[Evolution-hackers] Re: Selecting/Unselecting Sources

[JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>]

On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 15:43, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 16:35, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 20:10 +0200, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 19:45, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> > > > > The main issue I see with this is that you will create meetings that
> > > > > will disappear the moment you finish creating them (unless "primary"
> > > > > implies both displayed and default, which is a little inconsistent).
> > > > 
> > > > What I meant was primary == always shown. Without changing the state of
> > > > the checkmarks.
> > > 
> > > We agreed with jpr to implement the following:
> > > 
> > >       * It is possible to hide/show a calendar without selecting it
> > >       * Selecting a calendar makes it visible again
> > >       * Adding events to a calendar makes it visible again
> > >
> > hmm, do you mean we should then listen for changes on all the calendars,
> > and once there's a change in one of them auto-select it?
> 
> Nah, just when an user adds an event or selects the calendar from the
> tree. No need to toggle web-subscribed visible upon change for example.
> But the idea is that if you add an event to a hidden calendar(*) then we
> need to make the calendar visible so that the event doesnt just
> disappear. 

This is actually fairly tricky and the only thing I haven't done yet. 
My feeling is for 2.0 I will just prevent the user from doing this.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.