove the $prefix/share/oaf/gda-*.oafinfo and > $prefix/share/oaf/gnomedb-*.oafinfo. Also, you'll have, through the > GNOME-DB manager component, to change all your "Provider" entries in all > your data sources to the new providers' OAFIIDs >=20 > cheers >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > gnome-db-list mailing list > gnome-db-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list --=20 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn carlos@hispalinux.es http://TorresQuevedo.hispalinux.es http://nulies.hispalinux.es http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Espa=F1a Y tu, ya has Evolucionado?, p=E1sate a Evolution :-) From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:35:59 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5672BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:35:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC7454867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:20:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: OAFIIDs From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Perell=C3=B3_Mar=C3=ADn?= Cc: GDA In-Reply-To: <200012252101.eBPL1k425184@smtp.wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:27:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142021.DAC7454867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 22:03:08 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > El 18 Dec 2000 21:30:37 +0100, Rodrigo Moya escribi=F3: > > Hi all! > >=20 > > I forgot to tell you that I've changed all the OAFIIDs (CORBA object > > implementation identifiers) both in libgda and gnome-db. Also, I've > > changed the names of the .oafinfo files. > >=20 > > This has been done to conform with the new GNOME/OAF namespace. That is= , > > the OAFIIDs are now of the form: > >=20 > > OAFIID:GNOME_[AppName]_[ObjectName] > >=20 > > note that they all have to be included in the GNOME namespace, since > > this has been decided in gnome-components-list > > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-components-list) with the > > wide use GNOME is getting lately in mind. Also, note that the [horrible= ] > > UUIDs (the big number at the end of the OAFIIDs) have disappeared, whic= h > > is, IMO, a very good thing, since now the OAFIIDs are human readable an= d > > not a big-chunk-of-words-and-numbers-that-nobody-can-read. Also having > > OAFIIDs using a clear namespace as this one makes it easier for > > programmers. > >=20 > > Also, oafinfo files must follow this rules, and now are not called > > anymore gda-*.oafinfo, or gnomedb-*.oafinfo, but: > >=20 > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_MySQL.oafinfo > > GNOME_GDA_Provider_Postgres.oafinfo > > GNOME_DB_Manager.oafinfo > > ... > >=20 > > The GNOME_DB_ and GNOME_GDA_ subnamespaces have been reserved for > > GNOME-DB (see in bonobo/doc/NAMESPACE, in the Bonobo sources), so we > > can create any subsubnamespace as we like. > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Then, we must code all the CORBA methods as GNOME_GDA_*? or could we use > the traditional GDA_* names? >=20 for the moment, I have just changed the GNOME part (GNOME::DB), so you can continue using GDA_. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:37:58 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0902BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:37:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AED54867 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:22:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: libgda lxhispano From: Rodrigo Moya To: GDA In-Reply-To: <20001226041715.9B9F93360B2@cvs.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:29:34 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231142221.A8AED54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 25 Dec 2000 23:17:15 -0500, Gnome CVS User wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome > Module name: libgda > Changes by: lxhispano 00/12/25 23:17:15 >=20 > Modified files: > report : ChangeLog Makefile.am gda-report-stream.c=20 > gda-report-stream.h=20 >=20 > Log message: > 2000-12-25 Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn >=20 > * updated gda-report-stream.[ch] to make them compile again. > * included the lib/gda-client directory for header files in > Makefile.am >=20 Carlos, you should remove this. The report client IS NOT a GDA client. Of c= ourse, an app can be both a GDA and a report client, but we don't want to add unneeded dependencies to this library, so that it can be used, for example, in a report-generation-dedicated machine,=20 without any other stuff. cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 09:58:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EFA2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 09:58:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es (38-MADR-X110.libre.retevision.es [62.83.45.102]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7BC5488D; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:42:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Updated ftp.gnome-db.org From: Rodrigo Moya To: Carlos Perello Marin Cc: Akira TAGOH , gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227101856.C26702CEDE@mail.gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:50:04 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231144252.0B7BC5488D@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 11:20:37 +0100, Carlos Perello Marin wrote: > El 27 Dec 2000 16:09:50 +0900, Akira TAGOH escribi=F3: > > Hi Carlos, > >=20 > > On 27 Dec 2000 00:40:59 +0100, Carlos Perell=F3 Mar=EDn wrote: > > > Hello world!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year!!! > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I have updated the ftp.gnome.org site and now has the latest release, > > > you could found it at: ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/ > > >=20 > > > I have uploaded the source, RedHat and Debian version (Please, Akira, > > > tell me if i must modify something or if the mirror i have done is > > > enough to run with apt). > >=20 > > good. Please add the apt-line on the web as following: > >=20 > > deb ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > > deb-src ftp://ftp.gnome-db.org/pub/gnome-db/debian ./ > >=20 >=20 >=20 > Please, go to http://www.gnome-db.org/download.php and tell me if is all > correct. >=20 > Rodrigo, I have modify the web site, Is it at CVS? >=20 yes, in gnome-db/www cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:08:32 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A4D2BB47 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19654867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 15:52:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: notices on front end From: Rodrigo Moya To: Margus Vali Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20001227154408.A3544@aivas> Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 15:59:28 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231145240.7B19654867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 27 Dec 2000 15:44:08 +0200, Margus Vali wrote: > Hello! > I'm running RH7 with ORBit-0.5.6, oaf-0.6.1, bonobo-0.31 and GConf-0.11 > upgraded from eazel hourly distro (200012270216-200012270216). > Also upgraded/updated the build environment from RH mirror and some > packages from spidermonkey.helixcode.com RH7 dir. > > some problems/notices: > - gnome-db configure doesn't check whether gal and libglade devels are > installed ok, I'll work on this soon. > - the purpose of online help system is unclear to me, could it be just > on the help menu to open gnome-help separately? well, I plan to have an integrated help system. To be included in the front end. But I'm sorry it does not work very well. But I'll work on it soon > - at least the connect is now successful (thanks, Rodrigo) > - the provider manager doesn't reflect the status of providers (seems like > down while the process actually runs). Can't shut down the provider either. > kill -HUP doesn't shut the provider down. kill -KILL helps. this part also needs some fixes. Thanks for noting them > - sometimes making connection in the database component fails somehow > leaving the opening connection popup window open/sometimes closes it, but > the connection is made successfully in the second attempt. This only > happens with the mysql provider. Postgres provider seems to be ok the first > time. hmm, strange. I'll have a look also at that code. It happened sometimes to me, but it stopped some time ago. > - in the database sql widget running a select query always fails, two > Error Viewer windows pop up with two messages: > IDL:CORBA/BAD_OPERATION:1.0: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > %s: An Error occured in the CORBA system. > The other error viewer window only shows 1/1, but contains actually 2 > messages > like the first one. browsing around the messages, closing first window, > then > clicking 'next' on the other crashes the database component. > As you can guess, no grid with database rows appears :) What's the > appropriate orbit/oaf/bonobo version to use? with the ones you've got it's ok. The problem is one I found the other day which I was not sure if it was included in the 0.2.1 release. So please, get sources from CVS and compile them. I'll make a release in a couple of days. > gda-test works ok with postgres provider and the browser shows the > table structures (Types page should have a bigger text widget). > - otherwise, good work! (what about the etable that can be > modified and the database data updated afterwards, this would make > it a whole lot more usable?) > we plan to change the GnomeDbGrid widget to use the etable widget. But, well, about updatable recordsets, we had a discussion about them some time ago (look in the archives). If you can add something to the discussion (== a solution) it will be welcome. I've been quite busy lately, so I haven't made much progress, but I'll fix all this next century :) cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:28:29 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3653B2BBB2 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:28:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF5C54867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:12:46 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Starting Gnome-DB widgets support for libglade From: Rodrigo Moya To: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mar=C3=ADn_Carre=C3=B1o?= Cc: james@daa.com.au, gnome-db-list@mail.gnome.org, Lista desarrollo ASPL Fact In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:19:56 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231151246.0DF5C54867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 28 Dec 2000 11:16:18 +0100, David Mar=EDn Carre=F1o wrote: >=20 > Hi. >=20 > Here, in ASPL, we are making a version of libglade for supporting gnome-d= b > widgets. When we finish it, we'll send patches. >=20 great! If you find any strange thing/bug in the GNOME-DB widgets API, pleas= e tell me. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Sun Dec 31 10:40:42 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome-db-list@gnome.org Received: from mailer.barrapunto.com (alfa.sinetgy.com [212.85.32.12]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109BB2BB58 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 10:40:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from 51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es (51-MAD2-X31.libre.retevision.es [62.83.131.51]) by mailer.barrapunto.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8B054867; Sun, 31 Dec 2000 16:25:02 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Unable to use anything in gnome-db From: Rodrigo Moya To: jm@netconcepts.com Cc: gnome-db-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: Evolution 0.8 (Developer Preview) Date: 31 Dec 2000 16:32:12 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20001231152502.2A8B054867@mailer.barrapunto.com> Sender: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: gnome-db-list-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Loop: gnome-db-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5 Precedence: bulk List-Id: GNOME-DB discussions On 29 Dec 2000 12:36:12 +1300, wrote: > Fixed. I removed the .gconf dir. > > you can do that, or even better, go to settings, and, in the components tab, select the components you want loaded when you start the front-end. cheers